Professional Documents
Culture Documents
130 E. Meiburg and C.-Y. Chen: High-Accuracy Implicit Finite-Difference Simulations SPE Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, June 2000
gered array of point sources and sinks arranged in the quarter should be mentioned that the crucial step in demonstrating the
five-spot configuration. The corresponding velocity field can be feasibility of high-accuracy finite-difference algorithms for reser-
evaluated on the basis of the results provided by voir modeling lies in the implicit solution of the concentration
Morel-Seytoux,37,38 and also Muskat,39 who derives the following equation, as opposed to the Poisson equation.
expression for the velocity potential: Potential Velocity Field. For reasons that will become clear dur-
共 x,y 兲 ⫽
1
4
ln 冉
1⫺cn 2 xcn 2 y
cn 2 x⫹cn 2 y
. 冊 共10兲
ing the discussion of the solution procedure for the convection-
diffusion equation, it is useful to avoid the appearance of singu-
larities in the velocity components. For this purpose, we spread
Alternatively, approximate analytical expressions can be con- the effect of the point source and the point sink out over a small
structed to any desired accuracy, based on the relations provided but finite area, by assuming a Gaussian distribution of the diver-
by Lamb40 for a single, infinite, row of sources.41 By using these gence characterized by a core size . Typically, our test simula-
analytically available expressions for the potential component of tions employed ⭐0.05. The radial velocity v near such a
the streamfunction pot and its derivatives, any inaccuracy related ‘‘Gaussian source’’ is
to the existence of the singularities can be avoided, yielding a
much more accurate representation of the flow near the injection 1 2 2
v⫽ 共 1⫺e ⫺ r / 兲 . 共17兲
and production wells. Furthermore, the closed-form solution of r
the potential flow component will aid in eliminating grid orienta-
The divergence due to the finite-source size is
tion effects.14,15,42 Since the Laplacian of the potential stream-
function component vanishes, we obtain 2 ⫺r 2 / 2
⑀ ⫽“•u⫽ e . 共18兲
ⵜ 2 rot ⫽⫺ , 共11兲 2
⫽ pot ⫹ rot , 共12兲 It should be pointed out that this smearing out of the source will
have negligible effect on the flow as long as the size of the source
where rot is the rotational component of the streamfunction. The is smaller than the front radius. By adding to the above potential
symmetry boundary conditions at the sides are velocity field the effect of the local Gaussian spreading near 共0,0兲
x⫽0,1:c x ⫽0, ⫽0, rot ⫽0, k x ⫽0, 共13兲 and 共1,1兲, we obtain the final form of the potential velocity field
for the quarter five-spot geometry. Notice that the finite size of all
y⫽0,1:c y ⫽0, ⫽0, rot ⫽0, k y ⫽0. 共14兲 other sources and sinks can be neglected, since they are many core
sizes away.
Suitable initial conditions can be specified, for example, as
Spatial Discretization. The spatial discretization of the govern-
共 x,t⫽t i 兲 ⫽ pot 共 x兲 , 共15兲 ing equations is based on the compact finite-difference schemes
c 共 x,t⫽t i 兲 ⫽c 0 共 x兲 , 共16兲 presented by Lele.35 The evaluation of the first derivatives con-
tained in the convection terms is performed as follows: When they
where c 0 (x) is taken from the one-dimensional similarity solu- appear explicitly, we employ the sixth-order formulation
tions provided by Tan and Homsy43 for radial source flow. It
should be noted that, in contrast to rectilinear or pure radial flow, f i⫹2 ⫺ f i⫺2 f i⫹1 ⫺ f i⫺1
⬘ ⫹ f i⬘ ⫹ ␣ 1 f i⫹1
␣ 1 f i⫺1 ⬘ ⫽b 1 ⫹a 1 , 共19兲
the quarter five-spot pattern does not allow for a one-dimensional 4⌬ 2⌬
base state, from which a more complex flow would then evolve
through the development of instabilities. with
␣ 1 ⫽1/3, a 1 ⫽14/9, b 1 ⫽1/9. 共20兲
Computational Approach Here, ⌬ indicates the mesh size, which is identical in the x and y
While the spatial discretization will be based on compact finite directions. For reasons that will become clear in the discussion of
differences, the temporal discretization has to be chosen carefully the time-stepping scheme, we apply a fourth-order accurate dis-
as well. The traditional use of explicit methods, applied, for ex- cretization when the convection terms appear implicitly. In this
ample, by Tan and Homsy31 for rectilinear displacements, has case
considerable drawbacks for the quarter five-spot flow. The reason
lies in the singularities at the well locations, near which the fluid ␣ 1 ⫽2/11, a 1 ⫽16/11, b 1 ⫽⫺1/11. 共21兲
velocities are orders of magnitude larger than in the center of the In order to compute the second derivatives of the diffusion terms,
domain. For example, on a 1,0242 grid for a two-dimensional we apply the sixth-order formulation
simulation, the magnitude of the velocities will vary by O(103 )
between the gridpoints nearest to the wells and those at the center f i⫹2 ⫺2 f i ⫹ f i⫺2
⬙ ⫹ f i⬙ ⫹ ␣ f i⫹1
␣ f i⫺1 ⬙ ⫽b 2
of the computational domain. For explicit schemes, these small 4⌬ 2
regions near the wells consequently determine the maximum al-
lowable time step as a result of stability restrictions in terms of a f i⫹1 ⫺2 f i ⫹ f i⫺1
⫹a 2 , 共22兲
Courant-Fredrichs-Levy number. These problems can be over- ⌬2
come by employing an implicit computational approach for the
with
concentration equation, as will be described in detail below.
