Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ill p. Delay-Goyet,J. M. Zajac, and B. P. Roques, Neurosci. Lett. 103, 197 (1989).
[ 1 8] P e p t i d y l D i p e p t i d a s e A: A n g i o t e n s i n
I-Converting Enzyme
B y PIERRE CORVOL,TRACY A. WILLIAMS,and FLORENT SOUBRIER
Introduction
Peptidyl dipeptidase A (EC 3.4.15.1) is a Zn2+-metallopeptidase which
acts on many substrates, primarily by releasing a C-terminal dipeptide. Its
broad substrate specificity explains its successive denominations as angio-
tensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) since it cleaves the C-terminal dipeptide
from angiotensin I (AI) to produce the potent vasopressor octapeptide
angiotensin II, 1 and as kininase II because it inactivates bradykinin (BK)
General Properties
Angiotensin I-converting enzyme is an ectoenzyme anchored to the
plasma membrane with the bulk of its mass exposed at the extracellular
surface of the cell. There are two A C E isoforms which are glycosylated: a
Substrate Specificity
The primary specificity of A C E is to cleave C-terminal dipeptides from
oligopeptide substrates with a free C terminus in the absence of a penulti-
mate proline residue. It is via this action that A C E hydrolyzes both AI and
BK. BK is in fact the most favorable substrate for ACE, having a kcat/Km
ratio of 3900-5000 sec -1 mM -1 which is considerably higher than that for
AI hydrolysis (kcat/Km of 147-189 sec 1 m M 1) (reviewed in Ehlers and
Riordan7). At neutral pH, A C E hydrolyzes a wide range of substrates in
addition to AI and BK by virtue of its classic specificity described above.
Other substrates include neurotensin, 4 [MetS]enkephalin, [MetS]en -
kephalin-Arg6-GlyY-Leu8,/3-neoendorphin, and dynorphins. 15A C E also hy-
drolyzes C-terminal amidated peptides such as cholecystokinin-8 and vari-
ous gastrin analogs, a6 However, it should be noted that although all of the
above substrate hydrolyses have been observed in vitro, no convincing
evidence exists to support a physiological role for such hydrolyses, with
the exception of angiotensin I'and bradykinin.
Anion Activation
17L. Wei, F. Alhenc-Gelas, P. Corvol, and E. Clauser, J. Biol. Chem. 266, 9002 (1991).
18F. E. Dorer, J. R. Kahn, K. E. Lentz, M. Levine, and L. T. Skeggs, Circ. Res. 34, 824 (1974).
19R. Shapiro, B. Holmquist, and J. F. Riordan, Biochemistry 22, 3850 (1983).
20H. S. Cheung, F. L. Wang, M. A. Ondetti, E. F. Sabo, and D. W. Cushman, J. Biol. Chem.
255, 401 (1980).
21R. Shapiro and J. F. Riordan, Biochemistry 22, 5315 (1983).
22A. J. Turner, N. M. Hooper, and J. A. Kenny, in "Neuropeptides: A Methodology" (G.
Fink and A. J. Harmar, eds.), p. 189. Wiley, New York, 1989.
[ 18] PEPTIDYLDIPEPTIDASEA 287
Purification
S t r u c t u r e of Angiotensin I-Converting E n z y m e
It has long been known that two molecular forms of A C E exist in
mammalian tissues: a somatic form found in endothelial cells, epithelial
tissues, and in the brain, and a testicular form present exclusively in germinal
23F. Alhenc-Gelas,J. Richard, D. Courbon, J. M. Warnet, and P. Corvol, J. Lab. Clin. Med.
117, 33 (1991).
24H. G. Bull, N. A. Thornberry, and E. H. Cordes, J. Biol. Chem. 260, 2963 (1985).
25j. j. Lanzillo, J. Stevens, Y. Dasarathy, H. Yotsumoto, and B. L. Fanburg, J. Biol. Chem.
260, 14938 (1985).
26N. M. Hooper, J. Keen, D. J. C. Pappin, and A. J. Turner, Biochem. J. 247, 85 (1987).
