Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
In this paper, effect of influential factors on separation of monovalent (Na+ ), divalent (Cu2+ , Zn2+ , Pb2+ ) and trivalent (Cr3+ ) ions from wastewater
was investigated. Two types of different membranes (AMV and CMV made by Asahi Glass and AR204SXR412 and CR67MK111 made by Ionics)
with different ion exchange capacities (IEC) were used. Taguchi experimental design was used to plan a minimum number of experiments. A L9
orthogonal array (OA, four factors in three levels) was employed to evaluate effect of concentration (100, 500, and 1000 ppm), temperature (25,
40, and 60 ◦ C), flow rate (0.07, 0.7, and 1.2 mL/s) and voltage (10, 20, and 30 V) on separation percent (SP) of the individual ions in the solution.
A L16 OA (five factors in four levels) was applied to enquire the effect of ion valence in a mixture of ions on the response (SP). Statistical analysis,
ANOVA, was also employed to determine the relationship between experimental conditions and yield levels. The results show that increasing
concentration, voltage and temperature improves cell performance; however, SP decreases with increasing flow rate. At concentrations of more
than 500 ppm, dependency of SP on concentration diminishes. The optimum levels of influential factors, determined for all ions are: concentration
1000 ppm, temperature 60 ◦ C, flow rate 0.07 mL/s and voltage 30 V. According to the results, using a membrane pair with higher IEC improves SP.
It was found that performance of an electrodialysis (ED) cell is almost independent on the type of ions and only depends on the operating conditions
and the cell structure. This result was confirmed by the experiments conducted on a mixture of ions. It was also found that SP of monovalent ions
is larger than divalent and trivalent ions (SCr < SCu , SZn , SPb < SNa ). For ions of similar valence, SP was found to be restricted by molecular weight
and electrochemical activation energy of the ions (SPb < SCu < SZn ).
© 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Electrodialysis; Wastewater treatment; Taguchi method; Experimental design; ANOVA; Monovalent; Divalent and trivalent ions
1383-5866/$ – see front matter © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2006.08.023
148 M. Sadrzadeh et al. / Separation and Purification Technology 54 (2007) 147–156
ED cell is packed with a pair of ion exchange membranes Concentration of metal ions in the dilute product was mea-
(cation and anion) and a pair of platinum electrodes (anode and sured using a conductometer (HANA, HI 8633), when separation
cathode). Both electrodes are made of pure platinum. Area of of individual ions was investigated. The conductometer was nec-
essary to calibrate for each type of ion. When separation of the polymeric backbone due to the almost short run time (about
mixture of ions was investigated atomic absorption (Shimadzu, 30 min). Even if the hydroxides precipitate only on the surface,
AA-670) was utilized. they should increase resistance and consequently decrease SP
[9,10,11]. Hence, after a short period of time, SP increases to
2.5. Experiment and analysis methods a steady value and then decreases. This value was reported and
CIP (Cleaning in Place), using distilled water, was applied to
Two statistical techniques including Taguchi method and remove all precipitants from the membrane surface and make
ANOVA were chosen for this study. Taguchi method utilizes the membrane fresh for the next run.
OA’s from experimental design theory to study a large number Four factors each with three levels (low, medium and high)
of variables with a small number of experiments. OA’s are sub- were chosen based on previous results in related works and qual-
sets of the full factorial experiment which is balanced, i.e., each itative experiments [4,5]. The matrix experiment was designed
variable setting occurs the same number of times and none of by selecting an appropriate OA (L9 array) for control param-
two experiments are the same (or even mirror images). Using eters. Controllable factors and their levels in the L9 array are
OA’s significantly reduces the number of experimental configu- presented in Table 2.
rations to be studied. OA’s were originally discovered by Tippett
in 1934. However, Taguchi simplified their use by providing tab- 3. Results and discussion
ulated sets of standard OA’s and corresponding linear graphs to
fit specific projects [6]. A brief overview of the process followed 3.1. Separation of individual ions
by Taguchi approach to parameter design is provided in Fig. 2.
