Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Carlos Mendoza
The Constitution of the United States of America was ratified on September 17, 1787.
The Bill of Rights contained only ten Amendments, but since its ratification, it now contains
twenty-seven. Why am I giving you historical facts? The answer is simple. Most of us have had
an encounter with a Police officer and if you haven’t yet, you probably will at some point of your
life. The true question is, have you complied or will comply with all of the Officer’s requests?
There are many officers that act on the color of the law and do expect you to comply to their
requests. You have rights; You are covered by OUR Constitution! There was an incident where
Philip Turner was illegally detained for recording a police station in Fort Worth, Texas. Mr.
Turner was aware of his Constitutional rights and appealed to The United States Court of
Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. In another incident, we have a blue-collar divorcee that has read up
on his rights and stands his ground by not identifying himself to a Socorro Police Department
Police Officer. (C. Mendoza. Public Conversation. January 7,2018). The two selected genres will
be rhetorically reviewed.
The first selected genre is the appeal of Philip Turner to the Fifth Circuit Court in New
Orleans, Louisiana filed February 16, 2017. Turner filed the appeal when the Northern District
of Texas granted the motion to dismiss his case citing basis of qualified immunity. The intended
audience is every American to include but not limited to: American born citizens, naturalized
citizens without regard to class, race, gender, age or religion. This appeal and the concurrent
The second genre is a video filmed by Maria Mendoza. She films the encounter between
a Socorro Police Department and her husband, Carlos Mendoza on January 7, 2018. Mendoza’s
objective is to challenge the Police Officer’s demands and demonstrate to his ex-wife that he will
not be intimidated by a Police Officer. The intended audience were: Officer Sierra, Mrs.
Zaragoza and Mr. Mendoza’s family. The purpose was to educate the Officer, let Mrs. Zaragoza
know that Mendoza was not intimidated by her taking an Officer to his house, and to show his
children that you should not fear the Police if you have not committed a crime.
The intention for both genres are to educate and inform. Turner’s appeal brings light to
the fact that our First Amendment right had not being clearly established in 2015 in the recording
of any police activity or the filming of a public building form a public ease way. After his appeal,
the Fifth Circuit Court ruled that public photography and recording of any police activity or
public building is not a crime; therefore, you can not be illegally detained or arrested for doing
the aforementioned. Texas, place where Turner’s incident took place, is not a stop and ID state.
Mr. Turner refused to identify himself to the Officers and was handcuffed and detained illegally
until Lieutenant Driver showed up to the scene and subsequently released him. Even though he
was handcuffed and shove into a squad car the officers claim that he was not arrested but
acknowledged that he was detained. Turner’s actions resulted in our first constitutional right
being clearly established when concerning public buildings and public servants. Since the
February 16th, 2017 ruling there has been an increase of self- proclaimed auditors that conduct
First Amendment audits around the nation on state and federal agencies. Law enforcement has
“beefed up” their training. Mrs. Mendoza’s video also portrays the assertion of the recording of
a public servant. The officer in the video is aware and properly trained that there is no
wrongdoing with the recording. Mr. Mendoza also is aware that Texas is not a stop and ID state
The Constitution and Our Rights 4
and also refuses to identify himself to the officer. Sierra agrees that Mendoza does not have to
identify himself but tries several times to get Mendoza’s full name and he only receives
Mendoza’s first name. The differences in the genres is that Mr. Turner was illegally detained due
to the lack of training of the officers while the officer in the video was properly trained. Mendoza
was not detained because Sierra was properly trained. Another difference are Turner’s legal
matters; the actions of Mendoza’s encounter did not acquire legal costs or court proceedings. We
can conclude that the actions Mendoza took were justified by Turner’s actions.
Ethos
Turner’s appeal is a court document that was filed in February of 2017 by clerk Lyle W.
