Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kayla Y. Mendoza
The issue of universal healthcare is one that is widely discussed quite frequently, even in
nonbearing countries such as the United States. The most recent and successful attempt in the US
moving towards universal healthcare was the Affordable Care Act administered by formed
president, Barrack Obama. The bill's goal was to make it so that every citizen would be covered
with some form of health insurance, reduce the cost of said insurance. However many
complained that the bill had raised other taxes too much, not have been entirely successful.
counterproductive. As of today, no parties fully support Obamacare but no new bills have been
drafted either, leaving everything at a standstill. In the article, "A history of why the US is the
only rich country without universal health care", written by Annalisa Merelli, provides a brief
summary of the current circumstances regarding the healthcare policies we have now and the
government's plans for our future. Annalisa Merelli is a published journalist and reporter for
Quartz, a digital global news outlet who has worked from and lived large parts of her adult life in
different countries. Merelli focuses her article by addressing all citizens who are concerned with
the costs and future of their healthcare and is speaking on the premises of the cease in any
progression in either working towards or away from Obamacare. Merelli's article was overall
effective as it addressed the proper audience, provided facts and statistics, and sent a general
informative message that was easy to comprehend and apply to possible current situations.
Merelli begins her article with an interesting title that will grab the attention of most
readers. The title alone makes its own suggestions about what points Merelli will be covering. In
most cases, when someone or something is given the “rich” adjective, it is often being compared,
so many citizens may find this more intriguing and may be given the allusion that the US is
3
Running Head: UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE
being greedy with money. In other connotations, one might take it as the US may be
economically stable, but other nations are enriched by thriving health care systems that do
benefit their citizens. Wherever you may interpret the intentions of the title, Merelli makes a
successful attempt at luring in her desired audience. She also makes an attempt at gaining at
expanding on the audience by also discussing Bernie Sanders, who is widely popular with
younger generations and millennials and discussed his involvement in terms of progressing our
healthcare system. Aside from these groups, there are also the activists who fight for and claim
that health care is a basic human right that the US is depriving it’s citizens, another easy target
who will easily relate and find the article more than informative, but even a platform of support.
To contribute more to the reader, Merelli’s writing style was concise and clean, which allowed
The most frequent point made is that the US spends the most money regarding health
care, yet they still carry one of the most costly and ineffective methods of deliverance. The new
idea being introduced is that this is how the government makes more money, by keeping their
own tight leashes on the costs of medications, treatments, etc. These concepts will allow the
reader to either feel angry and cheated, or neutrally unaffected. The diction throughout the article
is often negative, which feeds the reader with the idea that maybe the nation should be
redirecting itself towards universal healthcare. Based on the information and numbers provided
in the article, an emotional appeal is made present in allowing the reader to see how US citizens
are publicly struggling, and the government is no where near any solutions. Merelli’s most
effective jab at the current circumstances is her first subheading titled, “National Sickness”,
inferring that this is more than just an issue of political games and advantages, but it is what it
Trump’s presence in office, many things are being changed and rearranged, and one of the first
things to be altered was the healthcare system the country had in place. With so many balls in the
air there is a lot of room for confusion, which is where Merelli came to step in and clearly
establish what is happening and where each political party is standing, and goes as far as
claiming that history is repeating itself, as very similar problems have arose before. Merelli
alludes that the repetition of events should be a big red flag, obvious problems are being ignored,
but no one of importance will address them because no one wishes to sacrifice their hard-earned
salaries. The immediate tone noticed is strict and informative and Merelli uses the compared
salaries of medical professionals from different pictures to fully deliver the idea of how the US
stays “rich”. Merelli’s description leaves the reader with the impression that the whole system is
made for one-sided beneficiaries, and not in favor of the potential patients.
Overall, Merelli uses consistent tones and maintains her credibility by providing her
readers with facts from trusted sources and by quoting individuals with heavily weighed stances
on the subject. Throughout her article, Merelli also kept means of professional communication
with the intended readers all whilst keeping them fully engaged by also providing room for
interpretation all while being informed, effectively using the rhetorical devices of ethos, pathos
and logos. The point and overall message remains, the healthcare system is a problem in our
country, but only remains as so for the smaller and simpler glory of “staying rich”.
5
Running Head: UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE
References
Merelli, A. (2017, July 18). Health care in the US: Why universal health care never ...
https://www.bing.com/cr?IG=E85BB96D92AA4732A49EB52FE4871454&CID=1B713D75A5
16675B01CD36DCA4B966AD&rd=1&h=saonsgKbs83AAlKPr38ptHY6RykPshjx3NPSuvN48
KY&v=1&r=https%3a%2f%2fqz.com%2f1022831%2fwhy-doesnt-the-united-states-have-
universal-health-care%2f&p=DevEx,5068.1