In this study, the quality characteristic was SP which was The matrix experiment was conducted under the limiting
calculated as follows: current density and the results for ions using two types of mem-
C0 − C branes are recorded in Tables 3 and 4. According to these tables,
SP = × 100 (1)
C0 8th run gives the best SP of metal ions. Selecting this run, as
an optimal condition can be an erroneous decision. Since, based
where, C0 and C are feed and dilute concentrations, respectively.
on L9 OA of Taguchi method, one-ninth (1/9) of all possible
Noise factors were room temperature, pH variation in the cell,
occurring electrolysis on the electrodes, concentration polariza-
tion, precipitation of metal hydroxides such as Cu(OH)2 on the Table 2
cation exchange membranes and voltage variation. Controllable factors and their levels
According to literatures, pH effect on performance of ED Run Controllable factors
cell is negligible especially at voltages greater than 10 V [7,8]. T (◦ C) C (ppm) F (mL/s) V (V)
Higher voltages cause water molecules to dissociate and the
produced H+ or OH− ions give the salty solution acidic or alkalic 1 25 100 0.07 10
2 25 500 0.7 20
properties. Hence, electrical resistance of the solution decreases. 3 25 1000 1.2 30
Obviously, shifting pH to the strong acidic region as well as to 4 40 100 0.7 30
the strong alkalic region, improves ED process performance. At 5 40 500 1.2 10
a limiting voltage (10 V), the dissociation rate decreases and pH 6 40 1000 0.07 20
effect can be neglected. 7 60 100 1.2 20
8 60 500 0.07 30
Metal hydroxides only precipitate on the surface of cation 9 60 1000 0.7 10
exchange membrane and do not penetrate into the cavities of
150 M. Sadrzadeh et al. / Separation and Purification Technology 54 (2007) 147–156
Table 3
SP and SNL values for five types of ions using membranes type 1
Run Mean response (SP) Signal to noise ratio (SNL )
Na+ Zn2+ Cu2+ Pb2+ Cr3+ Na+ Zn2+ Cu2+ Pb2+ Cr3+
1 29.11 27.53 22.35 21.65 21.97 29.28 28.75 26.97 26.71 26.84
2 14.82 12.02 13.37 11.15 7.26 23.42 21.56 22.51 20.95 17.22
3 12.83 12.70 11.90 11.77 10.14 22.16 22.07 21.51 21.42 20.12
4 21.36 20.21 15.34 14.16 13.90 26.59 26.03 23.71 23.02 22.86
5 9.10 7.81 8.83 8.24 7.88 19.18 17.80 18.83 18.32 17.93
6 87.24 84.62 82.85 79.40 73.41 38.81 38.55 38.37 38.00 37.32
7 17.96 15.50 8.99 8.01 7.58 25.09 23.57 18.98 18.07 17.59
8 98.54 98.73 97.33 92.95 85.94 39.87 39.89 39.76 39.36 38.68
9 20.50 16.65 16.57 15.70 15.35 26.24 24.42 24.36 23.92 23.72
Table 4
SP and SNL values for five types of ions using membranes type 2
Run Mean response (SP) Signal to noise ratio (SNL )
Na+ Zn2+ Cu2+ Pb2+ Cr3+ Na+ Zn2+ Cu2+ Pb2+ Cr3+
1 28.41 26.48 20.15 19.95 19.08 29.07 28.45 26.07 26.00 25.61
2 12.53 8.05 11.58 10.80 7.11 21.96 18.11 21.27 20.67 17.04
3 11.70 11.05 9.36 9.23 8.42 21.36 20.84 19.40 19.30 18.51
4 21.16 19.16 13.10 12.65 11.52 26.51 25.56 22.25 22.04 21.23
5 8.47 7.56 6.45 6.83 5.84 18.56 17.55 16.19 16.69 15.33
6 85.36 83.67 81.67 76.86 70.58 38.63 38.45 38.24 37.71 36.97
7 13.16 10.80 6.36 8.39 7.59 22.39 20.64 16.02 18.48 17.60
8 98.06 97.67 94.94 92.96 81.40 39.83 39.80 39.55 39.37 38.21
9 18.83 15.85 15.08 14.39 14.26 25.50 23.97 23.56 23.16 23.08
M. Sadrzadeh et al. / Separation and Purification Technology 54 (2007) 147–156 151
Fig. 3. Effect of (a) temperature, (b) concentration, (c) flow rate and (d) voltage on SP.
Fig. 4. Effect of (a) temperature, (b) concentration, (c) flow rate and (d) voltage on SN.
152 M. Sadrzadeh et al. / Separation and Purification Technology 54 (2007) 147–156
Taguchi method uses graphs of the marginal means of each 3.2. Comparison of applied membranes
factor, but these graphs are only used to show the trend of each
factor more understandable. It is incorrect to use these graphs to Effects of controllable factors on SP and SN for Zn2+ ions
predict other values which were not experimented. According using both types of membranes are displayed in Fig. 5. Compar-
to Fig. 3b at a concentration of about 600 ppm, maximum ing the amounts of SP and SN for these membranes, it was found
SP is observed which should be confirmed with experi- that performance of the membranes type 1 is slightly better than
mentation. that of type 2.
