International Journal of Mechanical and Production

Engineering Research and Development (IJMPERD)

ISSN (P): 2249-6890; ISSN (E): 2249-8001
Vol. 8, Issue 1, Feb 2018, 833-838
© TJPRC Pvt. Ltd

IMPLEMENTATION OF LOW-POWERED MULTI-SENSOR BUOY

SYSTEM FOR COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS

J. S. ASHWIN
Research Scholar, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (Marine), AMET
University, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
ABSTRACT

Marine environments are fundamental to recognize the constraints that decide their condition. Posidonia and
seagrasses apply for impressive work in shielding the coastline from disintegration. In these ranges, numerous creatures
and living beings live and discover the prairie nourishment and the security against predators. It is viewed as a bio-
indicator of the nature of beachfront marine waters. It is vital to screen them and keep up these environmental groups
as spotless as could reasonably be expected. In this paper, we introduce an oceanographic float for Posidonia knolls
checking. It depends on an arrangement of minimal effort sensors which can gather information from water, for
example, temperature, and turbidity and from the climate as temperature, relative mugginess, and precipitation, among
others. The framework is mounted in a float which keeps it segregated to conceivable oxidation issues. Information

Original Article
assembled is prepared to utilize a microcontroller. The system execution is checked keeping in mind the end goal to
guarantee that the information transmission will produce no postponements. This proposition could be utilized to screen
different zones with extraordinary environmental intrigue and for observing and directing aquaculture exercises.

KEYWORDS: Multi-Sensor Buoy, CC2520, Posidonia & WSN

Received: Oct 06, 2017; Accepted: Oct 26, 2017; Published: Jan 30, 2018; Paper Id.: IJMPERDFEB201897

INTRODUCTION

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) investigate works have expanded tremendously as of late because of
the many sorts of uses. WSNs are made out of sensors that sense information from nature and hubs that get the
detected information and process (Shuley & Cella, 2009). Because of their low memory and constrained battery,
hubs can't store a great deal of information, so they should send it. As WSNs can be made out of many centres,
they have to self-sort out in light of various system designs and utilize conventions to convey (Marcos et al., 2011)
(LIAN et al., 2013). These conventions ought to have thought a few perspectives, for example, the vitality
compels, security in information transmission and being tolerant to network disappointments with a specific end
goal to keep up a right system execution (Smithson et al., 2007).

Indeed, even that the significant share of WSNs is created for human applications, the marine applications
are turning into an imperative territory (Shariat-Panahi et al., 2010). Water secures 3/4 of our planet. In the human
effect in seas is winding up plainly more clear. The need of persistent observing of submerged situations can be
secured by utilizing WSNs. Earthbound and submerged WSNs have a few contrasts (Sagadevan et al.). The earth is
submerged WSNs more forceful than in earthbound WSNs, so the conveyed gadgets will require significant
assurance: water disconnection to keep away from consumption and bio-fouling. Since the waves from tidal and
boats can create developments in the current landscape of the mesenchymal stromal cell secretome: a new

www.tjprc.org editor@tjprc.org
834 J.S. Ashwin

paradigm for cell-free regeneration (Konala et al., 2016) the WSNs, the framework must be set up to expect these
developments and changes of areas from its underlying sending. For the most part submerged WSNs are utilized to cover
higher zones than earthbound WSNs the vitality utilization will be higher, and the signs are weakened in the submerged
conditions. Thus, it is imperative to actualize proficient vitality procedures in an investigation of the optical and electrical
properties of tin sulphide thin films (Geetha et al., 2015) information preparing and vitality reaping answers for drag out
the system lifetime and system soundness. What's more, sensor hubs in submerged WSNs are set in a (Venugopal &
Manoharan, 2015) evaluation of mechanical properties are aluminium metal matrix composite for marine applications are
particular place along the water section, so buoyancy and mooring gadgets are required. At long last, the remote
correspondence innovation in earthly WSNs utilize different radio frequencies (Torres et al., 2010); however, in submerged
WSNs the water creates a vital lessening on radio frequencies, so numerous organisations are utilising different
advancements, for example, sound or light. Underwater sensors can be set at the base, at the surface, or at various focuses
along the water section. The detected parameters can change contingent upon the point where the sensors are put and the
goal of the WSN (Karthik et al., 2016).

