Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What Is an Author?
28. Noam Chomsky, Cariesian Lingui#ica ( New York: Ha,per & 30. For a discussion of the recent reorientation of the sign, see
Row, 1966). Foucault's "Nietzsche, Freud, Marx." On the role of repetition,
29. La Communication: Hennes I (Paris: Editions de Minuit, 1968), Foucault writes in I.:Ordre du diacoura: ''The new is not found in
pp. 78-112. what is said, but in the event of its return" (p. 28); see also below,
''I'heabum Philooophicum," pp. 186-196.
136 WllAT IS AN AUTHOR? 137
of the history, but not the science, of mechanics; whereas, a re- Developing a similar analysis could provide the basis for a
examination of the books of Freud or Marx can transform our typology of discourse. A typology of this sort cannot be ad-
understanding of psychoanalysis or Marxism. equately understood in relation to the grammatical features,
A last feature of these returns is that they tend to reinforce formal structures, and objects of discourse, because there un-
the enigmatic link between an author and his works. A text has doubtedly exist specific discursive properties or relationships that
an inaugurative value precisely because it is the work of a par· aro irreducible to the rules of grammar and logic and to the
ticular author, and our returns are conditioned by this knowledge. Jaws that govern objects. These properties require investigation
The rediscovery of an unknown text by Newton or Cantor will if we hope to distinguish the larger categories of discourse. The
not modify classical cosmology or group theory; at most, it will different forms of relationships ( or nonrelationships) that an
change our appreciation of their historical genesis. Bringing to author can assume are evidently one of these discursive properties.
light, however, An Outline of Psychoanalysis, to the extent that This form of investigation might also permit the introduction of
we recognize it as a book by Freud, can transform not only our an historical analysis of discourse. Perhaps the time has come to
historical knowledge, but the field of psychoanalytic theory- if study not only the expressive value and formal transformations
only through a shift of accent or of the center of gravity. These of discourse, but its mode of existence: the modifications and
returns, an important component of discursive practices, form a variations, within any culture, of modes of circulation, valoriza-
relationship between "fundamental• and mediate authors, which tion, attribution, and appropriation. Partially at the expense of
is not identical to that which links an ordinary text to its im- themes and concepts that an author places in his work, the
mediate author. "author-function• could also reveal the manner in which dis-
These remarks concerning the initiation of discursive practices course is articulated on the basis of social relationships.
have been extremely schematic, especially with regard to the Is it not possible to reexarnine, as a legitimate extension of
opposition I have tried to trace between this initiation and the this kind of analysis, the privileges of the subject? Clearly, in
founding of sciences. The distinction between the two is not undertaking an internal and architectonic analysis of a work
readily discernible; moreover, there is no proof that the two ( whether it be a literary text, a philosophical system, or a scien-
procedures are mutually exclusive. My only purpose in setting up tific work) and in delimiting psychological and biograplucal
this opposition, however, was to show that the "author-function• references, suspicions arise concerning the absolute nature and
sufficiently comple.x at the level of a book or a series of texts th;t creative role of the subject. But the subject should not be en-
bear a definite signature, has other determining factors when tirely abandoned. It should be reconsidered, not to restore the
analysed in terms of larger entities- groups of works or entire theme of an originating subject, but to seize its functions, its
disciplines. intervention in discourse, and its system of dependencies. W o
should suspend the typical questions: how does a free subject
penetrate the density of things and endow them with meaning;
Unfortunately, there is a decided absence of positive proposi- how does it accomplish its design by animating the rules of dis-
tions in this essay, as it applies to analytic procedures or direc- course from within? Rather, we should ask: under what condi-
tions for future research, but I ought at least to give the reasons tions and through what forms can an entity like the ,ubject ap-
why I attach such importance to a continuation of this work. pear in the order of discourse; what position does it occupy;
}38 COON'T.ER•MEMORY