Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Oceans of Opportunity
Repeating the onshore success
EWEA has a target of 40 GW of offshore wind in the EU by 2020,
implying an average annual market growth of 28% over the coming 12
years. The EU market for onshore wind grew by an average 32% per year
in the 12-year period from 1992-2004 – what the wind energy industry
has achieved on land can be repeated at sea.
Oceans of Opportunity
EWEA is the voice of the wind industry, actively promoting the utilisation of offshore wind power technology.
wind power in Europe and worldwide. It now has over 600 members from
almost 60 countries including manufacturers with a 90% share of the world A single European electricity market with large amounts of wind power
wind power market, plus component suppliers, research institutes, national will bring affordable electricity to consumers, reduce import dependence,
wind and renewables associations, developers, electricity providers, finance cut CO2 emissions and allow Europe to access its largest domestic
and insurance companies and consultants.
Harnessing Europe’s largest domestic energy resource
energy source.
September 2009
Coordinating and main authors: Dr. Nicolas Fichaux (EWEA) and Justin Wilkes (EWEA)
Main contributing authors: Frans Van Hulle (Technical Advisor to EWEA) and Aidan Cronin (Merchant Green)
Contributors: Jacopo Moccia (EWEA), Paul Wilczek (EWEA), Liming Qiao (GWEC), Laurie Jodziewicz (AWEA), Elke Zander (EWEA),
Christian Kjaer (EWEA), Glória Rodrigues (EWEA) and 22 industry interviewees
4. Supply Chain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Building a second European offshore industry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Supply of turbines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
The future for wind turbine designs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Supply of substructures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Vessels – turbine installation, substructure installation and other vessels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
A brief introduction to some vessels used in turbine installation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
Vessels status for European offshore wind installation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
Future innovative installation vessels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Ports and harbours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Harbour requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Existing facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
Showcase: Bremerhaven’s success story . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
Harbours of the future . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
Future trends in manufacturing for the offshore wind industry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
5. Main Challenges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
Annex: Offshore Wind Energy Installations 2000-2030 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
(1)
European Commission, 2008. ‘Offshore Wind Energy: Action needed to deliver on the Energy Policy Objectives for 2020 and
beyond’. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0768:FIN:EN:PDF.
(2)
EEA (European Environment Agency), 2009. ‘Europe’s onshore and offshore wind energy potential’. Technical report No 6/2009.
Grids
has clearly recognised that offshore wind power will We must stop thinking of electrical grids as national
be key to Europe’s energy future. infrastructure and start developing them -- onshore
and offshore -- to become European corridors for elec-
Over 100 GW already proposed tricity trade. And we must start developing them now.
The faster they are developed, the faster we will have
It is little wonder therefore that over 100 GW of offshore a domestic substitute if future fuel import supplies
wind energy projects have already been proposed or are disrupted or the cost of fuel becomes prohibitively
are already being developed by Europe’s pioneering expensive, as the world experienced during 2008.
offshore wind developers. This shows the enormous
interest among Europe’s industrial entrepreneurs, The future European offshore grid will contribute
developers and investors. It also shows that EWEA’s to building a well-functioning single European elec-
targets of 40 GW by 2020 and 150 GW by 2030 are tricity market that will benefit all consumers, with
eminently realistic and achievable. The 100 or more the North Sea, the Baltic Sea and the Mediterranean
GW is spread across 15 EU Member States, as well Sea leading the way. Preliminary assessments of the
(3)
The Council Conclusions to the 2nd Strategic Energy Review referred to the Blueprint as a North West Offshore Grid.
The Offshore
Wind Power
Market of
the Future
In addition to these large projects, Phase 1 of Thornton Assuming the financial crisis does not blow the
Bank in Belgium was developed together with two near- offshore wind industry off course, 2010 will be a
shore projects, one in Finland and one in Germany. In defining year for the offshore wind power market in
addition, an 80 kW turbine (not connected to the grid) Europe. Over 1,000 MW (1 GW) is expected to be
was piloted on a floating platform in a water depth installed. Depending on the amount of wind power
of 108m in Italy. Subsequently decommissioned, this installed onshore, it looks as if Europe’s 2010
turbine was the first to take the offshore wind industry offshore market could make up approximately 10%
into the Mediterranean Sea, which, together with of Europe’s total annual wind market, making the
developments in the Baltic Sea, North Sea and Irish offshore industry a significant mainstream energy
Sea, highlights the pan-European nature of today’s player in its own right.
offshore wind industry.
In summer 2009 EWEA surveyed those of its mem- phase or proposed by project developers or govern-
bers active in developing and supplying the offshore ment proposed development zones. This 100 GW of
wind industry, in order to underpin its scenario devel- offshore wind projects shows tremendous developer
opment for 2030. The project pipelines supplied interest and provides a good indication that EWEA’s
by offshore wind developers are presented in the expectation that 150 GW of offshore wind power will
Offshore Wind Map and outlined in this report. In all, be operating by 2030 is both accurate and credible(4).
EWEA has identified proposals for over 100 GW of
offshore wind projects in European waters - either To see the updated Offshore Wind Map:
under construction, consented, in the consenting www.ewea.org/offshore
7,000
25,000 5,000
Onshore (1992-2004)
6,000
Offshore (2008-2020) 20,000 4,000
5,000
15,000 3,000
4,000
10,000 2,000
3,000
5,000 1,000
2,000
(MW) 0 0 (MW)
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
1,000
(MW) 0
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
(4)
Independently of EWEA’s survey of offshore developers which identified 120 GW of offshore wind farms under construction,
consented, or announced by companies or proposed development/concession zones (available at www.ewea.org/offshore) New
Energy Finance has indentified 105 GW of offshore wind projects in Europe (NEF Research Note: Offshore Wind 28 July 2009).
(5)
European Commission, 2006. ‘Renewable Energy Roadmap’, COM(2006)848 final.
160
(€bn) 0 0 (€bn)
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
140
Avoiding Climate Change
120 TWh offshore
In 2011, offshore wind power will avoid the emission
100 of 10 Mt of C02, a figure that will rise to 85 Mt in the
year 2020.
80
60
40
20
(TWh) 0
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
The 230 GW of wind power operating in 2020 would produce 582 TWh of electricity, with the 40 GW offshore contributing 148 TWh.
(6)
• Total installed capacity of 40,000 MW • Meeting between 3.6% and 4.3% of total
EU electricity demand
• Annual installations of 6,900 MW
• Avoiding 85Mt of CO2 annually
• Electricity production of 148 TWh
• Annual investments in wind turbines of €8.8 billion
120,000 12,000
(TWh) 0
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
100,000 10,000
60,000 6,000
Annual investments in offshore wind power are
expected to increase from €9.8 billion in 2021 to
40,000 4,000 €16.5 billion in 2030.
20,000 2,000
(MW) 0 0 (MW)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
The 400 GW of wind power operating in 2030 would produce 1,155 TWh of electricity, with the 150 GW offshore
(7)
20 2.5 500 80
(mt) 0 0 (mt)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
•Total installed capacity of 150,000 MW • Meeting between 12.8% and 16.7% of total EU
electricity demand
•Annual installations of 13,690 MW
• Avoiding 292 Mt of CO2 annually
•Electricity production of 563 TWh
• Annual investments in wind turbines of €16.5 billion
Offshore development – deeper and further and further from the shore. Looking at the wind farms
proposed by project developers, the wind industry will
As technology develops and experience is gained, the gradually move beyond the so-called 20:20 envelope
offshore wind industry will move into deeper water (20m water depth, 20 km from shore).
