Professional Documents
Culture Documents
20%
42%
ORGANIC FOOD STORE
10% SUPERMARKET
FARMERS MARKET
7% 6% HEALTH FOOD STORE
ONLINE RETAILER
Figure 11. Preferred retail outlets of Australian organic consumers (Nourish Foods 2005).
retail sales. Exports were assumed up to about 80% for some processed
to be higher than the 10% indicated, groceries. With these assumptions it
and were calculated at 15% of farm is conservatively estimated that retail
gate sales. A mark-up of 1.9 was used sales of organic produce in Australia
(Wynen 2003), although a higher value are about $623 million. Exports in 2007
may be more realistic where higher were estimated to be $34.7 million and
premiums are available or with greater imports considerably more at $231
value-adding to raw products. Imports million. Given the higher number of
were estimated to be 40% of organic smaller respondents, it is probable that
retail sales based on information farm-gate sales and possibly exports
provided by several industry sources, are under-estimated. Organic retail sales
although it is acknowledged that were estimated to be worth $80 million
actual levels of imported products can in 1995 (Hudson 1996) and $106.5
vary from almost zero for fresh food, million in 2001 (Wynen 2003).
Eco Farms
Strengthening markets through better supply
E
co-Farms began as a small
business selling organic fruit and
vegetables to a niche market
in Sydney in 1986 and has risen to
become Australia’s largest wholesale
buyer and supplier of fresh produce to
key domestic metropolitan markets.
The company has diversified
operations significantly in recent
years. Business efforts are now split
between wholesaling and repacking;
groceries; and the development of their expansion and diversification can
own value-added retail grocery brand benefit both organic producers and
Absolute Organic. consumers” says Tenay Barker, sales and
Eco-Farms has representatives in business development manager.
QLD, NSW, VIC and SA and attributes The business has realised strong
much of its success to strong supplier and consistent annual growth with
relationships and a committed sales increased turnover in volumes,
team, as well as the development particularly for fresh produce.
of exceptional inter-supply chain They see key opportunities in
relationships. producing organic alternatives
They have been a dominant figure in for processed goods in Australian
providing a more stable and consistent supermarkets.
platform for long term grower market “Compared to overseas organic
access, facilitating entry into all major markets, Australia is actually often
national retail grocery chains as well as ahead in terms of fresh produce
grocery independents, and health quality, packaging and product
food stores. range. But in the packaged section
“We’ve been working with growers for of overseas supermarkets there is an
more than two decades. Our continued alternative organic product for nearly
every conventional item. That is not
something we currently see in Australia
and offers significant expansion
potential”, says Tenay.
The company has realised particular
success recently with their new range
of Absolute Organic beetroot, sweet
potato and flavoured potato chips,
catering to growing consumer demand
for blended health and convenience
items.
They note key challenges to future
growth will be consistency of supply,
supply affected by variability in
growing conditions and subsequent
scarcity in specific product lines and
supply chain co-ordination.
Processors, manufacturers
and importers
T
he organic manufacturing/ overall industry.
processing market is growing Australian organic food
at a steady rate. AQIS data in manufacturers are already producing
Figure 12 shows that the amount of a wide range of products, including
organically certified manufacturers baby food, cereal products, cheeses,
has grown significantly over the past fruit juices, yoghurts, preserves, canned
few years, while Figure 13 shows that and jarred items, dried and frozen food,
manufacturers of organic food make up ready meals and other convenience
a considerable proportion (21%) of the foods. Increasing amounts of these
800
No. of manufacturers/processors
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Year
Figure 12. Number of certified manufacturers/processors from 2002 to
2007 (AQIS 2008).
Table 65. Proportion of organic processors, manufacturers and importers (n = 260) categorised by States and
commodities. Percentages are calculated separately for each State.
Proportion (%)
Commodity Total NSW VIC QLD WA TAS ACT SA NT Export
Grains 76 38 23 46 15 8 9 60 9
Vegetables 59 16 32 29 15 8 73 20 50 3
Condiment, other 37 13 5 10 15 51
Fruit 33 10 21 4 15 33 10 14
Health & beauty 18 7 5 4 8 8 17
Dairy 8 4 4 2 8 10
Meat 8 1 5 2 23
Farm input 6 2 8 8 9 50 3
Fertiliser 6 4 25
Nuts 6 4 4 2
Snack food 3 2 9 3
Responses 260 68 57 52 13 12 11 10 2 35
organic produce with about two-thirds conditions to remain similar and only
expecting a marginal or significant 7% expecting sales to decrease
increase in sales, 14% expecting (Table 66).
