INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT & REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee : Name of Rater :

Position: MASTER TEACHER I Position :

Review Period: JUNE 2016 - MARCH 2017 Date of Review : MARCH 2017

District:

School: _______________________

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE

per KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE

June- 25%
Conducts at least an action research related to March 5- Conducted Action Research within the district supported by the
Professional
following evidences: Research proposal approved by the Division ( 5 - Action Research conducted with expenses less 5 - Action research conducted 5 days before the
Growth and school or classroom concerns/ problems during
complete format ), Research Report with findings and than the approved budget schedule
Development the year
recommendations, proposed Learning Interventions and Programs

5% 4 - Action research conducted on schedule

4- Conducted Action Research within the district supported by the
Action Research
following evidences: Research proposal approved by the Division ( 4 - Action Research conducted with expenses within the budget
conducted
complete format ), Research Report with findings

5 - Action research conducted 1- 5 days after the

3- Conducted Action Research within the district supported by the schedule
3 - Action Research conducted with expenses 5%
following evidences: Research proposal approved by the Division (
over the budget
complete format ), with no findings

3 - Action research conducted 6- 10 days after the

2 - Action Research conducted with expenses 10% schedule
2- Approved Action Research Proposal
over the budget

1-No Action research conducted 1 - Action research conducted with expenses more 1- No action research done
than 10% over the budget
Seminars, Attends seminars , trainings , workshops
Trainings , and other work-related activities ( school , 5 - 5 or more seminars , trainings , workshops in any level
5%
Workshops district , division , region , national level ) attended
Attended within the school year June

to 4 - 4 seminars , trainings , workshops in any level attended

March 3 - 3 seminars , trainings , workshops in any level attended

2 - 2 seminars , trainings , workshops in any level attended

1 - 1 seminar , workshop , training in any level attended

Conducts/ facilitates seminars, 5 - Conducted seminars / trainings / workshops / LAC within

5- Conducted seminars/ trainings / workshops / LAC utilizing
Seminars, workshops, trainings within a year (school- June 10% 5- 4 seminars/workshops/trainings/ LAC conducted / facilitated the specified time in the training design
low-cost , indigenous materials with less than the budget
Workshops & based, district, division, regional or to supported by evidence / TCR
national level) alloted.
Trainings March
Conducted/ 4 - Conducted seminars / trainings / workshops / LAC 1 - 2
Facilitated 4- 3 seminars/workshops/trainings / LAC conducted/ facilitated 4 - Conducted seminars/ trainings / workshops / LAC utilizing days beyond the specified time in the training design
supported by evidence / TCR low-cost , indigenous materials and within the budget alloted.

3- 2 seminars/workshops/trainings / LAC conducted/ facilitated
supported by TCR
2- 1 seminars/workshops/trainings / LAC conducted /facilitated
supported by evidence/TCR
3 - Conducted seminars/ trainings / workshops / LAC utilizing 3 - Conducted seminars / trainings / workshops / LAC 3-5 days
low-cost , indigenous materials with 5% more than the budget beyond the specified time in the training design
alloted.
2 - Conducted seminars/ trainings / workshops / LAC 2 - Conducted seminars / trainings / workshops / LAC 6-8 days
utilizing low-cost , indigenous materials with 10 % more than beyond the specified time in the training design
the budget alloted.

1- 1 seminar/workshop/training / LAC conducted / facilitated 1 - Conducted seminars/ trainings / workshops / LAC 1 - Conducted seminars / trainings / workshops / LAC 9-12
withoutout evidence / TCR utilizing low-cost , indigenous materials with 15% more than days or more beyond the specified time in the training design
the budget alloted.
Demonstration 5% 5 - demonstration teaching conducted based on
teachings served 5 - 3 demonstration teachings conducted with MOVs 5-100% of demonstration teachings done with appropriate
Conducts demonstration teaching during June alloted time
the year to March instructional materials / ICT equipment
4-80-99% of demonstration teachings done with appropriate 4 - demonstration teaching conducted 1- 5 minutes
4- 2 demonstration teachings conducted with MOVs
Instructional materials / ICT equipment after the alloted time

3-1 demonstration teachings served with MOVs
2 - 1 demonstration teaching served without MOVs
1- Failed to serve any demonstration teaching
3-60-79% of demonstration teachings done with appropriate 3 - demonstration teaching conducted 6- 10 minutes
Instructional materials/ ICT equipment after the alloted time
2-40-59% of demonstration teachings done with apropriate 2 - demonstration teaching conducted 11-15 minutes
Intructional materials/ ICT equipment after the alloted time
1-39% and below of demonstration teachings done with 1 - demonstration teaching conducted 15 minutes
inappropriate Intructional materials / ICT equipment beyond alloted time