Figure 10: Development of the offshore wind industry in terms of water depth (m) and distance to shore (km)
160
Distance to shore (km)
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360
This scatter graph shows the probable future devel- result from development in Germany – and will include
opment trends of the offshore industry in the 2025 in the future the UK’s Round 3, characterised by farms
timeframe (approximately)(8) . far from shore (more than 60 km) connecting in ideal
situations to offshore supernodes, with a water depth
Identified trends: generally between 20m and 60m.
(8)
The data is based on an EWEA spreadsheet containing information on all offshore wind farms that are operating, under construc-
tion, consented, in the consenting process or proposed by project developers supplied to EWEA and available (updated) at
www.ewea.org/offshore. The scatter graph contains only those farms where both water depth and distance to shore was provided
to EWEA, and should therefore be treated with a suitable level of caution.
Photo: Siemens
(10)
U.S. Department of Energy, 2008. ‘20% Wind Energy by 2030: Increasing Wind Energy’s Contribution to U.S. Electricity Supply’
http://www.20percentwind.org/20p.aspx?page=Report. May 2008.
(11)
http://www.doi.gov/news/09_News_Releases/031709.html.
Photo: Siemens
the very first time -- the leasing of federal waters for coastline to 20m out to sea covers about 157,000
projects to generate electricity from wind as well as km2. Assuming 10% to 20% of the total amount of sea
from ocean currents and other renewable sources. surface were to be used for offshore development, the
And this will open the door to major investments in total offshore wind capacity could reach 100-200 GW.
offshore clean energy. For example, there is enormous However, in the coastal zone to the south of China,
interest in wind projects off the coasts of New Jersey typhoons may be a limiting factor for the deployment
and Delaware, and today’s announcement will enable of offshore wind turbines, especially in the Guangdong,
these projects to move forward.” Fujian and Zhejiang Provinces.
China: the first farm is developed(12) In 2005, the nation’s Eleventh Five Year Plan
encouraged the industry to learn from international
With its large land mass and long coastline, China experience on offshore wind development and to
is exceptionally rich in wind resources. According explore the offshore opportunities in Shanghai,
to the China Coastal Zone and Tideland Resource Zhejiang and Guangdong Province. The plan also sets
Investigation Report, the area from the country’s a target of setting up one to two offshore wind farms
(12)
Contribution from Liming Qiao, GWEC.
Spatial Planning:
Supporting
Offshore Wind and
Grid Development
Photo: Elsam
Maritime spatial planning Germany, Denmark, Belgium and the Netherlands,
each of which has its own approach. A few coun-
Increased activity within Europe’s marine waters has tries, such as the UK, Germany and Denmark, have
led to growing competition between sectors such as integrated the deployment of offshore wind energy
shipping and maritime transport, the military, the oil into a global approach that encompasses industrial,
and gas sector, offshore wind and ocean energies, port research and policy aspects, and they are seen as the
development, fisheries and aquaculture, and environ- most promising markets.
mental concerns. The fact that the different activities
are regulated on a sectoral basis by different agen- Most other countries use existing marine plan-
cies, each with its own specific legislative approach ning laws, which can delay projects considerably as
to the allocation and use of maritime space, has led offshore wind is a newly developing and unique energy
to fragmented policy making and very limited EU coor- resource. Drawn out and imprecise planning can
dination. In contrast to spatial planning on land, EU increase the costs of offshore projects significantly.
countries generally have limited experience of inte-
grated spatial planning in the marine environment, With no integrated approach, offshore wind energy
and sometimes the relevant governance structures deployment is caught between conflicting uses,
and rules are inadequate. interest groups and rules from different sectors and
jurisdictions (both at inter-state and intra-state level).
In addition to the wide range of sectoral approaches This creates project uncertainty, increases the risk
to the use of the sea, there are very different plan- of delays in, or failure of offshore wind projects, and
ning regimes and instruments in the different impairs the sector’s potential for growth.
Member States. For example, in Germany there are
regional plans for the territorial seas and national EEZ These barriers are further aggravated by the absence
(Exclusive Economic Zones) plans, whereas in France, of an integrated and coordinated approach to mari-
sea “Enhancement Schemes” have been used in time spatial planning (MSP) between the different
some areas as the main instrument. Member States and regions. There are potential
synergies between offshore projects and cross-border
Only a few European countries currently have defined inter-connectors that are currently not being exploited
dedicated offshore wind areas, including the UK, and taken into consideration in MSP regimes. Without
crown Estate (CE): Department of Trade and Industry’s (DTI) Offshore ORCU: Permit for Secretary of State for Trade and
UK Tenders right to Renewables Consents Unit (ORCU): Food and construction/operation ORCU: Coast
Industry: Permit for construction of
develop site Environment Protection License for works at sea of a generating station protection permit onshore substation/overhead line
Developer:
Danish Energy Authority DEA: Site tender/permit to survey DEA: Building permit DEA: Permit to exploit site
Denmark (DEA): Site pre-screening for Environmental Impact Assessment
Construction of
and generate electricity
wind plant
(EIA)
Single-window Application Process
Developer: General Directorate for Energy Policy and Mines DGPEM: Adm.
DGPEM: DGPEM: Coordinate DGPEM: Developer:
Expression (DGPEM): Site pre-screening, evaluation of envi- Authorization
Spain ronmental/tourism/fishing/shipping impact/
Site application review Lease Project planning,
and construction
of interest tender with govt. agencies agreement feasibility studies
in site grid conection permit
Developer: Presents concessions appli- MME: MME: Publishes initial concession MME: Building and
Belgium cation, incl. detailed site plan/EIA to Consultation with application, opens concession exploitation authorization
Ministry of Marine Environment (MME) stakeholders process to competitors (plant/cabling)
Developer: Notice of intention Developer: Public Developer: Two years envi- BSH: BSH: Länder (state government): Cable
Germany to construct communicated to and stakeholder ronmental study, shipping Project Cable approval approval 12 nm zone for the
BSH (federal marine authority) consultation risk analysis approval EEZ Transmission System Operator
Developer: Intention to apply Developer: Informal Developer: Formal Energy Regulator: Oil and Energy
Norway for permits communicated public and stakeholder application presented Formal public and stake- Energy Regulator: Ministry: Final project
Energy Regulator consultation to Energy Regulator holder consultation Application approval approval if appeal
Department of Communications, Energy, and Natural stakeholder consultation CENR: Foreshore regulation: Construction,
Ireland Resources (CENR): Foreshore license to explore site lease
preparation of EIS generation, and supply permit
Ministry of Industry: Ministry of Sustainable Building permit, Municipality Network Authority (part of Energy
Sweden Permit for explotation Development: if in 12 nm zone, Ministry of Administration): Concession for
of seabed Environmental permit Industry if in EEZ cabling and grid access
consent dependent on MoT with Economic and Environment Ministries build and operate wind
Authorization and stakeholders plant
Source: Emerging Energy Research, 2008. ‘Global Offshore Wind Energy Markets and Strategies 2008 – 2020’.
cross-border coordination, grid investments in partic- power generation by the recent European Commission
ular risk being sub-optimal because they will be made Communications:
from an individual project and national perspective,
rather than from a system and transnational perspec- • ‘Offshore Wind Energy: action needed to deliver
tive. This harms both the deployment of offshore wind on the Energy Policy Objectives for 2020 and
energy projects and the development of a well-func- beyond’(13);
tioning Europe-wide market for electricity. • ‘An Integrated Maritime Policy for the European
Union’(14); and
The lack of integrated strategic planning and cross- • ‘Roadmap for Maritime Spatial Planning: achieving
border coordination has been identified as one of common principles in the EU’(15).
the main challenges to the deployment of offshore
(13)
COM (2008) 768. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0768:FIN:EN:PDF.
(14)
COM (2007) 575. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2007:0575:FIN:EN:PDF.
(15)
COM (2008) 791. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0791:FIN:EN:PDF.
