Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ENG111
Marisa Enos
4 March 2018
It is assumed, here in America, that when a child is sent to school, they are being nurtured
and taught by people who are experts in the field of teaching those children. These educators
have gone to school many years to be teaching those children. Why then should it be worrisome?
There has been a war on creativity for many years, and it has gotten progressively worse. These
teachers have gone through the same broken education system that everybody else does. Perhaps
they do not realize that their methods are, in fact, preventing children from using their creativity
in everyday life. Any bit of imagination that is left after preschool is put aside and those children
are set on an assembly line to ride along until they get their diploma. In this way, children are
taught to go along with what the teacher says to do, and in return graduates without issue. The
problem with this method, is that it oppresses any bit of divergent thinking that child has left. In
divergent thinking, many different solutions to one problem can be found. This takes creativity
America has been known as the “melting pot” from the start. That is, a country where
many different nationalities are accepted, and unity is more important than the color of skin. At
least that’s what it’s supposed to be like. Creativity comes from so many different cultures, so
everybody’s imagination tends to create something unique. In a text written by bell hooks, an
author, professor, and cultural critic, she points out the problem that faces African American
Kenny 2
students, and why they are misunderstood. In “Language: Teaching New Worlds/New Words”
hooks explains the background of the black vernacular of the English language. When Africans
were brought over to America as slaves, their own language was taken from them. “Needing the
oppressor’s language to speak with one another they nevertheless also reinvented, remade that
language so that it would speak beyond the boundaries of conquest and domination. In the
mouths of black Africans in the so-called “New World,” English was altered, transformed, and
became a different speech” (hooks 57). They used divergent thinking to find this path to some
form of dignity in their lives. Now, after everything those who were enslaved had to go through,
the black vernacular is often misunderstood and found unacceptable in the American educational
system. As hooks points out in this text, it is difficult for the black vernacular to be integrated
into academic writings (hooks 58), as it is often misunderstood by a primarily white audience. In
today’s American society, we claim to be open-minded and accepting of all cultures. In reality,
because of the way we have been brought up in an oppressive educational environment, we only
have the capacity for convergent thinking. Anything that is not understood, is discounted. We are
taught that there is only one way to write, one way to speak, only one way that is correct. In a
sense, a child’s imagination being taken away at such a young age isn’t so much different than
what hooks’ ancestors went through when their own language was taken away. Both are forced
socioeconomic status also plays a role in the American educational experience. Paulo Freire was
an educator and author who spent most of his time working to influence the educational
community to change the way teachers and learners interact. Freire is popular for his book,
explains this term more thoroughly. Many times in education, there is a curriculum that is
followed and not strayed from. It is an extremely impersonal experience for both parties
involved. There is no respect, no creativity, and no dialogue involved, just the teacher making
their “knowledge deposit” to the student. In this way, everything is black and white; there is no
gray area. Again, this teaches convergent thinking rather than using dialogue to take in multiple
ideas and realize that there is more than one way to look at an issue.
The current education system is outdated in its methods and children are being given
medications that basically sedate them to force them to be quiet and listen while the teacher
deposits the information. Sir Ken Robinson approaches this problem in a way that could be
considered controversial. Like Freire and hooks, Robinson focuses on the flaws in the
educational system as well as changing the way education is approached. While hooks focuses
on changes in cultural acceptance, Freire pushes for a “problem posing” education (Freire 6).
Robinson goes into detail about the way children are being anesthetized and numbed rather than
being encouraged to have fun with what they’re learning. In his video, “Changing Education
Paradigms”, Robinson points out the over-stimulating world around these children, which makes
them think school subjects are boring and have issues paying attention. This causes a chain
reaction of being diagnosed with ADHD and put on medication that numbs them rather than
nurturing their creativity and showing them the fun side of education. “The arts especially
address the idea of an aesthetic experience. An aesthetic experience is when your senses are
operating at their peak; when you’re present in the current moment, when you’re fully alive”
(Robinson). This is the way children should be taught; the conditions in which you learn the best.
Another great thing that Robinson brings to his audience’s attention, is that children are divided
Kenny 4
into groups by the year they were born rather than what discipline they are passionate about,
which they should be focusing on more. This would foster creative thinking.
Much like Robinson’s view on anesthetizing children for the sake of learning, Paulo
Freire addresses the same problem. In a depository education system, creative power is inhibited
and discouraged in the classroom. Freire’s problem-posing education has a “constant unveiling
of reality”, stating that it “strives for the emergence of consciousness” (Freire 8). His problem-
posing idea is, in fact, the exact thought that Robinson puts out in his Changing Educational
Paradigms video. This system is based around creativity and the development of critical
divergent thinking (Freire 10). Another similarity in these two views on education, is that Freire
tells us in his excerpt, that those who experience the banking concept of education are
“necrophilic” or dead, in a sense because they cannot be liberated and live freely in this way
(Freire 5). What Robinson speaks about in his video, is liberation of our children as well as adult
students. Authentic liberation, according to Freire, is the process of humanization (Freire 6).
themselves should be discounted because it isn’t the same the majority of the population’s. If
creativity was nurtured instead of killed, these people could learn a thing or two from these
people’s languages and ways of life. There is rich history behind the way people are taught to
express themselves. In order to foster the growth of our people, and achieve real happiness and
liberation, America could benefit greatly from Paulo Freire’s model of problem-posing
education. It would do away with many issues we see in the world. Mental illness, including
ADHD, would become more of a rarity if people could just be their own creative selves.
Children who present with mental illness are statistically developing them younger than before,
when creativity had a place in the world we live in. It is then, that divergent thinking would have
Kenny 5
a place in society. It could be understood that it is alright to have different viewpoints on politics
and that each job in society has a function, each one being as important as the next. Children
Works Cited
Freire, Paulo. The "Banking" Concept of Education. 1970.
http://www.umsl.edu/~alexanderjm/The%20Banking%20Concept%20of%20Education.pdf.
2018.
hooks, bell. "Language: Teaching New Worlds/New Words." Various. Exploring Connections: Learning in
the 21st Century. New York: Pearson Education, 2016. 55-60.