45%
Prepares LPs/ DLL using appropriate
Instructional
LPs & DLLs strategies, methodologies and 5- 100 % LP/ DLLs with complete parts using appropriate strategies, approches 5-100% & above teaching-process facilitated using
Competence 5- 100% LP/ DLL with IMs are prepared a day before
Prepared instructional materials within the year June to and Instructional materials prepared appropriate localized materials / ICT equipment
March 15%
4 - 80-99%% LP/ DLLs with complete parts using appropriate strategies, 4- 80%-99% of teaching-process facilitated using 4 - 100% of LP/DLL with IMs prepared during the day
approches and Instructional materials parts appropriate localized instructional materials/ ICT equipment

3- 60-79% LP/ DLLs with complete parts using appropriate strategies, approches 3- 60% - 79% of teaching-process facilitated using 3- 100% LP/ DLL prepared a day late
and Instructional materials prepared appropriate localized instructional materials/ ICT equipment

2- 40-59% LP/ DLLs with complete parts using appropriate strategies, approches 2-40%-59% of teaching-process facilitated using 2- 100% LP/DLL prepared 2 days late
and Instructional materials prepared appropriate localized instructional materials/ ICT equipment

1- 39 % or less of LP/ DLLs with complete parts using appropriate strategies, 1- 39% & below teaching-process facilitated using 1- 100% LP/DLL prepared 3 days late
approches and Instructional materials prepared appropriate localized instructional materials / ICT equipment

Students' Achieves at least 75% of the pupils/

Performance students performance by conducting 5- Conducted enrichment , reinforcement,
5- Conducted enrichment , reinforcement , remedial
Achieved enrichment , reinforcement and remedial 5 - 3 points increased from the baseline remediation utilizing 100% low-cost materials/ SIMs
session ahead of the scheduled time
classes within the year appropriate for the pupils' learning level
10%

4 - Conducted enrichment , reinforcement,

4- Conducted enrichment , reinforcement , remedial
4- 2. 5 points increased from the baseline remediation utilizing 80- 99% low-cost materials/
sessions on time the scheduled time
SIMs appropriate for the pupils' learning level

3- Conducted enrichment , reinforcement,

3 - Conducted enrichment , reinforcement , remedial
3- 2. 0 points increased from the baseline remediation utilizing 60-79% low-cost materials/
sessions conducted 1 - 2 days after
SIMs appropriate for the pupils' learning level

2 - Conducted enrichment , reinforcement,

2 - Conducted enrichment , reinforcement , remedial
2- 1.5 point increased from the baseline remediation utilizing 40-59% low-cost materials/
sessions 3-4 days after
SIMs appropriate for the pupils' learning level

1- Conducted enrichment , reinforcement,

remediation utilizing 39% or less low-cost 1 - Conducted enrichment , reinforcement , remedial
1- 1 point increased from the baseline
materials/ SIMs appropriate for the pupils' learning sessions 5 days after or more
level
 Initiates /implements/assists in projects, 10% 5- 5 programs/projects/interventions/school publication initiated /
Projects,
Programs & 5 - 5 of programs / projects/ publication /
programs & interventions that will assisted/implemented with MOVs
Interventions intervention implemented within the specified time
Initiated, enhance the curriculum and its delivery 4-4 programs/projects/interventions/school publication initiated /
Implemented & 4 - 4 programs / projects/ publication / intervention
assisted/implemented with MOVs
Assisted within the school year exceeded 1-5 days within the specified time
3-3 programs/projects/interventions/school publication initiated /

assisted/implemented with MOVs 3 - 3 programs / projects/ publication / intervention

exceeded 6-10 days
2-2 programs/projects/interventions/school publication initiated / 2- Initiated/ implemented/ assisted in projects/
programs/ intervention with more than 10% of the
assisted/implemented with MOVs
alloted budget

1-1 program/project/intervention/school publication initiated / 1- Initiated/ implemented/ assisted in projects/

programs/ intervention with 15% or more of the
assisted/implemented with MOVs
alloted budget
NAT/ ELLNA Increases NAT and ELLNA performance 5% 5- 3 points and above increased or more NAT/ ELLNA result
Performance 4 - 2 points increased in NAT/ ELLNA result