288 METALLOPEPTIDASES [ 181
Somatic Form
Complete cDNAs for the somatic form of A C E were first isolated
from human endothelial 29 and mouse kidney c D N A libraries. 3° The human
endothelial A C E m R N A is 4.3 k b , 29 whereas the rabbit pulmonary A C E
m R N A is 5.0 kb. 31 Two A C E m R N A s have been detected in mice of 4.9
and 4.15 kb in both the kidney and lung. 32 A high level of sequence similarity
has been found between the different mammalian A C E c D N A sequences
cloned to date. The human, 29 mouse, 3°, rabbit, 31 bovine, 33 and rat 34 se-
quences are 80-90% identical in both nucleotide and amino acid sequences.
H u m a n endothelial A C E comprises 1306 amino acid residues, of which 14
are cysteine residues, and contains 17 potential N-linked glycosylation sites
but no Ser/Thr-rich region indicative of O-glycosylation. Comparison of
the amino terminus of the human A C E precursor, as deduced from the
27 T. Berg, J. Sulner, C. Y. Lai, and R. L. Softer, J. Histochem. Cytochem. 34, 753 (1986).
28 T. A. Williams, K. Barnes, A. J. Kenny, A. J. Turner, and N. M. Hooper, Biochem. J. 288,
878 (1992).
29 F. Soubrier, F. Alhenc-Gelas, C. Hubert, J. Allegrini, M. John, G. Tregear, and P. Corvol,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 9386 (1988).
3o K. E. Bernstein, B. M. Martin, A. S. Edwards, and E. A. Bernstein, J. Biol. Chem. 264,
11945 (1989).
31 T. J. Thekkumkara, I. W. Livingston, R. S. Kumar, and G. C. Sen, Nucleic Acids Res. 20,
683 (1992).
32 K. E. Bernstein, B. M. Martin, E. A. Bernstein, J. Linton, L. Striker, and G. Striker,
J. Biol. Chem. 263, 11021 (1988).
33 S. Y. Shai, R. S. Fishel, B. M. Martin, B. C. Berk, and K. B. Bernstein, Circ. Res. 70,
1274 (1992).
34 G. Koike, J. E. Krieger, H. J. Jacob, M. Mukoyama, R. E. Pratt, and V. J. Dzau, Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 198, 380 (1994).
[ 18] PEPTIDYLDIPEPTIDASE A 289
Germinal Form
H
i
H
!~-862,960
p. ~ Substrate
/
HN~jN H+ / R//
FIG. 1. Proposed mechanism for the action of ACE. Solid arrows represent zinc coordination
bonds, and dashed arrows represent the first steps of the enzyme mechanism. Numbers indicate
the amino acid position of the residue in the N and C domains, respectively (human ACE
numbering). The mechanism is based on that proposed for thermolysin [P. M. Coleman,
J. N. Jansonius, and B. W. Matthews, J. Mol. Biol. 70, 701 (1972)].
S t r u c t u r e - F u n c t i o n Relationships of Angiotensin
I-Converting Enzyme
The discovery by molecular cloning of the existence of two homologous
ACE domains each containing the consensus sequence found in the active
site of other Zn 2+ metallopeptidases was quite unexpected. Indeed, previous
studies strongly suggested the presence of a single active site per ACE
molecule: analysis of the zinc content of somatic ACE indicated the pres-
ence of a single zinc atom per molecule of ACE, 42 and studies with radiola-
beled ACE inhibitors detected a single apparent high-affinity binding
s i t e , 43'44 As similar findings were observed for testicular ACE, which was
found to correspond to the C domain of somatic ACE, this raised the
question of whether the N domain was functional. 38
41 M. R. W. Ehlers, Y.-N. P. Chen, and J. F. Riordan, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comrnun. 183,
199 (1992).
4: p. Biinning and J. F. Riordan, J. lnorg. Biochem. 24, 183 (1985).
43 S. M. Strittmatter and S. H. Snyder, Mol. Pharmacol. 29, 142 (1986).
44 F. Cumin, V. Vellaud, P. Corvol, and F. Alhenc-Gelas, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
163, 718 (1989).
