Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Structural Analysis
By
Aslam Kassimali
Theory of Structures‐II
g
Engr. Shahzad Saleem
Department of Civil Engineering
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Slope‐Deflection Method
• An alternative approach
pp can be used for analyzing
y g is
termed the displacement or stiffness method.
2
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Slope‐Deflection Method
• In displacement method,
method the unknown displacements are
determined first by solving the structure’s equilibrium
equations; then the other response characteristics are
evaluated through compatibility considerations and
member force
force‐deformation
deformation relationships.
relationships
• The
h displacement
di l methods
h d includes
i l d Slope‐Deflection
l fl i
Method and Moment‐Distribution Method.
• The slope‐deflection
p method was introduced byy George
g
A. Maney in 1915.
3
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Slope‐Deflection Method
4
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Slope‐Deflection Equations
A L B
5
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
B Deformed position
p
A (elastic curve)
L
P
w
MAB MBA
A B
L
EI= constant 6
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
P
w
MAB MBA
A B
L
7
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
w P
MAB MBA
A L B
Tangent at A
g
Un‐deformed position
d f d
A B
Elastic curve
B’
θA
θB
A’
Tangent at B
w P
MAB MBA
A L B
Tangent at A
g
Un‐deformed position
d f d
A B
Elastic curve
B’
θA Δ
θB
A’
Tangent at B
w P
MAB MBA
A L B
Tangent at A
g
Un‐deformed position
d f d
A B
Elastic curve
B’
Ψ
θA Δ
θB
A’ Ψ
Cord
Tangent at B
w P
MAB MBA
A L B
Tangent at A
g
Un‐deformed position
d f d
A B
Elastic curve
B’
Ψ
θA Δ
θB
A’ Ψ
Cord
Tangent at B
“The member end moments, end rotations, and chord rotation are
p
positive when counterclockwise.”
• Note that all the moments and rotations are shown in positive
p
sense in figure on previous slide.
12
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
w P
MAB MBA
A L B
Tangent at A
g
Un‐deformed position
d f d
A B ΔBA
Elastic curve
B’
Ψ
θA Δ
θB
A’ Ψ
Cord
ΔAB Tangent at B
∆ BA ∆ AB
θ A −ψ = θ B −ψ = (3)
L L
MBA
3
2
A 1 B
MAB
Bending Moment Diagram
15
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
1 ⎡⎛ M AB L ⎞⎛ L ⎞ ⎛ M BA L ⎞⎛ 2 L ⎞ ⎤
∆ AB = ⎢⎜ − 2 ⎜ 3 + ⎜ 2 ⎜ 3 + g A ⎥
EI ⎣⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠ ⎦
M AB L2 M BA L2 g A
∆ AB =− + + (4b)
6 EI 3EI EI 16
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
• The three terms in equations (4.a & 4.b) represent the tangential
deviations due to MAB, MBA, and the external loading, acting
separately on the member, with a negative term indicating that the
corresponding tangential deviation is in the direction opposite to
th t shown
that h on the
th elastic
l ti curve off the
th member.
b
M AB L2 M AB L2
6 EI 3EI
MAB
A
Tangential deviation due to MAB
17
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
A B
MBA
M BA L2 M BA L2
3EI 6 EI
Tangential deviation due to MBA
P
A w B
gA gB
EI EI
Tangential deviation due to External Loading
18
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
• By substituting the expressions for ΔBA and ΔAB into Eq. 3, we have
M AB L M BA L g B
θ A −ψ = - - (5a )
3EI 6 EI EIL
M AB L M BA L g A
θ B −ψ = − + + (5b)
6 EI 3EI EIL
M BA L 2 M AB L 2 g B
= − − 2(θ A −ψ )
3EI 3EI EIL
19
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
2 EI
M BA = (θ A + 2θ B − 3ψ ) + 2 (g B − 2 g A )
2
(6b )
L L
20
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
FEMAB FEMBA
θA = θB = Ψ = 0
Fixed‐End Moments
• The moments that would develop at the ends of such a fixed beam
are referred to as fixed‐end moments and their expression can be
obtained by
b setting θA = θB = Ψ = 0;
0 that is,
is
FEM AB =
2
(2 g B − g A ) (7a )
L 2
= 2 (g B − 2 g A ) (7b )
2
FEM BA 21
L
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
• The two slope‐deflection equations have the same form and either
end of equations can be obtained from the other simply by
switching the subscript A and B.
