You are on page 1of 98

Slope‐Deflection Method

Structural  Analysis
By 
Aslam Kassimali

Theory of Structures‐II
g
Engr. Shahzad Saleem
Department of Civil Engineering
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Slope‐Deflection Method

• Previously we have discussed Force/Flexibility methods


of analysis of statically indeterminate structures.

• In force method, the unknown redundant forces are


d
determinedd first
f b solving
by l the
h structure’s
’ compatibility
bl
equations; then other response characteristics of the
structure are evaluated
l d by
b equilibrium
ilib i equations
i or
superposition.

• An alternative approach
pp can be used for analyzing
y g is
termed the displacement or stiffness method.
2
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Slope‐Deflection Method

• In displacement method,
method the unknown displacements are
determined first by solving the structure’s equilibrium
equations; then the other response characteristics are
evaluated through compatibility considerations and
member force
force‐deformation
deformation relationships.
relationships

• The
h displacement
di l methods
h d includes
i l d Slope‐Deflection
l fl i
Method and Moment‐Distribution Method.

• The slope‐deflection
p method was introduced byy George
g
A. Maney in 1915.
3
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Slope‐Deflection Method

• This method takes into account only the bending


deformations.

• This method gives an understanding of the Matrix‐


Stiffness
ff Method,
h d which
h h forms
f the
h basis
b off most
computer software currently used for structural analysis.

4
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Slope‐Deflection Equations

• When a continuous beam or a frame is subjected to external loads,


internal moments generally develop at the ends of its individual
members.

“The slope‐deflection equations relate the moments at the ends of


the
h member b to the
h rotations andd displacements
d l off its end
d and
d the
h
external loads applied to the member.”

• Let us consider an arbitrary member AB of the continuous beam.

A L B
5
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

• When the beam is subjected to external loads and support


settlements, the member AB deforms as shown (exaggerated), and
internal moments are induced at its ends.
P U d f
Un‐deformed  position
d iti
w

B Deformed position
p
A (elastic curve)
L

P
w
MAB MBA
A B

L
EI= constant 6
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

P
w
MAB MBA
A B
L

• Double‐subscript notation is used for member end moments, with


the first subscript identifying the member end at which the
moment acts and the second subscript indicating the other end of
the member.

• MAB denotes the moment at end A of the member AB.

• MBA denotes the moment at end B of the member AB.

7
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

w P
MAB MBA
A L B

Tangent at A
g
Un‐deformed  position
d f d

A B
Elastic curve
B’
θA
θB
A’

Tangent at B

• θA & θB denote, respectively, the rotations of end A and B with


respect to the un‐deformed (horizontal) position of the member.
8
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

w P
MAB MBA
A L B

Tangent at A
g
Un‐deformed  position
d f d

A B
Elastic curve
B’
θA Δ
θB
A’

Tangent at B

• Δ denotes the relative translation between the two ends of the


member in the direction perpendicular to the un‐deformed axis of
the member. 9
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

w P
MAB MBA
A L B

Tangent at A
g
Un‐deformed  position
d f d

A B
Elastic curve
B’
Ψ
θA Δ
θB
A’ Ψ
Cord

Tangent at B

• Ψ denotes the rotation of the member’s chord (straight line


connecting the deformed positions of the member ends) due to
the relative translation Δ. 10
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

w P
MAB MBA
A L B

Tangent at A
g
Un‐deformed  position
d f d

A B
Elastic curve
B’
Ψ
θA Δ
θB
A’ Ψ
Cord

Tangent at B

• Since the deformations are assumed to be small, the chord


rotation can be expressed as ∆
ψ= (1)
L 11
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

• The sign convention used in this chapter is as follows:

“The member end moments, end rotations, and chord rotation are 
p
positive when counterclockwise.”

• Note that all the moments and rotations are shown in positive
p
sense in figure on previous slide.

• The slope deflection equations can be derived by relating the


member end moments to the end rotations and chord rotation by
applying the second moment‐area theorem.

12
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

w P
MAB MBA
A L B

Tangent at A
g
Un‐deformed  position
d f d

A B ΔBA
Elastic curve
B’
Ψ
θA Δ
θB
A’ Ψ
Cord

ΔAB Tangent at B

• From figure we can see that


∆ BA + ∆ ∆ AB + ∆
θA = θB = (2)
L L 13
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

• By substituting Δ/L=Ψ into the preceding equation we have,

∆ BA ∆ AB
θ A −ψ = θ B −ψ = (3)
L L

• ΔBA is tangential deviation of end B from the tangent to the elastic


curve at end A and ΔAB is the tangential deviation of end A from
the tangent to the elastic curve at end B.

• According to the second‐moment area theorem, the expressions


for the tangential deviations ΔAB and ΔBA can be obtained by
summing the moments about the ends A and B, respectively, of the
area under
d M/EI diagram
di b t
between th two
the t ends.
d
14
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

• The bending moment diagrams for the member is constructed in


parts by applying MAB, MBA, and the external loading separately on
the member with simply supported ends.