Buoy-based coastal monitoring systems are appropriate for monitoring and controlling the waters status, as
installation and maintenance are simple to perform and not very costly (Pirenne et al., 2007). Moreover, the technology
used makes it possible to automate the instrumentation and sample-taking and variable adjustment of sampling frequency.
In this way, surface sensor buoys can be deployed in a network to achieve a precise spatial representation of the marine
variables measured (Shuley et al., 2009). There are three possible types of sensor buoy networks depending on how the
sensor nodes are linked:

• Wired buoy networks (Wang et al., 2009).

• Wireless aerial buoy networks linked by radio frequency (Mungle et al., 2002), GPRS or a combination of the
two.

• Underwater buoy networks linked by acoustic waves (Cayirci et al., 2002).

There are references in the literature to infrastructures that combine some of these options. Of the types of the
network described, it is the ones using wireless communication that provide the flexibility needed for optimum data
gathering and control. Thus, sensor buoys can be installed at the locations required by the instrumentation as nodes of a
Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) (Verdone et al., 2009) to make up measurement systems that are large and dense enough
to provide the necessary spatial coverage.

EXISTING SYSTEM

The existing arrangements are for the most part impromptu ones as their outline relies on upon different elements.
For example, the attributes of the marine condition (deep water instead of shallows or seaside tidal ponds, climatic
conditions, and so forth.), the time-size of the organization, the spatial extent of the sending, and the fleeting determination
of information gathering. Due to all these diverse conceivable situations, plans must be re-examined and need to limit the
expenses of arrangement and upkeep of the system.

Impact Factor (JCC): 6.8765 NAAS Rating: 3.11

Implementation of Low-Powered Multi-Sensor Buoy System for Coastal Environments 835

FEATURES AND ITS DESCRIPTIONS

Multisensory Buoy

The buoy comprises a plastic part or buoy which gives adequate lightness to the entire framework and a fibre
structure, which will be responsible for containing all electrical and electronic segments and the battery. The inside of this
arrangement is efficiently open through a little entryway in its extreme side. Besides, the buoy has a longitudinal opening
that crosses the whole question. Inside this opportunity, the sensors are put in non-metallic structures. The sensors are
always submerged in the water because the lightness limit puts the sensors under the waterline over the sensors. There is an
opening to permit the water stream and its trade without issues and to stay away from the cold water. The principal purpose
of finding sensors in this part is to keep them secured against stun and different issues. Our multisensory framework
includes two gatherings of sensors. The first is in charge of gathering meteorological parameters, for example,
precipitation, temperature, relative moistness, and sunlight based radiation. The second gathering of sensors is situated
under the water, and they gather information about water conditions. For our situation, the framework takes estimations of
temperature, saltiness, turbidity, and nearness of fuel. All sensors are associated with a processor fit for catching simple
signs from our sensors, handle them, and remotely send this information to the base station situated at the territory.

Wireless Node

Our remote hub depends on the remote module called CC2520 2.4GHz Range Extender. The CC2520 gadget is a
financially savvy and elite RF front end for low-power and low-voltage 2.4-GHz remote applications. The CC2520 device
is a range extender for all CC25XX 2.4-GHz low-control RF handsets, transmitters, and framework on-chip items from
Texas Instruments as shown in figure 1.

There are a few motivations to utilize this remote module. The principle advantage over existing frameworks is
that it works under the IEEE 802.15.4 standard which makes genuinely modest the buy of these gadgets [3]. Moreover, it is
customised in C dialect which grants incredible adaptability in the advancement of new applications. Furthermore, it offers
an implanted site that can be utilized to see the present qualities accumulated by the sensors. At long last, its little size
makes this gadget perfect for a few applications, for example, native and country observing, agribusiness, creature
checking, indoor observing, or wearable sensors for e-wellbeing applications, among others.

Figure 1: Block Diagram

www.tjprc.org editor@tjprc.org
836 J.S. Ashwin

CONCLUSIONS

In this paper, we have introduced an oceanographic multisensory float which can gauge immeasurably essential
parameters that can influence these characteristic territories. The float depends on a few ease sensors which can gather
information from water and the climate. The information collected by all sensors are prepared to utilize a microcontroller
and put away in a database held on a server. The float is remotely associated with the base station through a remote
module. At long last, the individual sensors, the system operation, and versatile application to accumulate information from
float are tried in a controlled situation.

REFERENCES

1. Shuley N., Cella U. M., Wireless Sensor Networks in Coastal Marine Environments: A Study Case Outcome. 5th International
Workshop on UnderWater Networks; Berkeley, CA, USA. 4–6 November 2009; pp. 1–8.

