Government vs. EB) Hogar Filipino So Phil-394, July @, 144 Ponente: Justice Street Facts: The members of the board of El Hogar Filpin veewes S% of the net profit as shoun in He balance shee¥ and is distributed in proporton tothelr attendance to 7 af te board: Arcampleint was ‘il agains} the, and the sith cave of attion alleged thot-the divects, instead of Servin without Poy) 24 receiving hhomizal pa or ated calay—as the complainan re would be prper-hae beén veevirg loge conponsat in vagirg abounty- Dssue: Whether ocrnot the courds may declare He bylaw provision nal) ard wid? Held: No- The caporation law does pol undertake te prescribe the vale of compensation forthe directors of exporations. The compensation for He divectos of Bl Hogar fi Iipine hes been fixed in ib bans: Tejuthe and iely of this provision was a rater for He ‘shareholder when the flee vere tamed, and tHe circumstance. that, with the wauth of the typo the aroun pid as compensator ty the divectus kes inveaed peyonal whet weld prbdbly be rete P Secure adeyucte serie tom Shem is ym that’ cannot be comected in this action.Tramat Mercantile Dine. vS- a B37 SCRA IA November 09,48 Porente: Justice Vituy Facts: Melchor » Cuesta, doing busines under the name of Farmers Machineries, sold q tractor to Tram at Mercantile, Dre. . David Ong, Tramat's —- and mann ager issued a check for 00. Tramaf- sald the tractor, : with an te laun mover fabricated b it UAE lavid ent on the check when WAWASA Ph ated en ie hand +» poy on the ad the defects on the laun mover, the ersine was a reconditioned unit. Tssue~ Whether or not-Ong shuld be held jrintly and sewerally lable? Held NM. Tt was an epror 40 poll David Ong joint ty and severally liable. with Tromat to dela Cresta ander the prestioned transaction 00 had there so - notin his fecora| cy ep, butos an offer of a cory pation, Tames d with ed and epaate anality. feud iL Dae ‘nl be the pee, niet Loon sling ‘for and on its beha lt vaferly cald ‘be made Irable theree. hack lrobilty of-a co wae. fret * or oy i the agaahoy may sovaldly atta, asa rae, gr when - a) fle assents 10 a a ocer! aalavtal act ofthe De rasan, consents tr He psuance of wertered stocks, C) He aarges t hold him orally and solid wily _ with He coporahicn 2) He is made, by as oe yovsion of [ lady orally answer ithe -vate achon- ibe B no waicae “Dail Ong could be- nh perstrally eames under any af the abovementioned Couey.Ricardo A-Llamedo v3- ee als 279 ScbA 443, March 26, [4 : Ponente: Tach Tones, Jr Facts: Private complainant Leon Caw delvered te the accused Ricardo Uamade and Jacintr Prsoll the amount of F(G0,000 whichis tobe yepad in 6 months with 12% interest. As secanty, the accused issued and i signed a fotdated check which was - wy and dishonored for being drawn a cer insafficient Lands. Gaw Hed a complant for violation 7 OF BP. Pascaa| remained at [age and the tral on the merit against i Ses was conducted The tl court convibled Lamado. Bisue. Whether or rot er toner, Panty at fn Am Bane Coparthon could be held civilly ahd crininally Irable 2? Held: Yes. fettHorey i a knowled ig of the tsuanre of the check with ~out Sufficient-fande and involvemen te bansackon wi Irivate. com lainont. However, ouledye involes a stole of mind Athealt 1 extablic,, tas fhe statute, “‘Asolé creates a prima facie pre motion ie, @., thatthe avi d fnwwedgo of the ina then fei his" fands th ‘yr credit us : honk atthe Gne of He icsuane and onthe check's Preentment cae 3rd pa vaph ot Sec-] of BP: Bly- 22 states that: Whee eck is drawn i, cuporation oman or entity the “on or toatl sighed heh check in bobalt-bt /suah baer stb be a ini who acteally syhed the check in behalf stoped g al Sab erElena F. Utchico vs. ap al: 3B SCRA 25, Jine 08 [147 Povente: Jasheo Hermesisin, Jr Fads: i rep ondents weve emple bites of Cra, Inc. whe wew dismisied due +o alle a Pierchent Teel ‘led an ifeqid al dismissal