73%
(1,734)
PRODUCER
MANUFACTURER
21% WHOLESALER
(505) OTHER
3% 3%
(67) (74)
Table 66. Expected change in sales of organic products over the following year
reported by organic processors, manufacturers and importers.
Expected change in sales Total (n = 115) %
Significant increase 51 44
Marginal increase 22 19
Remain similar 16 14
Marginal decrease 6 5
Significant decrease 2 2
Not reported 18 16
Abattoirs
A
battoirs are an important part of of the processing sector has in turn
the organic supply chain, linking been constrained by the relatively low
primary producers with their volumes and seasonality of organic
down-stream markets in the wholesale livestock production.
and retail sectors. While the volume Five abattoirs reported processing
of organic meat production doubled organically produced livestock. A
between 2001 and 2005 (Wynen number of abattoirs located in QLD
2006), according to respondents this and TAS processed organically certified
growth has often been constrained by or in-conversion beef, while abattoirs in
the lack of organic abattoirs in close NSW and VIC processed poultry
proximity leading to uneconomical and pigs respectively.
transport costs. The development
S
Managing Director Gary oil inputs allowed for use in sustained and ethical industry growth.
Leeson in front of OCP certified organic production A strong team of around six key
popular products systems (known as allowed employees have developed 25 products
Eco-Oil Organic Miticide/ inputs) are a rapidly growing, high over the past 17 years, eight of which
Insecticide and Eco-carb value segment of the organic industry. have been approved for registration by
Organic Fungicide. Used by farmers and home gardeners the Australian Pesticide and Veterinary
to replenish soil health biologically, Medicine Authority (APVMA).
allowed inputs are rapidly gaining “This is a major achievement for a
momentum in both organic and relatively small company considering
conventional markets. the necessary expertise and research
Organic Crop Protectants (OCP) have costs required to satisfy the APVMA and
manufactured and distributed certified Department of Health in the safety and
crop nutrition and protection products effectiveness of a product”, says Gary.
in Australia since 1990. In Australia they The company sees key opportunities
currently sell twenty registered organic ahead for small and innovative
products including soil fertility and plant biologically based input suppliers in
bio-stimulant products, spraying oils, both organic farming and conventional
natural insecticide/ fungicide alternatives, agriculture. Gary says increased scarcity
and bio-inoculants (live microbial isolates) of crude oil resources and rising costs
to major home and garden retailers, and of petro-based products means small
direct to farm operations. input companies will take a leading role
Business is focused primarily on in crop protection and nutrition product
plant protection domestically and they development, as large multinationals
export proprietary products to Japan, look towards GM technology and
Korea and New Zealand. countries like South America, India and
Leyland Minter, OCP founder, China for sales growth.
developed natural formulas in his youth He says obstacles to future profitable
- “I began with a home-made insect growth include regulatory barriers in
spray made from a mix of tea tree oil, product development and the high cost
soap flakes and peanut oil” – gaining of product registration.
Exports
T
he International Federation of (JAS) and several respondents using more
Organic Agriculture Movements than one overseas certifier (Table 67).
(IFOAM) estimates the global In 2007, there were 26,550 reports
organic market to be growing at a of commodities exported (AQIS 2008),
rate of 20 – 30% per annum, which consisting of 8.6 million units (kg or
suggests significant export business litres). Despite some very high export
opportunities for certified operators volumes earlier in the decade, the level
in Australia. As with the conventional of exports has been averaging about
market, Australian commodities such as 8.9 million units annually over the past
grain and beef produced and marketed five years (Figure 14).
as organic have a good reputation in Earlier industry estimates of organic
the overseas market. exports range from $30 million in 1997,
Survey respondents using overseas to $50 million in 2000 (cited in Halpin
certification schemes commonly used 2004). Despite the decline in total
National Organic Program (NOP) for the volume over the past decade, there has
USA or IFOAM, with a smaller number been a move towards more processed
using the Japanese Agriculture Standard and higher value commodities such
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Year
Figure 14. Total quantity of organic produce exported by
AQIS-registered organic clients (AQIS 2008).