If Member States decided to perform maritime spatial Maritime spatial planning approaches should be
planning (MSP), and dedicate areas for offshore wind based on a common vision shared at sea basin level.
developments and electricity interconnectors, it would In this regard, cross border cooperation on MSP is
send clear positive signals to the industry. Provided key for building a common and streamlined planning
the right policies and incentives are in place, MSP approach and making optimal use of the maritime
gives the industry long term visibility of its market. space. Cross-border cooperation on MSP would aid
Consolidated at European level, such approaches projects crossing several Economic Exclusive Zones
would enable investments to be planned out. This such as large-scale offshore wind projects, and the
would enable the entire value chain to seek invest- interconnectors of the future pan-European grid.
ment in key elements of the supply chain (e.g. turbine
components, cables, vessels, people) while poten-
tially lowering the risks and capital costs.
Offshore wind synergies with other maritime started in Denmark to combine offshore wind parks
activities with aquaculture. Offshore wind parks could also be
combined with large desalination plants, or be used
Offshore wind parks cover large areas as the project as artificial reefs to improve fish stocks. Since the
size must be sufficient to ensure the financial foundation structure in an offshore wind turbine is
viability of the project, and as a minimal distance large and stable it may in the future be combined
between the turbines is needed to avoid or mini- with ocean energies to give additional power produc-
mise the wake effects. It is therefore possible to tion at a given offshore site. This last point was also
optimise the use of the space by developing syner- promoted by the European Commission through the
gies with other activities. For example, a project has recent 2009 FP7 call.
Photo: Eneco
Building the
European
Offshore Grid
Photo: Siemens
Introduction • increased interconnection capacity will provide
additional firm power (capacity credit) from the
The deployment of offshore wind energy requires a offshore wind resource.
dedicated offshore electricity system. Such a system
will provide grid access for the more remote offshore The future European offshore grid will therefore
wind farms, and additional interconnection capacity to contribute to building a well-functioning single European
improve the trading of electricity between the differing electricity market that will benefit all consumers.
national electricity markets. The transnational offshore Because of the prominent concentration of planned
grid of the future will have many functions, each bene- offshore wind farms in the North Sea, the Baltic Sea
fitting Europe in different ways: and the Mediterranean Sea, a transnational offshore
grid should be built first in those areas. In many of
• the geographically distributed output of the the offshore grid designs that have already been
connected offshore wind farms will be aggregated proposed, an offshore grid has branches reaching as
and therefore smoothed, increasing the predict- far as Ireland, France and Spain.
ability of the energy output and diminishing the
need for additional balancing capacity(16); This section will address planning issues, technology
• wind farm operators will be able to sell wind farm aspects, possible topologies, and the consequences
output to more than one country; for the European network in general. Furthermore it
• power trading possibilities between countries will will briefly discuss the operational, regulatory and
increase; economic aspects of an offshore grid.
• it will minimise the strengthening of onshore
(mainland) interconnectors’ high-voltage networks, Mapping and planning the offshore grid
which can be difficult due to land-use conflicts;
• connecting offshore oil and gas platforms to Drivers for planning
the grid will enable a reduction of their GHG
emissions; Building an offshore grid is different from building an
• it will offer connection opportunities to other onshore grid in many ways – not least technically and
marine renewable energy sources; economically. Perhaps the greatest challenge is the
• shared use of offshore transmission lines leads international aspect. The two basic drivers throughout
to an improved and more economical utilisation of the planning (and later in the implementation stage)
grid capacity and its economical exploitation; of a transnational offshore grid are its role in interna-
• European energy security will be improved, due to tional trade and the access it provides to wind power
a more interconnected European grid; and other marine energy sources.
TradeWind, 2009. “Integrating Wind - Developing Europe’s power market for the large-scale integration of wind power.”
(16)
The basis for planning the offshore grid is therefore a modular way, i.e. that it is made up of modules
combination of an ambitious - but realistic - vision of that can feasibly be exploited;
future offshore wind power capacities and a common • take into account time-dependent aspects such as
stakeholder vision on the future necessary expansion realistic implementation scenarios for wind power
of the European transmission network. This report development, supply chain issues and financing
seeks to develop and implement such a vision. possibilities;
• coordinate the implementation of the offshore
The future projections for offshore wind power capacity network with the upgrade of the onshore network;
are discussed in Chapter 1. • present a coordinated approach to implementing
the common vision shared by the relevant stake-
The future development of the European transmission holders throughout the process.
grid is described in different publications (TDP UCTE
2008, Nordic Grid Master Plan 2008) and various Partners in the planning and work process are the TSOs,
national studies (the Netherlands, the UK, Denmark). governments, regulators, technical suppliers, wind farm
Some international studies (TradeWind) have explored developers, consultants and financing bodies.
the implications of offshore wind for grid require-
ments. At present, issues related to the joint planning Policy processes supporting the planning
of offshore wind power development and grid rein-
forcement arise in markets with significant offshore Because of the complexity of transnational planning
wind development (Germany, the UK). Finding practical processes, the planning of an offshore grid requires
solutions for these issues will be very helpful for the strong policy drivers and supra-national control mecha-
process of international joint planning. nisms. In the present political framework, transmission
lines through different marine zones are forced to
Planning in the different maritime areas seek regulatory and planning approval with the rele-
vant bodies of each Member State through which the
At present, offshore grid ideas are being developed line passes. Multiple country reviews impose delays of
above all for northern Europe, especially for the North years to an approval process that is already complex
Sea and the Baltic Sea. However, offshore wind farms enough.
are expected to be developed in most European
waters, and so the grid aspects of developments along Offshore grid topology and construction
the Atlantic Coast and in the Mediterranean area also
have to be considered in pan-European planning. In the No lack of ideas
longer term, and depending on further technological
developments enabling the industry to reach deeper There is no shortage of ideas from academics, grid
waters, the offshore network should be expanded to companies and various industries on how to construct
areas that have not yet been investigated, including a dedicated offshore transmission grid. Because of
the northern part of the North Sea. the concentration of planned offshore wind farms in
the North Sea and the Baltic Sea, a transnational
Planning approach offshore grid will be constructed in those areas first.
A realistic schedule for a transnational offshore grid Proposals have been put forward by several different
should: bodies, including the following:
European Academies Science Advisory Council, 2009. ‘Transforming EU’s Electricity Supply – An infrastructure strategy for
(17) & (17b)
Photo: Elsam
Plus. The technologies are not identical, and efforts HVDC circuit breakers, load flow control concepts and
are needed to make them compatible and jointly oper- very fast protection schemes. Also, operational experi-
able, when used together in the future offshore grid. ence has to be collected to optimise the interface with
For that purpose, two major conceptual decisions have wind power generation in the HVDC environment.
to be taken – namely, to agree to standardise the DC
working voltage levels and to agree on the largest Offshore grid topology
possible plug and play boundary. In addition, other
players such as Areva are also developing HVDC VSC There are three basic elements which will form the
technology. backbone of the future offshore transmission network.
These are:
Although all technologies for the offshore grid already
exist in principle, there are several aspects of HVDC • lines/branches: these consist of submerged
VSC technology which require technical development cables characterised by transmission capacity;
in the short term in order to achieve the necessary • offshore nodes (hubs or plugs): these offshore
technical maturity - such as the availability of ultra fast nodes consist of offshore platforms containing
The offshore grid topology basically builds upon the EWEA’s 20 Year Offshore Network Development Master
following types of transmission highways: Plan is based on the necessary grid upgrades that
would allow all planned, proposed, under construction
• A. interconnectors developed by TSOs (in principle and operating offshore wind farms to transport all the
through bilateral cooperation) for the purpose of electricity produced to European electricity consumers
cross border exchange between electricity markets in an economically sound way. It is underpinned by
(current state of play); the TradeWind study and existing TSO plans, and is
• B. lines specifically developed for connection of designed, in addition to connecting offshore wind
offshore wind farms, and offshore facilities (current farms to the grid, to increase electricity trading oppor-
state of play); and tunities and improve Europe’s energy security.