conpla lain with the against Cotpry cy sb Ploro ean ae Incarporator anc dc of Cp Lae) and petitiones, who wore hiph ht othicrals ond divedad of Cr ¢: The Labor feb Te ~missed the Comp int but adeved | pls Flore and Gage wpy —— Tasue: Whether or pot petihores aan be hold Irable? Held: Yes. A coporation is 0 a jundical entity with legal pessonalr vate. and dishrct ‘iam th ose ach ov apd in 1 bobalf a f Pile pepe comprising tf. The gen aval rule is that alti incuyred by te ovat di PE iced a ik oh ‘Taher ne peruines fyi gs oe along uAth He covporation may’ so va \Mly attach, iSarul only when— a) e assents to a priertly al of He a oral, 1) He consonts fotheissuance, of lepted sf stds, c} ) He agrees + hold Knsot pray avd soltdavily [ble ith the op sch +) Hels _ by o ate i (ay /, {0 pesonall aad ie opporrte act} “hide Th Labor cases parties duty, co divectos ard oth are ae — caporton ia fermination of onp lpment ot expatnte empl lees done with malice arin bad faith»Attredo Mantekbareeal-15- Bacoleel Mavala iting, Gy Dace 5 SKM 36, May bt, [462 Porente: Taste I Reyes Fock: Plaintiffs, Montelibano ove Sugar planter adheved fo the detendart- — Bacolod Murcra Milling C05 Dre. cbrder identical milling canteark wth a SS% shave of the te produck Apa sal was made fo Incveare Montelbano's shave. which was od, ted by He expoatien in on anended iniling contract, and adapted o Gad vebolukion- Montelibans filed 0 cose. and Conterded frat 3 Megves Sagar Centvals hod alveadly granted indparey| porte akon of 62-S% fo ae amir and tha} the resolution abl “ales the auperahon to vant sipbilar Cncecione- Bacolod Murcia mil yesisted the claim ard het the stypulotons in fhe resoluhon vere mae vithoot consideration and void ab iniho and it as beyond fle beard of divecfus to edgy Tersue: Whether or pot the vesolubjont pase by the boavdot divectas are valid and binding and thatthe court oy peview i+? Held: }es-The board of directors of Baccled Marcin Milling, Coy Dros hod the authordy 42 medity the papa terms of the. Averded Pil (enttvach» The i vs sed, t \ good faith by the board at dey therfore tis valid ond ing avd vhether or Al hull cause lags or decrease thepretts ot the orporaten the coud has no authority p voview them uh der tho “Baia Jedyinent fale!Strong vs- Repide 4l Phil 144, ay 03,1004 Poneto: Justice’ Peckham Facks: The Phi ppine Sugav Estates Development Co Lnc- owned Dominican for lands- Francisco f ide, was the majonty stackheldey and one of the Sdivectors oF Phil Sug ar Estate: He war elect by He board and adininishator of He co Paring ie US: occupation , te _ geverninent warted tosecuve fiHe over baad While fendin negovabons, Re pide Took steps to purchase the G00 shares of stock owed by Blearor Stary hich weve in possession of Stua- Tones. Repde insteed of Seeing Tones, enply od Kauttman Whe later on employed Se, « fo urdhase the shaves Ve shag. Negotiate wee ‘A, the sale hangackoy increased the value of He shaves of chooks ariguly outed b by Stary. Stary Filed accnplaint fr the vecoveny of her $00 shies of tock She! argued that hera ont Pres had ho authority trsell he-~chaes and that Role coneala} the facts aftectiry their value! Tesues Whether or rot itwos hepih's duty tr dizelawe fo Strarg's agent, He facts beaving yon or vAch might hie value fH 7 Held: Yes. Directs ave. lable fay fiaud commited by conealment of wtormaley as tothe storte and piubable vault of the neqotvation fir Hesale of -yate assets which may affect theprite of He corporation's stock. hepide violated hss duty of loyalty, & ide asa direct, violated his duty pdivbie such knayledge and ‘amounted te deccit and concealment Phis immatens] whether or‘not theshueheldes? agent did or dtd not have. power tesel) the stock.Prine, White, Cement Copan vs. Drtermedide Ayelie, Curt 30 SCRA 03, March 14, (443 Ponerte: Sushre- Coupes Jn facts: Mejandvo Te, a member of the bead of