CHI-SQUARE TEST

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Age * 70 100.0% 0 0.0% 70 100.0%
trainingandtechnology

Age * trainingandtechnology Crosstabulation

Count
trainingandtechnology Total
yes no can’t say
Below 20 years 7 5 7 19
21- 30 years 4 15 5 24
Age 31 - 40 years 3 5 4 12

Above 41 years 6 6 3 15
Total 20 31 19 70

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 7.111a 6 .311
Likelihood Ratio 7.226 6 .300
Linear-by-Linear .463 1 .496
Association
N of Valid Cases 70
a. 4 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is 3.26.

Symmetric Measures
Value Approx.
Sig.
Nominal by Contingency .304 .311
Nominal Coefficient
N of Valid Cases 70
CORRELATION METHOD
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
superiors * 70 100.0% 0 0.0% 70 100.0%
Areyouhappy

superiors * Areyouhappy Crosstabulation

Count
Areyouhappy Total
yes partly no you have a can’t say
yes mind reaction anything
Strongly agree 2 3 2 2 3 12
Agree 4 2 6 2 4 18
neutral 1 2 1 1 5 10
superiors
Disagree 3 6 0 4 1 14
Strongly 2 4 4 3 3 16
disagree
Total 12 17 13 12 16 70

Symmetric Measures
Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Approx.
Errora Tb Sig.
Nominal by Contingency .436 .424
Nominal Coefficient
Interval by -.043 .116 -.358 .722c
Pearson's R
Interval
Spearman -.039 .116 -.318 .751c
Ordinal by Ordinal
Correlation
N of Valid Cases 70
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
ONE WAY ANOVA TEST
ANOVA
employeeperformance
Sum of df Mean F Sig.
Squares Square
Between 14.276 4 3.569 3.710 .009
Groups
Within Groups 62.524 65 .962
Total 76.800 69

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: employeeperformance
Tukey HSD
(I) (J) Mean Std. Sig. 95% Confidence
providingstandards providingstandard Differenc Error Interval
s e (I-J) Lower Upper
Bound Bound
Agree .29487 .35698 .922 -.7067 1.2965
neutral .62821 .39262 .503 -.4734 1.7298
Strongly agree
Disagree .15385 .38469 .994 -.9255 1.2332
Strongly disagree -.75275 .37776 .281 -1.8127 .3072
Strongly agree -.29487 .35698 .922 -1.2965 .7067
neutral .33333 .36551 .891 -.6922 1.3589
Agree
Disagree -.14103 .35698 .995 -1.1426 .8606
Strongly disagree -1.04762* .34949 .030 -2.0282 -.0670
Strongly agree -.62821 .39262 .503 -1.7298 .4734
Agree -.33333 .36551 .891 -1.3589 .6922
neutral
Disagree -.47436 .39262 .747 -1.5760 .6273
Strongly disagree -1.38095* .38583 .006 -2.4635 -.2984
Strongly agree -.15385 .38469 .994 -1.2332 .9255
Agree .14103 .35698 .995 -.8606 1.1426
Disagree
neutral .47436 .39262 .747 -.6273 1.5760
Strongly disagree -.90659 .37776 .128 -1.9665 .1533
Strongly agree .75275 .37776 .281 -.3072 1.8127
Agree 1.04762* .34949 .030 .0670 2.0282
Strongly disagree
neutral 1.38095* .38583 .006 .2984 2.4635
Disagree .90659 .37776 .128 -.1533 1.9665
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
 employeeperformance
a,b
Tukey HSD
providingstandar N Subset for alpha =
ds 0.05
1 2
neutral 12 1.8333
Agree 18 2.1667 2.1667
Disagree 13 2.3077 2.3077
Strongly agree 13 2.4615 2.4615
Strongly disagree 14 3.2143
Sig. .454 .051
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are
displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 13.730.
b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean
of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are
not guaranteed.