Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
[hide]
1Definitions
2China
3France, UK, and Italy
4India
o 4.1Ballistic missile defence
o 4.2Cruise missile defense
5Israel
6Russia
7United States
8Other developments
o 8.1Japan
o 8.2Taiwan
o 8.3South Korea
o 8.4United Arab Emirates
9Criticism
10See also
11Footnotes
12References
13External links
Definitions[edit]
The term "Missile defense system" broadly means a system that provides any defense
against any missile type (conventional or nuclear) by any country.
Any mechanism which can detect and then destroy a missile before it can cause any
harm is called a missile defence system (MDS).[2]
The role of defense against nuclear missiles has been a heated military and political topic for several decades. However, missile
defense is no longer limited to interception of strategic nuclear weapons. The gradual development and proliferation of missile
technology has blurred the line between the technologies for the interception of tactical missiles (usually short to intermediate range
with non-nuclear payloads) and the interception of strategic missiles (usually long ranged with nuclear payloads). High-performance
tactical ballistic missiles carrying non-nuclear payloads now have the ability to affect strategic balance in conflict zones. Likewise,
high-performance tactical missile defense systems can now influence force deployment strategies.
China[edit]
China tested the FJ ABM in the Cold War but they were ultimately cancelled. The PLA has currently developed the KTseries of anti
ballistic missiles and also have adopted limited anti ballistic capabilities on the HQ-9, KS series, and HQ-16.
China successfully tested its exoatmospheric interception capability in a test in 2010 and also in a test in 2013, being the second of
two countries able to do so.
Four versions of the S-300 are in service the PMU, PMU1 and PMU2 and the navalised S-300FM Rif. Based on the S-300PMU1,
the Rif equips the PLAN’s two Type 51C Luzhou air-defence destroyers enabling them to contribute to the protection of a coastal
site against SRBM attack.[3]
The S-300PMU2 has the best chance of intercepting an SRBM missile as it employs the 48N6E2 missile which has a warhead
optimised for destroying ballistic missiles, and better kinematics compared to earlier 48N6 missiles.[3]
HQ-9 may have some ABM capability.[Note 1][3]
However, it might be noted that on 11 January 2007 the Chinese successfully performed an anti-satellite missile test[4] using a KT-
1[Note 2] missile with a Kinetic Kill Vehicle mounted.[3]
New missiles, the HQ-19, HQ-26, and HQ-29, are being built.[5]
HMS Diamond (D34) a Royal Navy Type 45 destroyer equipped with the Sylver A-50 VLS and Aster 15 and 30 missiles. Diamond fired her missiles for the first
Italy and France have developed a missile family called Aster (Aster 15 and Aster 30). Aster 30 is capable of ballistic missile
defense. On 18 October 2010, France announced a successful tactical ABM test of the Aster 30 missile and on 1 December 2011 a
successful interception of a Black Sparrow ballistic target missile. Royal NavyType 45 destroyers and French Navy and Italian
Navy Horizon -class frigates are armed with PAAMS, using Aster 15 and 30 missiles.
Also, France is developing another version, Aster 30 block II which can destroy ballistic missiles with a maximum range of 3000 km.
It will have a Kill Vehicle warhead.
Superficie-Aria Media Portata Terrestre (Italian for Ground-based Surface-to-Air Medium Range, SAMP/T) using batteries of Aster
30 missiles. France has demonstrated the feasibility of destroying medium range ballistic missile.
Aster 15 and 30 missiles differ only in the size of their booster - total weights being 310 kg and 450 kg respectively. Aster 30
requires the longer tubes of the SYLVER A50 launcher, but its range is extended from 30 kilometres (19 mi) to 120 kilometres
(75 mi). Aster 30 is also capable of ballistic missile defense. The first stage booster of the missile is entirely designed and
manufactured by Avio of Italy.