• The three simple‐beam bending moment diagrams thus obtained


are shown in Figure.
ML diagram (simple beam
bending moment diagram 
due to external loads)

MBA
3
2
A 1 B
MAB
Bending Moment Diagram
15
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

• Assuming that the member is prismatic (EI is constant along the


length of the member) we sum the moments of the area under the
M/EI diagram about the ends B and A, respectively, to determine
the tangential deviations.
1 ⎡⎛ M AB L ⎞⎛ 2 L ⎞ ⎛ M BA L ⎞⎛ L ⎞ ⎤
∆ BA = ⎢⎜ 2 ⎟⎜ 3 ⎟ − ⎜ 2 ⎟⎜ 3 ⎟ − g B ⎥
EI ⎣⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠ ⎦
M AB L2 M BA L2 g B
∆ BA = − − (4a)
3EI 6 EI EI

1 ⎡⎛ M AB L ⎞⎛ L ⎞ ⎛ M BA L ⎞⎛ 2 L ⎞ ⎤
∆ AB = ⎢⎜ − 2 ⎜ 3 + ⎜ 2 ⎜ 3 + g A ⎥
EI ⎣⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠ ⎦
M AB L2 M BA L2 g A
∆ AB =− + + (4b)
6 EI 3EI EI 16
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

• In which gB and gA are the moments about the ends B and A,


respectively, of the area under the simple‐beam bending moment
diagram due to external loading (ML diagram).

• The three terms in equations (4.a & 4.b) represent the tangential
deviations due to MAB, MBA, and the external loading, acting
separately on the member, with a negative term indicating that the
corresponding tangential deviation is in the direction opposite to
th t shown
that h on the
th elastic
l ti curve off the
th member.
b

M AB L2 M AB L2
6 EI 3EI
MAB

A
Tangential deviation due to MAB
17
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

A B

MBA

M BA L2 M BA L2
3EI 6 EI
Tangential deviation due to MBA

P
A w B

gA gB
EI EI

Tangential deviation due to External Loading
18
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

• By substituting the expressions for ΔBA and ΔAB into Eq. 3, we have
M AB L M BA L g B
θ A −ψ = - - (5a )
3EI 6 EI EIL
M AB L M BA L g A
θ B −ψ = − + + (5b)
6 EI 3EI EIL

• To express the member end moments in terms of the end


rotations, the chord rotation, and the external loading, we solve
Eq. 5 simultaneously for MAB and MBA. Rewriting Eq. 5a as

M BA L 2 M AB L 2 g B
= − − 2(θ A −ψ )
3EI 3EI EIL
19
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

• By substituting this equation into Eq. 5b and solving the resulting


equation for MAB, we have
2 EI
M AB = (2θ A + θ B − 3ψ ) + 2 (2 g B − g A )
2
(6a )
L L
and by substituting Eq. 6a into either Eq. 5a or 5b, we have

2 EI
M BA = (θ A + 2θ B − 3ψ ) + 2 (g B − 2 g A )
2
(6b )
L L

• It indicates that the moments develop at the ends of a member


depend on the rotations and translations of member’s ends as well
as on the external loadingg applied
pp between the ends.

20
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

• Now, suppose that the member under consideration, instead being


a part of a larger structure, was an isolated beam with both ends
completely fixed against rotations and translations, as shown.
P
A w B

FEMAB FEMBA
θA = θB = Ψ = 0
Fixed‐End Moments

• The moments that would develop at the ends of such a fixed beam
are referred to as fixed‐end moments and their expression can be
obtained by
b setting θA = θB = Ψ = 0;
0 that is,
is
FEM AB =
2
(2 g B − g A ) (7a )
L 2

= 2 (g B − 2 g A ) (7b )
2
FEM BA 21
L
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

• By comparing Eqs. 6 & 7, we find that the second terms on the


right sides of Eqs. 6 are equal to the fixed‐end moments.
2 EI
M AB = (2θ A + θ B − 3ψ ) + FEM AB (8a )
L
2 EI
M BA = (θ A + 2θ B − 3ψ ) + FEM BA (8b )
L
• Equations (8a &8b), which express the moments at the ends of a
member in terms of its end rotations and translations for a
specified external loading, are called slope‐deflections equations.
• These equations are valid for prismatic members, composed of
linearly elastic material and subjected to small deformations.
• The deformations due to axial and shear forces are neglected.
22
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

• The two slope‐deflection equations have the same form and either
end of equations can be obtained from the other simply by
switching the subscript A and B.

M nf =
EI
22EI
(2θ n + θ f − 3ψ ) + FEM nf (9)
L

in which the subscript n refers to the near end of the member


where moment Mnf acts and the subscript f identifies the far
(other) end of the member.

23
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Members with One End Hinged

• The slope deflection equations derived previously are based on the


condition that the member is rigidly connected to joints at both
ends, so that the member end rotations θA and θB are equal to the
rotations of the adjacent joints.
joints

• When one of the member’s ends is connected to the adjacent joint


by a hinged connection, the moment at the hinged end must be
zero.

• The slope
slope‐deflections
deflections equations can be easily modified to reflect
this condition.

24
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

• With reference to the previous Figure of member AB, if the end B


of the member AB is hinged, then the moment at B must be zero.
B substituting
By b tit ti MBA = 0 into
i t Equation
E ti (8),
(8) we write
it

2 EI
M AB = (2θ A + θ B − 3ψ ) + FEM AB (10a )
L
2 EI
M BA =0= (θ A + 2θ B − 3ψ ) + FEM BA (10b )
L

• Solving Eq. (10) for θB, we obtain

θA L
3
θB = − + ψ − (FEM BA ) (11)
2 2 4 EI
25
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

• To determine θB from the slope deflection equations, we substitute


Eq. (11) into Eq. (10a), thus obtaining the modified slope‐deflection
equations
ti f member
for b AB withith a hinge
hi att end
d B.
B

3EI ⎛ FEM BA ⎞
M AB = (θ A −ψ ) + ⎜ FEM AB − (12a )
L ⎝ 2 ⎠
M BA = 0 (12b )
• Similarly, it can be shown that for a member AB with a hinge at end
A, the rotation of the hinged end is given by

θBL
3
θA = − + ψ − (FEM AB ) (13)
2 2 4 EI
26
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

