Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4, DECEMBER 2005
(1)
(2)
Fig. 1. Cross-sectional view of the motor. The PMs used in this AFPMSM are ferrite-type magnets
having therefore a linear characteristic in the useful
region. The remanence of PMs is considered to be ideal and
oriented in the axial direction yielding to the following Fourier
series:
(3)
(4)
by the stator poles configuration and the magnetization distribu-
tion. The parametric study of the cogging torque can be simply (5)
made using its expression issued from the proposed quasi-3-D
model. So the cogging torque of this AFPMSM is computed for and the constitutive relation between and
different stator auxiliary poles openings and for different mag-
(6)
netization distribution. Moreover, for the manufactured proto-
type of this AFPMSM, the results issued from the quasi-3-D Combining (5) and (6) yields
presented solution of magnetic field in the air gap are compared
on one hand with those issued from some 3-D FEM simulations (7)
and, on the other hand, with the measured values.
Using the fact that the magnetic flux density is equal to the
II. ANALYTICAL MODELING OF THE MAGNETIC FIELD curl of a vector potential and choosing the Coulomb gauge
, (7) becomes
A. Geometry of the Machine
The geometry of the studied AFPMSM is presented in Figs. 1 (8)
and 2. The rotor PMs are surface mounted, axially magnetized,
and separated by nonmagnetized zones. The cross-sectional Taking into account the considered assumptions, the previous
view in Fig. 1 shows the arrangement of air gap, rotor PMs, and equation can be written in a cylindrical coordinates system as
stator poles along the axial direction. The stator has four poles
with four auxiliary poles (Fig. 2). (9)
Taking into account the geometry of this machine, its main
flux is obviously 3-D and the boundary conditions in the radial Using the separation of variables technique, the vector potential
direction (inner and outer diameter) are very hard to choose in solution form in the PMs region can be written as
the case of an analytical approach. Nevertheless, an effective
quasi-3-D analytical modeling of the magnetic field can be car-
ried out simply by conveniently adapting a 2-D analytical solu-
tion. It is extended to the entire main flux region by multiplying
the vector potential solution by a radial-dependent function is-
sued from an FEM study. (10)
748 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION, VOL. 20, NO. 4, DECEMBER 2005
(11)
The magnetic-field solution will be given briefly in the fol-
lowing subsections.
1) Region I (Slots): The origin of the circumferential direc-
tion is arbitrarily chosen to be in the center of a stator main Fig. 3. Unrolled surface of a cylindrical cutting plane placed in the main flux
region.
pole (Fig. 3). The slots, which are numbered , 1, and
, have the following boundary conditions:
for (12)
(20)
for (13)
4) Boundary Condition Between Regions: Boundary condi-
With these boundary conditions, the general solution for the tions between regions are required to determine the Fourier se-
magnetic filed in the slots region can be expressed as ries coefficients of the magnetic field. The magnetic flux density
continuity condition prescribes that the magnetic flux density
normal component is continuous at the surface between two re-
gions. Ampere’s continuity condition prescribes that there is a
jump in the tangential component of the magnetic field strength
(14) as one passes through a surface current density between regions.
In the studied machine, the permeability of the stator and rotor
cores is assumed to be infinite. Then, the magnetic-field strength
in iron is zero. Also, it is assumed that stator and rotor iron as
(15) well as PMs are nonconductive materials. So, the surface current
density is equal to zero everywhere. Then, the boundary condi-
tions between regions II and III are
2) Region II (Air gap): In this region, the general solution
of the magnetic field is
For and (21)
(17)
(22)
for
(19)
(24)
AZZOUZI et al.: QUASI-3-D ANALYTICAL MODELING OF MAGNETIC FIELD OF AFPMSM 749
Fig. 4. Axial flux density versus radial coordinate for e = 1 (1) mm, 2 mm Fig. 5. Axial flux density versus radial coordinate for e = 1 mm (1), 2 mm
(2), and 4 mm (3). (2), and 4 mm (3).
Fig. 7. Measured and computed axial flux density in the air gap at points b1
After the integration on the radial direction between the inner and b2.
and outer radii, the cogging torque expression becomes
(30)
(31)
where
(32) Fig. 8. Measured and computed axial flux density at the point a ( = 7:5 ).