India[edit]
India's air defence network has two principal components - the ‘Air Defence Ground Environment System’ (ADGES) and the ‘Base
Air Defence Zones’ (BADZ). The ADGES network provides for wide area radar coverage and permits the detection and interception
of most aerial incursions into Indian airspace. The BADZ system is far more concentrated
withradars, interceptors, SAMs and AAA units working in conjunction to provide an intense and highly effective defensive barrier to
attacks on vital targets.[7]
Israel[edit]
Israel has a national missile defense against short to long range missiles using theirArrow missile system. The Arrow
or Hetz (Hebrew: ח ֵ ץ, pronounced [ˈχet͡ s]) is a family ofanti-ballistic missiles designed to fulfill an Israeli requirement for a theater
missile defense system. Jointly funded and produced by Israel and the United States,[Note 3]development of the system began in 1986
and has continued since, drawing some contested criticism. Undertaken by Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) and Boeing, it is
overseen by the Israeli Ministry of Defense's "Homa" (Hebrew: חומה,pronounced [χoma], "rampart") administration and the U.S. Missile
Defense Agency.
The Arrow system consists of the joint production hypersonic Arrow anti-missile interceptor, the Elta EL/M-2080 "Green Pine" early-
warning AESA radar, the Tadiran Telecom "Golden Citron" ("Citron Tree") C 3I center, and the Israel Aerospace Industries "Brown
Hazelnut" ("Hazelnut Tree") launch control center. The system is transportable, as it can be moved to other prepared sites.
Following the construction and testing of the Arrow 1 technology demonstrator, production and deployment began with the Arrow
2 version of the missile. The Arrow is considered one of the most advanced missile defense programs currently in existence.[26][27]
The design of Arrow 3 promises to be an extremely capable system, more advanced than what we have ever attempted in the U.S. with our
“ programs. [...] This has to do with the seekers that have greater flexibility and other aspects, such as propulsion systems – it will be an
extremely capable system.[28] ”
It is the first operational missile defense system specifically designed and built to intercept and destroy ballistic missiles.[29][30] Initial
operating capability of Arrow 3 is expected in 2014.[31] The first Arrow battery was declared fully operational in October 2000.
Although several of its components have been exported, the Israeli Air Defense Commandwithin the Israeli Air Force (IAF) of
the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) is currently the sole user of the complete Arrow system.
Apart from Arrow missile, Israel has Iron dome which is designed to intercept and destroy short-range rockets and artillery shells
fired from distances of 4 to 70 kilometers away[32] and David's Sling that is designed to intercept medium-to-long range rockets and
cruise missiles, such as those possessed by Hezbollah, fired at ranges from 40 km to 300 km.[25]
Russia[edit]
S-300PMU-2 vehicles. From left to right: 64N6E2 detection radar, 54K6E2 command post and 5P85 TEL.
S-400 vehicles. From left to right: 6P80 TEL, 65N6 detection radar.
The Russian A-135 anti-ballistic missile system is currently operational only around the city of Moscow, the national capital, and is
being augmented to protect major cities inRussia. The A-135 anti-ballistic missile system is a Russian military complex deployed
around Moscow to counter enemy missiles targeting the city or its surrounding areas. It became operational during 1995. It is a
successor to the previous A-35, and compliant with the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty from which the US unilaterally withdrew in
2002.[3]
The A-135 system attained "alert" (operational) status on 17 February 1995. It is currently operational although its 53T6 (NATO:SH-
11) component is deactivated (as of February 2007). A newer missile is expected to replace it. There is an operational test version
of the system at the test site in Sary Shagan, Kazakhstan.
The S-300PMU1 and PMU2 can intercept SRBMs, and the S-300V and S-400 Triumf systems are capable of intercepting a multiple
IRBM attack by all DF-21 model IRBMs.[3] These air-defense systems have been purchased by Turkey, India, China, Saudi Arabia,
and South Korea. Other countries which have also expressed interest include Iran and Belarus.