• And the modified slope‐deflection equations can be expressed as


3EI ⎛ FEM AB ⎞
M BA = (θ B −ψ ) + ⎜ FEM BA − (14a )
L ⎝ 2 ⎠
M AB = 0 (14b )

• Because the modified slope‐deflection equations given by Eqs. (12)


and (14) are similar in form, they can be conveniently summarized
as
3EI ⎛ FEM hr ⎞
M rh = (θ r −ψ ) + ⎜ FEM rh − (15a )
L ⎝ 2 ⎠
M hr = 0 (15b )
27
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

In which the subscript r refers to the rigidly connected end of the


member where the moment Mrh acts and the subscript h identifies
th hinged
the hi d end d off the
th member.
b

• The
Th rotation
i off the
h hinged
hi d end
d can now be
b written
i as
θr L
3
θh = − + ψ − (FEM hr ) (16)
2 2 4 EI

28
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Basic Concept of the Slope‐Deflection Method

• To illustrate the basic concept of the slope‐deflection method,


consider the three‐span continuous beam shown in Figure below.

30 k
30 k
1.5 k/ft
EI = constant
A D E = 29,000 ksi
I = 500 in4
B C
20 ft 10 ft 10 ft 15 ft

Although
g the structure actuallyy consists of a single
g continuous
beam between the fixed supports A and D, for the purpose of
analysis it is considered to be composed of three members, AB, BC,
andd CD,
CD rigidly
i idl connected d at joints
j i A B,
A, B C,
C and
d D located
l d at the
h
supports of the structure. 29
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Degrees of Freedom
Identify the unknown independent displacements (translations and
rotations) of the joints of the structure. These unknown joint
di l
displacementst are referred
f d to
t as the
th degrees
d off freedom
f d off the
th
structure.
From the qualitative deflected shape of the continuous beam
shown in Figure below, we can see that none of its joints can
translate.
30 k
1.5 k/ft
θB θC
A D
θB B θC C
20 ft 10 ft 10 ft 15 ft

The fixed joints A and D cannot rotate,


rotate whereas joints B and C are
free to rotate.
30
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Degrees of Freedom
30 k
1.5 k/ft
θB θC
A D
θB B θC C
20 ft 10 ft 10 ft 15 ft

This beam has two degrees of freedom, θB and θC, which represent
the unknown rotations of joints B and C, respectively.

The number of degrees of freedom is sometimes called the degree


of kinematic indeterminacy of the structure. This beam is
ki
kinematically
i ll indeterminate
i d i to the
h second
d degree.
d

A structure without
h any degrees
d off freedom
f d is termedd
kinematically determinate. 31
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Equations of Equilibrium
The unknown joint rotations are determined by solving the
equations of equilibrium of the joints that are free to rotate. The
f
free b d diagrams
body di off the
th members
b andd joints
j i t B and d C off the
th
continuous beam are shown.
30 k
1.5 k/ft
θB θC
D
A
θB B θC C
20 ft 10 ft 10 ft 15 ft

30 k
1.5 k/ft MCD
MBA MCB MDC

A B B C C D
MAB MBC
B C

32
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Equations of Equilibrium
In addition to the external loads, each member is subjected to an
internal moment at each of its ends.
The correct senses of the member end moments are not yet
known, it is assumed that the moments at the ends of all the
members
b are positive (counterclockwise).
( l k )
The free body diagrams of the joints show the member end
moments acting in an opposite (clockwise) direction in accordance
with Newton’s law of action and reaction.
30 k
1.5 k/ft MCD
MBA MCB MDC

A B B C C D
MAB MBC
B C

33
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Equations of Equilibrium
Because the entire structure is in equilibrium, each of its members
and joints must also be in equilibrium. By applying the moment
equilibrium
ilib i equations
ti ∑MB = 0 andd ∑MC = 0,0 respectively,
ti l to
t the
th
free bodies of joints B and C, we obtain the equilibrium equations

M BA + M BC = 0 (17a)
M CB + M CD = 0 (17b)

30 k
1.5 k/ft MCD
MBA MCB MDC

A B B C C D
MAB MBA MBC MCB
B C

MBC MCD
34
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Slope‐Deflection Equations
The equilibrium equations Eqs. (17) can be expressed in terms of
the unknown joint rotations, θB and θC, by using slope‐deflection
equations
ti th t relate
that l t member
b end d momentst to
t the
th unknown
k j i t
joint
rotations.
Before
f we can write the
h slope‐deflection
l d fl equations, we needd to
compute the fixed‐end moments due to the external loads acting
on the members of the continuous beam.
beam
To calculate the fixed‐end moments, we apply imaginary clamps at
joints B and C to prevent them from rotating.
rotating
Or
we generally provide fixed‐supports at the ends of each member to
prevent the joint rotations as shown.

35
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Slope‐Deflection Equations
30 k
1.5 k/ft
A D

FEMAB FEMBA B FEMBC FEMCB C

OR
30 k
1.5 k/ft

A B B C C D
FEMAB FEMBA FEMBC FEMCB FEMCD FEMDC

The fixed‐end
Th fi d d moments t that
th t develop
d l att the th ends
d off the
th members
b
of this fully restrained or kinematically determinate structure can
easily be evaluated by using the fixed
fixed‐end
end moment expressions
given inside the back cover of book.
36
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Slope‐Deflection Equations
30 k
1.5 k/ft
A D

50 k‐ft 50 k‐ft B FEMBC FEMCB C

OR
30 k
1.5 k/ft

A B B C C D
50 k‐ft
50 k ft 50 k‐ft FEMBC FEMCB FEMCD FEMDC

F member
For b AB:
AB wL2 1.5(20 )
2
FEM AB = = = 50k − ft
12 12
wL2 1.5(20 )
2
FEM BA = = = 50k − ft
12 12 37
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Slope‐Deflection Equations
30 k
1.5 k/ft
A D