• C. lines developed in a coordinated effort for the
purpose of connecting offshore wind, marine tech- EWEA urges other stakeholders, particularly the
nologies and the promotion of cross border trade. European Commission in its Blueprint for a North Sea
Grid and ENTSO-E’s System Development Committee,
The capital costs of the HVDC converter stations are to incorporate EWEA’s 20 Year Offshore Network
higher than corresponding substations in AC, while the Development Master Plan, taking into account
cost of cables is lower for DC than for AC. the results of European-funded projects such as
WindSpeed (www.windspeed.eu) and OffshoreGrid
(www.offshoregrid.eu).
OffshoreGrid will develop a scientifically-based view The main objective of the WINDSPEED project is to
on an offshore grid in northern Europe along with identify a roadmap to the deployment of offshore
a suitable regulatory framework that takes all the wind power in the central and southern North Sea.
technical, economic, policy and regulatory aspects The roadmap includes the definition of an offshore
into account. The project is targeted at European wind energy target and a set of coordinated policy
policy makers, industry, transmission system opera- recommendations for the deployment of offshore
tors and regulators. The geographical scope is firstly wind in this specific sea basin. WINDSPEED delivers
the regions around the Baltic and North Sea, the a decision support system for the evaluation of the
English Channel and the Irish Sea. Secondly, the physical potential for offshore wind, having inputs
results will be transferred by qualitative terms to the such as policy targets for all users of the sea, alloca-
Mediterranean region. tion rules and calculation rules for the assessment
of impacts on offshore wind economics.
Table 2: EWEA’s 20 Year Offshore Network Development Master Plan (North and Baltic Seas)
Capacity
Name, description and timeframe Status
(MW)
Existing - 11 offshore grids
NorNed linking Norway and the Netherlands Operating 700
Skagerrak linking Norway and Denmark Operating 940
HVDC linking France and the UK Operating 2,000
Kontek linking Germany and Denmark Operating 600
HVDC linking Germany and Sweden Operating 600
Konti-Skan linking Denmark and Sweden Operating 300
SwePol linking Sweden and Poland Operating 600
HVDC Linking Swedish mainland and Gotland Operating 260
Estlink linking Finland and Estonia Operating 350
Fenno Skan linking Sweden and Finland Operating 500
Moyle Interconnector linking N. Ireland and Scotland Operating 500
In the 2020 timeframe
Planned/under construction - seven offshore grids
Great Belt, internal Denmark Planned by 2010 600
Fenno Skan II linking Sweden and Finland Planned by 2011 800
BritNed linking the UK and the Netherlands Planned by 2011 1,000
East-West Interconnector linking Ireland and north Wales Planned by 2012 500
Estlink II linking Finland and Estonia Planned by 2013 700
Upgrade linking Norway and Denmark (Skagerrak) Planned 350
NordBalt linking Sweden and Lithuania, possibly as HVDC-VSC (formerly 700 to
Planned by 2016
SwedLit) 1,000
Under study - 14 offshore grids
Internal HVDC between Scotland and England Under study 1,800
Internal HVDC between Scotland and Wales Under study 1,800
Internal HVDC between Scotland and Shetland Islands Under study 600
Internal HVDC between Scotland and Isle of Lewis Under study 600
Internal HVDC in Scotland Under study 600
Nemo HVDC linking Belgium and UK Under study 1,000
Upgrade linking UK and France (EFA) Under study 2,000
Under study by
Skagerrak 4 linking Norway and Denmark 600
2014
Under study by
Cobra Cable linking the Netherlands and Denmark 700
2016
Under study
NorNed 2 linking Norway and the Netherlands 700
2015 - 2016
(22)
Energinet.dk, Svenska Kraftnät, Vattenfall Europe Transmission, 2009. ‘An analysis of Offshore Grid Connection at Kriegers Flak in
the Baltic Sea’.
Capacity
Name, description and timeframe (North and Baltic Seas) Status
(MW)
In the 2030 timeframe
EWEA recommendation – six offshore grids
EWEA
Upgrade linking the UK and Ireland 1,000
recommendation
EWEA
HVDC linking the UK (Shetland Islands) and north Norway node 2,000
recommendation
HVDC linking the UK and the Netherlands (as a modular connection, EWEA 2,000 to
possibly also linking Belgian node) recommendation 5,000
EWEA 1,000 to
HVDC linking the Netherlands with NorGer node
recommendation 5,000
EWEA 1,000 to
HVDC linking the Netherlands node with Nord Link node
recommendation 5,000
EWEA
New HVDC linking Ireland and France 1,000
recommendation
Offshore grid construction timeline - staged Onshore connection points are identified. Dedicated
approach (HVDC) offshore lines are built by TSOs to inter-
connect clustered wind power capacity. Dedicated
Most of the electricity grids in the world have been regulatory regimes are established for offshore
put together from the bottom up, connecting local transmission, enabling TSOs to recover investments
producers with nearby off-take points, and this will not via the national electricity market. The process
be different with the offshore grid. The construction starts towards the internationalisation of regula-
of an offshore grid is a process that will take many tory regimes. The necessary onshore transmission
years to be fully accomplished. Even the implementa- reinforcements are identified. The multilateral grid
tion process of a single line is very lengthy (around 10 planning process is prepared. Work on the stand-
years), involving several stages (Figure 18). ardisation and technical development of HVDC VSC
technology speeds up.
figure 18: Stages in a typical timeline for building
an offshore interconnector total process duration is Stage II: Transition to transnational grid
around 10 years
A process of multilateral grid planning is in place. Long-
distance lines dedicated to offshore wind are planned
and implemented. Implementation of pilot projects for
connecting offshore wind power to different markets
(Kriegers Flak, super-node). HVDC VSC technologies
are optimised, based on operational experience.
Adaptation of trajectories of planned offshore inter-
SOURCE: Statnett, 2009 connectors to connect offshore wind power.
A possible timeline for the construction of a trans-
national offshore grid is sketched in Figure 18. The Stage III: Transnational grid
timeline falls naturally into three main stages:
Step by step implementation of the transnational
Stage I: Local (national) grids offshore grid. The planned lines are built. The maps
illustrate a proposed grid scenario for the short term
Countries establish and implement coordinated (present situation to 2010), the medium term (2020)
connection for offshore wind power at national level. and the long term (2030 and beyond).
One of the first studies that looked into this issue was
the TradeWind project. On the basis of wind power
scenarios, the study identified upgrades that would
significantly alleviate the congestions in the European
grid for wind power scenarios up to 2030.
Such as the German study: DENA, 2005. ‘Integration into the national grid of onshore and offshore wind energy generated in
(23)
Beside these organisational developments, one of variability introduced by the offshore wind resource.
the first tasks for the TSOs and industries involved is As an example, north-west Germany is identified as an
to set up a system of standards and grid connection energy surplus area with high internal congestions on
requirements. New standardisation efforts are needed the mainland grid. Taking into account the fact that the
in the field of HVDC, more specifically to agree on a Netherlands and Belgium will benefit from increased
common system of voltage levels. Furthermore, in imports, and that Norway has large amounts of control-
order to enable a smoothly and efficiently constructed lable and storable hydro power, an offshore grid which
grid, it will be essential that parties agree on a system linked these countries together would bring consider-
of plug and play and standard – interchangeable able economic, environmental and system benefits(24).
building blocks.