The elliptic Poisson equation for the determination of the ␣ 2 ⫽2/11, a 2 ⫽12/11, b 2 ⫽3/11. 共23兲
streamfunction from the vorticity distribution can be solved as
well using compact finite differences, in conjunction with a split- The discretization of the right-hand side of the vorticity equation
ting technique or a fast matrix inversion scheme. As a result, the is uniformly performed by means of the sixth-order compact
present numerical approach is applicable also to nonperiodic finite-difference expressions. At the boundaries, the relevant odd
boundaries, e.g., see Refs. 44 and 45. However, as a result of or even symmetry conditions dictated by the physical problem are
splitting the streamfunction into a rotational and an irrotational applied, respectively, so that the order of accuracy does not de-
component, the governing system of equations and boundary con- crease.
ditions for the quarter five-spot pattern can be solved more effi- Implicit Time Stepping. To overcome the limitations of explicit
ciently on the basis of fast Fourier transform methods. Conse- schemes, and in order to achieve second-order accuracy in time,
quently, for the present quarter five-spot geometry we opt for this we base our numerical solution of the concentration equation on
approach, although standard finite-difference algorithms for the an alternating-direction-implicit procedure.46 This approach splits
solution of the Poisson equation are available and can easily re- the full time step ⌬t into two half steps of size ⌬t/2. During the
place the present spectral module for more complex geometries. It first half step, the convection and diffusion terms in the x direc-
E. Meiburg and C.-Y. Chen: High-Accuracy Implicit Finite-Difference Simulations SPE Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, June 2000 131
tion are treated implicitly, while those in the y direction are dealt
with explicitly. During the second half step, the roles are reversed,
so that now the y direction is implicit while the x direction is
explicit. The source term is treated implicitly during both half
steps.
With the spatial discretization in the form of compact finite
differences as described above, we obtain the following system of
semidiscrete equations for the first half step:
c i,*j ⫺c i,n j
⫽⫺ 共 uc 兲 x 兩 i,*j ⫺ 共 v c 兲 y 兩 i,n j ⫹ ⑀ i, j c i,*j
⌬t/2
1 1
⫹ c 兩* ⫹ c 兩n ,
N Pe xx i, j N Pe y y i, j
* ⫺c i⫹1,j
c i⫹1,j n
* ⫺ 共 v c 兲 y 兩 i⫹1,j
⫽⫺ 共 uc 兲 x 兩 i⫹1,j n
⫹ ⑀ i⫹1,j c i⫹1,j
*
⌬t/2
1 1
⫹ c 兩* ⫹ c 兩n ,
N Pe xx i⫹1,j N Pe y y i⫹1,j
* ⫺c i⫺1,j
n Fig. 1–Maximum vorticity value max in the flow field as a func-
c i⫺1,j
⫽⫺ 共 uc 兲 x 兩 i⫺1,j
* ⫺ 共 v c 兲 y 兩 i⫺1,j
n
⫹ ⑀ i⫺1,j c i⫺1,j
* tion of time for R Ä5 and N Pe Ä400. Excellent agreement is ob-
⌬t/2 served between the growth rate of the simulation and the alge-
braic growth rate predicted by Tan and Homsy „see Ref. 43…,
1 1 shown as a dotted line.
⫹ c 兩* ⫹ c 兩n .
