Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OPENING BRIEF OF
MONTEREY PENINSULA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
Page
I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................1
B. Other ................................................................................................. 3
A.12-04-019
Opening Brief of Monterey Peninsula Water Management District
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OPENING BRIEF OF
MONTEREY PENINSULA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
I. INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to the Administrative Law Judge’s Ruling of April 4, 2018 (Ruling), the
Monterey Peninsula Water Management District (MPWMD) submits this Opening Brief
regarding the Final Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (FEIR) on California-
American Water Company’s (Cal-Am) Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project
(MPWSP).1 MPWMD follows the outline adopted in the Ruling, but refrains from
commenting on all sections while reserving the right to comment in any reply brief it may
file on or before May 3, 2018.
While MPWMD remains concerned with several issues and descriptions related to
the FEIR2, we focus here on only a single issue: Cal-Am’s mitigation measure that has
1 CALAM Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental
Impact Statement, SCH# 2006101004, Prepared for the California Public Utilities Commission and
Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (March 2018), hereafter referred to as “FEIR.”
2 MPWMD has contacted the FEIR preparer directly with additional factual and/or typographical
B. Project Description
MPWMD currently has no argument regarding this issue, but reserves the right to
address this in reply briefing.
A.12-04-019
Opening Brief of Monterey Peninsula Water Management District
might occur. Thus, one must conclude that Cal-Am is offering an interim or long-term
replacement of water supply or compensation.
As we have already seen with the issue of compliance with the Agency Act and the
uncertainty of the cost to replace groundwater3, the offer of a replacement supply or
compensation is a contingent liability of the MPWSP that could have potentially significant
economic impacts. MPWMD urges the Commission to address those impacts in this
proceeding. MPWMD posits that Monterey Peninsula ratepayers should not be burdened
with this undefined and potentially extraordinary risk.
D. Alternatives
MPWMD currently has no argument regarding this issue, but reserves the right to
address this in reply briefing.
E. Other
MPWMD currently has no argument regarding this issue, but reserves the right to
address this in reply briefing.
MPWMD currently has no argument regarding this issue or its subsections, but
reserves the right to address this in reply briefing.
B. Other
IV. CONCLUSION
3 See Opening Brief of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), page 20 (December 15, 2017). ORA
argues that the cost of compliance with the Monterey County Agency Act is “currently uncertain, due to the
uncertain amount of return water required for the desalination plant.” ORA concludes that Cal-Am
shareholders, not ratepayers, should bear the risks if return water percentages are higher than anticipated.
A.12-04-019
Opening Brief of Monterey Peninsula Water Management District
MPWMD has actively participated in this proceeding since its inception. We
believe it is likely that Opening Briefs on the FEIR will reveal controversies and
disagreements that will linger after the issuance of a Certificate of Public Convenience and
Necessity (CPCN), assuming that is the Commission’s decision. With such a high prospect
of potential litigation resulting from the issuance of a CPCN for the MPWSP, MPWMD
encourages the Commission to expeditiously open a Phase 3 in this proceeding to examine
expansion of Pure Water Monterey as a potential interim solution in the event of a
significantly delayed desalination facility.
A.12-04-019
Opening Brief of Monterey Peninsula Water Management District