divectns of Prime White onont and said copovaten entered into a denlership agreement whoroly Tewoul} be-the exclusive: dealer and for distributer of sail coporatin of ts ‘coment ireducls in the entive Mindanao. Te enteved into Reort ottiacks Later, fame-White Coup - decided to impose certain conditions yn the dealeschip agve “Sal nk tin ito ptr wl dey Tel ine white Cup. bat-were ve was conttenined to cancel He contracts he entered into: Prime White or omered io an etclusive delet aqreenent with Mapaleen Go. for He mavketny of white coment in Mindanao- Disue: Whether ov net the dealership ayreemen| entered into by Te with his own cago is valid and binding 2 Hold: Mi. Alejandro Te was net an neat hewas a member i ot the bowd’of divectas and auditor of Prime White Cement Cup- He was a selt-dealing directo ft coped povls shall be exercised by the bow ot divectus except as othenitse prided by law. Inthe absence of expres delen atson, a contract entered td by ipepreador on behalf of the pan — tion, may bind the co thon rf the botvd should rabty He came either exprsifor imply. Adivechy ee aves positon in trash. Th case of conthet ‘between himse'€ and trat-ot the op he anne? saonite the inkuest of the apetvon to hy oun advantage. Te aca diec —4ar should hove acted ino mimer as ret tr andily pejudlive tne coypmehn Te camel be alloved fo enrich himsolf-Charles W-Mead vs- E-C- Mola slough ef-a- Al Phil. 1S, December 26, (4 Panter Taste Trent Facts: Charles W:Mead and €-C- MeCall Lough farmed the Phil. Erginecrin and Constachon Be vy The a ber ie strokhelded and divectus of the Mesd Tet fb a, the other dvectus entered wt an a vf wher al) the ae ina why conbact ujlh He naa) authorifes weve sold to E-C-Mclallogh MoCalloagh, in fn, sold) Hernghty te R-W-Brouny AOL Fores, Toby Pee jet Tent yma, ard vohoed Yo interest od the oy fmed He Manilq Sal lage daaatta. Tissue: Whether o ret He frou or diveckus of He casporatin ray parche the cypete pope? Held: Jes. A dvecty or of fier moy in good faith and fran adepante consideration portose fiom » bya} uty wee ae or Stockhaldod He popes) even of an insdlvent Speen ard a scale made to He divectsy is Cty and bindin wp on the minority. The majorily of the stockholdes oy divechrs sold ie of the open velievng themseles and Charles Mead of all responsibility a le oy Fanstey Pade b the poorum ofthe bead of divectas 5 a majonh of He Stotldneldess fs ofl and binding won Groves MeadCandid ee VS: el de| saz Orzo, et-al- hil 83, March Ai [4|! pk Juste Tent Faots: During He (403- M107, defendants, Orozco constituting a majority of the boad of divectass, wither! the feo content ite ae deducted their cs npersahon fiom he wis inane instead of fiom the het ptt ot He bark thereby detiaudng “He beak avd its stockholders. Candedo Pascua) ‘aled a in hs i nyt aS a stockholder tor the benebit of the bank and all other steckKoldas He sues i pohabhof tho covporaton Tissues Whether or not (Candids Pascual have. thewpraty fosue by and ip beholf of He caporattion and other steckholdacs? Hold: Yes. ee of the fact that he os a stockboldey, he moy Ge 4 it, derivative shit, pute depends. Cardy Pascual is seokig claims for the as 1898 -| (oy Poscu only hecame asteckheldey in [103- He can Sue iin (03 forvad heceate he myst be a slockheldey a It of achion 7s Personal in pature- Bees an assental vequiste fo hae a va vat dervahve sdi-thal a ivy banging the oon hl acstockhelder atthe tine. wll al os complained of nol) Pascsa) comotwshitute an achon a yeas he was mpi ee and thet ps fom [7 fo half of (403-Harrie S: Everett vs. Asta Banking Cooporthen 44 Phil: S18, November 03, [146 forente: Justice. Ostrnd Facts: Everett efal-, stockholders of Teal and Compay entered into a MOA and VA with fava Banking (orp intended fr the Prec ofall pares fiom wtsrde creditos- Hougier, allen one of the offices of Asta Bank, coased He vemnal of He ales as dic