Cayce of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Philip Turner was a Computer
Science Major at Austin Community College in Texas. This document is twenty-six pages long
and is in black and white. The appeal was heard by Circuit Judges Weiner, Clement and
Higginson. The Defendants in this case were Officer Grinalds, Officer Dyess and their
supervisor, Lieutenant Driver. The Plaintiff and the Defendants all had counsel present. This
document refences other hearings with similar cases and cites current laws. This genre is very
credible. Mrs. Mendoza’s video portrays the interaction between a blue collar, university student
divorcee and a Socorro Police Department Officer who has taken an oath to protect and to serve.
The video was taken at night and thus is kind of dark; only illuminated by the cellphone light and
Officer Sierra’s flashlight. This video is seven minutes and forty seconds long. In the video you
can see Officer Sierra, whom identifies himself as such and provides his badge number, the
daughter in question, Mr. Mendoza and you can see Mrs. Zaragoza’s truck. You can hear Mrs.
Mendoza, a baby, Nathalie, Mendoza’s mother. You can assume that Mrs. Zaragoza is in the
2007 white Toyota Tundra as the officer states that she had contacted him and requested him to
The Constitution and Our Rights 5
accompany her to Mendoza’s house to assist her in getting her child back. There is no evidence
Pathos
The court document expands our First Amendment. We all can be educated and reminded
of our constitutional rights by reading Turner’s appeal. This appeal has shaped the way for many
self-proclaimed constitutionalists that thrive on their rights. Mrs. Zaragoza’s video shows a
perfect educated encounter between Officer Sierra and Mr. Mendoza. Mr. Sierra seems very
educated, polite and aware of the Amendments. The persons educated in this video were Mrs.
Zaragoza. She learned that she can not use the police for a civil issue and that the police do not
have the right to strip a father from his daughter. Mr. Sierra advised her that this has to be
resolved in Family Court. Mr. Mendoza’s family was educated in the proper way to interact with
a police officer. Officer Sierra was not educated in this video as he was very savvy of his duties,
Logos
The court document enrages readers when they come to the part that details the officer’s
actions toward Mr. Turner. There is one paragraph where Mr. Turner askes Officer Grinald that
what would happen if he refuses to identify himself. The officer continues to ask for his
identification. When the Officers gets tired of asking him for his identification, without warning
they handcuff him, take his video camera away and shove him in their patrol car. Then Officer
Grinalds looks at him and tells him that that is what happens when you fail to ID yourself. This
abuse of power. You do get a sign of relief and justice when the Presiding Judge partially rules in
favor of Turner. The video captures the interaction of the Socorro Police Department Officer and
The Constitution and Our Rights 6
Mr. Mendoza. This is a homemade video that is not great in quality but does get the point across.
The badge on the Officer, the radio and the uniform identify him as a public servant. This is a
Turner’s appeal is very structured. On the first page it lists the Plaintiff and the Defendants. It
goes on to give a brief description of the incident that occurred between the Defendant and the
Plaintiffs. That is followed by facts and proceedings about the case. On page 4 it has the standard
review of the case followed by the Analysis. The conclusion can be found on page 26. The
language is that used in court proceedings, very proper English. On twenty of the twenty-six
pages at the bottom you will find references to other documents and related cases in other states.
The homemade video is normal everyday blue-collar working English language. It starts off with
the Officer arriving at Mr. Mendoza’s residence. The encounter is brief. Mendoza briefly tells
the officer that he does not have to let his daughter go but that he will let her go. The daughter is
escorted by Sierra to her awaiting mother in the Toyota Tundra. The video is ended when Mrs.
Zaragoza drives by Mendoza’s house. The officer is never seen passing in front of the house as
he stays behind.
Conclusion
Our forefathers drafted and ratified our first ten amendments in 1787. Since then, 17
Amendments have been ratified with the last one being passed in late 1992. As Americans, we
need to be “caught” up and know our rights. Knowing our rights will prevent unlawful arrest as
with Turner. Public servants should be trained on our rights also and how to approach, execute
Reference
Philip Turner v. Lieutenant Driver; Officer Grinalds; Officer Dyess (United States Court