M nf =
EI
22EI
(2θ n + θ f − 3ψ ) + FEM nf (9)
L
23
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Members with One End Hinged
• The slope
slope‐deflections
deflections equations can be easily modified to reflect
this condition.
24
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
2 EI
M AB = (2θ A + θ B − 3ψ ) + FEM AB (10a )
L
2 EI
M BA =0= (θ A + 2θ B − 3ψ ) + FEM BA (10b )
L
θA L
3
θB = − + ψ − (FEM BA ) (11)
2 2 4 EI
25
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
3EI ⎛ FEM BA ⎞
M AB = (θ A −ψ ) + ⎜ FEM AB − (12a )
L ⎝ 2 ⎠
M BA = 0 (12b )
• Similarly, it can be shown that for a member AB with a hinge at end
A, the rotation of the hinged end is given by
θBL
3
θA = − + ψ − (FEM AB ) (13)
2 2 4 EI
26
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
• The
Th rotation
i off the
h hinged
hi d end
d can now be
b written
i as
θr L
3
θh = − + ψ − (FEM hr ) (16)
2 2 4 EI
28
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Basic Concept of the Slope‐Deflection Method
30 k
30 k
1.5 k/ft
EI = constant
A D E = 29,000 ksi
I = 500 in4
B C
20 ft 10 ft 10 ft 15 ft
Although
g the structure actuallyy consists of a single
g continuous
beam between the fixed supports A and D, for the purpose of
analysis it is considered to be composed of three members, AB, BC,
andd CD,
CD rigidly
i idl connected d at joints
j i A B,
A, B C,
C and
d D located
l d at the
h
supports of the structure. 29
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Degrees of Freedom
Identify the unknown independent displacements (translations and
rotations) of the joints of the structure. These unknown joint
di l
displacementst are referred
f d to
t as the
th degrees
d off freedom
f d off the
th
structure.
From the qualitative deflected shape of the continuous beam
shown in Figure below, we can see that none of its joints can
translate.
30 k
1.5 k/ft
θB θC
A D
θB B θC C
20 ft 10 ft 10 ft 15 ft
Degrees of Freedom
30 k
1.5 k/ft
θB θC
A D
θB B θC C
20 ft 10 ft 10 ft 15 ft
This beam has two degrees of freedom, θB and θC, which represent
the unknown rotations of joints B and C, respectively.
A structure without
h any degrees
d off freedom
f d is termedd
kinematically determinate. 31
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Equations of Equilibrium
The unknown joint rotations are determined by solving the
equations of equilibrium of the joints that are free to rotate. The
f
free b d diagrams
body di off the
th members
b andd joints
j i t B and d C off the
th
continuous beam are shown.
30 k
1.5 k/ft
θB θC
D
A
θB B θC C
20 ft 10 ft 10 ft 15 ft
30 k
1.5 k/ft MCD
MBA MCB MDC
A B B C C D
MAB MBC
B C
32
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Equations of Equilibrium
In addition to the external loads, each member is subjected to an
internal moment at each of its ends.
The correct senses of the member end moments are not yet
known, it is assumed that the moments at the ends of all the
members
b are positive (counterclockwise).
( l k )
The free body diagrams of the joints show the member end
moments acting in an opposite (clockwise) direction in accordance
with Newton’s law of action and reaction.
30 k
1.5 k/ft MCD
MBA MCB MDC
A B B C C D
MAB MBC
B C
33
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Equations of Equilibrium
Because the entire structure is in equilibrium, each of its members
and joints must also be in equilibrium. By applying the moment
equilibrium
ilib i equations
ti ∑MB = 0 andd ∑MC = 0,0 respectively,
ti l to
t the
th
free bodies of joints B and C, we obtain the equilibrium equations
M BA + M BC = 0 (17a)
M CB + M CD = 0 (17b)
30 k
1.5 k/ft MCD
MBA MCB MDC
A B B C C D
MAB MBA MBC MCB
B C
MBC MCD
34
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Slope‐Deflection Equations
The equilibrium equations Eqs. (17) can be expressed in terms of
the unknown joint rotations, θB and θC, by using slope‐deflection
equations
ti th t relate
that l t member
b end d momentst to
t the
th unknown
k j i t
joint
rotations.