of Tel ard pm Delon gave pees 3 ov eo npany fo the bank and Tied tio contacts J adel ae ‘ie a Zed Hebuk t rece te same and tr5ell ‘he phpe Ay oF the a rele and permitted the bank ja to foreclso the Same and stale 4 jnst-He ao an wy invhich Ye any was not raproeatal boy anyond- Defendants th fer ne Pit feb ae all the asseh ad goonwll ofthe company wore Uren b/the Bank. Tasuer Whether or net the pleinttés hae the bel capacity to bry an achon? Hold: Yes. Stoccholders cannot pvolinarih ly commento tat 1h epi hy and such inthe hands of ts board aii hewerey, hoe ave excep tons whey He board of divects vill notsue since they ave 2 Hensler » m tg fraud: Wertre boad of diedos is tha lebe. os pride jpal deferdan's peel such ee divectut - ta lachon and sees fhesamd is pot vegsived: The law does nok repaive [rhiyants to 4o aselecs acts. Planttffs Stale 0 good case of ackon f/ eguitable relief and their complaint iS notin ay ype fatally defelve-ae Bank vs - Myuo| Caadomo (4 SRA 671) Mav. 30, (96% Ponente: Justice TBL Rees Facts: Damaso Perez, a stockhelder of the Lepublic Bank inshutee a dex ~vativesuit for and behalf. of the =r atnst-the board at-divedacs of RepablicBank ard tho Moneta Bland of C6 Conbol Bonk Perez alleged thet Pablo Rowen , oe of the board of divectus (entra) bak committed aud fa-qrauting coMsin loans to fetitiout and nomers ~ting (2585° Perez, also aller o miguel Caademo ten Central Banh Governor eer pt ef Table Rowan as a technical consa tent and with saNion a he 2 appointment ofthe howd of divecles yas i. bad fail and uithott interken te pooect the wevet ofthe Bank. The cmp lint was dismissed by the bier cau - Tssuez Whether or not the eA below ered in dismissing the complaint? i Yes. ei ee stockhalder ts ee denratio resesta Ve Suit on bohal of he! ole sa wharin he holds souk Ooi Pp retect o vindicate rights: Damaso Perez it not aa in his thal, pat in bitte ep cl Kon, iris wt He ypovtle + pid one from criminal prusakon on ap feutend | Valor ie vy neither a lleging por vindtoxkwy this ow» Indiddual iRinitor rejadico, hattheinbad ote kpllicbk and dedenye Cash”Western Prsttele. of Techndloyy, Tt v5 - Salas a SRA Alb, he ast al) (444 fonentes Jushre a asichina Fach: The information state the defendants con pi ping and cantederakin and defraud the. aera and. steeds. RTC acyaitted fhe accuse ed witout 1 sing ay fn . bil iy, -Pehtones assed that te motion ti vecoadon Hon 0 ie evil « of the RIC decision iS aderiatve suit frag by them a mina ty steokhddey of Western Enshtute of Teddy, Be far and on ‘ahait ot the cupaation- Tissue! hella or not He perl moy be ensidered as a deviate acton? Held: Wo. A derivahve suitis an ackon aught by He pirate os holds in-He name ofthe o ane bat ways for which +e directas vefuw # sue. a i ae Ce de a and has been the prncipel me pinot fnfalag bash lat Stadtholded who ts suip In bob € ji ora mast ale {n his onplaint betoe on x thathe is de oh a loAatue. cause of ackor on hid the operation nikSan Mique\ Corp. vs~ Ernest Krab 1p SCAN, August 04 Ponente: Jastire hata = Bduado de los Aryeles was a dvector appointed by vm who Hered the shwes ot padi Sorono Tl. cli bs, tH he jon i jaangco, ba associate and danny of then Paid Mayco5- 1 hl ink eal’ d 4 derivative suit agalst itoonderh, in bobalt of Sah Ay is far a revocation of a hoard vealuhe Adoptee 19 assume fhe loans ji rd by Mp tanta a a = wy Son fe ke awholly~ owhed suber wh ‘he Miquel A hoswd i JEL on the gourd thet tel Angeles Bo mth rot have. a uate saes 1 the imberestof He ‘sfoddrelders and bisnle as pCOO direct has acntlict of meet ata Veprsetntve in the minwnly stokbalbes of San iniquel Gp. Tssue: Whether or pot Doles Arye caninstitete a dovivaive suf Held. Yes. the bona do ounershi by a stockholder tn his oun right softs : invest him vitastanding to brj ih denvative cuit for He berth ofthe san inde thle ot Woes Argole is ymmatertal sine-he