Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fillet Optimization
Problem Description
• The fillet inside the valve chamber needs to be added and optimized so that the
stress is minimized, while at the same time cost constraints on the part dictate a
maximum mass for the part’s material. You will need to setup an optimization run
that allows the fillet radius to vary while at the same time minimizing the fillet
stress and the part’s volume. The maximum mass will be a constraint on the
optimization. We will consider this fillet radius determination a preliminary design
step. You will perform additional analyses later as part of a more detailed design
step.
Fillet Radius to
be optimized
Young’s
Detail Density Poisson's
Material Description Modulus
Nomenclature Ratio
(psi) (lb/in3)
Note: we will include linear material properties only for the optimization, with
the assumption that the stresses in the fillet of interest will be well below the
yield stress of the material.
A. To do this, orient the model such that you can see the inside of the filter bowl, select the
edges that make up the intersection between the inner side and end of the bowl, Create >
Fixed Radius Blend.
B. Give the radius a value of 0.35 in.
C. Make the radius value a parameter in DesignModeler by clicking in the box to the left of
the radius value, making it a [D] parameter. Name the parameter DS_Radius.
4. In the Workbench window, add a new Static Structural Analysis block linked to this geometry.
5. In Engineering Data create and define the materials shown on the previous page.
6. Open Mechanical, make sure units are set to US Customary in, lbm, lbf, …and assign the
correct material properties to your geometry.
A. Total Deformation
B. Equivalent Stress
C. Maximum Principal Stress
D. A Maximum Principal Stress plot scoped to the inside
upper end of the filter bowl, including the fillet surfaces
you added in DesignModeler (3 total faces)
11. Make the maximum of the Maximum Principal Stress plot
created in 9.D. above a parameter by clicking on the
appropriate box in the Details view for that plot, making it a
[P] parameter
15. In the Workbench window, make sure you have the three paramaters mentioned
above by double clicking the Parameter Set bar:
1.
2.
3.
17. Double click on the Design of Experiments cell. This will open up a DOE
tab in the Workbench window
20. Click the Update button at the upper left of the window. This will cause all design
points to be solved in the background. Expect this to take a few minutes. When
it’s done, take a look at the newly calculated Max Principal Stress and Mass values
that have now populated the DOE table.
22. In the Response Surface tab, click the Update button to calculate the response
surface
26. Double click on the Optimization cell to open up a new Optimization tab. Click on
Objectives and Constraints, and at right setup Minimize Max Principal Stress and
also Minimize Mass with an upper bound of 5.96 lbm. Run the optimization via
the Update button.
28. Look at Trade Off plots for both Max Principal Stress vs. Fillet Radius (Y axis) and
Mass vs. Fillet Radius (X axis).
This shows that the ‘verified’ stress is 10.69% lower than that predicted
by the response surface optimization. Most likely a finer mesh is needed
as a first step toward improving this result, but we’ll accept it for now.
31. At this point we consider this preliminary design step complete. For your final
project submission, please include: