NINA Matrix

Species 1
Contig_-_CO1
Contig_-_CO1
Contig_-_Dermogenys_sp.
Contig_-_CO1
JQ665826.1_Osteochilus_hasseltii_voucher_BK06_{ hasseltii}
Contig_-_CO1
Contig_-_CO1
Contig_-_CO1
HM345943.1_Osteochilus_kahajanensis_voucher_P2_{kahajenesis}
Contig_-_CO1
Contig_-_CO1
JX074188.1_Osteochilus_lini_isolate_CTOL3899_{ lini_isolate}
Contig_-_CO1
KC631202.1_Osteochilus_melanopleurus_{ melanopleurus}
Contig_-_CO1
KU692705.1_Osteochilus_microcephalus_voucher_BIF0659_{ microcephalus}
Contig_-_CO1
Contig_-_CO1
Contig_-_CO1
Contig_-_CO1
Contig_-_CO1
Contig_-_CO1
KX239498.1_Osteochilus_nashii_voucher_PUMNH_62/2013_{ nashii}
Contig_-_CO1
GU086577.1_Osteochilus_salsburyi_isolate_KIZCXY20071012_{ salsburyi_isolate}
Contig_-_CO1
KX239497.1_Osteochilichthys_thomassi_voucher_PUMNH_72/2014_l_{ thomassi}
Contig_-_CO1
KX239497.1_Osteochilichthys_thomassi_voucher_PUMNH_72/2014_l_{ thomassi}
KU692714.1_Osteochilus_vittatus_voucher_BIF1223_{ vittatus}
Species 2 Dist Std. Err
Contig_-_Dermogenys_sp. 0.228 0.027
JQ665826.1_Osteochilus_hasseltii_voucher_BK06_{ hasseltii} 0.084 0.015
HM345943.1_Osteochilus_kahajanensis_voucher_P2_{kahajenesis} 0.019 0.007
JX074188.1_Osteochilus_lini_isolate_CTOL3899_{ lini_isolate} 0.150 0.022
KC631202.1_Osteochilus_melanopleurus_{ melanopleurus} 0.158 0.023
KU692705.1_Osteochilus_microcephalus_voucher_BIF0659_{ microcephalus} 0.090 0.016
KX239498.1_Osteochilus_nashii_voucher_PUMNH_62/2013_{ nashii} 0.162 0.022
GU086577.1_Osteochilus_salsburyi_isolate_KIZCXY20071012_{ salsburyi_isolate} 0.153 0.022
KX239497.1_Osteochilichthys_thomassi_voucher_PUMNH_72/2014_l_{ thomassi} 0.142 0.020
KU692714.1_Osteochilus_vittatus_voucher_BIF1223_{ vittatus} 0.000 0.000
JX074190.1_Osteochilus_waandersii_isolate_CTOL3915_{ wandersii} 0.143 0.021
Similarity
0.772
0.916
0.752
0.916
0.752
1.000
0.916
0.752
1.000
1.000
0.981
0.772
0.907
0.907
0.907
0.981
0.772
0.907
0.907
0.907
1.000
0.850
0.801
0.823
0.823
0.823
0.847
0.847
0.842
0.795
0.835
0.835
0.835
0.838
0.838
0.884
0.910
0.753
0.886
0.886
0.886
0.919
0.919
0.845
0.869
0.910
0.753
0.886
0.886
0.886
0.919
0.919
0.845
0.869
1.000
0.910
0.753
0.886
0.886
0.886
0.919
0.919
0.845
0.869
1.000
1.000
0.910
0.753
0.886
0.886
0.886
0.919
0.919
0.845
0.869
1.000
1.000
1.000
0.910
0.753
0.886
0.886
0.886
0.919
0.919
0.845
0.869
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
0.907
0.757
0.882
0.882
0.882
0.916
0.916
0.848
0.865
0.997
0.997
0.997
0.997
0.997
0.838
0.784
0.792
0.792
0.792
0.835
0.835
0.866
0.870
0.841
0.841
0.841
0.841
0.841
0.838
0.847
0.790
0.813
0.813
0.813
0.854
0.854
0.901
0.886
0.855
0.855
0.855
0.855
0.855
0.852
0.872
0.858
0.781
0.810
0.810
0.810
0.841
0.841
0.851
0.843
0.834
0.834
0.834
0.834
0.834
0.837
0.892
0.841
1.000
0.772
0.916
0.916
0.916
0.981
0.981
0.850
0.842
0.910
0.910
0.910
0.910
0.910
0.907
0.838
0.847
0.858
0.857
0.787
0.830
0.830
0.830
0.854
0.854
0.919
0.880
0.855
0.855
0.855
0.855
0.855
0.851
0.865
0.940
0.858
0.857
Table. Estimates of Evolutionary Divergence between Sequences
The number of base substitutions per site from between sequences

are shown. Standard error estimate(s) are shown in the last column.
Analyses were conducted using the Kimura 2-parameter model [1].
The analysis involved 20 nucleotide sequences. Codon positions
included were 1st+2nd+3rd+Noncoding. All positions containing gaps
and missing data were eliminated. There were a total of 385 positions
in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA6
[2].
1. Kimura M. (1980). A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate

of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide
sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16:111-120.
2. Tamura K., Stecher G., Peterson D., Filipski A., and Kumar S.
(2013). MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version
6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution30: 2725-2729.
Disclaimer: Although utmost care has been taken to ensure the correctness of the
caption, the caption text is provided "as is" without any warranty of any kind. Authors
advise the user to carefully check the caption prior to its use for any purpose and
report any errors or problems to the authors immediately (www.megasoftware.net). In
no event shall the authors and their employers be liable for any damages, including
but not limited to special, consequential, or other damages. Authors specifically
disclaim all other warranties expressed or implied, including but not limited to the
determination of suitability of this caption text for a specific purpose, use, or
application.

NINA Matrix

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

NINA Matrix

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Species 1

The number of base substitutions per site from between sequences

1. Kimura M. (1980). A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate

You might also like