100,000,000
Quantity exported (million kg & litres)
10,000,000
1,000,000
100,000
10,000
1000
PREPARED FOOD HONEY GRAINS, CEREAL
100 BEEF FIBRES WINE
OILSEED FRUIT, VEG DAIRY
10 GRAINS, LEGUME JUICE
1
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
10,000,000
1,000,000
100,000
10,000
1000
100
10
1
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Organic Elements,
Uwe Wullfen
Selling the organic concept
T
he organic retail sector is the first food clubs in the Melbourne district.
point of contact for first-time Uwe says his status as a retailer gives
organic consumers and Uwe him an advantage when purchasing
Wullfen, Director of Organic Elements direct from agents, and that wholesale
retail outlet in Victoria, says the sector activities ensure the integrity of
is essential in driving the organic certified organic product stocked in
industry forward. his own stores, at Prahran and Queen
“Retailers influence everyone in the Victoria markets.
supply chain. My vision is to make “This is a vital point of trust from the
organics accessible to everyone by view of the consumer. I know what I
providing a reasonable price for retail is 99% certified organic of the
consumers and a fair return to growers. best quality because I buy it myself”,
To do that I have increased my buying he says.
power” he says. Uwe says wholesale customers who
Operating under a unique business value the service are those who lack
structure, Organic Elements has grown the time, resources or skills to negotiate
to become one of the largest buyers high quality orders from agents.
of fresh produce in Victoria, and has Organic Elements also exports small
gained traction in local markets by orders to Asia and the Pacific on a
simultaneously managing two organic seasonal basis. “I think it is important to
retail outlets at the same time as keep these contacts active and we are
wholesaling to shops, restaurants and interested in export for the future given
the strong ethical reputation of fresh
certified Australian organic produce
overseas” says Uwe.
He says one of his key advantages
is a dynamic and educated staff base.
“My business is run by a young and
energetic team who receive extensive
training. It’s crucial that you have the
knowledge to sell organic products.
Organic consumers put food first and
it’s amazing the amount of questions
people will ask”.
Major business obstacles in the
future are expected to include rising
petrol prices and increased wholesale
competition. Uwe says Organic
Elements will differentiate itself on
highest quality customer service while
keeping the price the consumer pays as
low as possible.
“I believe supplying high nutrition
organic food at a lower price is a
realistic business model” he says.
Shopping
W
here consumers shop for the three groups on organic products.
organic food depends upon Emerging and Converted consumers
their level of commitment to were roughly the same size market
purchasing organic. The majority of new segments (38% and 39% respectively)
organic consumers start their organic but the latter spent a higher amount on
journey at the supermarket and as they organic products.
become more committed to organic Supermarkets play a key role in
food, move their way to specialist shops introducing consumers to organic food.
such as health food shops, organic Supermarkets are increasingly providing
grocery stores or other specialty outlets. consumers with a larger range of fresh
The more committed the organic and processed organic food allowing
consumer, the greater their likelihood shoppers who prefer one-stop-shopping
of shopping in specialty food stores and the opportunity to trial organic products
farmers’ markets for organic food. without going to the effort to seek them
Nourish Foods (2005) segmented out. This convenience is critical for new
organic consumers into three groups: users in particular.
‘Experiential’, ‘Emerging’ and ‘Converted’. The other growth area in terms of
Experiential consumers were those retail channels is farmers’ markets.
that spent the lowest dollar amount of These have experienced significant
Table 69. Source of organic products by various organic consumer segments (Nourish Foods 2005).
Retail channel Respondents Percent of segment
Supermarkets (including independent supermarkets)
Experiential 51
Emerging 19
Converted 6
Organic food shops
Experiential 18
Emerging 47
Converted 51
Health-food shops
Experiential 7
Emerging 9
Converted 5
Green grocers, fruit and vegetable shops
Experiential 7
Emerging 4
Converted 3
Home delivery, Internet
Experiential 6
Emerging 1
Converted 10
Farmers’ markets
Experiential 4
Emerging 12
Converted 12
Other (e.g. direct from grower, other general market)
Experiential 6
Emerging 8
Converted 10
38%
39%
OVER 50%
11 – 50%
22% 1%
UP TO 10%
NOT SURE/DON’T KNOW
B
iological Farmers of Australia Co-op Ltd (BFA) represents over 3000 certified
organic businesses and members. For over 20 years the group has led by
example on matters relating to education, trade, promotion and advocacy.