The enhanced S-300VM/VMK is capable of intercepting ballistic missiles with a range of 2,500 km re-entry speeds of 4.5 km/s,
whereas the S-400 is claimed to be capable of intercepting ballistic missiles with a range of 3,500 km which equates to re-entry
speeds of 4.8 to 5 km/s. A system designed to intercept warheads at 5 km/s has the ability to act as a point system against simple
ICBM warheads which have a typical re-entry speed of 7 km/s.[3] Apart from the main Moscow deployment, Russia has striven
actively for intrinsic ABM capabilities of its late model SAM systems. Russian ground based theatre defence against ballistic and
cruise missiles are centered on the in-service
S-300P (SA-10)
S-300V (SA-12A/B Giant/Gladiator)
S-300PMU-1/2 (SA-20A/B Gargoyle)
S-400 (SA-21)
S-500 ( In development )
United States[edit]
A Payload Launch Vehicle (PLV) carrying a prototype exo-atmospheric kill vehicle is launched from Meck Island at the Kwajalein Missile Range on 3 December
2001, for an intercept of a ballistic missile target over the central Pacific Ocean.
Main article: United States national missile defense
The U.S. Sentinel program was a planned national missile defense during the 1970s, but was never deployed. Elements of Sentinel
were actually deployed briefly as the Safeguard Program, although it wasn't national in scope. United States has had in
development a nationwide antimissile program since the 1990s. After the renaming in 2002, the term now refers to the entire
program, not just the ground-based interceptors and associated facilities.
Other elements yet to be integrated into NMD (National Missile Defense) may include anti-ballistic missiles, or sea-based, space-
based, laser, and high altitude missile systems. The NMD program is limited in scope and designed to counter a relatively small
ICBM attack from a less sophisticated adversary. Unlike the earlier Strategic Defense Initiative program, it is not designed to be a
robust shield against a large attack from a technically sophisticated adversary.[33]
As of 2012, this system is operational with limited capability. In early April 2013, the Pentagon deployed 14 missile interceptors to
Guam in response to the North Korean threats to deliver nuclear weapons to the United States.[34][35]
Other developments[edit]
Japan[edit]
Main article: RIM-161 Standard Missile 3
In 2015, the Japan Air Self Defense Force (JASDF), and also the Japan Ground Self Defense Force (JGSDF), initiated their 51st
year of annual live-fire missile launches at McGregor Range, New Mexico in Fort Bliss.[36] The 2014 annual service practice of the
PAC-3 Patriot missile demonstrated a 100 percent kill rate before a group which included the commanding generals of White Sands
Missile Range (WSMR), and of the 32nd Army Air & Missile Defense Command(AAMDC). Every JASDF Patriot team participated in
the annual exercise, which takes several months.[37]
Since 1998, when North Korea launched a Taepodong-1 missile over northern Japan, the Japanese have been jointly developing a
new Surface-to-air interceptor known as the Patriot Advanced Capability 3 (PAC-3) with the US. So far tests have been successful,
and there are planned 11 locations that the PAC-3 will be installed. A military spokesman[38] said that tests had been done on two
sites, one of them a business park in central Tokyo, and Ichigaya – a site not far from the Imperial Palace. Along with the PAC-3,
Japan has installed a US-developed ship-based anti-ballistic missile system, which was tested successfully on 18 December 2007.
The missile was launched from a Japanese warship, in partnership with the US Missile Defense Agency and destroyed a mock
target launched from the coast.
Japan is in consultations with the United States to possibly deploy the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system and a
ground-based version of the Standard Missile-3 interceptors mounted on Aegis destroyers. Japan's intention is to create a four-
stage anti-missile shield.[39]
Taiwan[edit]
Taiwan is also engaging in the development of anti-ballistic missile system, based on indigenously developed Tien Kung-II (Sky
Bow) SAM system and Patriot-III missiles.[40]
Taiwan is building up a "missile defense shield" in response to Chinese missiles pointed in its direction. The latest addition will be
six Patriot III batteries and a long-range early warning radar system. Taiwan needs Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD)
system from the U.S. to defend herself as well.[41][42]
South Korea[edit]
Like the UAE (see below), South Korea has agreed to deploy THAAD systems.[43] The agreement was announced in July 2016. [44]
Because a kinetic-kill defense such as THAAD destroys high-value incoming missiles by colliding with them, the missile system is
defensive, and not for offense. The agreement came after a North Korean intermediate-range ballistic missile launch in June 2016;
China has rebuked the actions of the involved parties,[45] as destabilizing.
