Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CRP
Pressure Control and Regulation Module
User’s Manual
and Exercise Guide
Didacta Italia
CRP
Pressure Control and Regulation Module
User’s Manual
and Exercise Guide
The information contained in this manual can be modified at any time and without
warning on account of technical or educational needs.
Reproduction by any means, including photocopying of this test or parts thereof, or the
figures contained therein, is strictly prohibited.
Table of Contents
1. General ..................................................................................... 1
5. Exercises ................................................................................. 19
vi Didacta Italia
Chapter 1.
1. General
The CRP study unit has been designed for the study of closed and open loop pressure
control techniques.
The function performed by this unit is to enable the pressure applied by the air to the
tank wall to be adjusted.
At the outlet of the tank, a proportional valve adjusts the output of the air: by
working on this valve it is possible to control the pressure inside the tank according to
need.
Figure 1.1 – CRP Pressure Control Regulation Module
In this unit the controlled quantity is the pressure, and the control action is achieved
by means of a signal which is transmitted to the proportional valve so as to govern its
opening and closing.
In the CRP, the control action can only be of PID (proportional, integrative,
derivative) type. On account of the velocity of the process, it would be meaningless to
attempt simpler types of control action, such as On-Off control.
• Manual flow control valve between the auxiliary tank and the main tank
• pneumatic proportional valve for the control of the air output from the main tank
• Electrical power supply and signal conditioning unit with a control panel
including a digital pressure indicator.
The process simulator can be connected to a PC with the aid of a suitable A/D and
D/A conversion board.
In the first two cases, the software running on the PC (CRS) makes it possible to
observe the behaviour of the system as it is being controlled.
Figure 1.2 – CRS (Control Regulation Software)
In the third case, the CRS can simulate the behaviour of a controller, let the user
establish the control parameters and, as in the previous cases, enable the students to
examine the behaviour of the different variables involved.
Furthermore, the software makes it possible to activate the solenoid valve which
opens (closes) the circuit branch, resulting in the introduction of noise in the process.
The use of the CRP in connection with a PC and the CRS enables the students to
analyse the effects of the different control parameters on the behaviour of the control
chain.
3
10
11
6 12
Figure 2.1 – CRP Overall view
2
21
1 20
Figure 2.2 – Compressed air inlet with pressure regulator
5
7
19
17
15
16
14
18
Figure 2.3 – Tanks and valves
13
Figure 2.4 – PN pneumatic proportional valve
Y 9 10
X
8
n
11
6 7 12
5
4
13
3
2 14
15
1
20 19 18 17 16
Figure 2.5 – Synoptic view
1. Compressed air inlet
2. Pressure gauge for auxiliary tank input air
3. Manual regulator for I/P converter input air pressure
4. Pressure gauge for I/P converter input air pressure PR2
5. Safety valve for auxiliary tank (3.0 bar)
6. Pressure gauge for main tank pressure read‐out (Controlled variable ‐ Full scale 2.5 bar)
P
7. P/I (Pressure/Current) transducer for the measurement of the controlled variable
8. Optional electronic controller, MiniReg
9. Control board
10. Personal Computer
11. I/P (Current/Pressure) converter for the generation of the control signal
12. Pressure gauge to read the control signal in percentage terms (0‐100% corresponding
to 3 ‐ 15 psi) P
13. Pneumatic proportional valve VN
14. Manual valve to control the magnitude of the disturbance introduced V1
15. Manual valve to empty out the air from the main tank V2
16. Solenoid valve to introduce noise EV1
17. Main tank
18. Manual valve to introduce air into the main tank V3
19. Auxiliary buffer tank
20. Manual regulator for auxiliary tank input air pressure PR1
21. Air flowrate manual regulator
X Control signal
Y Controlled variable signal
n Noise signal
The air coming from the main line and suitably subjected to a reduction in pressure
by means of reducer 20 is introduced into the auxiliary tank 19.
From tank 19, which serves as a buffer, the air is conveyed into the main tank 17
through manual valve 18.
From tank 17 the air can be released via a channel which is controlled manually with
the aid of valve 15 or through a channel which is controlled by means of proportional
valve 13.
Work on solenoid valve 16 to have the air flow out via a supplementary channel,
whose is flow can be adjusted manually by means of valve 14.