This includes promoting an understanding about organics and organic market
premiums to consumers and retailers alike.
Australian
Organic Market Report 2008
The democratic structure of the group allows members to have ownership of the
future direction of the industry including involvement in standards setting and
market development via sectoral advisory groups.
Contact the BFA Group on: Phone: 07 3350 5716; Fax: 07 3350 5996
Email: info@bfa.com.au; Visit: www.bfa.com.au
References
• ABS. 2006. Household Expenditure Survey, Australia: Detailed Expenditure Items
2003-04 (Reissue) (Catalogue Number 6535.0.55.001). Australian Bureau of Statistics,
Melbourne.
• AQIS. 2008. Certifiers Stats. Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service, Canberra.
• Dillman, D.A. 1991. The design and administration of mail surveys. Annual Review of
Sociology. 17: 225-249.
• Fowler, F.J. 2002. Survey Research Methods. Sage Publications, Newbury Park.
• Goodman, A. 2003. Introduction to Data Collection and Analysis. Deakin University
Press, Geelong.
• Guthrie, J., Guthrie, A., Lawson, R. and Cameron, A. 2006. Farmers’ markets: The small
business counter-revolution in food production and retailing. British Food Journal.
108(7): 560-573.
• Halpin, D. 2004. A farm-level view of the Australian organic industry. In: Halpin, D.
(ed.) The Australian Organic Industry. A Profile. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries
and Forestry, Canberra. pp. 1-29.
• Hudson, R.B. 1996. The Domestic Market for Australian Organic Produce - An Update.
Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Barton.
• Kristiansen, P., Sindel, B.M. and Jessop, R.S. 2007. Sustainable Weed Management in
Organic Herb & Vegetable Production. Rural Industries Research and Development
Corporation, Barton.
• Lockie, S. and Donaghy, P. 2004. Who consumes organic food in Australia? In:
Halpin, D. (ed.) The Australian Organic Industry. A Profile. Department of Agriculture,
Fisheries and Forestry, Canberra. pp. 94-105.
• Lockie, S., Halpin, D. and Pearson, D. 2006. Understanding the market for organic
food. In: Kristiansen, P., Taji, A. and Reganold, J. (eds.) Organic Agriculture: a Global
Perspective. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood. pp. 245-258.
Australian Organic Market Report 2008 83
References
• Lockie, S., Lyons, K., Lawrence, G. and Grice, J. 2004. Choosing organics: A path
analysis of factors underlying the selection of organic food among Australian food
consumers. Appetite. 43: 135-146.
• MAQIR. 1999. Organic Certifiers – AQIS Charges Review. Final Report. Macarthur
Agribusiness Quarantine and Inspection Resources Pty Ltd., Brisbane.
• Nourish Foods. 2005. The Australian Organic Consumer Report. Profiling the Attitudes
and Behaviour of Organic Consumers. Nourish Foods Pty Ltd., South Melbourne.
• Pearson, D. 2003. Fresh fruits and vegetables: Why do so many of them remain
unbranded? Australian Agribusiness Review. 11(6): 1-9.
• Recke, G., Willer, H., Lampkin, N. and Vaughan, A. (eds.) 2004. Development of a
European Information System for Organic Markets - Improving the Scope and Quality
of Statistical Data. Proceedings of the 1st EISfOM European Seminar, held in Berlin,
Germany, 26-27 April, 2004. Forschungsinstitut für biologischen Landbau (Research
Institute of Organic Agriculture), Frick.
• Regional Development Victoria. 2007. Victorian Organic Food Products Directory
2007. Regional Development Victoria, Melbourne.
• Rippin, M., Vitulano, S., Zanoli, R. and Lampkin, N. (eds.) 2006a. Synthesis and Final
Recommendations on the Development of a European Information System for Organic
Markets. European Information System for Organic Markets, Bonn.
• Rippin, M., Willer, H., Lampkin, N. and Vaughan, A. (eds.) 2006b. Towards a European
Framework for Organic Market Information. Proceedings of the Second EISfOM
European Seminar, Brussels, November 10 & 11, 2005. Forschungsinstitut für
Biologischen Landbau (Research Institute of Organic Agriculture), Frick.
• RIRDC. 2006. Organic Industry Research and Development Plan 2006-2011. Rural
Industries Research and Development Corporation, Barton.