Increased 3 - 1.5 increased in NAT / ELLNA result

2- 1 point increased in NAT/ ELLNA result

1- 0. 5 point or below increased in NAT/ELLNA result

5 - observed proper decorum ( wearing of uniform . punctuality ,

Observes proper decorum at all times 5% attendance , courtesy , human relation )
4 - 4 out of 5 observed
3 - 3 out of 5 observed
2 - 2 out of 5 observed
1 - 1 out of 5 observed
Instructional
15%
Supervision
Conducts instructional and class
Instructional & monitoring of teachers within the school 5% 5 - Conducted instructional and class monitoring of 100% of
Class Monitoring year teachers with appropriate monitoring tool/ STAR observation form 5 - Reports submitted ahead of time
Assisted
4 - Conducted instructional and class monitoring of 80%- 99% of
teachers with appropriate monitoring tool/ STAR observation form 4 - Reports Submitted on time

3 - Conducted the instructional and class monitoring of 60%-79%%

of teachers with appropriate monitoring tool/ STAR observation form 3 - Reports submitted 1-2 days after

2 - Conducted instructional and class monitoring of 40%-59%% of 2 - Reports submitted 3-4 days after
teachers with appropriate monitoring tool / STAR observation form

1 - Conducted instructional and class monitoring of 39% of

teachers and below 1 - Reports submitted 5 days or more after
Mentoring/ Conducts mentoring/ coaching activities with
Coaching 5- 4 and above mentoring/coaching sessions done using
co- teachers within the year
Activities 5% 5- 4 and above teacher mentoring /coaching sessions were appropriate Ims/ICT equipment following scheduled time 5 - mentoring reports submitted ahead of time
Conducted conducted ( with report)

4 - 3 teacher mentoring /coaching sessions conducted 4-3 mentoring/coaching sessions done using appropriate 4 -mentoring reports submitted on time
(with report) Ims/ICT equipment following scheduled time

3-2 mentoring/coaching sessions done using appropriate

3- 2 teacher mentoring /coaching sessions conducted 3 - mentoring reports submitted 1 - 2 days after
Ims/ICT equipment following scheduled time
(with report)

2-1 mentoring/coaching sessions done using appropriate

2- 1 teacher mentoring /coaching sessions conducted 2- mentoring reports submitted 3-4 days after
Ims/ICT equipment following scheduled time
(with report)
1- no teacher mentoring /coaching sessions conducted 1- No mentoring/coaching sessions done using appropriate 1 - Mentoring reports submitted 5 days or more after
(with report) Ims/ICT equipment following scheduled time

Performance of Manages performance of teachers

Teachers following the RPMS cycle 5% 5- 100% and above of teachers' performance evaluated following 5 - Managed performance of teachers 1- 2 days
Managed (planning and commitments, RPMS framework cycle before the specified time frame
coaching and monitoring, review and 4- 80%-99% of teachers' performance evaluated following 4- Managed performance of teachers during the
evaluation and development planning) RPMS framework cycle specified time
within the year 3- 60%-79% of teacher's performance evaluated following 3- Managed performance of teachers 1-2 days after
RPMS framework cycle the specified time
2- 40%-59% of teacher's performance evaluated following 2 - Managed performance of teachers 3 - 4 days after
RPMS framework cycle the specified time
1-39%-below of teacher's performance evaluated following 1 - Managed performance of teachers 5 days or more
RPMS framework cycle after the specified time
10%
School /
Updates parents on children’s progress
Community/ Parent 5-100% of parents updated on pupils'/students' progress and 5 - Quarterly release of Cards/ PTA meetings
and problems through dialogues, 5%
Involvement problems through quarterly release of cards , PTA meetings , home conducted on the scheduled date
conferences and PTA meetings visitations.
Parents Updated Partnership
4- 80%- 99% of parents updated on pupils'/students' progress and 4 - Quarterly release of cards/ PTA meetings
problems through quarterly release of cards , PTA meetings , home conducted 1 week after the scheduled date
visitations.
3- 60%- 79% of parents updated on pupils'/students' progress and
3 - Release of Cards/ PTA meetings conducted 2
problems through quarterly release of cards , PTA meetings , home
weeks after the scheduled date
visitations.
2-40%- 59% of parents updated on pupils'/students' progress and 2 - Release of Cards/ PTA meetings conducted one
problems through quarterly release of cards , PTA meetings , home month after the scheduled date
visitations.

1-39% or below of parents updated on pupils/students' progress and

problems through quarterly release of cards , PTA meetings , home 1- Release of Cards/ PTA meetings conducted more
visitations. than one month after the scheduled date

Community & Participates in community and civic-

Civic Activities organization activities within the school 5% 5-100% of community & civic activities participated on
Participated year 5-100% of community and civic organization activities participated time

4-80-99% of community & civic activities participated on

4-80-99% of community and civic organization activities participated time

3-60-79% of community & civic activities participated on

3- 60-79% of community and civic organization activities participated time
2-40% - 59% of community and civic organization activities 2-40-59% of community & civic activities participated on
participated time
1-39% or less of community and civic organization activities 1-39% and below of community & civic activities
participated participated on time