Behavior of different ions is better shown in Figs. 3 and 4. Better performance of the membranes type 1 can be
Results concluded before (SCr < SPb < SCu < SZn < SNa ) were attributed to their higher ion exchange capacity (Table 1). For a
confirmed using these figures. For membrane type 2, the same membrane, IEC is directly proportional to its water content and
results were obtained. its ion conductivity [15]. Hence, the higher ion conductivity and
Fig. 5. Effect of (a) temperature, (b) concentration, (c) flow rate, (d) Voltage on ȳ and (e) temperature, (f) concentration, (g) flow rate, and (h) voltage on SN, for
Zn2+ ion using the membranes type 1 and type 2.
M. Sadrzadeh et al. / Separation and Purification Technology 54 (2007) 147–156 153
the more swelling, the higher IEC values. In membranes with precisely. All experiments were accomplished under operating
higher IEC, diffusion of coions is facilitated into the swollen condition of the second run of L9 OA (T = 25 ◦ C, F = 0.7 mL/s,
polymeric network due to the fact that Donnan exclusion does C = 500 ppm and V = 20 V). Five factors (Na+ , Cu2+ , Zn2+ , Pb2+
no longer work efficiently. Thus, ion-permselectivity through and Cr3+ ) in four levels (1/n, 2/n, 3/n and 4/n of 500 ppm, where
the membrane decreases. In order to avoid the reduction of ion- n is sum of the numbers at each run) were investigated, using a
permselectivity and mechanical stability, the polymeric matrix L16 OA. Concentration of ions in the feed solution at each run
of the membrane needs to be crosslinked. This reduces the mem- along with the acquired response (SP of each ion and total SP)
brane swelling [16]. As a result, it can be concluded that rate are presented in Table 5. As can be seen, the results confirm that
of ion removal enhances with increasing IEC of the membrane. SP of Na+ is the greatest and SP of Cr3+ is the smallest. SP’s
Using experimental data of other ions, the same figures as Fig. 5 of other ions are between these limiting values. This is likely
can be plotted. These figures confirm the results concluded due to the fact that monovalent ions occupy more surface active
before. sites and this restrains other ions to pass through the membranes.
Number of surface active sites which are occupied by trivalent
3.3. Separation of mixture of ions ions is three times more than that occupied by monovalent ions.
Since amount of these sites in a membrane surface is constant, it
Some experiments were conducted on a mixture of ions to is obviously concluded that SP decreases with increasing valent
verify the effect of ion type on performance of ED process more of ions.
Table 5
Concentration of ions in the feed solution with obtained results
Run Levels and calculated concentration (ppm) SP of ions (%) SPt (%)
Na+ Cu2+ Zn2+ Pb2+ Cr3+ Na+ Cu2+ Zn2+ Pb2+ Cr3+
Fig. 6. Effect of concentration of different ions in the feed solution on total SP.
Under an electric field, in the absence of membranes, ions the relative importance of various factors. ANOVA demonstrates
move competitively, based on the ratio of electrical charge to whether the observed variation in the response is due to alteration
mass of the ions (e/m). In an ED process, membranes have a key of level adjustments or experimental standard errors. ANOVA
role in this competition. In order to reach an equilibrium state in procedure results in calculation of sum of squares (SS), degree
a membrane, number of positive ions should be equal to that of of freedom (d.o.f.), mean square (variance) and associated F-test
negative ions based on the electroneutrality rule, i.e., a trivalent of significance (F). SS of factors is calculated as follows:
positive ion is accompanied with a trivalent negative ion. Hence,
KA
monovalent ions win the competition to equilibrate membranes A2i T2
and pass through them with less difficulty. SSA = − (3)
n Ai N
Effects of concentration of different ions in the feed solution i=1
on total SP are depicted in Fig. 6. As can be seen, total SP
increases as concentrations of Na+ , Cu2+ , Zn2+ and Pb2+ ions where, KA is the number of levels of factor A (KA = 3 for all
increase in the feed solution, contrary to what is observed for factors in this study), nAi the number of all observations at level i
Cr3+ ion. of factor A (nAi = 6 in this study), Ai the sum of all observations
When the amount of Na+ ion increases in the solution, of level i of factor A and T is the sum of all observations. SS of
amounts of other ions decrease, due to constant total concen- error is computed using the following equation:
tration (500 ppm). Since, as discussed before, SP of Na+ ion is
greater than that of other ions, total SP increases. Increasing the SSe = SST − (SSA + SSB + · · ·) (4)
amount of divalent ions affects total SP insignificantly. This is
due to the dual effect of decreasing Na+ and Cr3+ ions in the where, SST is the total SS:
feed solution on total SP. Effect of increasing Cr3+ ion on SP is
opposed to what was mentioned for Na+ ion.