In the Baltic Sea, linking the wind farm clusters in
Combining transmission of offshore wind the Kriegers Flak together would enable flexibility for
power and power trading transporting higher amounts of offshore wind power to
areas with higher electricity prices. Furthermore, such
The capacity of the offshore grid should be suffi- a link would make it possible to trade power effec-
cient to transport the maximum expected output of tively between Sweden, east Denmark and Germany in
the connected offshore wind farms. However, this periods with low wind speeds.
maximum is only produced for a certain amount of
hours each year. On average (annual basis or longer), Regulatory framework enabling improved
the capacity factor of the offshore wind farms, and market rules
so the capacity usage of the line by the wind farm, is
approximately 40%. The offshore wind farms should At present, there are significant barriers in the elec-
have first call on the rights to use the grid connec- tricity market in Europe, which hamper an efficient
tion, as: combination of trade and offshore wind power trans-
mission via a transnational offshore grid:
• in a properly functioning electricity market, wind
power’s very low marginal cost will ensure it is • the differences in regulatory regimes and market
the cheapest (and environmentally most benign) mechanisms of the countries involved;
electricity at any time on the market place; or • a lack of proper rules with respect to priority
• in the absence of a properly functioning electricity feed-in for wind power versus nomination of day-
market (as is currently the case) priority access ahead and intra-day trade.
would need to be granted to wind power, as stip-
ulated in the EU Renewable Energy Directive These issues should be taken up in the ongoing
2009/28/EC. Regional Initiative for the integration of European
power markets as pursued by ERGEG. In order to
Either way, wind farm operators would specify their ensure that sufficient grid capacity is built in time,
grid requirements to the grid operator on a day-ahead a common regulatory regime should be put in place
basis, together with functioning intra-day markets. to incentivise the organisations responsible for wind
The remaining capacity would then be available for farm connection (TSOs) and organisations responsible
interconnection users at day-ahead nomination, for planning interconnection (TSOs, market parties) to
together with functionioning intra-day markets. plan and construct the most economically efficient
grid system.
The benefits of the operation of such a grid for the
market have been outlined by the TradeWind project. It is necessary to establish a legal and regulatory
The offshore grid enables the different electricity framework that enables an efficient use of the different
markets to be interconnected in a much better way lines of the offshore grid in all its stages. In order
and with a significant surplus, with markets relying to ensure an efficient allocation of the interconnec-
on import and at the same time providing access tors for cross-border trade, they should be allocated
to cheap balancing power to deal with the added directly to the market via implicit auction.
TradeWind, 2009. ‘Integrating Wind - Developing Europe’s power market for the large-scale integration of wind power.’
(24)
Taking these properties into account, TradeWind used There are several ways of evaluating the economic
market models to help estimate the economic benefits value of an offshore grid. A basic distinction can be
TradeWind, 2009. ‘Integrating Wind - Developing Europe’s power market for the large-scale integration of wind power.’ Available at:
(25)
http://www.trade-wind.eu.
C. Veal, C. Byrne, S. Kelly, 2007. ‘The cost-benefit of integrating offshore wind farm connections and subsea interconnectors in the
(26)
North Sea’. Proc. European Offshore Wind Conference and Exhibition, Berlin, Germany.
(27)
Greenpeace, 2008. ‘A North Sea Electricity Grid [R]evolution’. Available at: http://www.greenpeace.org/belgium.
(28)
TradeWind, 2009. ‘Integrating Wind - Developing Europe’s power market for the large-scale integration of wind power.’
Available at: http://www.trade-wind.eu.
(29)
Seanergy: East Coast Transmission (January 2008).
(30)
International Energy Agency, 2008. ‘World Energy Outlook’.
OCEANS OF OPPORTUNITY OFFSHORE REPORT 39
Chapter 3 - Building the European Offshore Grid
Photo: Vestas
the assessment of the economics, the cost of elec- investments with higher risks and longer return rates.
trical losses and operation and maintenance costs Upfront guarantees are needed, possibly in combina-
should be taken into account. tion with regulated returns. Such guarantees should
be based on the cumulative number of consumers
Financing the European electricity grid on the interconnected markets. The final cost for the
consumers, however, would be lowered by the fees
The financing of the future pan-European offshore grid collected by the network operators through the use
will involve significant investments. Therefore a good of the interconnector. Therefore, as the European
understanding of the transiting electricity volumes, electricity market becomes fully operational, trading
which will come from the production of the offshore develops, and the grids are used at full capacity, the
wind parks and the development of trading, is neces- cost for the final consumer would be minimal.
sary to ensure a sustainable return on investment.
If allowed by regulators, merchant interconnectors
Investments in regulated interconnectors, performed could represent additional profits for TSOs, which
and operated by TSOs should prioritise meshed grids. would incentivise their construction. Private compa-
In this respect, the regulators should allow these nies investing in these face higher risks, in particular
Recommendations:
It is recommended that a transnational offshore grid issues. Appropriate standardisation work should be
infrastructure be built to connect the predicted 40 GW carried out in the short term.
by 2020, 85 GW by 2025 and 150 GW of offshore
wind power by 2030, together with the promotion of Preliminary topologies will be presented, including
trade between electricity markets. A realistic planning possible time frames (short, medium and long term).
schedule for the offshore grid should closely follow Ongoing studies like the European Commission
existing initiatives for offshore interconnectors, and funded OffshoreGrid project are expected to provide
would conceive a grid in a modular and methodical way. more detailed analyses in the short term. These
The transnational offshore grid must be planned as an proposals should be taken up as soon as possible
integral part of the European transmission system and in the planning process of ENTSO.
involve onshore reinforcements where necessary.
A common regulatory regime should be put in place
An ambitious European vision must be established to incentivise the organisations responsible for wind
using EWEA’s 20 Year Offshore Network Development farm connection (TSOs) and the organisations respon-
Master Plan; the planning and implementation process sible for planning interconnection (TSOs, market
should involve close cooperation and efficient coordi- parties) to plan and construct the most economically
nation between the stakeholders (European TSOs). efficient grid system.
ENTSO-E should provide the appropriate forum for coop-
eration, should a sufficiently ambitious vision emerge Preliminary assessments of the economic value of
in ENTSO’s 10 Year Network Development Plan. the offshore grid indicate that it will bring significant
economic benefits to all society.
HVDC VSC is a promising technology and R&D should
be accelerated to address the remaining technical
Supply Chain
Photo: Vestas
Building a new European offshore industry parallel. In the development of offshore, the door is
still wide open for innovative concepts and designs.
In the last few years, the offshore wind energy sector
has emerged as a distinct sector of the wind industry. Therefore, the European offshore wind industry
In terms of technology, the onshore market is should be seen as a specific industry, distinct from
approaching maturity, with well established processes onshore wind industry development. Reaching 40 GW
and reliable mass-produced products. Onshore, tech- of offshore wind energy by 2020 will mean manufac-
nological improvements are focused on delivering turing, installing and operating approximately 10,000
large numbers of wind turbines and ensuring cost wind turbines, which corresponds to an average of
competitiveness through the optimisation of the three to four offshore turbines being installed per
manufacturing process and supply chain manage- working day over the next 12 years. Currently, the wind
ment. Research is focused on further improving the power industry installs 20 onshore wind turbines in
products’ reliability and efficiency. the EU per working day. Developing a new European
offshore industry is a challenge, but the development
The offshore wind energy sector is at a much earlier of onshore technology and markets serves as a strong
stage of development. In terms of annual installa- indicator and benchmark for what can be achieved.