50 k‐ft 50 k‐ft B 75 k‐ft 75 k‐ft C

OR
30 k
1.5 k/ft

A B B C C D
50 k‐ft
50 k ft 50 k‐ft 75 k
75 k‐ft
ft 75 k‐ft
75 k ft 0 0

F member
For b BC:
BC
PL 30(20 )
FEM BC = = = 75k − ft
8 8
PL 30(20 )
FEM CB = = = 75k − ft
8 8 38
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Slope‐Deflection Equations
The slope‐deflection equations for the three members of the
continuous beam can now be written by using Eq. (9).
Since none of the supports of the continuous beam translates, the
chord rotations of the three members are zero (ΨAB = ΨBC = ΨCD
=0).
)
Also, supports A and D are fixed, the rotations θA = θD = 0. By
applying Eq. (9) for member AB, with A as the near end and B as
the far end, we obtain the slope‐deflection equation
2 EI
M AB = (0 + θ B − 0) + 50 = 0.1EIθ B + 50 (18a )
20
Next, by considering B as the near end and A as the far end, we
write
2 EI
M BA = (2θ B + 0 − 0) − 50 = 0.2 EIθ B − 50 (18b )
39
20
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Slope‐Deflection Equations
Similarly, by applying Eq. (9) for member BC, we obtain

2 EI
M BC = (2θ B + θ C ) + 75 = 0.2 EIθ B + 0.1EIθ C + 75 (18c )
20
2 EI
M CB = (2θ C + θ B ) − 75 = 0.2 EIθ C + 0.1EIθ B − 75 (18d )
20

and for member CD,,


2 EI
M CD = (2θ C ) = 0.267 EIθ C (18e )
15
2 EI
M DC = (θ C ) = 0.133
33EIθ C (188 f )
15
40
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Joint Rotations
To determine the unknown joint rotations θB & θC, we substitute
the slope‐deflection equations Eqs. (18) into the joint equilibrium
equations
ti E
Eqs. (17) and
d solve
l the
th resulting
lti systems
t off equations
ti
simultaneously for θB & θC. By substituting Eqs. (18b) and (18c) into
Eq (17a),
Eq. (17a) we obtain

(0.2 EIθB − 50) + (0.2 EIθB + 0.1EIθC + 75) = 0


or 0.4 EIθ B + 0.1EIθC = −25 (19a )
and by substituting Eqs. (18d) and (18e) into Eq. (17b), we get

(0.2 EIθC + 0.1EIθB − 75) + 0.267 EIθC = 0


or 0.1EIθ B + 0.467 EIθC = 75 (19b )
41
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Joint Rotations
Solving Eqs. (19a) & (19b) simultaneously for EIθB and EIθC, we
obtain
EIθ B = −108.46 k − ft 2
EIθC = 183.82 k − ft 2

By substituting
B b tit ti the
th numerical
i l values
l off E = 29,000
29 000 ksi 29 000(12)2
k i = 29,000(12)
ksf and I = 500 in.4 = (500/124)ft4 , we determine the rotations of
joints B and C to be

θ B = −0.0011 rad or 0.0011 rad


θC = 0.0018 rad

42
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Member End Moments
The moments at the ends of the three members of the continuous
beam can now be determined by substituting the numerical values
off EIθB and
d EIθC into
i t the
th slope‐deflection
l d fl ti equations
ti (E 18).
(Eqs. 18)

M AB = 0.1(− 108.46) + 50 = 39.2 k-ft


kf
M BA = 0.2(− 108.46) − 50 = −71.7 k-ft or 71.7 k-ft
M BC = 0.2(− 108.46 ) + 0.1(183.82 ) + 75 = 71.7 k-ft
M CB = 0.2(183.82 ) + 0.1(− 108.46 ) − 75 = −49.1 k-ft
f or 49.1 k-ft
f
M CD = 0.267(183.82) = 49.1 k-ft
M DC = 0.133(183.82 ) = 24.4 k-ft
k ft

43
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Member End Moments
To check that the solution of simultaneous equations (Eqs. 19) has
been carried out correctly, the numerical values of member end
momentst should
h ld be b substituted
b tit t d into
i t the
th joint
j i t equilibrium
ilib i
equations (Eqs. 17). If the solution is correct, then the equilibrium
equations should be satisfied.
satisfied

M BA + M BC = −71.7 + 71.7 = 0 Checks


M CB + M CD = −49.1 + 49.1 = 0 Checks

The member end moments just computed are shown on the free
body diagrams of the members and joints in Figure on next slide.

44
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Member End Moments
30 k
1.5 k/ft 49.1 24.4
71.7 49.1

A B B C C D
39.2 71.7
SAB = 13.38 k SBA B SBC SCB C SCD SDC

By Cy
Member End Shears
The shear forces at the ends of members can now be determined
by applying the equations of equilibrium to the free bodies of
members. For member AB,

+ ∑MB = 0 39.2 − S AB (20 ) + 1.5(20)(10 ) − 71.7 = 0


S AB = 13.38 k ↑
45
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Member End Shears
30 k
1.5 k/ft 49.1 24.4
71.7 49.1

A B B C C D
39.2 71.7
SBA = 16.62 k B SBC SCB C SCD SDC
SAB = 13.38 k

By Cy
For member AB,
+ ↑ ∑ Fy = 0 3 38 − 1.5(20 ) + S BA = 0
13.38
S BA = 16.62 k ↑

46
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Member End Shears
30 k
1.5 k/ft 49.1 24.4
71.7 49.1