Measuring instruments 6 and 12 give the values of the pressure controlling the
proportional pneumatic valve 13 (i.e. the control signal) and the pressure in tank 17 (i.e.
the controlled variable), respectively.
• it performs the conditioning of the electric signals to and from the NI (National
Istrument) conversion board, so as to adapt the board’s inputs/outputs to the
inputs/outputs of the transducers and actuators equipping the unit;
• supplies a number of test points to let the user check out the most important
electric signals by means of an oscilloscope;
Figure 2.6 shows the front view of the electrical equipment of the CRP.
3 ‐ control by means of external electronic controller (MSRR)
4 ‐ manual control
25. LED indicator for the operation of the noise solenoid valve
26. Three‐position NOISE selector
0 ‐ the solenoid valve is deactivated and its operation is disabled
MAN ‐ the solenoid valve is on
PC ‐ solenoid valve operation is controlled via the PC
27. Auxiliary output of control signal X (0 ‐ 5 V)
28. Auxiliary output of controlled variable Y (0 to 5 V proportional to the pressure reading 0
‐ 2 bar)
29. Didacta logo
Figure 2.7 ‐ Rear view of the control board equipment
3.1 Installation
Figure 3.1 – Electrictal connections
3) Perform conncetion of pressure sensor, EV, IP/Converter and USB port from PC
as shown in picture 3.1.
4) Connect the unit to the power line (220V 50/60 Hz) by means of the cable
supplied as standard . as shown in picture 3.1.
5) Connect the air input 6 to the compressed air supply through the plastic pipe that
comes with the unit.
7) Adjust regulator 3 until the pressure pressure gauge gives a reading of ca 25 psi.
10) Turn on the PC and install the software according to the instructions provided in
the CRS Utilisation manual.
3.2 Start-up
4) Proceed with the tests by following the indications contained in the exercises
proposed in Chapter 5.
4. Pressure control
The simplest control action is of the On-Off type. In this case, we assume we have a
two-stage (On-Off) actuator.
Whilst this type of control can be profitably used when dealing with quantities, such
as temperature and level, that vary slowly over time, it is not suitable for quantities that
may vary extremely rapidly, such as flow or pressure.
Accordingly, the CRS software to be used on the CRP has been configured so as to rule out
the possibility of On‐Off control.
4.2.1 General
In various practical applications, the control system can be achieved thanks to the
contribution of three components:
• proportional
• integrative
• derivative
The control signal, which is calculated on the basis of the error observed (i.e., of the
difference between the and the desired value (Set-Point) of the controlled variable and
the measured value of such variable) is the outcome of the sum of three terms, the first
of which is proportional to the error, the second is proportional to its integral over time,
and the third is proportional to its derivative (which represents its "trend").
As mentioned before, this component is proportional to the error between the Set-
Point and the measured value.
Often people refer to the inverse, expressed as a percentage, of the proportional gain:
this parameter is called Proportional Band (BP).
The reason for this name becomes clearer if we think that when the control signal
reaches 100% of its possible value, in our case when the heating element is crossed by
the maximum permitted current, the error reaches a "saturation level", and any
subsequent increase in the error will no longer be able to cause an increment in the
control signal.
The Proportional Band is the error interval within which the control signal takes on
an intermediate value, of between 0 and 100%, and outside which it is, respectively, 0
and 100%, i.e., within this band, the control signal is proportional to the error.
Given an error, e, between 0 and the BP, the percentage value of the control signal,
X, is:
100
X e (1)
BP
The greater is the BP, the error being the same, the lower is X; in other words, the
lower is the proportional gain of the controller.
Let us assume we are working with a proportional controller and we wish to obtain a
pressure equal to 50% of its maximum value.
Let us imagine that, in the example described above, with a BP of 80%, equilibrium
has been reached with a pressure corresponding to 65% (and hence an OFFSET of
15%).
100
X 65 50 18.75
80
This means that the proportional valve is at ca. 19% of its maximum opening, so that
the pressure becomes stable at 65%.
If, for any reason, the pressure were to increase, the error would also increase; this
would result in an increase in the control signal leading to the recovery of equilibrium
conditions.
Conversely, a decrease in pressure would give rise to a decrease in the error and a
consequent reduction in the opening of the valve.
It should be noted that the general characteristics of the system have been designed
to reflect a special relationship between the control signal (opening of the proportional
valve) and the pressure: in the region of interest for our purposes, an increase in the
control signal necessarily entails a decrease in pressure.