292 METALLOPEPTIDASES [ 1 81
TABLE I
KINETIC PARAMETERS FOR HYDROLYSIS OF Hip-His-Leu AND ANGIOTENSIN I BY N AND C DOMAINS
OF ANGIOTENSIN I-CONVERTING ENZYMEa
Hip-His-Leu Angiotensin I
the zinc-binding histidines or the catalytic glutamic acid of the two domains
was mutated.
The recombinant wild-type A C E was structurally, immunologically, and
enzymatically identical to affinity-purified human kidney ACE. 45 Con-
versely, the two mutants, which possessed critical mutations in both the N
and C domains were devoid of enzymatic activity. The mutants with only
the N domain intact were able to hydrolyze the synthetic substrate Hip-
His-Leu and angiotensin I. For those mutants, the Michaelis constant (Km)
for both substrates, Hip-His-Leu and angiotensin I, was similar to that of
the wild-type enzyme, but the catalytic constant (kcat) was 10 and 4 times
lower for Hip-His-Leu and angiotensin I, respectively. The mutants con-
taining only the C domain intact displayed similar Km values as for the N
domain and the wild-type enzyme toward Hip-His-Leu and angiotensin I
although, in this case, the g c a t value for angiotensin I was 3 times higher
than that for the N-domain active site and the kcat for Hip-His-Leu was 9
times higher (Table I). Both the N and the C domains have an absolute zinc
requirement for activity and are sensitive to competitive A C E inhibitors. In
all the experiments, both domains appeared to function independently, as
the activity of the wild-type enzyme was equal to the sum of the activities
of the N and C domains. There is no indication of cooperativity between
the two domains. These studies established that A C E has two functional
catalytic sites, both dependent on a zinc cofactor. In agreement with these
findings, the zinc content of somatic A C E has been reinvestigated and
shown to be two atoms of zinc per molecule. 28,46
47E. Jaspard, L. Wei, and F. Alhenc-Gelas,J. Biol. Chem. 268, 9496 (1993).
294 METALLOPEPTIDASES [ 181
53L. Wei, E. Clauser, F. Alhenc-Gelas, and P. Corvol,J. Biol. Chem. 267, 13398 (1992).
296 METALLOPEPTIDASES [ 181
TABLE II
INHIBITION OF N AND C DOMAINS OF ANGIOTENSIN I-CONVERTING ENZYME BY CAPTOPRIL,
ENALAPRILAT, LISINOPRIL, AND TRANDOLAPRILATa
K, (×101° M)
[C1 ]opt
Enzyme (mM) Captopril Enalaprilat Lisinopril Trandolaprilat
reversed for the N domain (Table II). Such observations provide further
evidence for the existence of structural differences between the two active
sites of A C E .
The binding of various A C E inhibitors has been used to p r o b e possible
structural differences existing between the N- and C-domain active sites. 54,55
The binding of A C E inhibitors to purified rat lung and testis A C E was
studied, and the binding p a r a m e t e r s for the two inhibitor-binding sites in
lung A C E were determined from the displacement of the A C E inhibitor
125I-labeled R O 31-8472 {9-[l-carboxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)propylami-
no]octahydro-10-oxo-6H-pyridazo[1,2-a] [1,2]diazepine-l-carboxylic acid}
with either unlabeled c o m p o u n d or another c o m p o u n d 351A, an analog of
lisinopril. Similar Kd vlaues for R O 31-8472 were determined for the two
binding sites in lung A C E ; however, with 351A, the Kd for the N domain
was m o r e than 100-fold higher c o m p a r e d to that for the C domain. As the
main structural difference between the two inhibitors is the length of the
inhibitor side chain which interacts with the active-site zinc a t o m in each
domain of A C E , it was proposed that the N domain of A C E contains a
deeply recessed active site, and, therefore, the N-domain active site zinc
a t o m is less accessible to the inhibitor 351A c o m p a r e d to that in the C
domain.