A B B C C D
39.2 71.7
SBA = 16.62 k B SCB = 13.87 k C SCD SDC
SAB = 13.38 k SBC = 16.13 k
= 16 13 k

By Cy
For member BC,
+ ∑ MC = 0 1 7 − S BC (20) + 30(10) − 49.1 = 0
71.7
S BC = 16.13 k ↑

+ ↑ ∑ Fy = 0 16.13 − 30 + SCB = 0
SCB = 13.87 k ↑
47
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Member End Shears
30 k
1.5 k/ft 49.1 24.4
71.7 49.1

A B B C C D
39.2 71.7
SBA = 16.62 k B SCB = 13.87 k C SCD = 4.9 k SDC = 4.9 k
SAB = 13.38 k SBC = 16.13 k
= 16 13 k

By Cy
For member CD,
+ ∑MD = 0 9 1 − SCD (15) + 24.4 = 0
49.1
SCD = 4.9 k ↑

+ ↑ ∑ Fy = 0 4.9 + S DC = 0
S DC = 4.9 k ↓
48
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Support Reactions
30 k
1.5 k/ft 49.1 24.4
71.7 49.1

A B 16.62 k16.13 k71.7
B C C D
39.2
SBA = 16.62 k B SCB = 13.87 k C SCD = 4.9 k SDC = 4.9 k
SAB = 13.38 k SBC = 16.13 k
= 16 13 k

By = 32.75 k
= 32 75 k Cy

From the free body diagram of joint B, we can see that the vertical 
reaction at the roller support B is equal to the sum of the shears at 
ends B of member AB and BC; that is

B y = S BA + S BC = 16.62 + 16.13 = 32.75 k ↑

49
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Support Reactions
30 k
1.5 k/ft 49.1 24.4
71.7 49.1

A B 16.62 k16.13 k71.7
B C 13.87 k 4.9 k
C D
39.2
SBA = 16.62 k B SCB = 13.87 k C SCD = 4.9 k SDC = 4.9 k
SAB = 13.38 k SBC = 16.13 k
= 16 13 k

By = 32.75 k
= 32 75 k Cy = 18.77 k
= 18 77 k

The vertical reaction at the roller support C equals the sum of 
shears at ends C of members BC and CD.

C y = SCB + SCD = 13.87 + 4.9 = 18.77 k ↑

50
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Support Reactions

30 k
1.5 k/ft
A D

B C

32.75 k 18.77 k

51
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Support Reactions
30 k
1.5 k/ft
A D
39.2 k‐ft B C

32 75 k
32.75 k 18 77 k
18.77 k
13.38 k

The reactions at the fixed support A are equal to the shear and 
moment at the end A of member AB.

Ay = S AB = 13.38 k ↑
M A = M AB = 39.2 k − fft
52
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Support Reactions
30 k
1.5 k/ft 24.4 k‐ft
A D
39.2 k‐ft B C

32 75 k
32.75 k 18 77 k
18.77 k
13.38 k 4.9 k

The reactions at the fixed support D equal the shear and moment 
at end D of the member CD.

D y = S DC = 4.9 k ↓
M D = M DC = 24.4 k − fft
53
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Equilibrium Check
30 k
1.5 k/ft 24.4 k‐ft
A D
39.2 k‐ft B C

32 75 k
32.75 k 18 77 k
18.77 k
13.38 k 4.9 k

To check out computations of member end shears and support 
reactions, we apply the equations of equilibrium to the free body 
of the entire structure.
+ ↑ ∑ Fy = 0
13.38 − 1.5(20 ) + 32.75 − 30 + 18.77 − 4.9 = 0 Checks

+ ∑MD = 0
39.2 − 13.38(55) + 1.5(20)(45) − 32.75(35) + 30(25)
− 18.77(15) + 24.4 = −0.1 ≈ 0 Checks 54
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Shear Diagram
30 k
1.5 k/ft 24.4 k‐ft
A D
39.2 k‐ft B C

32 75 k
32.75 k 18 77 k
18.77 k
13.38 k 4.9 k

Using General sign conventions

16.13
13.38 

4.9
A F B E C D

8.92 ft
‐13.87
‐16.62
55
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Moment Diagram
30 k
1.5 k/ft 24.4 k‐ft
A D
39.2 k‐ft B C

32 75 k
32.75 k 18 77 k
18.77 k
13.38 k 4.9 k

Using General sign conventions

89.7
20.5 24.4
A B C D
F E

‐39.2 ‐49.1
‐71.7
56
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila
30 k
1.5 k/ft 24.4 k‐ft
A D

39.2 k‐ft B C

32.75 k 18.77 k
13.38 k 4.9 k
16.13
13 38
13.38 

4.9
A F B E C D

8.92 ft
13 87
‐13.87
‐16.62 89.7

20 5
20.5 24.4
A B C D
F E

‐39.2 ‐49.1
57
‐71.7
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Analysis of Continuous Beam
Based on the discussion above, the procedure for the analysis of
continuous beams can be summarized as follows:

1. Identify the degrees of freedom of structure.


2. Compute
p fixed‐end moments.
3. In case of support settlements, determine the chord rotations Ψ.
4. Write slope deflection equations.
5
5. W it equilibrium
Write ilib i equations
ti f each
for h joint.
j i t
6. Determine the unknown joint rotations.
7. Calculate member end moments by substituting the numerical values of joint
rotations determined in step 6 into the slope deflection equations.
8. Satisfy the equilibrium equations for joints in step 5.
9. Compute member end shears.
10. Determine the support reactions by considering the equilibrium of joints.
11. Satisfy the equilibrium equations for end shears and support reactions.
12. Draw shear and bending moment diagrams using the beam sign convention.
58
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Structures with Cantilever Overhangs
Consider a continuous beam with a cantilever overhang, as shown
in the figure.
w
A Actual Beam
D
B C
a

MCD = wa2/2 w

Statically Determinate Cantilever Portion D
C
SCD = wa

wa

w wa2/2
Actual Beam
A
59
B C
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Example 1

• Determine the reactions and draw the shear and bending moment
diagrams for the two‐span continuous beam shown in Figure.