tions, offshore wind energy is where onshore wind
was in the early 1990s. With 1.5 GW installed today, This industry will also develop in partnership with
the sector will shortly leave the demonstration phase related industries, such as the oil and gas sector, the
to enter a phase of strong industrial growth. In the shipbuilding industry and the steel sector, and be a
coming years, the main focus will be on standardising driver for their future development. Offshore wind
the installation processes and developing dedicated energy provides an historic opportunity to create a
offshore turbines from a dedicated supply chain, just new heavy industry in which Europe is a technology
as it was for onshore wind 15 years ago. leader, uniting existing heavy industries in a common
effort to tackle climate change and improve the secu-
Whereas the size of onshore wind turbines, and rity of Europe’s energy supply, whilst reducing energy
onshore turbine technology, seem to be reaching an imports, creating new jobs and ensuring European
optimum, offshore wind turbine technology is still technology leadership.
progressing and evolving fast, to reflect the require-
ments of conditions specific to offshore, such as Cost reductions for the offshore wind energy sector
market evolution and economies of scale. In this will arise in particular from higher market volumes
field, incremental technology innovations are taking and longer production series from the industry. The
place, but technological breakthroughs are sought in project scale will increase, and the trend will continue
towards larger offshore wind farms in the 200-300 manufacturers and developers, this causes bottle-
MW range and beyond, using dedicated and standard- necks in periods of high onshore demand.
ised offshore turbines. This will enable streamlined,
repeatable installation processes, and provide incen- MAKE consulting(31) (Figure 20) indicates that there is
tives to build the necessary installation vessels and currently more production capacity in Europe than is
access technologies. Regarding access, dedicated needed to fulfill European demand. Total onshore and
harbours will be necessary to support the implementa- offshore demand is forecast to reach 10 GW in 2010,
tion of a large number of offshore wind turbines and compared to a production capacity of approximately
foundations. 12 GW, if castings are considered as the limiting
elements. That would leave room for production
In the following sections, some of the major cost capacity to be available for offshore manufacturing.
drivers are addressed: turbine supply, the available
substructures, vessels and harbours. In addition, offshore wind turbine manufacturers are
increasing their capacity. A minimum offshore turbine
Supply of turbines capacity of 5,750 MW by 2013 (Table 3), will be suffi-
cient to supply the increase in the offshore market
Today, six turbine manufacturers are already supplying demand from 1.7 GW in 2011 to 6.8 GW in 2020.
the offshore market: Siemens, Vestas, REpower, BARD,
Multibrid and Nordex. 2008 was characterised first by component and then
turbine supply shortages which led to growth in wind
Most current offshore turbines are adaptations of turbine prices, partly due also to an increase in the
onshore designs. The production capacity for offshore price of raw materials. The market will now see signs
wind turbines is therefore dependent on the growth in of relaxation, including offshore turbine availability,
the onshore market. Given that the onshore market and increased competition, which may drive the costs
is less risky than the offshore market for turbine down in the medium term.
Offshore
Turbine supply Projected production Offshore capacity
Manufacturer capacity
2008 (MW) (MW) and timeline (MW)
2008 (MW)
Siemens 1,947 649(32) 6,000 2,000
Vestas 5,581 - 10,000 by 2010 2,000(33)
REpower 943 - 2,600 by 2010(34) 850(35)
BARD Engineering - - 400 by 2010 400
Multibrid 50 50 505 505
Nordex 1,075 150 4,450 by 2011 n.a.
Source: BTM Consult, 2008. “World market update 2008” for the supplied capacity in 2008, and EWEA.
The economics of offshore wind tends to favour significant modification of onshore machines by the
larger machines. The offshore environment may allow offshore sector, and in the medium and long term, to
the relaxation of a number of constraints on turbine the development of specific offshore turbine designs.
design, such as aesthetics and sound emission level.
However, addressing marine conditions, corrosion This trend is reflected by the new generation of offshore
and reliability issues creates new challenges in the wind turbines which are coming on the market. These
offshore sector. In the near term this will lead to a larger designs (in the 5 MW range) are dedicated to the
(31)
MAKE Consulting, 2009. ‘The wind forecast, supply side’.
(32)
Siemens reserved one third of its capacity for offshore wind.
(33)
No data available. Estimate assumes Vestas delivers as much as Siemens.
(34)
Based on Reuters Article Repower Plans Capacity Expansion April 2, 2008.
(35)
Assume 1/3 of capacity.
44 OCEANS OF OPPORTUNITY OFFSHORE REPORT
FIGURE 20: Domestic production capacity in Europe focus is reliability and cost efficiency. In this regard, a
compared to demand (MW) global approach to the value chain is needed. In the
past, upscaling was a major cost driver for the wind
industry. However, while large wind turbine designs (up
to 10 MW) are often cited, this raises the issue of the
availability of the installation vessels and cranes able
to install and operate these machines. The main driver
for offshore wind technology continues to be economic
efficiency, rather than generator size.
Siemens Wind Power has stated that it is prepared to reserve up to one third of its
production capacity for offshore wind turbines. In offshore development, Siemens
has taken a lead position, with the SWT3.6 107. This position was further strength-
ened in 2008, when the company signed an agreement with Denmark’s DONG
Energy for the supply of up to 500 offshore turbines.
Bonus – now Siemens Wind Power - pioneered the offshore installation of wind
turbines with the world’s first offshore wind farm at Vindeby, Denmark, installed in
Siemens 3.6 MW
1991. Since then, its track record includes Nysted Havmøllepark, Burbo Offshore
Wind Farm and Greater Gabbard. Siemens Energy will supply 175 of its SWT-3.6-
107 (3.6 MW) wind turbines to the 1 GW London Array offshore windfarm owned by
DONG Energy, E.ON and Masdar.
Siemens is currently developing its next generation of offshore turbines, and
testing 3.6 MW direct drive concept, suitable for offshore applications, with the
aim to improve reliability and reduce costs.
Vestas is one of the few players that has experience in the offshore sector. In
late 2008 the company won a large order of 300 MW for Warwick Energy’s Thanet
project in the UK. Vestas will increase its total production capacity (onshore and
Vestas 3 MW
offshore) to 10 GW in 2010. No reservation of capacity has been announced for
offshore. The offshore turbine supply will rely on the developments of the onshore
market.
The N90 offshore is an adaptation of the onshore design. This turbine is designed
Nordex 2.5 MW
for offshore use.
REpower manufactures some of the largest wind turbines in the world suitable for
offshore use, the 5M (5 MW) and the 6M (6 MW).
REPower will install six 5M in 2009 at the test project Alpha Ventus. The 5M
serial production begun in autumn 2008 in a new construction hall in Bremerhaven.
In the beginning of 2009, the first three 6M turbines were erected close to the
Danish-German border, where they are to be tested for offshore operation and
REpower 5 and 6 MW where they will be subjected to a type certification.
REpower is participating in the “Beatrice Demonstrator Project” to test the perform-
ance of the 5 MW turbine on the open sea 25 km off the east coast of Scotland
and at a water depth of over 40m. REpower recently signed an agreement with
Vattenfall to supply 150 MW to the Ormonde wind farm. Delivery is scheduled to
start in 2010.
Recharge, 12 June. ‘Taking our turbines offshore will be a breeze says Acciona’.
(36)
Supply of substructures
Papalexandrou, 2008. ‘Economic analysis of offshore wind farms. KTH School of Energy and Environment, in partnership with Ecofys’.