N Pe xx i⫺1,j N Pe y y i⫺1,j
Here, n and * denote evaluation at the old and intermediate time
placements in homogeneous porous media provides an ideal op-
levels, respectively. These equations can then be combined in or-
portunity for comparison, since in the neighborhood of the injec-
der to apply the compact finite-difference formulation. The result-
tion well the quarter five-spot flow is nearly identical to a radial
ing system of equations is
source flow. For R⫽5, i.e., an unfavorable mobility ratio of 148.4,
uc 兩 i⫺2,j
* 冉 b1
⫹
b2
4⌬x 4N Pe ⌬x 2 u i⫺2,j
⫹uc 兩 i⫺1,j
*
a1
2⌬x冊 冉 the authors provide both the algebraic growth rate and the
wave-number n max 共number of fingers around the azimuth兲 of
maximum growth as a function of N Pe . Specifically, when apply-
⫹
a2
⫺
2␣
N Pe ⌬x 2 u i⫺1,j ⌬tu i⫺1,j
⫹
␣⑀ i⫺1,j
u i⫺1,j 冊 ing linear theory for the asymptotic limit N Pe →⬁ to N Pe ⫽400,
the authors obtain ⬇27 and n max⬇60. After an initial transient
phase the present quarter five-spot simulation for R⫽5 and N Pe
⫹uc 兩 i,*j ⫺ 冉 b2
⫺
2a 2
⫺
2
⫹
⑀ i, j
2N Pe ⌬x 2 u i, j N Pe ⌬x 2 u i, j ⌬tu i, j u i, j 冊 ⫽400 共5122 grid, ⌬t⫽10⫺5 兲 shows a distinct region of algebraic
growth, as can be seen from the data for the vorticity maximum
max presented in Fig. 1. The slope corresponding to the growth
⫹uc 兩 i⫹1,j
* ⫺ 冉 a1
⫹
a2
⫺
2␣
2⌬x N Pe ⌬x 2 u i⫹1,j ⌬tu i⫹1,j
⫹
␣⑀ i⫹1,j
u i⫹1,j 冊 rate predicted by linear stability theory is indicated as well, and
visual inspection shows excellent agreement. By counting the
冉 冊
number of fingers emerging in the quarter five-spot flow, we ob-
b1 b2 tain n max⬇48– 56, which again indicates very good agreement.
⫹uc 兩 i⫹2,j
* ⫺ ⫹ This comparison with linear stability theory indicates that the ef-
4⌬x 4N Pe ⌬x 2 u i⫹2,j
fects of diffusion are properly simulated, so that the correct diffu-
2␣ n 2 n 2␣ n sive cutoff scale is obtained. The requirement to accurately repro-
⫽⫺ c ⫺ c ⫺ c duce the instability growth rate and the wave number of maximum
⌬t i⫺1,j ⌬t i, j ⌬t i⫹1,j
growth also serves as the main criterion to establish that the flow
␣ field is represented by a sufficiently fine grid. If the grid spacing
⫹ ␣ 共 v c 兲 y 兩 i⫺1,j
n
⫹ 共 v c 兲 y 兩 i,n j ⫹ ␣ 共 v c 兲 y 兩 i⫹1,j
n
⫺ c 兩n were too coarse, excessive numerical diffusion would be gener-
N Pe y y i⫺1,j
ated, which would affect the growth rate as well as the wave
1 ␣ number of the instability.
