Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Anais Blanco
Adler (2013) argues agriculture has a negative impact on water quality because waste
agriculture plays such a large part in our ecosystems it effects the water levels greatly. On
the other hand Anderson (2003) disagrees with Alder because he believes the recycling of
waste water is a positive thing because freshwater should only be used when necessary.
The recycling of water preserves the freshwater helping maintain a good water level
Campos Flores, I. (2015). Evaluation of point of use drinking water treatment systems for
colonias in the Southwest United States Available from Dissertations & Theses Europe
from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1732168228
Campos (2015) believes water sources are not available or inadequate to lots of parts of
the country therefore people cannot be the leading factor of lowering water levels.
Campos states water in “colonias” found in Dona Ana County tend to be unsanitary and
unusable so people don’t use the water as much as areas that have access to clean water.
Water levels in this area are not depreciating because it is unpotable which can also be a
factor of the pollution created over time. Thangarajan (2007) agrees water is being
polluted making it a limited resource to people but disagrees because he believes over
J Anderson. (2003). The environmental benefits of water recycling and reuse. Water Science &
Anderson (2003) states that freshwater is a limited source and it should be used
cautiously. Anderson believes the limited freshwater that is left is being threatened by
pollution but can be restored by recycling waste water for irrigation. Anderson fails to
realize water levels are rising rather than lowering because of the warming of the planet
according to Manheim (2016). Manheim agrees we must be more cautious about the
environment but water levels lowering because he states they are fluctuating.
Kirk L. Clarence, Brush W. William, Folwell Prescott, Maury W. John, & Alvord W. John.
www.jstor.org.lib.utep.edu/stable/pdf/41224419.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3A28e5c113e9d
fa9b4e8fdfe0241d389cf
Kirk (1918) states that the size of pipes used to extract water influences how much water
is extracted. The larger size of pipe leads to more extraction and people over time are
beginning to use them more frequently because they are more convenient and time
efficient. This has a negative effect on lowering water levels because water is rapidly
decreasing. Condensing the effect of pipe size, research stills shows that over extraction
is a great factor of lowering levels according to Nepali Times (2017) stating people near
water sources take advantage of the water source and tend to over extract.
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 4
Knott, J., Daniel, J. S., & Jacobs, J. (2017). Eyeing the rise: Assessing the effects of rising
groundwater from sea-level rise on coastal road pavement. Roads & Bridges, 55(9), 26.
search.ebscohost.com.lib.utep.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=f5h&AN=125159429&sit
e=eds-live&scope=site
Knott (2017) believes sea-levels are rising and are inducing ground water to rise as well.
The pressure created by sea level effects the pressure of the land making the ground
water rise because of the tension pushed from the sea. Manheim (2016) agrees that sea
levels are rising but was unaware that the sea level was contributing to the rise of
groundwater. Knott believes pollution is a factor in the warming of the planet but does
not consider it to be a direct issue with water levels, he only believes it affects quality of
water.
Manheim Frank. (2016). Living with climate change : How communities are surviving and
www.choicereviews.org.lib.utep.edu/review/10.5860/CHOICE.196798?
Manheim (2016) states pollution is to blame for water shortages because water is
becoming unusable due to the contamination from cars and waste are effecting all types
of water sources such as oceans, aquifers and lakes. Thangarajan (2007) agrees to
pollution being a large contributor to water issues but he believes over extraction is also a
key factor to water shortages. Manheim (2016) tends to focus only on pollution rather
than other issues that can contribute to lowering water levels. Manheim must take into
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 5
Marylou Doehrman. (2005). El Paso County makes toxic polluter list. The Colorado Springs
Doehrman (2005) claims El Paso County has been found to have an alarming level of toxic
pollution in water. This pollution has been created over the years by an excess dumping of
chemicals into water sources. McQuigge (2009) agrees water sources are taken for granted
and are constantly being polluted by careless mistakes. Doehrman has narrowed down the
issue to El Paso and is reliable because the toxin levels where compared throughout other
Murray McQuigge. (2002). Water: A clear and present danger. Canadian Journal of Public
from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41993679
McQuigge (2009) claims clean water is being taken for granted and people do not
the spread of E. Coli in water in 1982 in Canada because people were not cautious of being
sanitary around and properly disposing waste. In 2007 Thangarajan advanced this claim
when he realized people continue to be careless with waste because people are now burning
waste which is now polluting not only water but also the air. The issue with McQuiggie’s
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 6
Nepali Times (2017, December 23). Retrieved February 02, 2018, from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-4CEtbfH1c
Nepali Times (2017) claims water levels in Kathmandu Valley are lowering due to over
extraction by people in the area. Although Nepali Times may have seemed of concern to
only a small group of people in the Kathmandu Valley, it should in fact have concerned
anyone who cared about lowering water levels. For instance, according to Sheng (2005)
water levels are decreasing overtime due to the increase in population. The lowering of
11-01/page-4/
Ramirez (1990) claims pollution in the El Paso area has being excessive because of
fumes emitted from ASARCO that the University of Texas at El Paso contemplated
creating on spot pollution detectors. Ramirez focuses on ASARCO being the main
contributor to water pollution rather than expanding the danger of water pollution
globally. On the other hand Manheim (2016) makes a broad claim that other factors such
as cars and waste effect the content of water. Manheim does not just focus on one
polluter making his claim more valuable because it does not just focus on a certain region
of people.
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 7
and heavy metal concentrations in water and sediments of the Rio Grande at El Paso–
4120(03)00080-1 Retrieved
from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412003000801
Rios-Arana (2004) claims human activities are contributors to the rise in sediment load,
inconsistent water flows and runoff of minerals into the water system of the Rio Grande.
The negative effects of the Rio Grande lead to higher issues into the Gulf of Mexico.
Although Rios-Arana extended the water issue into The Gulf of Mexico rather than just
to the Rio Grande it fails to get an overall effect of water tables across the world. On the
other hand Anderson (2003) makes his claim based off of a versatile group rather than
just focusing on one. Anderson makes a similar claim stating human usage is the leading
Sheng, Z. (2005). An aquifer storage and recovery system with reclaimed wastewater to preserve
Sheng (2005) emphasized that the greatest threat to lowering water levels is the rapid
increase in population over the years. The increase in population has made water
demands rise greatly putting water levels to decrease to dangerous levels. Although
Sheng claim is reasonable Knott J (2017) pointed out water levels are rising because of
the warming of the planet. Knott agrees humans are the cause of water issues but he
believes they indirectly cause problems—create pollution which later effects the water.
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 8
Sun, D., Niu, S., & Zang, Y. (2017). Impacts of inland boundary conditions on modeling
seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers due to sea-level rise. Natural Hazards, 88(1), 145-
from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1917626768
Sun (2017) argues water levels are rising because of global warming. Global warming
can be a series of things affecting the planet to overheat. The overheating is causing ice
caps to melt creating the sea level to rise. Sun fails to recognize water is also being over
extracted and is rapidly lowering usable water levels. Campos (2015) disagrees with Sun
because Campos claims water levels are low and very scarce.
Thangarajan (2007) argued that ground water is being affected by a high level of
pollution from burning waste lands and car exhaust. Thangarajan based his claim only on
pollution rather than seeking further issue affecting water tables. While Thangarajan’s
claim is true he overlooked that water levels are also decreasing due to over extraction.
According to Nepali Times (2017) water levels are lowering because of the excessive