• Soil Association. 2006. Organic Works. Providing More Jobs Through Organic Farming
and Local Food Supply. Soil Association, Bristol.
• Soil Association. 2007. Organic Market Report 2007. Soil Association, Bristol.
• Willer, H., Yussefi-Menzler, M. and Sorenson, N. (eds.) 2008. The World of Organic
Agriculture. Statistics & Emerging Trends 2008. International Federation of Organic
Agriculture Movements and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture, Bonn and
Frick.
• Wolfert, S., Kramer, K.J., Richter, T., Hempfling, G., Lux, S. and Recke, G. 2004. Review
of Data Collection and Processing Systems for Organic and Conventional Markets.
European Information System for Organic Markets (EISfOM), Bonn.
• Wynen, E. 2003. Organic Agriculture in Australia - Levies and Expenditure. Rural
Industries Research and Development Corporation, Barton.Wynen, E. 2006. Organic
beef production and marketing in Australia. Journal of Organic Systems. 1(1): online.
• Wynen, E. 2008. Organic farming in Australia. In: Willer, H., Yussefi-Menzler, M. and
Sorenson, N. (eds.) The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics & Emerging Trends
2008. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements and Research
Institute of Organic Agriculture, Bonn and Frick. pp. 118-125.
Methodology
Mail survey operators was stratified by certification
The survey was designed to collect data agency. Within that framework, all
on the level of organic production and certified operators associated with each
sales in Australia in terms of volumes participating certifier were considered
produced and financial value, with a part of the target population (Goodman
focus on characterising the various 2003). This approach required close
production sectors existing in Australia. cooperation with the certifiers in terms
In addition, the survey sought to of access to client lists and addresses.
capture a range of socio-demographic The survey was distributed in the
factors associated with organic week beginning 15 September 2007
operators. The questionnaire was by the following methods. ACO, OGA
designed based on previous surveys and NASAA provided electronic mailing
carried out over a number of years lists of the certified (and in-conversion
by the Soil Association in the UK and or pre-certification) organic clients
incorporated the principles of survey and these lists were used to generate
design elaborated in social survey texts mailing labels. A mail-out kit consisting
(Dillman 1991, Fowler 2002). of a copy of the questionnaire, a
An initial draft questionnaire was cover letter from their certifier and a
sent out as a pilot study to at least ten large reply paid envelope were sent
organic industry representatives and directly to each client by standard
a similar number of researchers with post from the UNE. On the week
experience in survey design and use. beginning 14 October 2007, a follow-
Feedback received from the initial up was conducted by resending the
assessment was then incorporated into questionnaire, a new cover letter and a
the final version of the questionnaire reply paid envelope.
sent out to the target population. TOP organic clients were surveyed
In order to collect the most data, a in the week beginning 11 September
stratified sampling approach was used 2007 by sending the mail-out kits to
in which the total population of organic the certifier who then applied their
700
600
500
Responses
RESPONSES
400 FOLLOW UP
300
200
100
0
07
07
07
07
07
07
08
08
/0
/0
/0
/0
/0
9/
0/
1/
1/
2/
2/
2/
3/
10
11
/1
/1
/2
/0
/1
/1
/1
/1
/1
7/
/0
10
24
21
4/
1/
20
18
15
29
13
27
06
Date received
Figure 18. Number of responses received over time from initial survey mail-out.
The date of the follow-up mail-out is indicated by the triangle.
own labels and posted the kits to their entered into several spreadsheets
clients. This process was repeated for and an initial check for accuracy
a follow up in the week beginning 15 was made by randomly selecting 50
October 2007. questionnaires and double-checking
A small number of BDRI members all data entry. This data was then
listed on the organization’s website and normalised to standardise the response
via other available databases were also types (e.g. acres to hectares, text
targeted in the survey. A survey mail- removed from numeric fields) and to
out kit was sent to all members with ensure volume and price data was
publicly listed addresses. internally consistent. In almost all cases,
Past experience with national surveys the data was simply summed, averaged
of Australian organic growers indicates or, in the case of skewed (non-normal)
that repeated follow-ups are unlikely data, the median was calculated.
to yield further responses (Kristiansen Percentages were commonly used
et al. 2007). Figure 18 shows the rate to indicate relative proportions and
of returns over time, with the steepest frequency distribution plots were used
section of the curve occurring in the to display data relating to a certain
first two weeks and then becoming variable such as farming experience
less steep in the following fortnight, and farm size in order to characterise
regardless of the follow-up mail-out. the sampled population across
The responses reached a plateau by the variable.
