ACCEPTABILITYOF POINT OF SALE SYSTEM IN

CHRISTY AND JERRY STORE

__________________

A Thesis

Presented To

The Faculty of

San Agustin National High School

Sagbayan, Bohol

______________________

In Partial Fulfilment

of the Requirements for the TVL

Information and Communications

Technology

______________________

By

Harold Japay

Brian E. Arnejo

Chantery A. Jose Enad

Veronica G. Calicaran

Marlon B. Lamoste

Ronie S. Bitang

October 2017
 ii

Approval Sheet

This thesis entitled “Acceptability of Point of Sales

System in Christy and Jerry Store” was submitted by Ronie

S. Bitang, Brian E. Arnejo, Chantery A. Jose Enad, Veronica

G. Calicaran, Marlon B. Lamoste and Harold Japay, in

partial fulfilment of the requirements for the TVL ICT

DEPARTMENT, has been examined and recommended for approval

and acceptance.

PEREGRITA J. DATAHAN

CHAIRMAN

THESIS COMMITTEE

Accepted and approved for Oral Examination

PEREGRITA J. DATAHAN

CHAIRMAN

________________________ _________________________

MEMBER MEMBER

_________________________ _________________________

MEMBER MEMBER
 iii

PANEL OF EXAMINERS

Approved by the Committee on Oral Examination on ____________

with a grade of _______

PEREGRITA J. DATAHAN M.A

CHAIRMAN

________________________ _________________________

MEMBER MEMBER

_________________________ _________________________

MEMBER MEMBER

Accepted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the TVL –

ICT Department.
 ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The researchers would like to extend their sincerest

gratitude and deep appreciation to the following people, who

contributed a lot to make this piece of work possible.

First and above of all, GOD, the source of all things

possible, for giving the researchers the will and wisdom to do

the necessary things for this piece of work. The one who

enlighten the researchers’ heart and mind and always guides them

what to do through his sacred words.

Mrs. Peregrita J. Datahan, the researchers’ ever-supportive

class adviser as well as their research teacher for giving the

researchers a bunch of knowledge, encouragement, guidance and

advises for the development of this piece of work.

Mr. Fernando B. Enad, the researchers’ competent mentor in

ICT as well as their research adviser, for the guidance and

support he gave to the researchers all throughout the study.

Ms. Marie Stefanie C. Hora and Mr. Renecimin Daling, for

sharing their expertise with Mathematics to the researchers and

for the precious time they’ve shared in this study.

Mrs. Rhea Marie D. Enad, internal panel member, for the

constructive criticisms she shared for the improvement of this

work.

Mrs. Cheryl D. Anub, external panel member, for the

corrections she have rendered to the improvement of the study.

 Mr. Nilo P. Samputon, school head, also an internal panel

member, for constructive criticisms he shared to the researchers

and the support he rendered to make this study possible.

Christy and Jerry Store and end users, for the willingness

to cooperate with the researchers and for embracing the

responsibility as the respondents of this study.

The researchers, classmates, for making the researchers felt

that there’s still a room for happiness despite the struggles or

hardships that the researchers faced throughout the study.

Lastly, but definitely not the least, the researchers’

Families for giving them the inspiration to do the study and for

the financial support they’ve rendered to the researchers to

make this study viable.

The Researchers
 DEDICATION

We

Humbly and deeply dedicate

This piece of work

To the source of

All things possible-

GOD;

To our beloved and

Ever-supportive

Families

And especially to

Ourselves.
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE PAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i

APPROVAL SHEET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii

PANEL EXAMINERS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv

DEDICATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii

LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x

LIST OF FIGURES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xi

CHAPTER

I. THE PROBLEM AND ITS SCOPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

Rationale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

Theoretical Background. . . . . . . . . . . . 3

THE PROBLEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

Statement of the Problem. . . . . . . . . . . 11

Statement of Hypothesis . . . . . . . . . . . 11

Significant of the Study. . . . . . . . . . . 11

Scope and Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Research Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

Research Environment. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

Research Respondents. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

Research Instruments. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

Data Gathering Procedure. . . . . . . . . . . 15

Statistical Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

DEFINITION OF TERMS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

II PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA . . . . 19

ACCEPTABILITY OF POINT OF SALES SYSTEM IN CHRISTY

AND JERRY STORE

Perceived Usefulness . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

Perceived Ease of use. . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

System Capability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

User Satisfaction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

III SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS. . . . . . . . 29

Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

Recommendations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

A – Correspondence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38

B - Research Instruments . . . . . . . . . . . 40

C – Flowcharts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42

D – Previews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52

E – Database Schema. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68

CURRICULUM VITAE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
 LIST OF TABLES

TABLE

1 Acceptability of Point of Sale System. . . . . . . . 20

based on Perceived Usefulness

2 Acceptability of Point of Sale System. . . . . . . . 24

based on Perceived Ease of Use

3 Acceptability of Point of Sale System. . . . . . . . 26

based on System Capability

4 Acceptability of Point of Sale System. . . . . . . . 28

based on User Satisfaction
 LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE

1. Schematic Diagram of the Study. . . . . . . . . . . . 10

2.1 User Log in Flowchart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
2.2 Add User Flowchart. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
2.3 Update User Flowchart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
2.4 Add Product Flowchart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
2.5 Update Product Flowchart. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
2.6 Add to Cart Flowchart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
2.7 Pay Button Flowchart. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
2.8 Void Item Flowchart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
2.9 Cancel Order Flowchart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
2.10 User Log-out Flowchart. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51