⫺ c y y 兩 i,n j ⫺ c 兩n . A major concern in the numerical simulation of unstable
N Pe N Pe y y i⫹1,j
porous-media displacements is the issue of grid orientation ef-
For the second half step, we obtain a corresponding set of equa- fects. For a careful recent analysis of this topic and a review of the
tions. This scheme has a formal accuracy of O(⌬t 2 ) in time, pertinent literature, see Ref. 42. The authors identify as the under-
combined with O(⌬x 6 ) for the diffusion terms. The convection lying cause for grid orientation effects the anisotropic nature of
terms are discretized with O(⌬x 6 ) when explicit, and with numerical diffusion introduced by discrete finite-difference opera-
O(⌬x 4 ) when implicit. tors. As a result, grid orientation effects are shown to persist as
long as the numerical diffusion is comparable to or larger than the
Validation physical diffusion, which is the case for most of the reservoir
Rigorous validation represents an important step in establishing simulations reported in the literature. Our above comparison with
the accuracy and convergence properties of a novel numerical linear stability results, on the other hand, demonstrates that due to
approach. A popular test in the field of porous-media flows con- the high accuracy of the present numerical technique, the amount
sists of a comparison with the analytical results obtained by of artificial diffusion introduced by the discretization is much
Morel-Seytoux37,38 for unit mobility ratio flows. However, such a smaller than the physical diffusion. If substantial numerical diffu-
comparison cannot show whether the complex coupling between sion were present, an effectively lower value of N Pe would result,
concentration and viscosity variations and the velocity field is which should affect both the algebraic growth rate and the number
represented accurately. Consequently, rigorous testing requires a of emerging fingers. The excellent agreement between simulation
more challenging test case. In this regard, the linear stability results and linear theory thus implies that grid orientation effects
analysis by Tan and Homsy43 of radially symmetric miscible dis- are not a concern for the present simulations. The comparison
132 E. Meiburg and C.-Y. Chen: High-Accuracy Implicit Finite-Difference Simulations SPE Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, June 2000
Fig. 2–Homogeneous displacement with R Ä2.5 and N Pe
Ä2,000. Shown are concentration contours at times 0.07, 0.1,
0.16, and 0.24. After the formation of many fingers during the
initial stages, nonlinear interactions lead to a reduction in their
number. Shortly before breakthrough, the acceleration of the Fig. 3–Temporal evolution of the mixing length as a function of
dominant finger leads to a renewed generation of small scales. N Pe for R Ä2.5. - * -: N Pe Ä200, - x -: N Pe Ä400, -䊊-: N Pe Ä800,
-¿-: N Pe Ä1,200, and -"-: N Pe Ä2,000. Two solid lines represent
the slopes of 0.5 and 1.
with linear stability theory thus represents a very useful tool for
obtaining information about the presence of numerical diffusion,
and it should serve as a universal test case for direct numerical of the displacement process. For unstable rectilinear displace-
simulations of miscible quarter five-spot displacements. ments, this is typically done by analyzing the temporal evolution
Results for Representative Flow Fields. Homogeneous of the mixing length L mix , which tracks the distance between the
Displacement. In the following, a representative calculation for 0.1 and 0.9 contours of the spanwise-averaged concentration pro-
R⫽2.5 and N Pe ⫽2,000 in a homogeneous environment is de- file. It is well established that for small initial perturbations the
scribed. It should be emphasized that the simulation results given early stages are dominated by diffusion or dispersion, respec-
below merely serve to illustrate the capabilities of the numerical tively, so that L mix grows proportionally to t 1/2. Once finite-
approach. They are not intended to provide an in-depth analysis of amplitude fingers appear, the evolution of L mix becomes increas-
the physical mechanisms at work, as such an analysis is provided ingly dominated by convective effects, and its average growth is
elsewhere already.47-49 The simulation starts at t i ⫽0.005 with a approximately proportional to t. 31,50-55 It is not immediately ob-
nearly radially symmetric front. A very small asymmetry is im- vious how an equivalent mixing length can be defined for quarter
posed on the concentration front radius in order to break the arti- five-spot flows. Averaging over the azimuthal direction would be
ficial symmetry about the diagonal. Vigorous fingering with the appropriate for radially symmetric source flows, but not for the
correct growth rate and the number of fingers predicted by linear present, spatially varying base flow. Even taking the average
stability theory sets in even without this perturbation, however, along equipotential lines of the constant mobility irrotational flow
the fingering pattern would stay symmetric with respect to the does not give a meaningful quantity, due to the mobility ratio
diagonal of the quarter five-spot domain. Concentration contours, dependence of the base flow. In the following, we will attempt to
computed on a 1,0242 grid, are shown in Fig. 2 for times t provide a global characterization of quarter five-spot flows in
⫽0.07, 0.1, 0.16, and 0.24. During the early, nominally nearly terms of the mixing area, defined as the area between the 0.1 and
radially symmetric stages, the unstable flow gives rise to numer- 0.9 contours. By dividing this mixing area by the instantaneous
ous small fingers, whose algebraic growth rate and azimuthal perimeter of an equivalent circular area of injected fluid, we then
wave number are again in excellent quantitative agreement with obtain a mixing length whose temporal evolution can be tracked.
linear stability results. Following a period of strong growth, the However, it needs to be kept in mind that this mixing length is
fingers soon reach amplitudes large enough for nonlinear effects still not strictly comparable to the one commonly employed in
to become important. Complex interaction effects between them rectilinear displacements. For example, in the limit of vanishing
reduce their number to O(10), mostly due to shielding and merg- diffusion, the front thickness will tend to zero, and according to
ing events, and in spite of an occasional tip splitting. The remain- our definition, the mixing length will vanish as well, in spite of the
ing fingers continue to interact strongly with each other, in par- presence of vigorous fingering. The rectilinear mixing length defi-
ticular, through partial merging, shielding, and splitting events. In nition, on the other hand, will result in a finite value, due to the
the process, several small islands of resident fluid are formed and averaging process it is based on.
