Professional Documents
Culture Documents
” – Lois Tyson
condemned (or privileged) to be forever the most rigorous and, consequently, the
most unreliable language in terms of which man names and transforms himself.”
“Language is not the reliable tool of communication we believe it to be, but rather a
- Jacques Derrida
DECONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM
Jacques Derrida inaugurated the theory of deconstruction in the late 1960s and
it became a major influence on literary studies during the late 1970s. Many critics
have misperceived deconstruction as a superficial analysis of wordplay that destroys
our appreciation of literature and our ability to interpret it meaningfully. One reason
for this is that the writing by some of the major users (like Jacques Derrida, Luce
Irigaray, Geoffrey Hartman) of this theory offered explanations that attempt to
summarize the work of these thinkers, frequently employ such unusual language and
organizational principles that they seem to defy our understanding and acceptance.
In Europe, on the other hand, deconstruction was understood as a response to
structuralism; it is therefore sometimes referred to as a “poststructuralist” approach to
literary analysis. Structuralism argued that individual thought was shaped by linguistic
structures. It therefore denied or vehemently deemphasized the relative autonomy of
subjects in determining cultural meanings; indeed, it seemed virtually to dissolve the
subject into the larger forces of culture. Deconstruction attacked the assumption that
these structures of meaning were stable, universal, or a historical. However, it did not
challenge structuralism's views about the cultural construction of human subjects.
Despite the above, deconstruction can improve our ability to think critically
and to see more readily the ways in which our experience is determined by ideologies
of which we are unaware because they are “built into” our language. Thus,
deconstruction can be a very useful tool for Marxism, feminism, and other theories
that attempt to make us aware of the oppressive role ideology can play in our lives. In
order to have a better understanding of how deconstruction reveals the hidden work of
ideology in our daily experience of our world, and ourselves we must first understand
deconstruction’s view of language. This is because, according to Derrida, “language is
not the reliable tool of communication we believe it to be, but rather a fluid,
ambiguous domain of complex experience in which ideologies program us without
our being aware of them.”
Derrida and Miller reveal the complex nature of not only deconstruction but
also of language itself. Derrida says in Deconstruction and the Other (pg 124):
I am not sure that deconstruction can function as a literary method
as such. I am wary of the idea of methods of reading. The laws of
reading are determined by that particular text that is being read. This
does not mean that we should simply abandon ourselves to the text, or
represent or repeat it in a purely passive manner. It means that we must
remain faithful, even if it implies a certain violence, to the injunctions of
the text. These injunctions will differ from one text to the next so that
one cannot prescribe one general method or reading. In this sense
deconstruction is not a method.
J. H. Miller also said in Theory Now and Then (pg 231) that
Sentences of the form ‘Deconstruction is so and so’ are a contradiction
in terms. Deconstruction cannot by definition be defined, since it
presupposes the definability or, more properly, ‘undecidability’ of all
conceptual or generalizing terms. Deconstruction, like any method of
interpretation, can only be exemplified, and the examples will of course
all differ.
These quotes testify to the contradictory responses of critics and theorists
concerning the nature of deconstruction itself. The quotes seem to also suggest that the
different perspectives deconstruction may elicit. Unable to make up his mind about the
nature of deconstruction, Jacques Derrida comes to the conclusion that deconstruction
is not a method of textual reading. Similarly, Miller suggests that deconstruction
cannot be defined simply because it is undecidable. He agrees, however, that
deconstruction is “a method of interpretation”, or textual interpretation.
In deconstructing life itself, we argue that everyday of our lives, language can
be seen as the line drawn between the living and the dead. Thus, human beings’ being
able to use language for communication is evident that they are still living beings.
Deconstruction as a theory is built on the belief that language is much more slippery
and ambiguous than we realize. Hence, without changing a word, a single sentence
can have several meanings that is, language isn’t as stable and reliable as we generally
assume it is. As an instance, the sentence “The lecturer says the students do not have
to attend his classes” can have several interpretations. These interpretations are
usually dependent on which word is stressed or paid more attention to.
1. The lecturer says the students do not have to attend his classes (to mean that the
lecturer is lying).
2. The lecturer says the students do not have to attend his classes (to mean that
CONCEPTS IN DECONSTRUCTION
Multiplicity: This has to do with multiple meanings to deconstruct the system set in
place by structuralism. In simple terms, it has to do with multiple meanings for
deconstructing a text. There are multiple meanings for everything, so there's no
essence behind a meaning and a gap between the signified and signifier as they are
both arbitrary.
Dissemination: This shows how meaning scatters, spreads, and multiples and how, in
the process of accumulating, meanings can be lost.
Supplement: Derrida takes this term from Rousseau, who saw a supplement as “an
inessential extra added to something complete in itself.” Derrida argues that what is
complete in itself cannot be added to, and so a supplement can only occur where there
is a lack. In any binary set of terms, the second can be argued to exist in order to fill in
a lack in the first. This will then suggest that in deconstruction, there may be a surplus
of meaning and rhetoric.