By plotting this relationship and relationship (1) (linking the error with the control
signal proportional to it) on a diagram, we obtain:
The equilibrium point P is given by the intersection between the curves representing
the two relationships.
What would have happened with a Proportional Band of 50% instead of 80%?
In particular, what would have been the pressure of the air upon the attainment of
equilibrium?
The relationship showing the control signal as a function of pressure remains the
same. The change is observed in the relationship linking the error with the control
signal, since, in this case, the proportionality constant, i.e. proportional gain, has
changed.
By adding to the previous diagram the curve that represents the new relationship, we
obtain the new point of intersection and we may see its displacement relative to the
previous equilibrium point.
The new equilibrium point P' is obtained for a lower pressure value than the previous
correspondent equilibrium point P.
In particular, the new equilibrium point is obtained with a control signal of 22%
(higher than the previous value) and a pressure of 61%, with a residual error of 11%.
Conversely, if the Proportional Band had been greater than 80%, i.e., if we had
decreased the gain, the OFFSET would have increased.
Aside from the apparent approximation made by taking the relationship between the
control signal and the pressure to be perfectly linear, the general principles have not
been impaired in any way, and they may be summed up as follows:
• a proportional only controller does not make it possible to eliminate the error and
hence to reach the desired pressure;
X t K p e t Ki e xdx (2)
0
The integral part of the control action eliminates the residual error which we would
have in proportional only control.
In these conditions, we can have a control signal other than zero, even in the
presence of nil error.
In this manner, in fact, we take into account the “history” of the error over time, and
not merely the current error, in the determination of the control signal.
Let us now assume that in these conditions a “disturbance” occurs; for instance, the
air output channel is suddenly opened and therefore the control signal becomes
“excessive” relative to the requirements.
Obviously, this phenomenon will result in the generation of an error, because the
pressure will decrease to below the Set-Point which had been maintained up to that
time.
The error will give rise to a reaction on the part of the regulator which brings about a
reduction in the control signal and restores the equilibrium conditions; however, thanks
to the integral component, a trace of the evolution of the “error” over time will be
maintained, even when the error drops to zero.
In our case, we may therefore expect that the optimal control action will be achieved
with a modest integrative component. It cannot be fully eliminated, in fact, if we wish to
compensate for the residual offset, and it must not take on an exceedingly high value
not to slow down the control process and make it unstable.
The control action can be improved further by supplementing the proportional and
integrative components discussed above with yet another component which is
proportional to the derivative (in time) of the error.
t
d
X t K p e t Ki e xdx Kd e t (3)
0
dt
This derivative component, whose intervention is associated with the "trend" of the
error, has an anticipatory effect on the overall action of the controller.
This third component, in fact, makes a contribution which is based on the rate of
change of the error: the faster is the rate of increase of the error, for instance, the greater
is the contribution of this component which anticipates, in this manner, a correction that
otherwise would have had to be made later on.
If the error remains constant, its derivative in time is nil and the contribution arising
from the presence of a derivative component is equally nil.
If the error is not constant but its variations are slow we approximate the situation
described before when dealing with the proportional-derivative controller. Thus, the
contribution obtained through the addition of a derivative component should be sought
in all those situations involving fast and limited changes in the load.
In our case, the great speed of the process being investigated makes it difficult to
adopt a derivative component.
Its presence, in fact, would easily result into considerable oscillations of the control
signal.
5. Exercises
Testing procedure
4. Select File-New.
5. Select "PID Regulator" in the "Select Exercise Type" window and press OK.
6. Enter the operator's name and your remarks in the "Test description" window and
press OK.
9. In the "Noise Set-up" window, select a continuous noise (DC function) and click
on OK.
10. Do not make any manual alignment, i.e., leave the control signal in the "Manual
Alignment" window on 0 and click on OK.
11. In the "Real Time Diagram" window disable the disturbance by means of the
"Enable" field in the "Noise" panel.
14. Return to the "PID Parameters" window by means of the "Param" button in the
"Real Time Diagram" window and set a Proportional Band of 50%; press OK.
16. Recall the "PID Parameters" window again, set a Proportional Band of 100% and
press OK.
18. Recall the "PID Parameters" window again, set a Proportional Band of 120% and
press OK.