Before
f we can write the
h slope‐deflection
l d fl equations, we needd to
compute the fixed‐end moments due to the external loads acting
on the members of the continuous beam.
beam
To calculate the fixed‐end moments, we apply imaginary clamps at
joints B and C to prevent them from rotating.
rotating
Or
we generally provide fixed‐supports at the ends of each member to
prevent the joint rotations as shown.
35
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Slope‐Deflection Equations
30 k
1.5 k/ft
A D
OR
30 k
1.5 k/ft
A B B C C D
FEMAB FEMBA FEMBC FEMCB FEMCD FEMDC
The fixed‐end
Th fi d d moments t that
th t develop
d l att the th ends
d off the
th members
b
of this fully restrained or kinematically determinate structure can
easily be evaluated by using the fixed
fixed‐end
end moment expressions
given inside the back cover of book.
36
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Slope‐Deflection Equations
30 k
1.5 k/ft
A D
OR
30 k
1.5 k/ft
A B B C C D
50 k‐ft
50 k ft 50 k‐ft FEMBC FEMCB FEMCD FEMDC
F member
For b AB:
AB wL2 1.5(20 )
2
FEM AB = = = 50k − ft
12 12
wL2 1.5(20 )
2
FEM BA = = = 50k − ft
12 12 37
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Slope‐Deflection Equations
30 k
1.5 k/ft
A D
OR
30 k
1.5 k/ft
A B B C C D
50 k‐ft
50 k ft 50 k‐ft 75 k
75 k‐ft
ft 75 k‐ft
75 k ft 0 0
F member
For b BC:
BC
PL 30(20 )
FEM BC = = = 75k − ft
8 8
PL 30(20 )
FEM CB = = = 75k − ft
8 8 38
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Slope‐Deflection Equations
The slope‐deflection equations for the three members of the
continuous beam can now be written by using Eq. (9).
Since none of the supports of the continuous beam translates, the
chord rotations of the three members are zero (ΨAB = ΨBC = ΨCD
=0).
)
Also, supports A and D are fixed, the rotations θA = θD = 0. By
applying Eq. (9) for member AB, with A as the near end and B as
the far end, we obtain the slope‐deflection equation
2 EI
M AB = (0 + θ B − 0) + 50 = 0.1EIθ B + 50 (18a )
20
Next, by considering B as the near end and A as the far end, we
write
2 EI
M BA = (2θ B + 0 − 0) − 50 = 0.2 EIθ B − 50 (18b )
39
20
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Slope‐Deflection Equations
Similarly, by applying Eq. (9) for member BC, we obtain
2 EI
M BC = (2θ B + θ C ) + 75 = 0.2 EIθ B + 0.1EIθ C + 75 (18c )
20
2 EI
M CB = (2θ C + θ B ) − 75 = 0.2 EIθ C + 0.1EIθ B − 75 (18d )
20
Joint Rotations
To determine the unknown joint rotations θB & θC, we substitute
the slope‐deflection equations Eqs. (18) into the joint equilibrium
equations
ti E
Eqs. (17) and
d solve
l the
th resulting
lti systems
t off equations
ti
simultaneously for θB & θC. By substituting Eqs. (18b) and (18c) into
Eq (17a),
Eq. (17a) we obtain
Joint Rotations
Solving Eqs. (19a) & (19b) simultaneously for EIθB and EIθC, we
obtain
EIθ B = −108.46 k − ft 2
EIθC = 183.82 k − ft 2
By substituting
B b tit ti the
th numerical
i l values
l off E = 29,000
29 000 ksi 29 000(12)2
k i = 29,000(12)
ksf and I = 500 in.4 = (500/124)ft4 , we determine the rotations of
joints B and C to be
42
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Member End Moments
The moments at the ends of the three members of the continuous
beam can now be determined by substituting the numerical values
off EIθB and
d EIθC into
i t the
th slope‐deflection
l d fl ti equations
ti (E 18).
