Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Excellent 20 Pts Good 15 Pts Fair 10 Pts Poor 5 PTS: Content

    Uploaded by

    Versoza Nel
    66 views1 page
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating presentations across several criteria on a scale from Excellent to Poor. Criteria include: 1) Content, assessing inclusion of required information and organization of topic discussion. 2) Powerpoint/Graphics, evaluating visual design elements like attractiveness, text legibility, use of graphics and effects, and how well information supports images. 3) Voice, considering loudness, clarity of speaker, length of presentation, and group member contributions. 4) Grammar and Mechanics, examining correctness of capitalization, punctuation and absence of grammatical errors.

    Original Description:

    ghgh

    Original Title

    Rubrics in PPT

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating presentations across several criteria on a scale from Excellent to Poor. Criteria include: 1) Content, assessing inclusion of required information and organization of topic discussion. 2) Powerpoint/Graphics, evaluating visual design elements like attractiveness, text legibility, use of graphics and effects, and how well information supports images. 3) Voice, considering loudness, clarity of speaker, length of presentation, and group member contributions. 4) Grammar and Mechanics, examining correctness of capitalization, punctuation and absence of grammatical errors.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    66 views1 page

    Excellent 20 Pts Good 15 Pts Fair 10 Pts Poor 5 PTS: Content

    Uploaded by

    Versoza Nel
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating presentations across several criteria on a scale from Excellent to Poor. Criteria include: 1) Content, assessing inclusion of required information and organization of topic discussion. 2) Powerpoint/Graphics, evaluating visual design elements like attractiveness, text legibility, use of graphics and effects, and how well information supports images. 3) Voice, considering loudness, clarity of speaker, length of presentation, and group member contributions. 4) Grammar and Mechanics, examining correctness of capitalization, punctuation and absence of grammatical errors.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Good Fair Poor

    Excellent
    15 pts 10 pts 5 pts
    20 pts

    Content Excellent Good Fair Poor

    All required slides included with All required slides with relevant Missing some slides or relevant Many slides missing or less slides OR slides do
    correct information. information. information. not contain relevant information.
    Topic is discussed clearly and in an Topic is somewhat discussed but Topic is slightly discussed but more Topic is addressed but not discussed or
    organized manner. more information is required. material is needed. elaborated on.

    Powerpoint/Graphics Excellent Good Fair Poor

    Slides are attractive. Text is legible. Slides are attractive. Text is legible. Slides are legible. Amount of text is The slides are not legible. The amount of text is
    Graphics and effects are used More than half of the slides use too great for the amount of space too great for the space provided. There is little
    throughout to enhance graphics and effects to enhance provided. Less than half the slides use of graphics or effects. The information does
    presentation. Information is at the presentation. Information have graphics or effects. not consistently support images.
    advanced level and consistently adequately supports images. Information supports images at
    supports images. times.

    Voice Excellent Good Fair Poor

    Speaker presents in a loud, clear Speaker presents in a loud, clear Speakers presents in a voice that is Speaker does not present in a loud or clear
    voice and does not read from voice but turns to the screen sometimes clear but constantly voice and reads simply from the presentation.
    screen. Presentation is at least 15 occasionally. refers to the presentation.
    minutes. Speaker sounds somewhat credible. Presentation is less than the Presentation is less than 10 mins in length and
    Speaker sounds credible. Presentation is at least 15 mins in required 15 mins in length. Not all not all group members contribute to the
    All group members contribute to length. group members contribute to the presentation and the distribution of material for
    the oral presentation equally. All group members contribute to oral presentation, or the each presenter is not equal.
    the oral presentation equally. distribution is not equal.

    Grammer and Mechanics Excellent Good Fair Poor

    Capitalization and punctuation are There is one error in capitalization There are two or more errors in There are many grammar or mechanical errors
    correct throughout the or punctuation OR there is one capitalization or punctuation Or on the presentation.
    presentation. There are no grammatical error on the there are two or more grammatical
    grammatical errors. presentation. errors on the presentation.

    Research Excellent Good Fair Poor

    References Used a variety of Topic researched objectively. Both Sparse research, little evidence Little evidence of research, objectivity or
    credible references, properly cited points of view evident. presented. Opinion rather than verifiability.
    Used some references, most were Verifiable facts. objectivity. Facts not verifiable.
    credible, cited properly References
    were sparse, and verbatim.
    Some citations. Little or no
    references.
    Improper citation or no citation
    Originality
    Of research. Topic researched
    objectively. Both points of view
    presented with credible details.
    Verifiable facts. Little evidence of
    research, objectivity or
    verifiability.

    You might also like