(37)
Brief
Type of Suitable
physical Advantages Limitations
substructure water depths
description
One Easy to manufacture, experi- Piling noise, and competitive-
Monopile steel supporting 10 – 30m ence gained on previous ness depending on seabed
pillar projects conditions and turbine weight
Combination of proven
Monopile
One methods, Cost effective,
concrete,
supporting 10 – 40m less environmental (noise) Heavy to transport
installed by
pillar impact. Industrialisation
drilling
possible
Concrete Transportation can be prob-
structure, lematic for heavy turbines. It
Up to 40m
Gravity base used at´ No piling noise, inexpensive requires a preparation of the
and more
Thornton seabed. Need heavy equip-
bank ment to remove it
Steel
cylinder with
sealed top No piling, relatively easy to Very sensitive to seabed
Suction bucket n.a.
pressed into install, easy to remove conditions
the ocean
floor
Tripod / 3/4-legged Up to 30m High strength. Adequate for Complex to manufacture,
quadropod structure and more heavy large-scale turbines heavy to transport
Expensive so far. Subject
to wave loading and fatigue
failure. Large offshore instal-
Lattice Less noise. Adequate for
Jacket > 40m lation period (first piles, later
structure heavy large-scale turbines
on placing of structure and
grouting) therefor sensitive for
weather impact
Not in Suitable for deep waters,
Weight and cost, stability, low
Floating contact with > 50m allowing large energy poten-
track record for offshore wind
seabed tials to be harnessed
Floating
Spar buoy steel
Hywind being cylinder 120 - 700m Very deep water, less steel Expensive at this stage
tested attached to
seabed
Floating
Blue H
steel
Semi Prototype
cylinder Deep water, less steel Expensive at this stage
submersible being tested
attached to
in 113m
seabed
Source: Carbon Trust, EWEA, Companies
FIGURE 24: Medium and high depth foundations FIGURE 25: Blue H technology
Dynamic positioning systems are of vital importance for the precise positioning of wind turbines and safe installation offshore.
(38)
http://www.bnoffshore.com.
(39)
most of the offshore assembly should be done on FIGURE 29: High speed jack-up vessel shuttles from
land. Previous experience has led to the bunny ear manufacturing site
configuration whereby nacelles have the hub and
two blades mounted on shore and the third blade
stacked onboard a ship for installation. However, as
installing the third blade at sea is a sensitive and time WF M
2 WF M
C
1
Source: BVG Associates (40b) The choice of a given installation strategy depends on
the economic balance between the number and type of
ships used, the distance to the coast, and the trans-
Manufacture and pre-assembly
WF at harbour
M
portation / operation risks involved. For instance, the
third strategy limits the transition times of the instal-
This approach entails the setting up of an assembly lation vessel. However, it requires a second ship, and
operation close to the site. A second approach is means the wind turbines have to be handled a second
shipping the pre-assembled turbines directly from the time from the feeder to the installation vessel. A2SEA
turbine manufacturer to the site. Suppliers based in demonstrated that such a strategy could be economi-
Bremerhaven, for example, are able to deliver this type cally viable compared to the first and second options
of service. for UK Round 3, involving longer distances to the coast.
Recommendations:
The installation of 40 GW by 2020 will require dedi- cost in the region of €200 million, with a total invest-
cated offshore installation vessels for the offshore ment of €2.4 billion. Accessing capital to build such
wind energy sector. Such vessels should be able to vessels requires strong and stable market conditions
install offshore wind farms in medium water depths to guarantee return on investments. To speed up the
(30-40m and beyond), and operate in harsh condi- process and enable the timely delivery of the neces-
tions, in order to increase the number of days of sary number of installation vessels, specific financial
operation from an estimated 180 days a year to measures are required. The European Investment
260-290 days. Ideally, these vessels should be able Bank in particular should take the necessary meas-
to carry assembled subsystems, or even a set of ures to support the risk related to these significant
assembled turbines in order to limit the number of investments. Through the European Investment
operations performed at sea. Bank, the necessary financing instruments exist for
renewable energies. As key elements for the deploy-
On the basis of a minimum capacity of 10 turbines, ment of offshore wind power, installation vessels
10 sets of blades and 10 tower sections, 12 instal- should be eligible for such instruments, expanded
lation vessels will be required. Each vessel could accordingly.
A brief introduction to some vessels used in heavy-lift vessels when suited can be used for foun-
turbine installation dation, turbine, and cable installation, such as Eide
(installation at Nysted I, II and Lillegrunden), Rambiz
The tables below present a non-exhaustive list (Beatrice, Thornton Bank), or HLV Svanen (Egmond
of vessels that can be used for foundation and aan Zee, Gunfleets Sand and Rhyl Flats).
turbine installation. In addition to those presented,
Table 6: A selection of vessels and jack-up barges currently active in wind installation with an operating depth of
>30m(41)
JB-114 and
JB-109 SEA Jack Resolution LISA Kraken Titan 2
JB-115
Jack-up barge Seajacks
Owner A2SEA A2SEA MPI Vroon SMIT
NV int
Max 35 with leg
Operation depth 50m 35m 50m 50m 40m 50m
extensions
Crane max. 280t 600t 300t 600t 280t 700t 180t
Self Self
Self
Jack-up propelled Jack-up crane Jack-up ropelled
Configuration Jack-up barge propelled
barge jack-up ship barge jack-up
vessel
barge barge
160 38 60
Accommodation 50 incl. crew Max 60 160 optional na
optional standard optional
The MPI Resolution and the Kraken are the only dedi- currently working in the oil and gas sector. The Kraken
cated turbine installation vessels currently capable of is to return to wind installation shortly and is to be
working at more than 30m water depth. The Kraken is joined by a new sister ship.
Table 7: Selection of vessels currently active in wind turbine installation with an operating depth of <30m
Sea Energy and Sea Power are the original turbine in- though optimised for wind, is not self propelling.
stallation vessels used at Horns Rev 1. The Excalibur,
(41)
The Bard Wind Lift vessel is not included as this will be used by BARD Engineering themselves.
Wind
Attribute Adventure Discover Shamal Scirocco Inwind Gaoh Blue Ocean
Carrier
Seajacks Seajacks Wind
Owner MPI MPI Inwind Gaoh
Int Int carrier
Operation depth 40m 40m 40m 40m na na 40m 60m
Crane max. 1,000t 1,000t 700t 200t na na 1,600t 1,200t
52 incl.
120 incl. 60 incl. 121 incl.
Accommodation Max 120 crew na na na
crew crew crew
Awaiting
In service Q1 2011 Q3 2011 na na na na Q3 2011
finance
Table 9: Vessel availability (for European offshore wind installation) by type of application
Future innovative installation vessels Figure 33: Blue Ocean Ships multiple carrier concept
Such vessels are currently under development, such A number of specially adapted ports is critical for
as the concepts illustrated in Figures 32 and 33. A supplying the offshore market. These facilities should
market visibility over five years is required to secure possess deep water and reinforced quaysides to take
the financing. In the current financial situation, the the large weight of turbines, and large storage areas
financing of these major supply chain components is with low premium fees and suitable space to move
problematic. foundations and cranes.
Figure 32: Example of the Gaoh concept. This boat Within the next 10 years, manufacturers will have
is designed to lift 18 3.6 MW turbines in 45m depth, moved close to or located outlets at port facili-
including seabed penetration ties, as is the case in Bremerhaven (see Showcase:
Bremerhaven’s success story on p.60). In the near
future, the Bremerhaven facilities will produce 1 GW
of offshore wind turbines every year. The success
of Bremerhaven is built on a strong political push
for economic diversification, such as an integrated
approach towards offshore wind energy: this approach
is based on a strong manufacturing capacity, testing
facilities, demonstration sites, research and training
facilities, and a dedicated harbour. Such an integrated
approach enables offshore wind turbines to be tested
and demonstrated in near-offshore conditions, manu-
factured on site, and shipped directly to the offshore
site. If this development continues then large trans-
port and installation vessels could collect foundations
and turbines directly from a manufacturing facility
quayside and install them directly.
Source: Ole Steen Knudsen AS.
Harbour requirements
The objective of DOWNVInD (Distant Offshore Windfarms with No Visual Impact in Deepwater) is to make the step change in tech-
(42)
niques, technologies and processes needed to enable the development of large capacity windfarms offshore in deep water
(http://www.downvind.com).
Existing facilities
(43)
UK Ports and offshore wind Siemens´Perspective, Presentation by Chris Ehlers, MBA, MD Renewables Division, Siemens plc - 30
March 2009.