(Eqs. 18)
43
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Member End Moments
To check that the solution of simultaneous equations (Eqs. 19) has
been carried out correctly, the numerical values of member end
momentst should
h ld be b substituted
b tit t d into
i t the
th joint
j i t equilibrium
ilib i
equations (Eqs. 17). If the solution is correct, then the equilibrium
equations should be satisfied.
satisfied
The member end moments just computed are shown on the free
body diagrams of the members and joints in Figure on next slide.
44
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Member End Moments
30 k
1.5 k/ft 49.1 24.4
71.7 49.1
A B B C C D
39.2 71.7
SAB = 13.38 k SBA B SBC SCB C SCD SDC
By Cy
Member End Shears
The shear forces at the ends of members can now be determined
by applying the equations of equilibrium to the free bodies of
members. For member AB,
Member End Shears
30 k
1.5 k/ft 49.1 24.4
71.7 49.1
A B B C C D
39.2 71.7
SBA = 16.62 k B SBC SCB C SCD SDC
SAB = 13.38 k
By Cy
For member AB,
+ ↑ ∑ Fy = 0 3 38 − 1.5(20 ) + S BA = 0
13.38
S BA = 16.62 k ↑
46
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Member End Shears
30 k
1.5 k/ft 49.1 24.4
71.7 49.1
A B B C C D
39.2 71.7
SBA = 16.62 k B SCB = 13.87 k C SCD SDC
SAB = 13.38 k SBC = 16.13 k
= 16 13 k
By Cy
For member BC,
+ ∑ MC = 0 1 7 − S BC (20) + 30(10) − 49.1 = 0
71.7
S BC = 16.13 k ↑
+ ↑ ∑ Fy = 0 16.13 − 30 + SCB = 0
SCB = 13.87 k ↑
47
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Member End Shears
30 k
1.5 k/ft 49.1 24.4
71.7 49.1
A B B C C D
39.2 71.7
SBA = 16.62 k B SCB = 13.87 k C SCD = 4.9 k SDC = 4.9 k
SAB = 13.38 k SBC = 16.13 k
= 16 13 k
By Cy
For member CD,
+ ∑MD = 0 9 1 − SCD (15) + 24.4 = 0
49.1
SCD = 4.9 k ↑
+ ↑ ∑ Fy = 0 4.9 + S DC = 0
S DC = 4.9 k ↓
48
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Support Reactions
30 k
1.5 k/ft 49.1 24.4
71.7 49.1
A B 16.62 k16.13 k71.7
B C C D
39.2
SBA = 16.62 k B SCB = 13.87 k C SCD = 4.9 k SDC = 4.9 k
SAB = 13.38 k SBC = 16.13 k
= 16 13 k
By = 32.75 k
= 32 75 k Cy
From the free body diagram of joint B, we can see that the vertical
reaction at the roller support B is equal to the sum of the shears at
ends B of member AB and BC; that is
49
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Support Reactions
30 k
1.5 k/ft 49.1 24.4
71.7 49.1
A B 16.62 k16.13 k71.7
B C 13.87 k 4.9 k
C D
39.2
SBA = 16.62 k B SCB = 13.87 k C SCD = 4.9 k SDC = 4.9 k
SAB = 13.38 k SBC = 16.13 k
= 16 13 k
By = 32.75 k
= 32 75 k Cy = 18.77 k
= 18 77 k
The vertical reaction at the roller support C equals the sum of
shears at ends C of members BC and CD.
50
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Support Reactions
30 k
1.5 k/ft
A D
B C
32.75 k 18.77 k
51
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Support Reactions
30 k
1.5 k/ft
A D
39.2 k‐ft B C
32 75 k
32.75 k 18 77 k
18.77 k
13.38 k
The reactions at the fixed support A are equal to the shear and
moment at the end A of member AB.
Ay = S AB = 13.38 k ↑
M A = M AB = 39.2 k − fft
52
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Support Reactions
30 k
1.5 k/ft 24.4 k‐ft
A D
39.2 k‐ft B C
32 75 k
32.75 k 18 77 k
18.77 k
13.38 k 4.9 k
The reactions at the fixed support D equal the shear and moment
at end D of the member CD.