Decentering: This is based on the belief that there is no central meaning in and within
a text, everything is multiple, unstable, and without unified meaning.
Transcendental Signified: This is a reference upon which one may build a concept or
a philosophy, which provides ultimate meaning since it is the origin. However, for this
to be true, it would have to be understood without comparing it to other signified or
signifiers (impossible since we understand everything through comparison).
Logocentrism: This is the attitude that logos (the Greek term for speech, thought, law,
or reason) is the central principle of language and philosophy. Logocentrism is the
view that speech, and not writing, is central to language. The need or desire for a
centre that can serve as a basis for all thoughts and actions. Logocentrist theory claims
that speech is the original signifier of meaning, and that written word is derived from
the spoken word. The written word is, thus, a representation of the spoken word.
Différance: This is from two French words. They are: “to defer” and “to differ”. To
Derrida, this is the only name language can have; that is, Language can defer and
differ. Derrida uses the term “difference” to describe the origin of presence and
absence. Differance is indefinable, and cannot be explained by the “metaphysics of
presence.” A critical question can be raised that “why use language when we are not
sure of it?” A deconstructionist answer will be that language is used only because it is
the tool at our disposal and because there is no other one. So, while doing this, words
that are being used are put under erasure, that is, crossing words out to show that the
word is being used in a new way. Derrida's example is that you can't privilege speech
over writing because two spoken words may sound the same and have different
meanings.
Binary oppositions: This is a system of conceptual oppositions or hierarchies that
Western beliefs are base on, where one side of the binary is given more privileged or
power over the other according to Derrida. To Ferdinand De Saussure the binary
opposition was the “means by which the units of language have value or meaning;
each unit is defined against what it is not.” With this categorization, terms and
concepts tend to be associated with a positive or negative. For example, Reason and
Passion, Man and Woman, Inside and Outside, Presence and Absence, Speech and
Writing, etc. Derrida argued that these oppositions were arbitrary and inherently
unstable. And also, they can be used to detect one’s cultural ideology. Deconstruction
rejects most of the assumptions of structuralism and more vehemently “binary
opposition” on the grounds that such oppositions always privilege one term over the
other, that is, signified privileged over the signifier.
Double Reading: This is the use of two part reading process by deconstructionists to
interpret literature. In the first reading, a singular interpretation of the text is
developed without multiplicity or deconstruction. In the second reading, a
deconstructionist interpretation of the problem is developed, which flips the given
binary and undermines the structure of the text.
Mental Trace: In deconstruction, there is no signified but the ones we can get are the
ones we are able to create in our minds. These will generate a chain of signified and
not signifier. Signifier consists of and produces more signifiers in a never-ending
deferral of meaning: we seek meaning that is solid and stable, but we can never really
find it because we can never get beyond the play of signifiers that is language. In
Derrida’s words, what we take to be meaning is really only the mental trace left
behind by the play of signifiers. And that trace consists of the differences by which we
define a word.
Undecidability: The free play of the text's signifiers goes beyond the capacity of the
system to confine it to one meaning or a set or meanings. This shows that the there is
no unified meaning that can be attached to a particular text. There are several
meanings and the text is in between selecting one.
Phonocentrism: Derrida's belief that Western Culture privileges speech over writing.
Derrida and other deconstructionists argue that writing came before speech.
Simulacra: This is the simulation or imitation of the real grows more real than actual
reality. For instance, in our world today, Social Media and TV have constructed a
simulated reality more real than real life. Nothing has happened until TV or social
media say it has happened. So, stimulation is that thing that makes the reality become
more real even more than the reality itself.
Deconstructive criticism can be applied to language, our world, the human
identity and literature, itself since its vehicle is language, through the use of the
concepts that are highlighted and discussed above.
Not all concepts may be said to be present in a literary text but the following
concepts will be used in analyzing William Blake’s “Sick Rose” and John Donne’s
“The Flea” for the purpose of showing the undecidability of the text. These concepts
are multiplicity, free-floating signifiers, dissemination, supplement, decentering, and
logocentrism.
There are generally two main purposes for deconstructing a literary text, and
we may see either or both at work in any given deconstructive reading: They are:
1. to reveal the text’s undecidability
2. What ideology does the text seem to promote—what is its main theme—and how
does conflicting evidence in the text show the limitations of that ideology? We can
usually discover a text’s overt ideological project by finding the binary opposition(s)
that structures the text’s main theme(s).
Before we start to look at the different meanings it is important to understand what a flea is. A flea is
a wingless parastic insect which feeds on blood of mammals it sometimes trasmits diseases through
its bite. The fleas are always found in hot spots where a potential host animal spends alot of its time.
These areas are usually warm,shady and humid and therefore usually indoor in a region with cooler
climate.
Central meaning- a Flea is described as a small wingless insect that consumes/ sucks blood of their
host. It is strong and feeds on humans and warm blooded animals
disturbing desire,
urge,
union.