(44)
UK Department of Energy and Climate Change. ‘UK Offshore Wind Ports Prospectus’.
Bremerhaven has attracted half of the €500 million The industrial development is supported by research
invested in offshore wind power development along the facilities such as Deutsche Windguard, which oper-
German North Sea coastal region during the past years. ates one of the largest wind tunnels in the world,
Its economy, based on shipping, shipbuilding, and a with special acoustical optimisation for rotor blades.
commercial fishery faced a strong economic downturn Another example is the Fraunhofer Institute, which
in the 1990s. In the early 2000s, the local authorities operates a new rotor blade test facility for blades up
evaluated possible means of economic diversification. to 70m long. In future this blade testing capability
The historical strengths of this area included compre- will be expanded to include 100m long blades.
hensive maritime technology know-how and a skilled
workforce specialised in shipbuilding, heavy machinery Specific support was provided for wind turbine
design and manufacture. Offshore wind energy was demonstration, with fast and streamlined permit-
chosen as an alternative development. ting processes (6 weeks for the Multibrid M5000
prototype). Today five 5 MW turbines (four Multibrid
So far, Bremerhaven has attracted (see Figure 35): M5000s and one REpower 5M) are demonstrated
• two offshore wind turbine manufacturers REpower within the Bremerhaven city limits, with specific foun-
and Multibrid; dations designed for offshore implantations.
• two onshore wind turbine manufacturers,
PowerWind and Innovative wind; The success of Bremerhaven is said(46) to be due
• powerBlades, which is manufacturing blades up to a clear and integrated industrial strategy, public
to 61.5m long for REpower 5 and 6 MW turbines; ownership of land, and significant clustering of compe-
• WeserWind Offshore Construction weorgsmarien- tencies. Bremerhaven’s companies have already
hütte, specialised in the design and manufacturing created some 700 new jobs in the past three years,
of heavy steel offshore foundation structures. this is expected to rise to 1,000–1,200. In order to
It has designed the tripod support structures continue this growth, these established and newer
for Multibrid turbines, the jacket-foundations for companies require new workers in both blue and
REpower, and tripods for BARD Engineering. white collar positions. Dedicated training schemes
were put in place internally in the companies them-
Regarding the harbour’s facilities, an additional selves, through the Fachhochschule Bremerhaven,
terminal is planned for 2011. This terminal will be or the co-operation between the technical universi-
capable of directly handling large, heavy and bulky ties of Oldenburg, Bremen and Hannover, involved in
components, and/or complete assemblies – like ForWind, or the Bremerhaven Economic Development
nacelles weighing over 250 tonnes and large rotor Company through the POWER Cluster project(47).
blades with lengths of 61.5 metres and up.
Fraunhofer CWMT
rotor blade test
facility (2008) Rotor blade joint venture
Produktion facility WeserWind Railroad
River Weser Repower Systems AG
32 m Locks GmbH Offshore Construction Abelong & Rasmussen
Georgsmarienhuttle (option) (Start 2008)
Multibrid Production
hall for M5000 B71 3 km
(Existing) to Motorway
Tower production
(reservation)
Heavy load quay
As discussed in this chapter, offshore manufacturing • aquaculture of raw materials for food, energy and
capacities are likely to be increasingly located near the materials;
harbour facilities, in order to facilitate transport and • shelter in emergency situations;
installation, in particular for large machines. • recreation (yachting marina);
• ‘gas-to-wire’ units;
New concepts are emerging for servicing the future • logistics centre for the fishing sector;
offshore wind farms, such as the Dutch ‘harbour at sea’ • coastguard service;
concept. This concept is currently being developed to • lifeboat service;
service the future large offshore arrays implemented • harbour for offshore.
far from shore. Such multi-purpose platforms could Source: We@Sea
allow sailing times to be reduced for installation and
maintenance. They could also allow host crews and Figure 36: Harbour at Sea concept. Courtesy of
technicians on site, spare parts storage, and provide We@Sea
for offshore installation of transformer stations.
Photo: Elsam
Future trends in manufacturing for the offshore • the predominant offshore market is planned for
wind industry the North and Baltic Seas in the short to medium
terms. Countries in this area can expect to reap
• Production of offshore wind turbines can be the benefits of offshore wind development.
expected to remain in the established clusters
in the short term as a stable and reliable supply Bremerhaven has attracted a large number of offshore
chain is in place; players due to its integrated approach towards
• as offshore machines increase in size, more manu- offshore wind energy(48) (see Harbour section on p.58).
facturers will be relocated directly to or close A similar trend may emerge in Dutch and UK ports.
to harbour facilities to ease transportation of The current schemes will however not be sufficient
machines and delivery of components; to supply the necessary number of workers to deliver
• as offshore foundations increase in size and 40 GW offshore wind by 2020, as the market already
complexity they will be built closer to offshore wind faces shortages of project managers and electrical
sites; engineers in particular.
• as offshore installations increase, a large number
of offshore-ready personnel will be needed for the In this chapter, some of the major cost drivers of
installation and later for the O&M of the offshore offshore wind energy were addressed: turbine supply,
wind farms; available substructures, vessels and harbours. Cost
• independent offshore O&M companies will emerge reductions for the offshore wind energy sector will be
as soon as the market is large enough to support brought about above all from higher market volumes
them; and a more established track record from industry.
Bremerhaven has put nine separate initiatives in place to encourage offshore wind turbine manufacturers to relocate there.
(48)
Main Challenges
Photo: E.ON
Wind energy is one of six “European Industrial through the development of advanced measure-
Initiatives” proposed by the European Commission to ment techniques and systems, and developing a
accelerate innovation and deployment of strategically high resolution offshore wind atlas;
important technology. These initiatives are intended to • next generation of wind turbines: developing the
facilitate European leadership in energy technologies. next generation of offshore wind turbines, including
exploring concepts of very large scale turbines in
The offshore wind energy resource will never become the 10-20 MW range; and optimising manufac-
a limiting factor. There is enough energy over the seas turing processes and developing the necessary
of Europe to meet total European electricity demand test facilities;
several times over. In a recent study, the European • manufacturing: supporting the take-off of offshore
Environment Agency (EEA) estimates the technical by developing the necessary substructure concepts
potential of offshore wind energy in the EU to be and corresponding manufacturing processes and
30,000 TWh annually. The European Commission capacities, including boats and harbours; devel-
estimates total EU electricity demand of between oping standard and replicable installation and
4,279 TWh and 4,408 TWh in 2030. operation processes; improving knowledge of the
physical environment to reduce development risks
It would require eight areas of 100 km times 100 and uncertainty;
km (10,000 km2.) to meet all of the EU’s electricity • maritime spatial planning: developing spatial
demand, or less than 2% of Europe’s sea area not planning instruments, in particular offshore, to
including the Atlantic. The combined area of the facilitate the planning of the future offshore wind
North, Baltic and Irish Seas and the English Channel energy developments. A foreseen benefit of mari-
is more than 1,300,000 km2. The Mediterranean is time spatial planning is to provide guarantees to
an additional 2,500,000 km2. the supply chain on the future market volumes
at European level. Therefore, investments in the
Although the offshore wind energy resource will never corresponding manufacturing capacities, harbours,
become a limiting factor, it will be a challenge to boats, testing capacities, or human resources
develop a new offshore wind industry in the EU. Some could be performed in advance, while providing
of the main challenges are: guarantees to investors, lowering the risk, and
potentially the cost of capital;
• wind measurements and characteristics: acquiring • personnel: making sure a sufficient number of
more detailed knowledge of the wind on complex people are trained to supply the demand of the
structures for improving wind turbine designs; gath- offshore market.
ering detailed knowledge of wind characteristics