18 k
18 k
2 k/ft
A B C

10 ft 15 ft 30 ft

EI = constant

60
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution
1. Degree of Freedom

We can see that only joint B of the beam is free to rotate. Thus, the
structure has only one degree of freedom, which is the unknown
joint rotation, θB.

18 k
18 k
2 k/ft
A B C

θB

10 ft
f 15 ft
f 30 ft
f

EI = constant

61
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

2. Fixed‐End Moments

By using the fixed‐end moment expressions given inside the back


cover of the book, we evaluate the fixed‐end moments due to the
external loads for each member.
Pab 2 18(10)(15)
2
FEM AB = 2 = = 64.8 k − ft or + 64.8 k-ft
L 25 2

Pa 2b 18(10 ) (15)
2
FEM BA = 2 = = 43.2 k − ft or − 64.8 k-ft
L 25 2

wL2 2(30 )
2
FEM BC = = = 150 k − ft or + 150 k-ft
12 12
FEM CB = 150 k − ft or − 150 k-ft

Counterclockwise FEM are positive, whereas clockwise FEM are negative.


62
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

3. Chord Rotations

Since no support settlements occur, the chord rotations of both


members are zero; that is, ΨAB = ΨBC = 0.

4. Slope‐Deflection Equations

To relate the member end moments to the unknown joint rotation,


θB, we write the slope deflection equation for the two members of
th structure
the t t b applying
by l i Eq.
E (9).
(9)

M nf =
2 EI
(2θ n + θ f − 3ψ ) + FEM nf (9)
L
since the
h supports A and
d C are fixed,
f d theh rotations θA = θC =0.
63
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

4. Slope‐Deflection Equations

Slope‐Deflection Equation for Member AB

2 EI
M AB = (θ B ) + 64.8 = 0.08EIθ B + 64.8 (1)
25
2 EI
M BA = (2θ B ) − 43.2 = 0.16 EIθ B − 43.2 (2)
25

Slope‐Deflection Equation for Member BC

2 EI
M BC = (2θ B ) + 150 = 0.133EIθ B + 150 (3)
30
2 EI
M CB = (θ B ) − 150 = 0.0667 EIθ B − 150 (4)
30
64
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

5. Equilibrium Equations
The free body diagram of joint B is shown in Figure.
18 k
2 k/ft
2 k/ft
A B C

18 k
MBA /
2 k/ft
MBA MCB
B

A B MBC B C
MAB MBC

Member end moments,, which are assumed to be in


counterclockwise direction on the ends of members, must be
applied in (opposite) clockwise direction on the free body of the
joint in accordance
d with
h Newton’s
’ Third
h d Law.
65
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

5. Equilibrium Equations

The free body diagram of joint B is shown in Figure.

18 k
MBA 2 k/ft
/
MBA MCB
B

A B MBC B C
MAB MBC

By applying the moment equilibrium equation ∑MB = 0 to the free


body of the joint B, we obtain

M BA + M BC = 0 (5)
66
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

6. Joint Rotations

To determine the unknown joint rotations, θB, substitute the slope


deflection equations (Eqs. 2 & 3) into the equilibrium equation (Eq.
5).

(0.16 EIθ B − 43.2) + (0.133EIθ B + 150) = 0


or
0.293EIθ B = −106.8
from which
EIθ B = −364.5 k − ft 2

67
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

7. Member End Moments

The member end moments can now be computed by substituting


the numerical value of EIθB back into the slope‐deflection equation
(Eqs. 1 to 4).

M AB = 0.08(− 364.5) + 64.8 = 35.6 k − ft


M BA = 0.16(− 364.5) − 43.2 = −101.5 k − ft or 101.5 k-ft
M BC = 0.133(− 364.5) + 150 = 101.5 k − ft
M CB = 0.0667(− 364.5) − 150 = −174.3 k − ft or 174.3 k-ft

Positive answer for an end moment indicates that its sense is


counterclockwise, whereas a negative answer implies a clockwise
sense As MBA and MBC are equal in magnitude but opposite in
sense.
sense, the equilibrium equation MBA + MBC = 0 is satisfied. 68
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

18 k
2 k/ft
2 k/ft
B

A B 101 5
101.5 101.5 B C
35.6 101 5
101.5 101.5 174 3
174.3

8. Member End Shears

The member end shears, obtained by considering the equilibrium


of each member, are shown in figure below
18 k
2 k/ft
B
A B 101.5 101.5 B C
35.6 101.5 101.5 174.3
8.16 9.84 27.57 32.43
69
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

9. Support Reactions

The reactions at the fixed support A and C are equal to the forces
and moments at the ends of the members connected to these
joints. To determine the reaction at roller support B, consider the
equilibrium of the free body of joint B in the vertical direction.
direction

B y = S BA + S BC = 9.84 + 27.57 = 37.41 k ↑ ANS

18 k
9.84 27.57 2 k/ft
B
A B 101.5 101.5 B C
35.6 101.5 101.5 174.3
8 16
8.16 9 84
9.84 27 57
27.57 32 43
32.43
37.41
70
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

9. Support Reactions

The support reactions are shown in figure below.