The finding that each A C E domain interacts differently with competitive
inhibitors is of substantial interest both for structure-function studies of
the two active sites and for the possible design of an inhibitor m o r e specific
or even exclusively specific for one of the domains. Such a finding might
ated by the N domain, which hydrolyzes the peptide 40 times faster than
does the C domain. 56a
All the results indicate important functional and structural differences
between the two subsites of the active catalytic sites despite the high degree
of sequence homology. A C E cannot be considered as a true bifunctional
enzyme, especially since an exclusive substrate has not been identified
for either domain. Other enzymes contain two active sites and are truly
bifunctional becuase they exhibit distinct functions, such as the brush border
hydrolases sucrase-isomaltase 57 and lactase-phlorizin hydrolase. 58 For
those enzymes, the duplication of an ancestral gene occurred in the course
of evolution to form two active sites, but subsequent divergent evolution
resulted in a different catalytic activity for each active site. Another example
of a truly bifunctional zinc metalloenzyme is leukotriene-A4 hydrolase
which is able to act both as a hydrolase in the biosynthesis of leukotrienes
and as a peptidase. 59Even if, at the present time, A C E cannot be considered
a bifunctional enzyme, it appears that either the N or the C domain may
exhibit a marked catalytic preference according to the substrate, its site of
cleavage, and the chloride concentration. This may be of importance in
physiological conditions where several potential substrates are present and
may be preferentially cleaved by either domain. Similarly, the A C E activity
of either domain might be influenced in the intracellular medium, where
the chloride concentration is low. A n o t h e r explanation could account for
the specific properties of each active site, such as a lower selection pressure
on the N domain which might have been responsible for mutational changes
in key residues involved in the catalytic mechanism.
M e c h a n i s m of A n c h o r a g e a n d Solubilization of A n g i o t e n s i n
I-Converting E n z y m e
It has long been known from conventional studies on the purification
of A C E that the enzyme was bound to the membrane of the cell and
that a solubilization step, either by proteolytic cleavage with trypsin or by
detergent, was required to purify the enzyme. 26 The molecular sizes of the
soluble and the membrane-bound forms were similar, indicating that the
solubilization process did not greatly affect the size of the enzyme. Immuno-
histochemical studies located the enzyme on the surface of various epithelial
and endothelial cells. In addition to the membrane-bound form of the
enzyme, A C E has also been found as a soluble form in plasma, semen,
cerebrospinal fluid, and other body fluids. The relationship between the
membrane-bound and the soluble forms of the enzyme has been elucidated
to a large extent by molecular biology.
Solubilization
The plasma enzyme is probably derived from vascular endothelial cells
and lacks the carboxyl terminus of ACE, as it is not recognized by a
specific antibody directed against a peptide corresponding to that part of
the enzyme. Therefore, the secreted circulating form of A C E is derived
from the membrane-bound form by a posttranslational event, a mechanism
which has been described for the solubilization of several ectoproteins.
Posttranslational processing of the membrane-bound form of A C E into a
300 METALLOPEPTIDASES [ 18]
soluble form has been observed during the culture of fibroblastic and epithe-
lial cells which express recombinant somatic and germinal A C E . 45'60'61
The relationship between the membrane-bound form of A C E and the
circulating form has been elucidated in two different cell culture systems
expressing either somatic or germinal ACE. The site of cleavage of human
somatic A C E has been studied in C H O cells, which provide a convenient
model system to study the solubilization process. 62 The carboxyl terminus
of the secreted recombinant ACE, Ala-Gly-Gln-Arg, was established by
carboxyl-terminal sequncing and corresponds to a cleavage site between
Arg-l137 and Leu-1138. However the mutation of Arg-l137 to a glutamine
residue did not prevent the secretion of recombinant ACE, indicating that
the solubilizing enzyme can accommodate that change or can use an altena-
tive cleavage site. In addition, the carboxyl-terminal sequencing of purified
human plasma A C E showed the same cleavage site as above, and, therefore,
it would appear that a similar mechanism for A C E secretion exists in C H O
cells and in human vascular cells from which circulating A C E is derived.