Criticism[edit]
While speaking at a seminar in Vienna in 2012, Zhu Chenghu, of China's National Defense University, opined missile defense to be
destabilizing; Zhu was not alone: Joseph Circincione, of the Ploughshares Fund and attending the same seminar, stated that any
US military planner in Zhu's position would have had to say the same thing, in order to project credible military deterrence.[48] Bruno
Gruselle, in 2010, noted that French policy makers considered the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty and the doctrine
of Mutual assured destruction to be the cornerstones of strategic stability.[49] Some French analysts, notably Camille Grand,[50] view
missile defense as jeopardizing both the doctrine and the Treaty, as well as risking a new arms race,[49] which is reflected in the
development of advanced missile defense counter measures and decoys as well as a higher number of and more maneuverable
independently targetable reentry vehicles [51] - as well as the intercept systems designed to defeat them.
Additionally experts question the accuracy and reliability of these systems.[52] Beyond the technical difficulties, which have been
described as more challenging than hitting one bullet with another all performance data is derived from experiments and scripted
tests. Their effectivity in an actual all-out war situation is uncertain.[2] However, non-nuclear ballistic and conventional missiles have
been used in recent limited regional conflicts to strategic effect. Several Houthi-fired ballistic missiles in Yemen have been
intercepted by Saudi Patriot batteries, and Russian cruise missiles have been notably used in the current Syrian conflict.
Gruselle noted most French security experts doubted the technological feasibility of intercontinental ballistic missile defense. Some
thought it foolish to spend huge amounts of money on unproven technologies that lacked operational or political usefulness. Instead,
the French defense policy community viewed missile defense merely as an American "economic weapon" used to defeat the Soviet
Union and win the Cold War.[53]
The extant missile defenses are currently vulnerable to maneuverable hypersonic vehicles, which can maneuver at speeds high
enough to defeat missile defenses. China is among the countries pursuing hypersonic vehicles as warhead delivery systems.[54]
Yousaf Butt, a critic of missile defense, states in The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists that "just as with nuclear weapons, the U.S.
infatuation with missile defense will cause other nations to desire this expensive technology".[55]
Russia's top military officer has threatened to carry out a pre-emptive strike on U.S.-led NATO missile defense facilities in Eastern
Europe if Washington goes ahead with its controversial plan to build a missile shield.[56] Russian Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov
also warned that talks between Moscow and Washington on the topic are "close to a dead end."[56] U.S. State Department special
envoy Ellen Tauscher responded that neither country can afford another arms race.[56]
See also[edit]
Footnotes[edit]
1. Jump up^ However, it is kinematically inferior to the imported Russian S-300PMU2 Favorit
according to this source
2. Jump up^ described by the director of United States Defense Intelligence Agency as a SC-19
missile
3. Jump up^ Dr. Uzi Rubin: "The Arrow program used practically no U.S. technology, just U.S.
money. It was almost entirely based on Israeli technology, though we bought some components
in the U.S. because they were cheaper." (2003) —source
References[edit]
1. Jump up^ "Demonstration of integrated missile air defense system by June next year: Dr VK
Saraswat". domain-b.com. 2007-12-10. Retrieved 2010-11-21.
2. ^ Jump up to:a b c "India 7th nation with ICBM technology". Indian times. 23 April 2012.
Retrieved 8 August 2012.
3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g "China's Cruise and Ballistic Missile Defence". A Strategic Assessment of
PLA Theatre Missile and ASAT Capabilities. Air Power Australia. Retrieved6 August 2012.
4. Jump up^ "World fury at satellite destruction". Theage.com.au. 2007-01-19. Retrieved 2013-
04-19.
5. Jump up^ http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/world/china/hq-19.htm
6. Jump up^ "HMS Diamond fires Sea Viper missile for first time - Announcements - Inside
Government". GOV.UK. 2012-05-01. Retrieved 2013-04-19.
7. ^ Jump up to:a b "Ballistic Missile Defence for India". Bharat Rakshak. Retrieved 22 August 2012.
8. Jump up^ Pollack, Andrew. "India expects to use missile interception system as a weapon, top
scientist says". International Herald Tribune. Retrieved 2013-04-19.