ir . ing in his own hehalt, batin behalf a the pencktot Sm My ue) 5 the ont lic of interest between hin ard POGE 1s sef-auide. age the yeguisthes teeta on the E+ |) Should be mas in He suit, 2) Has ted tr-ermust inhanteyarale rene ~ die, putthe Rud of. ected refuse, 3) Cause of achion sen deabes onthe opaatin-Elfen W. Chase 5 Dr. Vick Buencamino [36 SCRA 365, May 1B, [125 Ponente: Jushe (ueras Facts: Blt Chase extered info an agveenent with Dr. Buencomine and Willan Crookey for He estblishment of afactvy in Manila called Anencan Mochinery Bayincerny Parts Ine. (AMPARTS), whore Chase. was tb transfer his bat poet |, ship his machineries fiom his tamer plantin America to Manila, itn) an Ke ual be tHe pradachon managoy: The Hveel 3) forsome tine had harmonious velaXonships wnt! Chase oder his resghabon. chase fileda case in Cal'fovnia agast Coan ke-of the prchoe nize oChss pleut. Then, Fe ew ein DH Manta ling ls act ud Donte by Boencamino and Canleer- Tysng: Whether ornot Chase has the epeity foustiute a deyiatvesut? Held: Yer. Elton Qrase has He persorall fo tik a derivatve suit as an AMPARTS stockhaler, etdenred by a Chase ws recognized as a stock holder and inital iaceiportor, Chose dil rotus in Glitirniay Hil Chale filed the Proont devivatve sutin CP Manly not for his porsorol lerel} but tothe fonottt of AMMARTS -Catalina R. Peres vs Hon Bienvenido Yan, bal: 3 SCAR 18, ber 30, I (46! Ponente* Jah Labrador, Tv. Fads: Several pchaies wore made by Rosas-Kalav Textile Mills in Me York far raw ioe hve ood aut. fo consist of dlzend| etc podack for which the Central Bank shyved all dollara lochs tor raw materials for the om en ‘ch necessarily Led b te pealyss akg bre lier ofthe Bhisled goods was lited ie val G Lew Yorn which Dalamal“oppointed by the boaval of divects AS ate lle a3 o-panayer, had thierests nd thatthe mena for said goods wore guitare by the Indian Commerctal (0 ny Tse: es Tashinran) may be allowed teimWale He ante fr yeceivewsh P and dama ayer? Held Yes- Caporete clivectus are qui Ly of breach of trast, a stockheldey” may insta i. ai ackon to itty» % — fraud n We Gadusl Wen ot orate affaiay whore, co ofa breach of frat ok on aun te te fn, wnbya or ponedy is useles aly Ea) ee aut th lal wie and 6 ma Ju arhntan td rat take th remedy fe ile) tm ae a poted a Roasts witha mentRicardo L- Gamboa vs. oe Oscav Vichotone, etal 40 SCRA AE, May OS, [174 Ponente: Take a spc, Jv Facts: Aut of preliminary injunchon was filed by hevein Vespondent-s as Aarchn -ses of | ede of shox Fork oonte Pola ee re rec tows surrey met ond authonbed the sale of Fas Shwes fe forestall fhe isonerts takeaer foo me ous proident and vire resident, in violation of Help nop five yah “etl cout valed jn favor of vey dont, Lateron priate feed ed ich an compumise agveoment with He reciyets “for the tenster of the £23 shaves, aydi inst wien the [ettones Bi Bled a motors f dismss which was denied: Pssae: Wether or not a devivethie suit is the move pryer otton that should have bean Filed by repardents? iM Mo. The i contend frit the pry a of theplain hfs waslf doratie suit pees potores in the rame of the ope in Be te secave a binding vellet (eae all fn velnadies guajlable within the operation An individual stockholder js Pinshlute « deriotve suiton dohalf ofthe hon wherein be hole inorder to patect or vindicate i wheroty the officals of He ca ae a P.sue, or al Heo phe ov bold the conte of Hae ap ‘tee, wy lain Yes ave a| ing and vindiealy iy fhev-oun inditder| inteasts or dude, ond Se mei mittedJuan D- Peete eh-al- v5- Rafe] Santos Phil 354, May 4, [150 ae Juste Reyos Facts: Juan P- Evangelista, chal. ave way take cllas of the Vita) Lumby Copy Pt whe ft cl ants holds matey 50% of-Heshcks of sat dvpovation gra alto ts and al always ue Na hee) snanorgey, and frome oak Santos, insachty, pe opel three os bsnl ‘nd soot allowed Hts amber ebncesston tol apse and ifs me