The site of cleavage of recombinant rabbit testicular A C E has been studied
in a permanent epithelial cell line by Ramchandran e t al. 61 Large amounts
of A C E are secreted by the cells, and the cleavage site occurs at a monobasic
site between Arg-663 and Ser-664. Interestingly, the secretion process could
be enhanced by treatment of cells with phorbol esters. The enzyme involved
in the secretion of A C E from pig kidney microvillar membranes has been
partially characterized. The ACE-secreting enzyme is tightly associated
with the membrane and is EDTA-sensitive, with the activity being substan-
tially restored by the addition of Mg 2+ and to a lesser extent by Zn 2+
a n d Mn2+. 63
Several questions are still unanswered concerning the mechanism of
A C E solubilization and its potential physiological role. The cleavage se-
quence found in human somatic ACE, Gln-Arg-Leu, is similar to the Gln-
Lys-Leu cleavage site of the amyloid precursor protein (APP), which hydro-
lyzes A P P within the 13-amyloid protein (AI3P) and prevents deposition of
AI3P, the principal component of plaques in Alzheimer's disease. This might
indicate the presence of a general posttranslational proteolytic mechanism
in the case of ACE, as discussed by Ehlers e t al. 6° for membrane-bound
proteins. It is not known whether the vascular endothelial cell solubilizing
enzyme is a rate-limiting factor for the production of plasma ACE; however,
60M. R. W. Ehlers, Y. N. P. Chen, and J. F. Riordan, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88,
1009 (1991).
61R. Ramchandran, G. C. Sen, K. Misono, and I. Sen, J. Biol. Chem. 269, 2125 (1994).
62V. Beldent, A. Michaud, L. Wei, M. T. Chauvet, and P. Corvol, J. Biol. Chem. 26g,
26428 (1993).
63S. Y. Oppong and N. M. Hooper, Biochem. J. 292, 597 (1993).
[ 18] PEPTIDYL DIPEPTIDASE A 301
S t r u c t u r e of G e n e for A n g i o t e n s i n I - C o n v e r t i n g E n z y m e
The complete i n t r o n - e x o n structure of the human A C E gene was deter-
mined from restriction mapping of genomic clones and by sequencing the
i n t r o n - e x o n boundaries. 64 The human A C E gene contains 26 exons: the
somatic A C E m R N A is transcribed from exon 1 to 26, but exon 13 is
removed by splicing from the primary R N A transcript; the germinal A C E
m R N A is transcribed from exon 13 to 26. The structure of the h u m a n
A C E gene provides further support for the hypothesis of duplication of an
ancestral gene. Exons 4-11 and 17-24, which encode the two homologous
domains of the enzyme, are highly similar in size and in sequence. In
contrast, the intron sizes are not conserved.
The human somatic and germinal forms of A C E m R N A are transcribed
from a single gene, 64 and thus the two species of A C E m R N A could be
generated either by differential splicing of a c o m m o n primary R N A tran-
script or by initiation of transcription from alternative start sites under
the control of separate promoters. Several studies have demonstrated the
presence of two functional promoters in the A C E gene, a somatic p r o m o t e r
and a testicular promoter, 64 by primer extension and RNase protection
assays on mouse, rabbit, and human germinal m R N A . 4°,65 The somatic
A C E p r o m o t e r is located on the 5' side of the first exon of the gene. Fusion
of fragments of the somatic A C E p r o m o t e r of various sizes to a reporter
gene and subsequent expression of the reporter gene demonstrated the
presence of positive regulatory elements inside the 132-bp region upstream
from the transcription start site and also indicated the presence of negative
regulatory elements between positions - 1 3 2 and - 3 4 3 and between - 4 7 2
and - 7 5 4 from the transcription start site. 66
The germinal A C E p r o m o t e r is located on the 5' side of the 5' end of
the germinal A C E m R N A with a transcription initiation site located inside
the A C E gene. Thus, intron 12 which corresponds to the genomic sequence
5' to the germinal specific exon 13, as deduced from the complete analysis
64C. Hubert, A.-M. Houot, P. Corvol, and F. Soubrier, J. Biol. Chem. 266, 15377 (1991).
65R. S. Kumar, T. J. Thekumkara, and G. Sen, J. Biol. Chem. 266, 3854 (1991).