20. At the end of the test, press the "Stop" and "Cancel" buttons.
21. Examine the samples of the signals produced during the test and their evolution
in time by means of the File-Browse-Data and File-Browse-Diagram functions.
Test results
Figure 5.1 – P control with Proportional Band = 80%, 50%, 100%, 120% (File PID_1.CRS)
Remarks
As can be seen, after a few minutes of the start of the test, the controlled variable and
the control signal become stable.
The Set-Point (50%) is not reached, and we are left with a rather conspicuous
OFFSET (of 15%).
When the Proportional Band is decreased to 50%, the OFFSET decreases to 11%.
Conversely, when the Proportional Band is raised first to 100% and then to 120%,
we see that the residual OFFSET is also progressively increased.
Notice the behaviour of the control signal in the different conditions: it "adapts" to
new equilibrium pressure.
Suggestions
The proportional Band being the same, repeat the test for different Set-Point values.
Testing procedure
4. Select File-New.
5. Select "PID Regulator" in the "Select Exercise Type" window and press OK.
6. Enter the operator's name and your remarks in the "Test description" window and
press OK.
and press OK
9. In the "Noise Set-up" window, select a continuous noise (DC function) and click
on OK.
10. Do not make any manual alignment, i.e., leave the control signal in the "Manual
Alignment" window on 0 and click on OK.
11. In the "Real Time Diagram" window disable the disturbance by means of the
"Enable" field in the "Noise" panel.
13. Watch the behaviour of the system for a few minutes and wait for equilibrium
conditions to be reached.
14. Recall the "PID Parameters" window by means of the "Param" button in the
"Real Time Diagram" window and set:
15. Examine the behaviour of the system for a few minutes and wait for equilibrium
conditions to be reached.
16. At the end of the test, press the "Stop" and "Cancel" buttons.
17. Examine the samples of the signals produced during the test and their evolution
in time by means of the File-Browse-Data and File-Browse-Diagram functions.
Test results
Figure 5.2 – P and PI control (File PID_2.CRS)
Remarks
It can be clearly since that as soon as the integral component is introduced, the
controller begins recovering the error.
Equilibrium is reached when the error is nil, i.e., when the desired Set-Point is
reached. Notice that in these conditions, the control signal is determined by the integral
component and its value remains nearly constant on account of the error being
neutralised.
Suggestions
Repeat the test with different integrative constant values and examine their influence
on the recovery action mentioned above.
Testing procedure
4. Select File-New.
5. Select "PID Regulator" in the "Select Exercise Type" window and press OK.
6. Enter the operator's name and your remarks in the "Test description" window and
press OK.
and press OK
9. In the "Noise Set-up" window, select a continuous noise (DC function) and click
on OK.
10. Do not make any manual alignment, i.e., leave the control signal in the "Manual
Alignment" window on 0 and click on OK.
11. In the "Real Time Diagram" window disable the disturbance by means of the
"Enable" field in the "Noise" panel.
14. Wait for equilibrium conditions to be reached and introduce a step like
disturbance; the disturbance can be either introduced manually, by means of the
NOISE selector set on MAN, or via software after setting the NOISE selector on
PC. In this case, just set the characteristics of the noise through the "Noise Set-
up" window and enable the disturbance by clicking the "Noise" field in the "Real
Time Diagram" window.
16. Recall the "PID Parameters" window by means of the "Param" button in the
"Real Time Diagram" window and set:
20. At the end of the test, press the "Stop" and "Cancel" buttons.
21. Examine the samples of the signals produced during the test and their evolution
in time by means of the File-Browse-Data and File-Browse-Diagram functions.
Test results
Figure 5.3 – P and PI control with the introduction of a disturbance (File PID_3.CRS)
Remarks
• in the presence of proportional only control, it reduces the error but does not
neutralise;
Finally, it should be noted that the deactivation of the solenoid valve EV1 entails the
introduction of a disturbance which results in the error being increased, but this error is
then neutralised by the controller.
Suggestions
Repeat the test by assigning different values to the proportional and integrative
constants and examine system behaviour.
Testing procedure
4. Select File-New.
5. Select "PID Regulator" in the "Select Exercise Type" window and press OK.
6. Enter the operator's name and your remarks in the "Test description" window and
press OK.
