You are on page 1of 2

NSH-FAB SHOP#3 AUDIT POINTS JUSTIFICATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION AND CLOSURE

SR.NO DESCRIPTION NSH ACTION ACD VERIFIED BY PSAL REMARKS

1.        Contractor is using Cooper heat PWHT procedure having status 3   
     ( approved with comments) on January 12, 2017.The contractor is 
using color for core wires and numbering for  insulating cable. The actual  Cooper Heat will incorperate the
1 practice need to be addressed in the procedure and to procedure to be  comment and will resubmit the 24/8/2017
submitted for Company approval. This need to applied for all PWHT  PWHT procedure for final approval.
procedures( Cooper heat, NSH, Petrochem). In the past Contractor was 
proactively informed to regularize the commented procedure.
4754-12/10/17

2.        During review of it was found that 6 joints ( form Line class number  Contractor complying the CSD


1CT2P09, 3CT2P12, 1CT2P06) are rejected for RT after PWHT. It was  recommendation to perform RT
identified that all 6 joints were not subjected to RT before PWHT. As per  before Stress relieving for joints
CSD comment on NSH PWHT procedure NSH-PSAL-FSRU-PRO-PI- welded by welders other than
2 0030 Rev02 contractor was advised to perform RT before PWHT. The  category A. with the present trend of 24/8/2017
same comment is  not incorporated till date to the procedure. This  RT after Stress relieving, we faced a
comment to be made applicable to all PWHT procedure. Contractor is  rejection of less than 0.5%. Contractor
also required to review the line class WPS essential and supplementary  considered the mandatory RT before
variable requirements as per ASME section IX and SAES-W-11  and  PWHT only for the case of P #4 & P # 5
incorporate a WPS to take care repairs. materials as per SAES-W-011.

3326(7/6/17)

3.        It was observed that Cooper heat revision 01  procedure was in 
use at shop. However the latest approval from Company is revision 02  latest Procedure is placed in the job
3 22/8/2017
which is a noncompliance to Para 19.0 document control of Contractor  location.
PQP.

procedure in place

System has been implimented ( As


4.         Recorder number RF-12-1932 calibration validly is for 6 months.  
per SAES-W-11 para 13.15 recorders
As per SAES-W-11  para 13.15 recorders need to be calibrated for every  will be calibrated for every 3
4 3 months. As highlighted proactively earlier contractor QC need to review  months,as an action contractor QC 24/8/2017
and approve all calibration certificates for such and similar errors.  reviewed and approved all calibration
Contractor has not yet implemented the system. cerificates)
VERIFIED BY PSAL

5.       PWHT Power supply equipment valid certificate  that need to be  will comply the procedure


5 24/8/2017
maintained as per Para 7.1.1 of NSH-PSAL-FSRU-PRO-PI-0030 Rev02. requirement
VERIFIED BY PSAL
6.       As per SAES-W-011 para 13.16.(b) Contractor need to demonstrate 
the acceptable temperature range of the junction between the  contractor will demonstrate the
6 requirement at job location by 24/8/2017
compensating cable and the thermocouple lead is from 0 to  verifying the temperature. will be verified by
+80°C. today

7.        Contractor is not initiating the RFI for receiving inspection for PMI  will be applied


activity as per SATIP-L-350-08  item 2.4 and SAIC- L-2010. Refer  SS  once new RFI
7 PSAL
flange fittings received PO –PSCI-M98-02-P218-DA-C-0.6 from  for the concern
GALPRETTI raised
PSAL
8.       Under SAIC-W-2010 incoming inspection for welding consumables 
contractor is stating not applicable for  item B-5 – verification of  Contractor will comply the
8 24/8/2017
consumable specifications as per ASME Section IIC. However this item is  requirement.
applicable for all consumables ordered and received as per ASME IIC
VERIFIED BY PSAL

9.        As per SATIP-L-350-08 item 2.1, SAIC-L-2005 to be used for 
incoming inspection of pipe and fittings. However Contractor is using 
9 SAIC-L-2006 as per SATIP-M-001-01 since SAIC –L-2005 is not covering  PSAL 24/8/2017
the requirements of pipe and fittings. Contractor need to get a clarification 
from Company.
PSAL

10.   As per SATIP-L-350-01, SATIP-L-350-08 & SATIP-W-011-01  
contractor has not attached document review checklists during submittal  Contractor will comply the
10 24/8/2017
for approval. As highlighted earlier contractor need to regularize this  requirement.
requirement.
SITE NEED TO TAKE
ACTION

11.    Category D Welders with  Number 2744GA, 27885, EMD424, T3550 
& T4644 have exceeded acceptable welding rejection rate of 7.5%   Contractor will revoke the JCC
11 ( actual 33 to 100%) for more than 2-3 weeks. However the welders are  24/8/2017
qualifeid for pipe welding.
not revoked and being used in structural welding. Noncompliance to 
SAEP-324 Appendix I note 8.0
ALL WELDERS
REVOKED( DOCUME
NTS AVAILABLE FOR
VERIFICATION)

Contractor selected the joints for all


the welders in week # 23 for RT as per
12.   RFI Raised based on SATIP-W-011-01 for week Number 23 was  6 WELDER RT STILL
the requirement. These joints will be
12 checked for Weld joint selection for welders and line class. However  24/8/2017 BALANCE TO CLOSE
reflected in the weekly report only
welder selection not matching with SATR-W-2019 report. THIS POINT
after performing the radiography as
per the approved report format.

Related Interests