left behind. The fingers near the edges of the domain keep grow- Fig. 3 depicts the development of L mix with time for R⫽2.5,
ing until relatively late times, in spite of the eventual dominance with N Pe as a parameter. During the initial stages and for lower
by those fingers located near the diagonal. The calculation dem- N Pe values, when the nearly radially symmetric displacement is
onstrates the ability of the numerical approach to simulate com- dominated by diffusion, the self-similar solution of the base-flow
plex dynamical events involving strongly disparate length and concentration profile indicates that the front thickness grows pro-
time scales. portionally to t 1/2. Since the perimeter of the injected area grows
It is of interest to employ the detailed information provided by approximately like t 1/2 as well, the overall mixing area exhibits
the above simulations in order to characterize the global features growth proportional to t. The mixing length, calculated along the
E. Meiburg and C.-Y. Chen: High-Accuracy Implicit Finite-Difference Simulations SPE Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, June 2000 133
Fig. 4–Isocontours of the permeability field for the correlation
length L Ä0.02. Lighter areas indicate higher-permeability val-
ues.
134 E. Meiburg and C.-Y. Chen: High-Accuracy Implicit Finite-Difference Simulations SPE Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, June 2000
Fig. 7–Breakthrough recovery data for N Pe Ä400 and R Ä2.5 as
a function of the heterogeneity index H Ä s 2 L .
E. Meiburg and C.-Y. Chen: High-Accuracy Implicit Finite-Difference Simulations SPE Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, June 2000 135
N Pe ⫽ Peclet number 14. Christie, M.A. and Bond, D.J.: ‘‘Detailed Simulation of Unstable Pro-
Q ⫽ source strength cesses in Miscible Flooding,’’ SPERE 共November 1987兲 514; Trans.,
D ⫽ diffusion coefficient AIME, 283.
R ⫽ viscosity parameter 15. Christie, M.A.: ‘‘High-Resolution Simulation of Unstable Flows in
Porous Media,’’ SPERE 共August 1989兲 297; Trans., AIME, 287.
u, v ⫽ velocity components
16. Bratvedt, F. et al.: ‘‘A New Front-Tracking Method for Reservoir
x,y ⫽ spatial directions Simulation,’’ SPERE 共February 1992兲 107.
⫽ streamfunction 17. Fayers, F.J., Blunt, M.J., and Christie, M.A.: ‘‘Comparisons of Em-
⫽ vorticity pirical Viscous Fingering Models and Their Calibration for Hetero-
⫽ radius of Gaussian source, linear growth rate geneous Problems,’’ SPERE 共May 1992兲 195; Trans., AIME, 293.
r ⫽ radial coordinate 18. Christie, M.A., Muggeridge, A.H., and Barley, J.J.: ‘‘3D Simulation
⑀ ⫽ divergence of Viscous Fingering and WAG Schemes,’’ SPERE 共February 1993兲
␣ ,a,b ⫽ numerical coefficients 19; Trans., AIME, 295.
f ⫽ function value 19. Sorbie, K.S., Zhang, H.R., and Tsibulkis, N.B.: ‘‘Linear Viscous Fin-
⌬,⌬x,⌬y ⫽ grid spacing gering: New Experimental Results, Direct Simulation, and the Evalu-
⌬t ⫽ time step ation of Averaged Models,’’ Chem. Eng. Sci. 共1995兲 50, 601.
n ⫽ wave number 20. Zhang, H.R., Sorbie, K.S., and Tsibuklis, N.B.: ‘‘Viscous Fingering
in Five-Spot Experimental Porous Media: New Experimental Results
L mix ⫽ mixing length
and Numerical Simulation,’’ Chem. Eng. Sci. 共1997兲 52, 37.
s ⫽ correlation variance 21. Tchelepi, H.A. and Orr, F.M. Jr.: ‘‘Dispersion, Permeability Hetero-
L,L x ,L y ⫽ correlation lengths geneity, and Viscous Fingering: Acoustic Experimental Observations
H ⫽ heterogeneity index and Particle-Tracking Simulations,’’ Phys. Fluids A 共1993兲 5, 1558.