9. In the "Noise Set-up" window, select a continuous noise (DC function) and click
on OK.
10. Do not make any manual alignment, i.e., leave the control signal in the "Manual
Alignment" window on 0 and click on OK.
11. In the "Real Time Diagram" window disable the disturbance by means of the
"Enable" field in the "Noise" panel.
13. Watch the behaviour of the system for a few minutes and wait for equilibrium
conditions to be reached.
14. Recall the "PID Parameters" window by pressing the "Param" button in the "Real
Time Diagram" window and set:
16. Wait for equilibrium to be reached, and introduce a step like disturbance; the
disturbance can be either introduced manually, by means of the NOISE selector
set on MAN, or via software after setting the NOISE selector on PC. In this case,
just set the characteristics of the noise through the "Noise Set-up" window and
enable the disturbance by clicking the "Noise" field in the "Real Time Diagram"
window.
18. At the end of the test, press the "Stop" and "Cancel" buttons.
19. Examine the samples of the signals produced during the test and their evolution
in time by means of the File-Browse-Data and File-Browse-Diagram functions.
Test results
Figure 5.4 – P and PID control with the introduction of a disturbance (File PID_4.CRS)
Remarks
Examine the reaction of the system to the presence of noise by restoring the
controlled variable to the desired value; as can be seen, the presence of a derivative
component, even a modest one, results in the generation of undesired oscillations. The
derivative component is therefore not suitable for this type of process.
Suggestions
Repeat the test by assigning different values to the derivative constant and examine
the behaviour of the system.
Now repeat the test by assigning different values to the three constants (Proportional
Band, Integrative and Derivative Constant) and examine the behaviour of the system.
Initial considerations
This exercise is performed with the aid of MiniReg, an electronic controller that can
be had on request. Again, we shall use the CRS software to examine the behaviour of
the system and transmit the Set-Point signal to the external controller.
For greater details on the operation of the MiniReg, see the relative documentation.
To use the MiniReg set the CONTROL selector on position 2 (ELECTRONIC REG.).
The MiniReg performs a PID control action enabling the operator to set the values to
be assigned to the three fundamental parameters; among its functions, MiniReg features
the automatic determination of the optimal values to be assigned to these parameters.
The exercise consists of using the MiniReg in this particular operating mode and
examining the behaviour of the system by means of the CRS. Furthermore, it is of
interest to determine the optimal values of the PID parameters by means of the MiniReg
and to compare such values with the ones set in the CRS software for the previous
exercises.
Testing procedure
1. Check the electrical power supply and MiniReg signal connections before turning
on the MiniReg.
5. Select File-New.
6. Select "Ext. Regulator" in the "Select Exercise Type" window and click on OK.
7. Enter the name of the operator and any note you may wish to add in the "Test
Description" window and click on OK.
9. Set the MiniReg on "Remote" mode to accept the Set-Point from the PC by
pressing the REM button.
10. In the "Noise Set-up" window, select a continuous noise (DC function) and click
on OK.
11. In the "Real Time Diagram" window disable the disturbance by means of the
"Enable" field in the "Noise" panel.
13. Activate the "Self-Tuning" function of the MiniReg by following the indications
given in the MiniReg manual.
14. Wait for a few minutes to enable the controller to interact with the process and to
determine the optimal parameter for the control action.
15. Examine the behaviour of the system for a few minutes and wait until it becomes
stable.
19. At the end of the test, press the "Stop" and "Cancel" buttons.
20. Examine the samples of the signals produced during the test and their evolution
in time by means of the File-Browse-Data and File-Browse-Diagram functions.
Test results
Figure 5.5 – PID control through the MiniReg with the introduction of a disturbance
(File EXT_1.CRS)
Remarks
By working on the MiniReg panel we have determined the optimal values of the PID
control parameters:
As can be seen, the MiniReg has excluded the derivative component, confirming the
unsuitability of this component for this type of process.
Suggestions
Repeat the tests by setting different parameters, other than those suggested by the
MiniReg, and observe the behaviour of the system.
Repeat the test using the CRS as the controller, in lieu of the MiniReg, and by
assigning to the parameters the values suggested by the MiniReg, that is:
Follow the indications given in Exercise 3. The control action will be seen to be
similar to the one observed with the MiniReg, but the oscillations in the value of the
control signal are markedly smaller.