N
T2
SST = (SP2j ) − (5)
N
j=1
3.4. ANOVA
where, N is the number of all observation. Variance is calcu-
After performing the statistical SN analysis, ANOVA needs lated by dividing the sum of squares by the degrees of freedom,
to be employed for estimating error variance and determining VA = SSA /νA . νA is estimated by νA = KA −1. F-value is calcu-
M. Sadrzadeh et al. / Separation and Purification Technology 54 (2007) 147–156 155
Table 6
Statistical results based on Zn2+ experimental data
Factor d.o.f. SS Variance F P
Flow rate 2 10349.01 13148.54 5174.50 6574.27 2388.2 7324.5 71.07 69.22
Voltage 2 1699.84 2354.05 849.92 1177.02 392.3 1311.3 9.33 11.10
Temperature 2 1363.88 2110.44 681.94 1055.22 314.7 1175.6 11.63 12.38
Concentration 2 1134.18 1370.39 567.09 685.19 261.7 763.4 8.01 7.28
Error 9 19.50 8.08 2.17 0.90 – – – –
Fig. 7. Contribution of each factor on the response for all ions using membranes type 1.
[2] Persistent, Bioaccumulation and toxic chemicals, Copper and Copper [9] M.E. Vallejo, F. Persin, C. Innocent, P. Sistat, G. Pourcelly, Electrotransport
Compounds, State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, September, of Cr(VI) through an anion exchange membrane, Sep. Purif. Technol. 21
2002. (2000) 61–69.
[3] W.S. Winston Ho, K.K. Sirkar, Membrane Handbook, Champan & Hall, [10] A. Chapotot, G. Pourcelly, C. Gavach, F. Lebon, Electrotransport of pro-
1992. ton and divalent cations through modified cation-exchange membranes, J.
[4] T. Mohammadi, A. Moheb, M. Sadrzadeh, A. Razmi, Separation of copper Electroanal. Chem. 386 (1995) 25–37.
ions by electrodialysis using Taguchi experimental design, Desalination [11] M. Kameche, C. Innocent, F. Xu, G. Pourcelly, Z. Derriche, Electro-
169 (2004) 21–31. transport of protons, alkali metal cations and solvent molecules through
[5] T. Mohammadi, A. Razmi, M. Sadrzadeh, Effect of operating parameters a commercial cation-exchange membrane conditioned with aqueous and
on Pb2+ separation from wastewater using electrodialysis, Desalination 167 organic solutions, Desalination 168 (2004) 319–327.
(2004) 379–385. [12] T. Mohammadi, A. Moheb, M. Sadrzadehb, A. Razmi, Modeling of metal
[6] I. Masters, A.R. Khoei, D.T. Gethin, The application of taguchi methods ion removal from wastewater by electrodialysis, Sep. Purif. Technol. 41
to the aluminium recycling process, in: Proceedings of the Fourth ASM (2005) 73–82.
International Conference on The Recycling of Metals, Vienna, 1999, pp. [13] D.C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, 3th ed., John
115–124. Wiley & Sons, NY, 1991.
[7] R. Klischenko, B. Kornilovich, R. Chebotaryova, V. Linkov, Purification of [14] J.T. Luftig, V.S. Jordan, Design of Experiment in quality Engineering,
galvanic sewage from metals by electrodialysis, Desalination 126 (1999) McGraw-Hill, NY, 1998.
159–162. [15] T. Navessin, Influence of the membrane ion exchange capacity on the cata-
[8] N. Kabay, M. Ardab, P. Kurucaoval, E. Ersoza, H. Kahveci, M. Can, lyst layer of proton exchange membrane fuel cell, PhD thesis, Simon Fraser
S. Dal, Effect of feed characteristics on the separation performances of University, October 2004.
monovalent and divalent salts by electrodialysis, Desalination 158 (2003) [16] P. Zschocke, D. Quellmalz, Novel ion exchange membranes based on an
95–100. aromatic polysulfone, J. Memb. Sci. 22 (1985) 325–332.