2. Marcos C., Gilabert J., Umgiesser G., Climate change response of the Mar Menor coastal lagoon (Spain) using a
hydrodynamic finite element model. Shelf Sci. 2011 doi: 10.1016/j. ecss.2011.12.002.

3. LIAN Hai-Yan, YUAN Fei and CHENG En, Embedded System for Acoustic Buoy Location and Tracking, IEEE 9th Conference
on Industrial Electronics and Application, pp.1885 -1888, 2013.

4. Smithson M . J., Pugh J., and Jones D. S. The Use of Ships of Opportunity for Irish Sea-Based Oceanographic Measurements,
Vancouver, Canada. 29 September– 4 October 2007; pp. 1–6.

5. Deepti Shrivastava & M. M. Malik, Synthesization of Cadmium Sulphide Nanocrystals by Wet Chemical Deposition
Technique, International Journal of Nanotechnology and Application (IJNA), Volume 5, Issue 5, November - December 2015,
pp. 11-16

6. Shariat-Panahi S., Gonzalez J., Gomariz S. Development of a control system for an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle.
Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV); Monterey, CA, USA. pp. 1– 3, September 2010;

7. Sagadevan, S., Podder, J. and Das, I., Structural, morphological, optical and electrical properties of PbSe thin films grown by
chemical bath deposition.

8. Konala, V. B. R., Mamidi, M. K., Bhonde, R., Das, A. K., Pochampally, R. and Pal, R., The current landscape of the
mesenchymal stromal cell secretome: a new paradigm for cell-free regeneration, Cytotherapy, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp.13-24, 2016.

9. Geetha, G., Priya, M. and Sagadevan, S., Investigation of the Optical and Electrical Properties of Tin Sulfide Thin Films,
Chalcogenide Letters, Vol. 12, No. 11, pp.609-617, 2015.

10. Venugopal, A., Manoharan, N., Evaluation of mechanical properties aluminium metal matrix composite for marine
applications, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 10(13), pp. 5557-5559, 2015.

11. Torres R., Soto F., Sánchez P., Albaladejo C., Iborra A., López J. A., Wireless sensor networks for oceanographic monitoring:
A systematic review, Sensors. 2010;7: pp-6948–6968.

12. Ratnesh Tiwari, Vikas Dubey & Raunak Kumar Tamrakar, Copper Doped Cadmium Sulphide (CdS: Cu) Quantum Particles:
Topological, Morphology and Photoluminescence Studies, International Journal of Industrial Engineering & Technology
(IJIET), Volume 3, Issue 3, July - August 2013, pp. 67-74

13. Pirenne B., Best M. M. R., Barnes C. R., Bornhold B. D., Juniper S. K., Phibbs P., The NEPTUNE Project—A Cabled Ocean
Observatory in the NE Pacific: Overview, Challenges and Scientific Objectives for the Installation and Operation of Stage I in
Canadian waters. Proceedings of the Underwater Technology and Workshop on Scientific Use of Submarine Cables and

Impact Factor (JCC): 6.8765 NAAS Rating: 3.11

Implementation of Low-Powered Multi-Sensor Buoy System for Coastal Environments 837

Related Technologies, Tokyo, Japan. April 2007; pp. 308–313.

14. Shuley N., Cella U. M., Johnstone R., Wireless Sensor Networks in Coastal Marine Environments: A Study Case Outcome,
Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on UnderWater Networks; Berkeley, CA, USA. November 2009; pp. 1–8.

15. Wang Z., Xia H., Jiang P., He Z., Design of a water environment monitoring system based on wireless sensor
networks, Sensors. 2009, pp-6411–6434.

16. Mungle C. S., Ong K. G., Yang X., Dreschel W. R., Zeng K., Grimes C. A., Design of a wireless sensor network for long-term,
in-situ monitoring of an aqueous environment, Sensors. 2002, pp-455–472.

17. Cayirci E., Su W., Akyildiz I. F., Sankarasubramaniam Y., Wireless sensor networks: A survey. Comput. Netw. 2002, pp-393–
422.

18. Verdone R., Conti A., Buratti C., Dardari D., An overview of wireless sensor networks technology and evolution,
Sensors. 2009; pp-6869–6896.

19. S. Karthik, S. Dineshkumar, Recognition and Tracking of Moving Object in Underwater Sonar Images, International Journal
of MC Square Scientific Research, 2016, Vol. 8, No.1, pp-93-98.

www.tjprc.org editor@tjprc.org