about five weeks after the initial
mail-out, after which a few very late Other data sets
returns were received and included in AQIS collects data from the certifiers on
the survey. the number of organic operators in the
The returned questionnaires were supply chain, the area used for organic
agriculture and the volume and value number of claimed certified operators
of exported organic produce. This data did not match the data from AQIS
is available at a cost from AQIS. The (2008) exactly, the categories used to
data in this report is presented with classify operators and commodities
acknowledgement to AQIS for the raw were inconsistent, and there were non-
data. It is cited throughout the report as trivial amounts of missing data. It was
AQIS 2008. therefore decided that this data would
Given the more stringent and legally not be used in this report, consistent
binding reporting requirements of with the approach of Halpin (2004).
AQIS, it is assumed that the data is A summary of the survey results for
the most comprehensive and reliable each commodity sector was presented
source on the organic industry. to a number of relevant industry
Where appropriate, the proportions experts in each sector for verification
and frequency distributions of this and comment. Where necessary, the
data set are used as a benchmark for multiplier for calculating total national
determining its representativeness. sales was adjusted on the basis of this
Certifier data was largely unavailable feedback, usually where significant
due to confidentiality requirements under-reporting was apparent.
within some agencies. In general, the
T
he organic industry in Australia is would benefit the industry.” The option
not alone with its challenges of of including specific questions about
data collection. Fortunately, there organic farming in the standard ABS
has been considerable effort in Europe Farm Survey was raised by a number of
to develop EU-wide data collection and respondents. While this may improve
processing systems (DCPS), particularly the quality of on-farm data, other
under the auspices of the European activities will be needed to properly
Information System for Organic Markets survey and describe other sectors such
(EISfOM) (Wolfert et al. 2004, Rippin et as input manufacturers and retailers.
al. 2006a). EISfOM symposia in recent The following recommendations are
years have highlighted the general based on ideas that have been raised
nature of problems national organic by respondents and contributors to the
industry bodies face in acquiring project, discussed in the literature in
useful and reliable market information Australia and overseas, and observed by
(Recke et al. 2004, Rippin et al. 2006b). the researchers throughout the project.
Despite the continental focus, these In order to improve the efficiency and
compilations of reports and case quality of organic data collection and
studies make several recommendations processing, it is recommended that
for collecting farm-level production action is taken to:
data, farm-level financial data, • foster support from certifiers to
price data, consumption data and encourage maximum participation by
international trade and supply chain their membership;
data. Most recommendations relate to • conduct sampling on a regular
ensuring high response rates, avoiding basis (at least on a biennial basis) in
duplication of activities, harmonising order to develop a solid timeline of
data collection categories and comparative data;
processes, improving the quality of data • use separate data collection tools and
collected and minimising the burden processes for the various parts of the
on organic operators, certifiers and supply chain;
others in the industry. It is suggested • review the range of models used for
that a more complete analysis be organic data collection and processing
carried out to review the range of systems globally and to evaluate their
models used for organic DCPS globally suitability for the organic industry
and to evaluate their suitability for the in Australia;
organic industry in Australia. • investigate avenues for centralising
Halpin made the suggestion that “In and unifying organic data collection
future, the only real solution to the lack and processing including:
of detail … would be to conduct an - formalising and harmonising the
ABS Farm Survey-style census where role of the certifiers in this process;
interviewers attend farms and take - making survey completion
down detailed data in predetermined obligatory as part of the
and detailed categories (which is very certification process;
expensive) or for the industry to agree - incorporating a number of organic-
that adoption and implementation specific questions in ABS’s farm and
of a national data collection system other surveys.
“Organic” is a labelling term that denotes products general environmental pollution. However, methods
that have been produced in accordance with are used to minimize pollution of air, soil and water.
organic production standards and certified by a duly Organic food handlers, processors and retailers adhere
constituted certification body or authority. Organic to standards to maintain the integrity of organic
agriculture is based on minimizing the use of external agriculture products. The primary goal of organic
inputs, avoiding the use of synthetic fertilizers and agriculture is to optimize the health and productivity
pesticides. Organic agriculture practices cannot ensure of interdependent communities of soil life, plants,
that products are completely free of residues, due to animals and people.