66p. Testut, P. Corvol, and C. Hubert, Biochem. J. 293, 843 (1993).
302 METALLOPEPTIDASES [ 181
of the ACE gene in humans, was proposed as the putative germinal ACE
promotor. 64 Unequivocal evidence for the promoter function of the se-
quence was obtained by using intron 12 to drive the transcription of a
reporter gene in a germinal specific fashion.67 A 689-bp mouse genomic
fragment containing intron 12, exon 12, and part of intron 11 of the mouse
ACE gene was fused to the 13-galactosidase coding sequence and microin-
jected into pronuclei of single-cell stage embryos. A histochemical analysis
of the transgenic mice demonstrated that B-galactosidase together with the
ACE fragment was solely expressed in elongating spermatozoa. In another
series of transgenic mice, a 91-bp fragment of intron 12 of the ACE gene
was used as the promoter and was sufficient to confer a germinal cell-
restricted pattern of transcription to the transgene. 68 Further mapping of
the elements controlling transcription was achieved by DNase footprinting
and gel mobility shift assays which demonstrated that a sequence between
positions - 4 2 and -62 specifically binds nuclear factors from testes extracts
and contains a consensus cAMP responsive element (CRE). 68 The two
alternative promoters of the ACE gene exhibit highly contrasting cell speci-
ficities as the somatic ACE promoter is active in several cell types in contrast
to the germinal ACE promoter, which is only active in a stage-specific
manner in male germinal cells. 69
Phylogenesis
T h e ancestral A C E gene has b e e n duplicated during evolution, an event
which seems to have o c c u r r e d early in evolution. In all m a m m a l i a n species
where the gene has b e e n cloned, that is, rabbits, mice, and humans, it
M o l e c u l a r G e n e t i c s of A n g i o t e n s i n I - C o n v e r t i n g E n z y m e
The concentration of A C E in human blood serum is stable within a
given subject but varies markedly from individual to individual. In healthy
humans, no hormonal or environmental factors have been identified which
affect serum A C E levels, a3 However, elevated serum A C E levels are ob-
served in some pathological conditions, such as granulomatous diseases,
hyperthyroidism, and diabetes. 83
A family study of serum A C E levels, first performed in normal nuclear
families, showed intrafamilial correlations of serum A C E levels. A segrega-
tion analysis of serum A C E levels revealed that the familial resemblance
was due to a major gene effect which modulates the levels of serum ACE. s4
The cloning of the human A C E c D N A enabled the detection of a polymor-
phism in the A C E gene. The polymorphism consists of the presence or
absence of a 287-bp D N A fragment, s5 The insertion polymorphism is lo-
cated in intron 16 of the A C E gene and corresponds to an A l u repetitive
sequence. 86 The polymorphism was subsequently analyzed in a group of
8oA. J. Turner, J. Hryszko, N. M. Hooper, and M. J. Dowdall, J. Neurochem. 48, 910 (1987).
sl N. Lamango and R. E. Isaac, Biochem. J. 299, 651 (1994).
82M. J. Cornell, D. Coates, and R. E. Isaac, Biochem. Soc. Trans. 21, 243 (1993).
83j. Lieberman, Am. J. Med. 59, 365 (1975).
84F. Cambien, F. Alhenc-Gelas, B. Herbeth, J. L. Andre, R. Rakotovao, M. F. Gonzales,
J. Allegrini, and C. Bloch, Am. J. Hum. Genet. 43, 774 (1988).
85B. Rigat, C. Hubert, F. Alhenc-Gelas, F. Cambien, P. Corvol, and F. Soubrier, J. Clin.
Invest. 86, 1343 (1990).
86B. Rigat, C. Hubert, P. Corvol, and F. Soubrier, Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 1433 (1992).
[ 19] ASTACIN 305
[ 19] A s t a c i n
By WALTER STIDCKER a n d ROBERT ZWILLING
Introduction
Astacin is a zinc endopeptidase from the digestive tract of the freshwater
crayfish Astacus astacus L. (i.e., Astacus ftuviatilis Fabr.) and other decapod