D y = S DC = 4.9 k ↓
M D = M DC = 24.4 k − fft
53
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Equilibrium Check
30 k
1.5 k/ft 24.4 k‐ft
A D
39.2 k‐ft B C
32 75 k
32.75 k 18 77 k
18.77 k
13.38 k 4.9 k
To check out computations of member end shears and support
reactions, we apply the equations of equilibrium to the free body
of the entire structure.
+ ↑ ∑ Fy = 0
13.38 − 1.5(20 ) + 32.75 − 30 + 18.77 − 4.9 = 0 Checks
+ ∑MD = 0
39.2 − 13.38(55) + 1.5(20)(45) − 32.75(35) + 30(25)
− 18.77(15) + 24.4 = −0.1 ≈ 0 Checks 54
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Shear Diagram
30 k
1.5 k/ft 24.4 k‐ft
A D
39.2 k‐ft B C
32 75 k
32.75 k 18 77 k
18.77 k
13.38 k 4.9 k
Using General sign conventions
16.13
13.38
4.9
A F B E C D
8.92 ft
‐13.87
‐16.62
55
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Moment Diagram
30 k
1.5 k/ft 24.4 k‐ft
A D
39.2 k‐ft B C
32 75 k
32.75 k 18 77 k
18.77 k
13.38 k 4.9 k
Using General sign conventions
89.7
20.5 24.4
A B C D
F E
‐39.2 ‐49.1
‐71.7
56
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
30 k
1.5 k/ft 24.4 k‐ft
A D
39.2 k‐ft B C
32.75 k 18.77 k
13.38 k 4.9 k
16.13
13 38
13.38
4.9
A F B E C D
8.92 ft
13 87
‐13.87
‐16.62 89.7
20 5
20.5 24.4
A B C D
F E
‐39.2 ‐49.1
57
‐71.7
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Analysis of Continuous Beam
Based on the discussion above, the procedure for the analysis of
continuous beams can be summarized as follows:
Structures with Cantilever Overhangs
Consider a continuous beam with a cantilever overhang, as shown
in the figure.
w
A Actual Beam
D
B C
a
MCD = wa2/2 w
Statically Determinate Cantilever Portion D
C
SCD = wa
wa
w wa2/2
Actual Beam
A
59
B C
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Example 1
• Determine the reactions and draw the shear and bending moment
diagrams for the two‐span continuous beam shown in Figure.
18 k
18 k
2 k/ft
A B C
EI = constant
60
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
1. Degree of Freedom
We can see that only joint B of the beam is free to rotate. Thus, the
structure has only one degree of freedom, which is the unknown
joint rotation, θB.
18 k
18 k
2 k/ft
A B C
θB
10 ft
f 15 ft
f 30 ft
f
EI = constant
61
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
2. Fixed‐End Moments
Pa 2b 18(10 ) (15)
2
FEM BA = 2 = = 43.2 k − ft or − 64.8 k-ft
L 25 2
wL2 2(30 )
2
FEM BC = = = 150 k − ft or + 150 k-ft
12 12
FEM CB = 150 k − ft or − 150 k-ft
3. Chord Rotations
4. Slope‐Deflection Equations
M nf =
2 EI
(2θ n + θ f − 3ψ ) + FEM nf (9)
L
since the
h supports A and
d C are fixed,
f d theh rotations θA = θC =0.
63
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
4. Slope‐Deflection Equations
2 EI
M AB = (θ B ) + 64.8 = 0.08EIθ B + 64.8 (1)
25
2 EI
M BA = (2θ B ) − 43.2 = 0.16 EIθ B − 43.2 (2)
25
2 EI
M BC = (2θ B ) + 150 = 0.133EIθ B + 150 (3)
30
2 EI
M CB = (θ B ) − 150 = 0.0667 EIθ B − 150 (4)
30
64
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
5. Equilibrium Equations
The free body diagram of joint B is shown in Figure.