⫽ potential 22. Leventhal, S.H.: ‘‘The Operator Compact Implicit Method for Reser-
voir Simulation,’’ SPEJ 共June 1980兲 120; Trans., AIME, 269.
Acknowledgments 23. Berger, A.E. et al.: ‘‘Generalized OCI Schemes for Boundary-Layer
Partial support by a NATO Collaborative Research Grant, by the Problems,’’ Math. Comput. 共1980兲 37, 79.
National Science Foundation in the form of an equipment grant, 24. Morton, K.W.: Numerical Solution of Convection-Diffusion Prob-
and by the Chevron Petroleum Technology Company is gratefully lems, Chapman and Hall, London 共1996兲.
acknowledged. We, furthermore, thank the NSF-sponsored San 25. Bell, J.B., Dawson, C.N., and Shubin, G.R.: ‘‘An Unsplit, Higher-
Diego Supercomputer Center for providing computing time. Order Godunov Method for Scalar Conservation Laws in Multiple
Dimensions,’’ J. Comput. Phys. 共1988兲 74, 1.
26. Bell, J.B., Colella, P., and Trangenstein, J.A.: ‘‘Higher-Order Go-
References dunov Methods for General Systems of Hyperbolic Conservation
1. Peaceman, D.W. and Rachford, H.H. Jr.: ‘‘Numerical Calculation of
Laws,’’ J. Comput. Phys. 共1989兲 82, 362.
Multidimensional Miscible Displacement,’’ SPEJ 共December 1962兲
27. Blunt, M., and Rubin, B.: ‘‘Implicit Flux-Limiting Schemes for Pe-
327; Trans., AIME, 225.
troleum Reservoir Simulation,’’ J. Comput. Phys. 共1992兲 102, 194.
2. Garder, A.O., Peaceman, D.W., and Pozzi, A.L. Jr.: ‘‘Numerical Cal-
28. Rubin, B. and Edwards, M.: ‘‘Extension of the TVD Midpoint
culation of Multidimensional Miscible Displacement by the Method
Scheme to Higher-Order Accuracy,’’ paper SPE 25265 presented at
of Characteristics,’’ SPEJ 共March 1964兲 26; Trans., AIME, 231.
3. Russell, T.F. and Wheeler, M.F.: ‘‘Finite-Element and Finite- the 1993 SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, New Orleans, 28
Difference Methods for Continuous Flows in Porous Media,’’ The February–3 March.
Mathematics of Reservoir Simulation, R.E. Ewing 共ed.兲, SIAM, Phila- 29. Liu, J., Pope, G.A., and Sepehrnoori, K.: ‘‘A High-Resolution, Fully
delphia, Pennsylvania 共1983兲 35. Implicit Method for Enhanced Oil Recovery Simulation,’’ paper SPE
4. Douglas, J. Jr. et al.: ‘‘Self-Adaptive Finite Element Simulation of 29098 presented at the 1995 SPE Symposium on Reservoir Simula-
Miscible Displacement in Porous Media,’’ Comput. Methods Appl. tion, San Antonio, Texas, 12–15 February.
Mech. Eng. 共1984兲 47, 131. 30. Batycky, R.P., Blunt, M.J., and Thiele, M.R.: ‘‘A 3D Field Scale
5. Bell, J.B., Shubin, G.R., and Wheeler, M.F.: ‘‘Analysis of a New Streamline Simulator With Gravity and Changing Well Conditions,’’
Method for Computing the Flow of Miscible Fluids in a Porous Me- paper SPE 36726 presented at the 1996 SPE Annual Technical Con-
dium,’’ SIAM (Soc. Ind. Appl. Math.) J. Numer. Anal. 共1985兲 22, ference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, 6–9 October.
1041. 31. Tan, C.T. and Homsy, G.M.: ‘‘Simulation of Nonlinear Viscous Fin-
6. Darlow, B.L., Ewing, R.E., and Wheeler, M.F.: ‘‘Mixed Finite- gering in Miscible Displacement,’’ Phys. Fluids 共1998兲 31, 1330.
Element Method for Miscible Displacement Problems in Porous Me- 32. Zimmerman, W.B. and Homsy, G.M.: ‘‘Three-Dimensional Viscous
dia,’’ SPEJ 共August 1984兲 391; Trans., AIME, 277. Fingering: A Numerical Study,’’ Phys. Fluids A 共1992兲 4, 1901.