them machineries, buildin ings, volts, flee par fs causin e compl: le niin ae the capiabon ag ‘aie disy deprect rater of its tal cou dismissed the acton on He. J nd of paper venutand | lack of cause ofaction- Bue: Whether or not pristitts have a agit b beng the acpoy for-theiy benefit? Held: Mo The complaint shous thatthe ackon is fir damages il - inismaragemoht of the af firs and assets of He a en ping 0 | offer it bein alleged that defendants ma Udninistaton as brvaglth dboo LA rain a HRe oan and the cons sper lass of valugof its stackr The wnjary Comp lathed 8 gs py vim I tottal of tre coup wation, wiht he Ode the damages a should po by He cospea in valher then bytHe sfockhaldecs “The stecldobles my ny net nay those dama Cen 6h inthe ppp bin Lol He isthe avaarg them @ oe of fhe ope ep te disolaton oe caput avd He! k rytda hey atl debhs and Irabil Hes.Delta Motor Sales CorPoakon 12. Judge T4naeis Mangos 70 SCRA Ca i307 ae Ponentes Tush Aypino Facts: tevein respondent Pamintuan inifated an action a ae ce Delta Motoy pies . rte alle eyed Beare Toyolx car shld to him and for fallave fo ae vbank fab yeni ye ve ang Hear. The summons were sorved on Dionisia hia [0 nye hep Hepeitvrer Pola Motas failedty ancwer the com splint and b dec aved in defaul- awa evidence was presented and « Aecision yet rendered against heey peitioer Potthande fle a motion te (itt the omer of dofult and fo Ieort aside He pdgnent and fer hew fra I which was denied- Tssue: Whether or not thee was poper Sovace of Sammons? Held: A Rule {4 of Rales of Cowd. provides frat ie defendant is a organized ondey the [aus of he diy inet ov 4 pactouship da) “sy eter Zrvito mo try be made on +he prrrdent, manager os cashier, agent, any of: Hs directs. Astnce ampliane “pbh the mode ot seit (0 (5 ar th confer j jursdickon of ro cout over a coigoahon Servite Conte of Uheseorke 5 = did net confer _jurtsdichen over the Kom in the foeclosute ale a Verder Hreumably in thatthe co wn “ae re 7 vr rebite th anachey ananst it or te thsure hh Co vould on a rpresentave Sa tateyatel vith He poet.E-B- Villavesa and Portnoy Ge. Utd: vs - Bento GK No- (36 426 é, Aagast 06, ( (199 Ponente: ahr Ginzagae| Keyes Facts: EB. nik ic a and Tope Dorp Cop erecated a deed of le with deep in the former ayced ol a af cols of (a th path og belong ing tHe. ae a housing sabdieston tor He canstrack'on of low cost hing unity: They a qreed that He Venue shal] be in RTC Makak in se of diy Tnpera) . Cap 1 filed a complain fur breach of contract ard dama ol Eb fiat Co: for bile to with jb contractual 0 ffs in thal otter than a few untinished lok crt hous, Hoe wee substi doelynerts then. Summons var serad upon the defendant ‘thou h fs Branch Manager a-Clo pat iy the shen€fis Dh twas served y 2 EB. Villovesa 6 va itt Branch Mora ser Eng Y. ach. The cxpankon Bled a nation tr dismiss on Hessewre of i Supe ‘Emaidh which was denied - Lssue: Whether or notthe coud negpived jurisdiction? Hold: No. The servie manna aie He prarch manager of £-B-Villoasa - at ts branch offre at C0, inStea yen a maha ee vindoal o Fore at Davao Cy i i 4 mit ds rot aepsaye- ce over He poopy of th pe “epee rile pavile Pat tHe J etondent | ita copamton ovgamged onder He lows tte He Philigpines ora f' hp duly fegistered pare a made on the president, mane oh nh cashiéy, ager omy bs clivectos. A conpliore wh’ He mode Raat Fie eoag cone jared ifn ot the ‘out over a coiporabien. The offer upon whom sore ts made mast pe one who ts pdmed inte statutes otenuise the sorvire is invutticienCuneta Motos Com be) 4 A-)-Samtos, Ine S ScRA 09, July 31, 1964 Ponente: ie Dizon Facks: Acerhticele of public coneniance((P0) was granted fo Nicsas Gnigpcin b a taricab servie in Manila Adel outacked a ' toLuneta Maras (0, To secure payment he crecated a cha joge. covering his CH: Subse. quently, Gntekion mort rd the same CPC ng oe! wrt Pobeb inane N . (ma BP) oe gin