18 k
2 k/ft
2 k/ft
A B C
18 k
MBA /
2 k/ft
MBA MCB
B
A B MBC B C
MAB MBC
5. Equilibrium Equations
18 k
MBA 2 k/ft
/
MBA MCB
B
A B MBC B C
MAB MBC
M BA + M BC = 0 (5)
66
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
6. Joint Rotations
67
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
18 k
2 k/ft
2 k/ft
B
A B 101 5
101.5 101.5 B C
35.6 101 5
101.5 101.5 174 3
174.3
9. Support Reactions
The reactions at the fixed support A and C are equal to the forces
and moments at the ends of the members connected to these
joints. To determine the reaction at roller support B, consider the
equilibrium of the free body of joint B in the vertical direction.
direction
18 k
9.84 27.57 2 k/ft
B
A B 101.5 101.5 B C
35.6 101.5 101.5 174.3
8 16
8.16 9 84
9.84 27 57
27.57 32 43
32.43
37.41
70
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
9. Support Reactions
18 k
2 k/ft
A B C
35.6 k‐ft 174.3 k‐ft
37.41 k
8.16 k 32.43 k
71
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
35.6 k‐ft 174.3 k‐ft
37 41 k
37.41 k
8.16 k 32.43 k
+ ↑ ∑ Fy = 0
8.16 − 18 + 37.41 − 2(30) + 32.43 = 0 Ch k
Checks
72
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
35.6 k‐ft 174.3 k‐ft
37 41 k
37.41 k
8.16 k 32.43 k
10 ft 15 ft 30 ft
+ ∑ MC = 0
35.6 − 8.16(55) + 18(45) − 37.41(30) + 2(30 )(15) − 174.3 = 0.2 ≈ 0 Checks
73
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
35.6 k‐ft 174.3 k‐ft
37.41 k
8.16 k 32.43 k
27.57
8 16
8.16
16.2 ft
A D B C
E
‐9.84
‐32.43
74
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
35.6 k‐ft 174.3 k‐ft
37.41 k
8.16 k 32.43 k
88.7
46
A B C
D E
‐35.6
35 6
‐101.5 ‐174.3
75
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Example 2
• Determine the reactions and draw the shear and bending moment
diagrams for the continuous beam shown in Figure.
60 kN
60 kN
15 kN/m
A D
B C
76
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
• From figure we can see that all three joints of the beam are free to
rotate. Thus the beam have 3 degrees of freedom, θA, θB, θD.
Solution
• The modified SDE do not contain the rotations of the hinged ends,
by using these equations the rotations θA, and θD of the simple
supports can be eliminated, which will then involve only one
unknown
k j i t rotation,
joint t ti θB.
60 kN
15 kN/m
A D
B C
78
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
1. Degree of Freedom
θB
2. Fixed‐End Moments
15(10)
2
FEM AB = = 125 kN − m or + 125 kN-m
12
FEM BA = 125 kN − m or − 125 kN-m
60(10 ) 15(10 )
2
FEM BD = + = 200 kN − m or + 200 kN-m
8 12
FEM DB = 200 kN − m or − 200 kN
kN-m
m
60 kN
15 kN/m
A D
B C
79
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
3. Slope‐Deflection Equations
Since both members of the beam have one end hinged, we use
Eqs. 15 to obtain the slope‐deflection equations for both members.