7. Ewing, R.E., Russell, T.F., and Wheeler, M.F.: ‘‘Convergence Analy- 33. Rogerson, A. and Meiburg, E.: ‘‘Numerical Simulation of Miscible
sis of an Approximation of Miscible Displacement in Porous Media Displacement Processes in Porous Media Flows Under Gravity,’’
by Mixed Finite Elements and a Modified Method of Characteris- Phys. Fluids A 共1993兲 5, 2644.
tics,’’ Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 共1984兲 47, 73. 34. Gottlieb, D. and Orszag, S.A.: Numerical Analysis of Spectral Meth-
8. Ewing, R.E., Russel, T.F., and Young, L.C.: ‘‘An Anisotropic ods: Theory and Applications, SIAM, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Coarse-Grid Dispersion Model of Heterogeneity and Viscous Finger- 共1977兲.
ing in Five-Spot Miscible Displacement That Matches Experiments 35. Lele, S.K.: ‘‘Compact Finite-Difference Schemes With Spectral-Like
and Fine-Grid Simulations,’’ paper SPE 18441 presented at the 1989 Resolution,’’ J. Comput. Phys. 共1992兲 103, 16.
SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, 6–8 February. 36. Spotz, W.F. and Carey, G.F.: ‘‘High-Order Compact Scheme for the
9. Ewing, R.E. and Wang, H.: ‘‘Eulerian-Lagrangian Localized Adjoint Steady Stream Function Vorticity Equations,’’ Int. J. Numer. Methods
Methods for Variable-Coefficient Advective-Diffusive-Reactive Eng. 共1995兲 38, 3497.
Equations in Groundwater Contaminant Transport,’’ Advances in Op- 37. Morel-Seytoux, H.J.: ‘‘Analytical-Numerical Method in Waterflood-
timization and Numerical Analysis, S. Gomez and J.P. Hennart 共eds.兲, ing Predictions,’’ SPEJ 共September 1965兲 247; Trans., AIME, 234.
Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands 共1994兲 38. Morel-Seytoux, H.J.: ‘‘Unit Mobility Ratio Displacement Calcula-
Vol. 275, 185. tions for Pattern Floods in Homogeneous Medium,’’ SPEJ 共Septem-
10. Wang, H., Ewing, R.E., and Russell, T.F.: ‘‘Eulerian-Lagrangian Lo- ber 1966兲 217; Trans., AIME, 237.
calized Adjoint Methods for Convection-diffusion Equations and 39. Muskat, M.: ‘‘The Flow of Homogeneous Fluids Through Porous
Their Convergence Analysis,’’ IMA J. Numer. Anal. 共1995兲 15, 405. Media,’’ McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York City 共1937兲.
11. Ewing, R.E.: ‘‘Recent Developments in Reservoir Simulation,’’ 40. Lamb, Sir H.: Hydrodynamics, Dover, New York City 共1932兲.
North Sea Oil and Gas Reservoirs, III, J.O. Aasen et al. 共eds.兲, Klu- 41. Chen, C.-Y.: ‘‘Topics in Miscible-Porous-Media Flows,’’ PhD disser-
wer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands 共1994兲 233. tation, U. of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 共1998兲.
12. Ewing, R.E.: ‘‘Multiphase Flows in Porous Media,’’ Advanced Math- 42. Brand, C.W., Heinemann, J.E., and Aziz, K.: ‘‘The Grid Orientation
ematics: Computations and Applications, A.S. Alekseev and N.S. Ba- Effect in Reservoir Simulation,’’ paper SPE 21228 presented at the
khvalov 共eds.兲, NCC Publishers, Novosibirsk, Russia 共1995兲 49. 1991 SPE Symposium on Reservoir Simulation, Anaheim, California,
13. Arbogast, T. et al.: ‘‘Computational Methods for Multiphase Flow 17–20 February.
and Reactive Transport Problems Arising in Subsurface Contaminant 43. Tan, C.T. and Homsy, G.M.: ‘‘Stability of Miscible Displacements in
Remediation,’’ J. Comput. Appl. Math. 共1996兲 74, 19. Porous Media: Radial Source Flow,’’ Phys. Fluids 共1987兲 30, 1239.
136 E. Meiburg and C.-Y. Chen: High-Accuracy Implicit Finite-Difference Simulations SPE Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, June 2000
44. Ruith, M. and Meiburg, E.: ‘‘Miscible Rectilinear Displacements 55. Lenormand, R.: ‘‘Transport Equations for Fluid Displacements in
With Gravity Override. Part 1: Homogeneous Porous Medium,’’ J. Stratified Porous Media: The MHD Model,’’ paper SPE 30797 pre-
Fluid Mech. 共in press兲. sented at the 1995 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,
45. Camhi, E., Meiburg, E., and Ruith, M.: ‘‘Miscible Rectilinear Dis- Dallas, 22–25 October.
placements With Gravity Override, Part 2: Heterogeneous Porous 56. Petitjeans, P. et al.: ‘‘Miscible Quarter Five-Spot Displacements in a
Media,’’ J. Fluid Mech. 共in press兲. Hele-Shaw Cell and the Role of Flow-Induced Dispersion,’’ Phys.