Mets Filed on achon fo tiecbse He ne Rehab Roane Co? also inspitated forecloswe proceed i ings on its And cha ee . age wherein He fC was sold ata touches in far of Amado San bs a jpled the mle and war yored by He Mable Service Commission (7IC)- Wed w tooo Lancing och tHe He vas sold at pubbiat in rian Lavets Mas- Poveda Sonfrs , En opt Tue: Whetheror net Lane Motors Ca. may acyive the fc? Held: No- Lanta Motos Co. does not have the wer tr acyaive He CAC because jt has no aathon' engage, in He besiness of (anol transpordaen andy yerste 3 foxicab servite- The « Spo ose. of Laneta Motas isp t infle tang vtafen of, Zs by Ge Sach acysiton wold be vat p pose whi hae no necessa cen with its legitimate. pas; -nen. Fe Nog He dactvire of limited op pay ard alee tej tyrone of He poprie dau of fe wheles of i intag Kon abn apartGovernment v4- El Hoday Filino 50 Pil 349, uly 15) 1487 Ponente: Juste Strack Facts: The divectus of EB] Hogar Filipino erected a modern veintovced concrete, offee building atthe site of i old puilding. Sail acpatsition of the lot and He construcken of the new off buldly are ult vires acts on tle pt of the euporation. Dssue: Whether ornot the eection of the building was reasonable 7 Held: es. The eeckon ofthe buildin a juste the law sfates that the corporations mas acppive properties as the transuction of its Pastner pray lsonably an recessanly veywive When E| Hogar Filipino acy wired the reper its pasiness has deal tf such anertent hat Hee ts 7 a need Konthact asaitable pull ing 0 peste of ts offier-Director of Lands vs- Court of yee 158 SRA See, March It 4bF Porente: Jushice Renan = Tylesia nv Knste (tue) plied with CH Cavite for registation veel of [and which Ht ail fb have acquived fom Kyi'lina dela _ virtue of a deed of absolute sale executed in 1174 IMC alkyed that fhe land pave been in actual continugus, ablic, peacetu) Jand en session and occupaton for wave than 30 ae e Government, th le Directoy of Lands © opprsd on Heya thot Zw did pe nie a cy weynive ownedhy and that the land is bile belurgirg He yl of the Pri yy ines andl not subject-to privete wp spr Tssue: Whether or pot Ine my agyie the land? Held: Jes sn - cytotec lend + Alienable fblic lond.c bel bya sess, — hn hit predecessors in interest, ny ss cortiny -eusly, aa exclu tasely 7 He prescribed petal b fo ot Zo yee pacar Ack is ‘conversed in aperty by al apse or Completion of said pened) ites pi a once tonne - re inh This isan exception to the rale’in the canstituhor peat pat a Hoat may poLthold alierable lands of the publ tc do —mai except dgvica caltwa) farnds-Republic vs- Arcoye Mining Company, Dc. te sca |, oben telat Ponente: Juste Bau te Facts: Acoje Mining Co-,Tre- wrote He Director of asp reppeshing fle aperiny of a port ‘deep and money ord ofhres at- its mining camp af- -GuZ, Zan lei Fo! soruive its “— and teiy famille bein in Said camp The divector of pasts ackiry on vepest veyrive te ny to adapt a pesolubton thet fee Mining would assume fall ve ra bility for all cash reeived by the pestinaste. h postothe Darch wx pened where. Hilane Sanchez, an employee of fev Mining, was te postmaster. one yy te pastmastey went bn 3 doy leate, put nevy rehuned: As a result, an ackon was brought by the hicinaget Pp receuey Hheamont of Sho hye. jn the accounts of the fotre ster, fiom He ae Dssue: Whether oy not the rslaton js utthin the caporaken's Pradegt? ‘i fea Held Yes. the resolution covrs 0 subject whith enems the benetit, convenience. and welfare of TE com anys employees and her finifie- There are certain onprate avb thelt may be! ported outside of He supe of He f vessly conferred Ete y aye necessary 40 pramete the wteret or vettad ote ceuport Ko blishment of Ae loca st offre js a yeasanable odpm adjunct fe He conduct ofthe business of Acoie Mining Grpany. Such post office 3 atta! iim -proenent in the lrg corditieh of AY employes. Sach acts not cate r