M AB = 0 ANS
3EI ⎛ 125 ⎞
M BA = (θ B ) + ⎜ − 125 − ⎟ = 0.3EIθ B − 187.5 (1)
10 ⎝ 2 ⎠
3E (2 I ) ⎛ 200 ⎞
M BD = (θ B ) + ⎜ 200 + ⎟ = 0.6 EIθ B + 300 (2)
10 ⎝ 2 ⎠
M DB = 0 ANS
60 kN
15 kN/m
A D
B C
80
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
4. Equilibrium Equations
MBD
M BA + M BD = 0 (3)
5. Joint Rotation
81
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
6. Joint Rotation
(0.3EIθ B − 187.5) + (0.6 EIθ B + 300) = 0
or
0.9 EIθ B = −112.5
from which
EIθ B = −125 kN − m 2
82
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
A B 225 225 B C
225 225
52.5 97.5 127.5 82.5
By = 225
60 kN
15 kN/m
15 kN/m
A D
B C
52 5 kN
52.5 kN 225 kN
225 kN 82 5 kN
82.5 kN
+ ↑ ∑ Fy = 0
52.5 − 15(20 ) + 225 − 60 + 82.5 = 0 Checks
+ ∑ MC = 0
− 52.5(20) + 15(20)(10) − 225(10) + 60(5) = 0 Checks
84
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
52 5 kN
52.5 kN 225 kN
225 kN 82 5 kN
82.5 kN
127 5
127.5
52.5
52 5
52.5
16.2 ft
A E B D
C
3.5 m ‐7.5
‐82.5
‐97.5
85
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
52 5 kN
52.5 kN 225 kN
225 kN 82 5 kN
82.5 kN
225
91.88
A E B D
C
86
225
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Example 3
• Determine the member end moments and reactions for the three‐
span continuous beam shown, due to the uniformly distributed
load and due to the support settlements of 5/8 in. at B, and 1.5 in.
att C,
C and
d ¾ in.
i att D.
D
2 k/ft
A D
B C
E = 29,000 ksi
I = 7 800 in 4
I = 7,800 in.
87
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
Solution
1. Degree of Freedom
Four joints of the beam are free to rotate, we will eliminate the
rotations of simple supports at ends A and D and use the modified
SDE for member AB and CD respectively.
The analysis will involve only two unknown joint rotations, θB and
θC.
2 k/ft
A D
B C
88
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
3. Chord Rotations
The specified support settlements are shown on a exaggerated
scale. 2 k/ft
A D
B C
A B C D
3
5 in.
ΨAB 8
in. 1
1 in.
4
2
ΨBC D’
D
B’ ΨCD
C’ 89
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
3. Chord Rotations
2 k/ft
A D
B C
20 ft 20 ft 20 ft
A B C D
ΨAB 5
8
in.
1
3
4
in.
1 in.
ΨBC 2
D’
B’ ΨCD
C’
0.0521
ψ AB =− = −0.0026
20
0.0729
ψ BC =− = −0.00365
20
1.5 − 0.75
ψ CD = = 0.00313
(12)20
90
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
4. Slope‐deflection Equations
M AB = 0 ANS
3EI
M BA = (θ B + 0.0026) − 100 = 0.15EIθ B + 0.00039 EI − 100 (1)
10
2 EI
M BC = [2θ B + θ C − 3(− 0.00365)] + 66.7
20
= 0.2 EIθ B + 0.1EIθ C + 0.0011EI + 66.7 (2)
2 EI
M CB = [2θ C + θ B − 3(− 0.00365)] − 66.7
20
= 0.1EIθ B + 0.2 EIθ C + 0.0011EI − 66.7 (3)
3EI
M CD = (θ C − 0.00313) + 100 = 0.15EIθ C − 0.00047 EI + 100 (4)
20
M DC = 0 ANS
91
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
5. Equilibrium Equations
MBA MCB
B
M BA + M BC = 0 C
(5)
MBC M CB + M CD = 0 MCD (6)
6. Joint Rotations
6. Joint Rotations
0.35 EIθ B + 0.1EIθ C = −2,307.24 (7)
0 1EIθ B + 0.35 EIθ C = −1,022.93
0.1 (8)
A B B C C D
427.7 427.7
1.38 41.38 81.79 41.79 20.4 60.4
By = 123.17 Cy = 62.19
94
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
A B B C C D
427.7 427.7
1.38 41.38 81.79 41.79 20.4 60.4
By = 123.17 Cy = 62.19
2 k/ft
A D
B C
95
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
1 38 k
1.38 k 123 17 k
123.17 k 62 19 k
62.19 k 60 4 k
60.4 k
81.79
41 79
41.79
A D
B C
‐1.38
‐20.4
‐41.38
96
‐60.4
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
1 38 k
1.38 k 123 17 k
123.17 k 62 19 k
62.19 k 60 4 k
60.4 k
808.2
A D
B C
‐427.6 97
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
For other cases follow Examples 16.1 to 16.7 in Slope‐Deflection
Notes & Structural Analysis by Hibbeler.
98