9. Jump up^ "India developing new missiles Towards destroying hostile missiles". Hindu.com.
2006-12-03. Retrieved 2013-04-19.
10. Jump up^ The New GuardianIndia unveils an all new anti-ballistic missile expected to be the
fore-runner of a sophisticated air defence system to thwart, among other threats,
a Pakistaninuclear weapons attack
11. Jump up^ "India tests interceptor missile". Google.com. 2009-03-06. Retrieved 2013-04-19.
12. Jump up^ "Development of Ballistic Missile Defence System: Year End Review" (Press
release). Ministry of Defence (India). 28 December 2007. Retrieved 2008-01-26.
13. Jump up^ Pollack, Andrew. "India successfully tests missile interceptor". International Herald
Tribune. Retrieved2013-04-19.
14. Jump up^ Rajat Pandit, TNN, 26 November 2007, 02:43AM IST (2007-11-26). "India on way to
joining exclusive BMD club". Timesofindia.indiatimes.com. Retrieved 2013-04-19.
15. Jump up^ PTI (2012-05-06). "Missile defence shield ready: DRDO chief". Thehindu.com.
Retrieved 2013-04-19.
16. Jump up^ "Delhi, Mumbai selected for ballistic missile defence shield". The Times Of India. 24
June 2012.
17. Jump up^ "Delhi, Mumbai to get missile defence shield - NDTV News". Ndtv.com. 2012-06-24.
Retrieved 2013-04-19.
18. Jump up^ "More Teeth to Defence System". IBNLive. Retrieved27 July 2012.
19. Jump up^ PTI Jun 24, 2012, 04.30PM IST (2012-06-24). "Delhi, Mumbai to be first provided
with missile defence shield". Economictimes.indiatimes.com. Retrieved 2013-04-19.
20. Jump up^ "Strategic Air Defences in a Nuclear South-Asia".Bharat-Rakshak. 2 July 2009.
Retrieved 22 August 2012.
21. Jump up^ "India To Boost Airfield Defenses". DefenceNews. Retrieved 22 August 2012.
22. ^ Jump up to:a b c "India discovers methods to face missile wars".IBNLive. 16 Dec 2007.
Retrieved 8 August 2012.
23. Jump up^ "February trial for naval air defence missile". Indo-Asian News service. 16 Nov 2011.
Retrieved 8 August 2012.
24. Jump up^ "Naval Barak-8 Missiles, Israel, India". Naval Technology. Retrieved 8 August 2012.
25. ^ Jump up to:a b "Rafael Confirms Offer of Iron Dome, David's Sling to Indian Armed Forces".
India-defence.com. Retrieved2013-04-19.
26. Jump up^ "Missile defense systems: Arrow". Claremont
InstituteMissileThreat.com. Archived from the original on 14 October 2009. Retrieved 2009-08-
19.
27. Jump up^ "The Arrow missile program". Jewish Virtual Library. Retrieved 2009-08-21.
28. Jump up^ "Israel, U.S. to embark on collaborative 'upper-tier' missile intercept program to
include Arrow 3 and land-based SM-3 missiles". Defense Update. Retrieved 2009-08-19.
29. Jump up^ "Israel profile: missile overview: Arrow anti-ballistic missile defense system". Nuclear
Threat Initiative. October 2008. Retrieved 2009-08-19.
30. Jump up^ "U.S.–Israel missile defense cooperation" (PDF).American Israel Public Affairs
Committee. 2006-12-21. Retrieved 2011-08-04.
31. Jump up^ Ben David, Alon (2012-01-26). "Boeing links up with IAI on Arrow-3". Aviation Week
& Space Technology. Retrieved2012-01-27.
32. Jump up^ Sharp, Jeremy M. (16 September 2010). "U.S. Foreign Aid to Israel". Congressional
Research Service. Retrieved 18 August 2011.
33. Jump up^http://www.zmne.hu/aarms/docs/Volume6/Issue4/pdf/05riem.pdf
34. Jump up^ "The Ultimate North Korean Missile Threat To America: A Nuke Power Grid Attack".
Forbes. 2012-04-18. Retrieved2013-04-19.