18 k
2 k/ft
A B C

35.6 k‐ft 174.3 k‐ft

37.41 k
8.16 k 32.43 k

71
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

10. Equilibrium Check

To check our calculations of member end shears and support


reactions, we apply the equations of equilibrium to the free body
of the entire structure.
18 k
18 k
2 k/ft
A B C

35.6 k‐ft 174.3 k‐ft

37 41 k
37.41 k
8.16 k 32.43 k

+ ↑ ∑ Fy = 0
8.16 − 18 + 37.41 − 2(30) + 32.43 = 0 Ch k
Checks
72
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

10. Equilibrium Check

To check our calculations of member end shears and support


reactions, we apply the equations of equilibrium to the free body
of the entire structure.
18 k
18 k
2 k/ft
A B C

35.6 k‐ft 174.3 k‐ft

37 41 k
37.41 k
8.16 k 32.43 k
10 ft 15 ft 30 ft

+ ∑ MC = 0
35.6 − 8.16(55) + 18(45) − 37.41(30) + 2(30 )(15) − 174.3 = 0.2 ≈ 0 Checks

73
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

11. Shear Force Diagram


18 k
2 k/ft
A B C

35.6 k‐ft 174.3 k‐ft

37.41 k
8.16 k 32.43 k

27.57

8 16
8.16
16.2 ft
A D B C
E
‐9.84

‐32.43

74
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

11. Bending Moment Diagram


18 k
2 k/ft
A B C

35.6 k‐ft 174.3 k‐ft

37.41 k
8.16 k 32.43 k

88.7
46
A B C
D E
‐35.6
35 6

‐101.5 ‐174.3

75
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Example 2

• Determine the reactions and draw the shear and bending moment
diagrams for the continuous beam shown in Figure.

60 kN
60 kN
15 kN/m
A D
B C

10 m 5 m 5 m


I 2I 2I
E = 200 GPa
I = 700 (106) mm4

76
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

• From figure we can see that all three joints of the beam are free to
rotate. Thus the beam have 3 degrees of freedom, θA, θB, θD.

• The end supports A and D of the beam are simple supports at


which no external moment is applied, the moments at the end A of
the
h member
b AB and d at the
h end
d D off the
h member
b BD must beb zero.
60 kN
15 kN/m
A D
B C

MBA MDB = 0


B
A D

MAB = 0 MBD


77
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

• The ends A and D can be considered as hinged ends and the


modified slope‐deflection equations can be used.
3EI ⎛ FEM hr ⎞
M rh = (θ r −ψ ) + ⎜ FEM rh − (15a )
L ⎝ 2 ⎠
M hr = 0 (15b )

• The modified SDE do not contain the rotations of the hinged ends,
by using these equations the rotations θA, and θD of the simple
supports can be eliminated, which will then involve only one
unknown
k j i t rotation,
joint t ti θB.
60 kN
15 kN/m
A D
B C
78
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

1. Degree of Freedom
θB
2. Fixed‐End Moments

15(10)
2
FEM AB = = 125 kN − m or + 125 kN-m
12
FEM BA = 125 kN − m or − 125 kN-m
60(10 ) 15(10 )
2
FEM BD = + = 200 kN − m or + 200 kN-m
8 12
FEM DB = 200 kN − m or − 200 kN
kN-m
m

60 kN
15 kN/m
A D
B C

79
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

3. Slope‐Deflection Equations
Since both members of the beam have one end hinged, we use
Eqs. 15 to obtain the slope‐deflection equations for both members.

M AB = 0 ANS
3EI ⎛ 125 ⎞
M BA = (θ B ) + ⎜ − 125 − ⎟ = 0.3EIθ B − 187.5 (1)
10 ⎝ 2 ⎠
3E (2 I ) ⎛ 200 ⎞
M BD = (θ B ) + ⎜ 200 + ⎟ = 0.6 EIθ B + 300 (2)
10 ⎝ 2 ⎠
M DB = 0 ANS
60 kN
15 kN/m
A D
B C
80
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

4. Equilibrium Equations

By considering the moment equilibrium of the free body of joint B,


we obtain the equilibrium equation
MBA
B

MBD

M BA + M BD = 0 (3)

5. Joint Rotation

To determine the unknown joint rotation θB we substitute the SDE


(Eqs. 1 &2) into the equilibrium equations Eq. 3 to obtain

81
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

6. Joint Rotation
(0.3EIθ B − 187.5) + (0.6 EIθ B + 300) = 0
or
0.9 EIθ B = −112.5
from which
EIθ B = −125 kN − m 2

7. Member End Moments

The member end moments can now be computedp byy substitutingg


the numerical value of EIθB into the slope‐deflection equations
(Eqs. 1 & 2).

82
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

8. Member End Moments


M BA = 0.3(− 125) − 187.5 = −225 kN − m or 225 kN-m ANS
M BD = 0.6(− 125) + 300 = 225 kN − m ANS

9. Member End Shears and Support reactions


60 kN
15 kN/m 97.5 127.5 15 kN/m
B

A B 225 225 B C
225 225
52.5 97.5 127.5 82.5
By = 225

60 kN
15 kN/m
15 kN/m
A D
B C

52.5 kN 225 kN 82.5 kN 83


University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

10. Equilibrium Checks


60 kN
15 kN/m
A D
B C

52 5 kN
52.5 kN 225 kN
225 kN 82 5 kN
82.5 kN

+ ↑ ∑ Fy = 0
52.5 − 15(20 ) + 225 − 60 + 82.5 = 0 Checks

+ ∑ MC = 0
− 52.5(20) + 15(20)(10) − 225(10) + 60(5) = 0 Checks

84
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

11. Shear Force & Bending Moment Diagrams


60 kN
15 kN/m
A D
B C

52 5 kN
52.5 kN 225 kN
225 kN 82 5 kN
82.5 kN

127 5
127.5

52.5
52 5
52.5
16.2 ft
A E B D
C
3.5 m ‐7.5

‐82.5
‐97.5
85
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

11. Shear Force & Bending Moment Diagrams


60 kN
15 kN/m
A D
B C

52 5 kN
52.5 kN 225 kN
225 kN 82 5 kN
82.5 kN
225

91.88

A E B D
C

86
225
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Example 3

• Determine the member end moments and reactions for the three‐
span continuous beam shown, due to the uniformly distributed
load and due to the support settlements of 5/8 in. at B, and 1.5 in.
att C,
C and
d ¾ in.
i att D.
D