In actual fact, though the PID parameters are pretty much the same, these two control
techniques are drastically different: one being analog and the other digital. The digital
simulation of an analog system, which is obtained, as is known, through the z transform,
in fact, has inherent limitations due to system discretisation.
Initial considerations
This exercise is performed with the aid of MSRR, an optional pneumatic controller.
The CRS software is used again to analyse the behaviour of the system.
Connect the pneumatic controller to the CRP module via the pneumatic inlet and
outlet located on the side of the module and called MSRR -IN and MSRR -OUT.
With reference to the synoptic view shown in Figure 2.2, the connection between
proportional valve 13 and the I/P transducer is disconnected by such terminals;
In MSRR mode, the electric module makes the electrical connection between the
transducers located on the input and the output of the module itself; in this manner, the
output from the I/P transducer is a pneumatic signal corresponding to the quantity being
controlled, i.e. to the pressure applied by the air to the interior walls of the main tank.
Thanks to the connections described above, this signal becomes the input signal to
the MSRR controller, whilst the output from the latter, representing the control signal, is
directly connected to the proportional valve.
For greater details on the operation of the MSRR, see the specific manual.
Testing procedure
2. Remove the upper jumper between MSRR -IN and MSRR -OUT.
4. Connect the compressed air supply to inlet 9 of the MSRR by means of the
special bushing located in the CRP module next to the output of the manual
compressed air pressure regulator, by removing the relative cap.
6. Connect the pneumatic control signal MSRR -OUT to the output OUT of the
control section of the MSRR module.
8. Make the pneumatic connections necessary for the type of control action to be
used (PID, PI or P) according to the indications given in the MSRR manual. In
this case, make the connections for PID control.
15. Select "Ext Regulator" in the "Select Exercise Type" window and press OK.
16. Enter the operator's name and your remarks in the "Test description" window and
press OK.
17. In the "Set-Point Set-up" window select a continuous Set-up function (DC
function) with a width of 0% and offset of 50%, and press OK. This amounts to
setting a Set-Point level of 1 bar.
18. On the control section of the MSRR module set a Set-Point of 50% by working
on the red indicator.
by means of the knobs equipping this section and by referring to the manual.
20. In the "Noise Set-up" window, select a continuous noise (DC function) and click
on OK.
21. In the "Real Time Diagram" window disable the disturbance by means of the
"Enable" field in the "Noise" panel.
23. Watch the behaviour of the system for a few minutes and wait for stability
conditions to be reached.
24. Introduce a step like disturbance manually and examine the reaction of the
system. To introduce the noise via the PC just enable the continuous disturbance
previously set by means of the "Enable" field in the "Noise panel. Wait for the
new stability conditions to be reached.
26. Introduce the disturbance again and see how the system reacts.
27. At the end of the test, press the "Stop" and "Cancel" buttons.
28. Examine the samples of the signals produced during the test and their evolution
in time by means of the File-Browse-Data and File-Browse-Diagram functions.
32. Examine the diagram, produced on paper by the recording section of the MSRR,
corresponding to the pneumatic control signal and pneumatic signal relating to
the controlled variable.
Test results
Figure 5.6 – PID control by means of the MSRR with the introduction of a disturbance
(File EXT_2.CRS)
Figure 5.7 ‐ Diagram of the control signal and the controlled variable obtained
by means of the MSRR
Remarks
You can see the satisfactory performance of the pneumatic control obtained by
means of the MSRR module. From the diagram you can see that the desired value is
obtained in a relatively rapid fashion and that it remains stable.
In the diagram shown in figure 5.6, obtained with the CRS, the control signal and the
signal of the controlled variable coincide as, as mentioned before, the CRP module in
MSRR mode sees to the electrical connection between the input signal and the output
signal.
In actual practice, this means that it is not possible to see the control signal on the
diagrams produced with the CRS program, as only the controlled variable appears.
The MSRR recording module, instead, makes it possible to obtain (see figure 5.7) a
diagram on paper showing both the pneumatic control signal and the pneumatic signal
corresponding to the controlled variable.
You should also notice that unlike the MiniReg, the MSRR will not transmit the Set-
Point signal to the controller; this value is set via software for purposes of visual
reference in the diagrams plotted out.
Suggestions
Perform additional tests by setting other parameters, other than those suggested
above, and examine the behaviour of the system.