35. Jump up^ Stewart, Phil. "U.S. to send missile defenses to Guam over North Korea threat".
Reuters. Retrieved 2013-04-19.
36. Jump up^ Japanese conduct joint live-fire exercises at McGregor
37. Jump up^ Fort Bliss Bugle (16 Oct 2014) p.12A JASDF 50th year of live-fire missile exercises
38. Jump up^ "Japan plans Tokyo missile shield". BBC News. 15 January 2008.
39. Jump up^ "Defense Ministry to study new missile defense systems". The Japan Times. 21
June 2014.
40. Jump up^ "Taiwan missile defence shield ready next year: report".Asia ONE. Retrieved 6
August 2012.
41. Jump up^ "Taiwan Builds Missile Defense Shield in Face of Chinese Missile Buildup". Defense
Tech. Retrieved 6 August 2012.
42. Jump up^ J. Michael Cole, The Plan Taiwan Needs to Defend against China: What Tsai Ing-
wen should be reading this weekend., The National Interest, May 28, 2016
43. Jump up^ South Korea, U.S. agree to deploy THAAD missile defense to counter North Korea
threat (7 July 2016)
44. Jump up^ S.Korea, U.S. Officially Start THAAD Talks (10 July 2016)
45. Jump up^ S.Korea, U.S. to deploy THAAD missile defence, drawing China rebuke (7 July
2016)
46. Jump up^ UAE graduates second class of THAAD air defenders
47. Jump up^ UAE air defenders graduate THAAD course, make BMD history accessdate=2016-
01-07
48. Jump up^ "US Missile Defense Schemes Also Destabilizing Asia". 21 July 2012. Retrieved 6
August 2012.
49. ^ Jump up to:a b "... Missile defense would become a reality and that systems would eventually
be deployed. Paris realized that it needed to adjust policy to these realities to avoid risking the
credibility of the French nuclear deterrent. " Nonetheless, Gruselle concedes in the same work
that "Paris realized that it needed to adjust policy to these realities to avoid risking the credibility
of the French nuclear deterrent.", as well as the fact that "France recognized the necessity of
missile defense to protect deployed French troops." That is to say, French policy makers
realized that the increasing performance and reliability of missile defense systems could reduce
its own nuclear deterrence, and was also necessary to maintain its foreign military
deployment. Bruno Gruselle (Nov 2010) "Missile Defense in NATO: a French
Perspective" Lisbon NATO Summit, Nov 2010
50. Jump up^ Camille Grand, Director, FRS; Chair, EU Non-Proliferation Consortium
51. Jump up^ Prepared Statement by Dr. Christopher Yeaw, Director, Center for Assurance,
Deterrence, Escalation, and Nonproliferation Science & Education at the Louisiana Tech
Research Institute, Before The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Hearing
on China’s Offensive Missile Forces Wednesday, April 1st, 2015
52. Jump up^ See for example, the reporting from the Los Angeles Times 5 April 2015
53. Jump up^ Bruno Gruselle (2010) "Missile Defense in NATO: A French Perspective"
54. Jump up^ "Hypersonic arms race: China tests high-speed missile to beat U.S. defenses". 13
January 2014.
55. Jump up^ 05/08/2010 - 07:49 "The myth of missile defense as a deterrent"
56. ^ Jump up to:a b c Craggs, Ryan (3 May 2012). "Russia Threatens Pre-Emptive Strike On NATO
Missile Defense Shields". Huffington post. Retrieved 6 August 2012.
External links[edit]
[hide]
Types of missile
Ballistic missile
Cruise missile
Shoulder-fired missile
Anti-submarine missile
Passive homing
Track-via-missile
Anti-radiation
Pursuit guidance
Beam riding
Laser guidance
Unguided rockets
Wire guidance
TERCOM
DSMAC
Inertial guidance
Astro-inertial guidance
Satellite guidance
Compass
List of missiles
List of ICBMs
Categories:
Missile defense
Anti-ballistic missiles
Russian inventions
Navigation menu
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Article
Talk
Read
Edit
View history
Search
Go
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
Add links
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using
this site, you agree to the Terms of Use andPrivacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view