46. Peaceman, D.W. and Rachford, H.H.: ‘‘The Numerical Solution of Fluids 共1999兲 7, 1705.
Parabolic and Elliptic Differential Equations,’’ SIAM J. 共1955兲 3, 28. 57. Shinozuka, M. and Jen, C.-M.: ‘‘Digital Simulation of Random Pro-
47. Chen, C.-Y. and Meiburg, E.: ‘‘Miscible-Porous-Media Displace- cesses and its Applications,’’ J. Sound Vib. 共1972兲 25, 111.
ments in the Quarter Five-Spot Configuration. Part 1: The Homoge-
58. Tan, C.T. and Homsy, G.M.: ‘‘Viscous Fingering With Permeability
neous Case,’’ J. Fluid Mech. 共1998兲 371, 233.
Heterogeneity,’’ Phys. Fluids A 共1992兲 4, 1099.
48. Chen, C.-Y. and Meiburg, E.: ‘‘Miscible-Porous-Media Displace-
ments in the Quarter Five-Spot Configuration. Part 2: Effect of Het- 59. De Wit, A. and Homsy, G.M., ‘‘Viscous Fingering in Periodically
erogeneities,’’ J. Fluid Mech. 共1998兲 371, 269. Heterogeneous Porous Media. I: Formulation and Linear Instability,’’
49. Pankiewitz, C. and Meiburg, E.: ‘‘Miscible-Porous-Media Displace- J. Chem. Phys. 共1997兲 107, 9609.
ments in the Quarter Five-Spot Configuration. Part 3: Nonmonotonic 60. De Wit, A. and Homsy, G.M.: ‘‘Viscous Fingering in Periodically
Viscosity Profiles,’’ J. Fluid Mech. 共1999兲 388, 171. Heterogeneous Porous Media. II: Numerical Simulations,’’ J. Chem.
50. Koval, E.J.: ‘‘A Method for Predicting the Performance of Unstable Phys. 共1997兲 107, 9619.
Miscible Displacement in Heterogeneous Media,’’ SPEJ 共June 1963兲 61. Gelhar, L.W. and Axness, C.L.: ‘‘Three-Dimensional Stochastic
145; Trans., AIME, 228. Analysis of Macrodispersion in Aquifers.’’ Water Resour. Res. 共1983兲
51. Todd, M.R. and Longstaff, W.J.: ‘‘The Development, Testing, and 19, 161.
Application of a Numerical Simulator for Prediction of Miscible
Flood Performance,’’ SPEJ 共December 1972兲 874; Trans., AIME, Eckart Meiburg is a professor in the Dept. of Aerospace and
253.
Mechanical Engineering at the U. of Southern California in Los
52. Araktingi, U.G., and Orr, F.M. Jr.: ‘‘Viscous Fingering in Heteroge-
Angeles. e-mail: eckart@spock.usc.edu. His research interests
neous Porous Media,’’ SPE Advanced Technology Series 共April 1993兲
71. are in the area of computational fluid dynamics. Meiburg
53. Sorbie, K.S. et al.: ‘‘Flow Regimes in Miscible Displacements in holds Diploma and PhD degrees in mechanical engineering
Heterogeneous Correlated Random Fields,’’ paper SPE 24140 pre- from the U. of Karlsruhe, Germany. Ching-Yao Chen is an as-
sented at the 1992 SPE/DOE Symposium on Enhanced Oil Recovery, sistant professor in the Dept. of Mechanical Engineering at Da-
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 22–24 April. Yeh U. in Chang-Hwa, Taiwan. His research interests include
54. Waggoner, J.R., Castillo, J.L., and Lake, L.L.: ‘‘Simulation of EOR computational fluid dynamics and viscous flows. Chen holds a
Processes in Stochastically Generated Permeable Media,’’ SPEFE PhD degree in aerospace engineering from the U. of Southern
共June 1992兲 173; Trans., AIME, 293. California.
E. Meiburg and C.-Y. Chen: High-Accuracy Implicit Finite-Difference Simulations SPE Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, June 2000 137