The cogging torque expression (29) depends on the design
parameters: the PMs distribution in the rotor as well as the
sured values of the axial flux density and the calculated ones
shape of stator magnetic circuit (slotting, auxiliary poles, pole
by using the quasi-3-D solution at the points and . One
number ) which are contained in the Fourier series coeffi-
can observe that the quasi-3-D analytical solution gives precise
cients of region III (25). Therefore, this expression can be used
values of the magnetic flux density over a substantial portion of
to reduce the cogging torque.
the main flux region. In Figs. 8–10, the measured values of the
axial flux density are compared to the (quasi-3-D) analytically
IV. RESULT AND DISCUSSION calculated ones at the points , , and , respectively, and this,
In order to validate the proposed quasi-3-D analytical model, for multiple positions of the rotor with respect to the stator.
the obtained analytical results have been compared with FEM In Figs. 7 and 9, the computed axial flux density values are
simulation results as well as measurement results on a 22 W, slightly higher than the corresponding measured values in front
four-pole prototype machine. The PMs used have remanence of the PM south pole. It is probably due to the fact that the north
flux density of 0.37 T, coercive field strength of pole PM does not have the same axial length than the south pole
255 , and recoil permeability of 1.1. The iron of PM. In Figs. 8 and 10, differences between calculated and mea-
stator and rotor is FeSi material with saturation flux density sured values would be explained by the fact that the remanence
of 1.9 T and initial permeability of 10 800. Outer and inner radii of PMs is not distributed regularly, or the Hall sensor is not suit-
of PM poles ( and ) are of 32 and 18 mm, respectively; ably mounted, or yet the manufacturing process is inadequate.
depth of PM is 4 mm; air-gap length is 1 mm; depth of Despite the differences between calculated and measured axial
slots is 25 mm; and outer and inner radii of stator poles ( magnetic-field values presented above, the results obtained from
and ) are 30 and 20 mm (Figs. 1 and 2). the presented quasi-3-D model can be considered largely satis-
The axial flux density was calculated and measured along factory with regards to the manufacturing uncertainties for this
three different radial lines passing, respectively, by the points sized motor.
, , and (Fig. 6). The measurements were made by means of Also, some 3-D FEM simulations of the manufactured proto-
Hall sensors. Fig. 7 reports the comparison between the mea- type have been made with FLUX3D software in order to check
AZZOUZI et al.: QUASI-3-D ANALYTICAL MODELING OF MAGNETIC FIELD OF AFPMSM 751
Fig. 9. Measured and computed axial flux density in the air gap at the point b Fig. 12. Radial dependence of the axial magnetic-field component.
( = 15 ).
REFERENCES
[1] S. Huang, J. Luo, F. Leonardi, and T. A. Lipo, “A comparison of power
density for axial flux machines based on general purpose sizing,” IEEE
Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 185–191, Jun. 1999.
[2] C. C. Chan, “Axial-field electrical machines—Design and applications,”
IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. EC-2, no. 2, pp. 294–300, Jun. 1987.
[3] B. J. Chalmers, W. Wu, and E. Spooner, “An axial-flux perma-
nent-magnet generator for a gearles wind energy system,” IEEE Trans.
Energy Convers., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 251–257, Jun. 1999.
[4] G. Barakat, T. El-meslouhi, and B. Dakyo, “Analysis of the cogging
torque behavior of a two-phase axial flux permanent magnet syn-
chronous machine,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 2803–2805,
Jul. 2001.
[5] Y. N. Zhilichev, “Three-dimensional analytic model of permanent
magnet axial flux machine,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 34, no. 6, pp.
3897–3901, Nov. 1998.
[6] E. P. Furlani and M. A. Knewtson, “A three-dimensional field solution
for permanent magnet axial field motors,” IEEE Trans Magn., vol. 33,
no. 3, pp. 2322–2325, May 1997.
[7] Z. Q. Zhu and D. Howe, “Influence of design parameters on cogging
Fig. 14. Resultant cogging torque waveforms of different magnetization torque in permanent magnet machines,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 15, no.
distributions. 4, pp. 407–412, Dec. 2000.
[8] S.-M. Hwang, J.-B. Eom, Y.-H. Jung, D.-W. Lee, and B.-S. Kang, “Var-
ious design techniques to reduce cogging torque by controlling energy
variation in permanent magnet motor,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 37, no.
4, pp. 2806–2809, Jul. 2001.
[9] S. S. Y. Narayanan, K. R. A. Nair, and N. Narayanan, “Design analysis
of permanent magnet DC motors with differing armature, magnet and
yoke lengths,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 55–61,
Mar. 1998.
[10] J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley,
1975.