2 k/ft
A D
B C

20 ft 20 ft 20 ft

E = 29,000 ksi
I = 7 800 in 4
I = 7,800 in.

87
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

Solution

1. Degree of Freedom
Four joints of the beam are free to rotate, we will eliminate the
rotations of simple supports at ends A and D and use the modified
SDE for member AB and CD respectively.

The analysis will involve only two unknown joint rotations, θB and
θC.

2 k/ft
A D
B C

88
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

2. Fixed End Moments


2(20)
2
FEM AB = FEM BC = FEM CD = = 66.7 k − ft or + 66.7 k-ft
12
FEM BA = FEM CB = FEM DC = 66.7 k − ft or − 66.7 k-ft

3. Chord Rotations
The specified support settlements are shown on a exaggerated
scale. 2 k/ft
A D
B C

A B C D
3
5 in.
ΨAB 8
in. 1
1 in.
4
2
ΨBC D’
D
B’ ΨCD
C’ 89
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

3. Chord Rotations
2 k/ft
A D
B C
20 ft 20 ft 20 ft

A B C D
ΨAB 5
8
in.
1
3
4
in.
1 in.
ΨBC 2
D’
B’ ΨCD
C’
0.0521
ψ AB =− = −0.0026
20
0.0729
ψ BC =− = −0.00365
20
1.5 − 0.75
ψ CD = = 0.00313
(12)20
90
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

4. Slope‐deflection Equations
M AB = 0 ANS
3EI
M BA = (θ B + 0.0026) − 100 = 0.15EIθ B + 0.00039 EI − 100 (1)
10
2 EI
M BC = [2θ B + θ C − 3(− 0.00365)] + 66.7
20
= 0.2 EIθ B + 0.1EIθ C + 0.0011EI + 66.7 (2)
2 EI
M CB = [2θ C + θ B − 3(− 0.00365)] − 66.7
20
= 0.1EIθ B + 0.2 EIθ C + 0.0011EI − 66.7 (3)
3EI
M CD = (θ C − 0.00313) + 100 = 0.15EIθ C − 0.00047 EI + 100 (4)
20
M DC = 0 ANS
91
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

5. Equilibrium Equations
MBA MCB
B
M BA + M BC = 0 C
(5)
MBC M CB + M CD = 0 MCD (6)
6. Joint Rotations

By substituting the slope‐deflection equations (Eqs. 1 – 4) into the


equilibrium equations (Eqs. 5 & 6), we obtain

0 35 EIθ B + 0.1EIθ C = −0.00149 EI + 33.3


0.35
0.1EIθ B + 0.35 EIθ C = −0.00063EI − 33.3

substituting EI = (29,000)(7,800)/(12)2 k‐ft2 into the right sides of


the above equations yields
92
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

6. Joint Rotations
0.35 EIθ B + 0.1EIθ C = −2,307.24 (7)
0 1EIθ B + 0.35 EIθ C = −1,022.93
0.1 (8)

By solving Eqs. (7) and (8) simultaneously, we determine the values


of EIθB and EIθB to be
EIθ B = −6,268
68.881 k − ft 2
EIθ C = −1,131.57.81 k − ft 2
7. Member End Moments

To compute the member end moments, substitute the numerical


values of EIθB and EIθC back into the slope‐deflection equations
(
(Eqs. 1 – 4)) to obtain
b
93
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

7. Member End Moments


M BA = −427.7 k − ft or 427 k-ft ANS
M BC = 427 k − ft ANS
M CB = 808 k − ft ANS
M CD = −808 k − ft or 808 k-ft ANS

8. Member End Shears and Support Reactions

41.38 81.79 41.79 20.4


2 k/ft 2 k/ft 808 808 2 k/ft
B C

A B B C C D
427.7 427.7
1.38 41.38 81.79 41.79 20.4 60.4
By = 123.17 Cy = 62.19

94
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

8. Member End Shears and Support Reactions

41.38 81.79 41.79 20.4


2 k/ft 2 k/ft 808 808 2 k/ft
B C

A B B C C D
427.7 427.7
1.38 41.38 81.79 41.79 20.4 60.4
By = 123.17 Cy = 62.19

2 k/ft
A D
B C

1.38 k 123.17 k 62.19 k 60.4 k

95
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

9. Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams


2 k/ft
A D
B C

1 38 k
1.38 k 123 17 k
123.17 k 62 19 k
62.19 k 60 4 k
60.4 k

81.79

41 79
41.79

A D
B C
‐1.38
‐20.4

‐41.38
96
‐60.4
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

9. Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams


2 k/ft
A D
B C

1 38 k
1.38 k 123 17 k
123.17 k 62 19 k
62.19 k 60 4 k
60.4 k

808.2

A D
B C

‐427.6 97
University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila

For other cases follow Examples 16.1 to 16.7 in Slope‐Deflection 
Notes & Structural Analysis by Hibbeler. 

98

You might also like