PLAIN TRUTH REVOLUTION

This is the 1st d of our

revolutionary G7
Summaries. All of them
can be found at
https://is.gd/HuWLbk.
Thanks for finding and
reading all.

WHY DO WE SAY THAT

LIBERIA IS AN ILLEGITIMATE
CIVIC ARRANGEMENT THAT
MUST BE LEGITIMIZED NOW,
BEFORE WE TAKE ANY MORE
STEPS FORWARD, BY THE
GRACE OF GOD?
Note that the essence of all this 5-year research, and all its
attending details, is to convince each of us, citizens and
international friends, that the current running of our country, as
it has been so from 1822 to date, is just not sustainable, apart
from being very dangerous, and thus, must be relatively halted
now. Let’s instead go to a national round table to review these
details; adopt lessons learnt from them as raw materials and new
inputs for a new civic design that will see us start life all over, as
a people. If not, continuous failure, fragility, and ultimate
disaster will remain our portion – sad to state this unbeatable
truth!!

PLAIN TRUTH REVOLUTION

9/7/2017
Welcome to our Revolution of DETAILS, a civic endeavor
that seeks to dig out root causes, and to get to the
bottom of our country’s deep-rooted social problems,
using God’s eternal principles of Love, Patience, Truth,
Hard Work, and Justice.
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Beginning Notes………………………………………………………………………………...1
Introductory argument…………………………………………………………………………..2
22 of the key things that can help show whether a country, like for example, “Liberia”, is
Legitimate, or whether its founding and sustaining arguments and theories, in addition
to how it goes about doing things, are legally and morally acceptable ……...............................2
The idea, and importance of a National Social Contract……………………………………….5
The legal requirements of a Contract, including a Social Contract…………………………….5
The big 4 LIES that laid Liberia’s foundation cornerstones…………………………………....7
A few historical and current event-accounts that prove Liberia’s already blurred Social
Contract to be very ILLEGITIMATE…………………………………………………………..7
The fakeness of Liberia’s so-called 1847 Constitutional Convention…………………............7
The very big lies in Liberia’s Declaration of Independence, Motto etc…..……………………7
How the criminal Black American founders of Liberia, the so-called “Congo” People
argued, and keep arguing up to this 2017, that all the Natives of this Land
(our Grain Coast) are “Animals”, and not human beings………………………………………8
How every story about the foundation of “Liberia” and its sustenance sadly resemble
a fable, or a story of animals, and NEVER human beings, so sadly………………....................8
How Liberia started life very wrongly and keeps swimming in this ocean of wrongs,
wrongs, and wrongs…………………………………………………………………...………..9
Some current opinion leaders’ views about Liberia’s enduring illegitimacy…………………9
Mr. John S. Morlu comments………………………………………………………...9
Keith Morris, Nathaniel Barnes, Sen. Henry Yallah, all comment………………….9
Jonathan Paye-Lay-Leh, Atty. Koffi Woods, Dean Johnson, Wilfred Bangourah,
Dr. Amos Saywer, all make their part of comments too …………………………...10
How Liberia lacks the ability to ever dispense justice holistically to its own
population: ………………………………………………………………………….10
Chief Justice Korkpor confirms this crippling defect……………………………...11
Justice Kabineh J’aneh, Judges Korboi Nuta and Blamo Dickson, Cllr. Benedict
Sannoh, all confirm this deadly reality in their own, different ways……………...11
A senior Court Official in Grand Cape Mount County makes his contribution…..12
The US State Department confirms all this too……………………………………12
What did young, Dr Martin Luther King once say about this kind of lack of
Justice within a society………………………………………………………………………..12
What’s about Greek Aristotle’s own contributions to this debate…………….……………....13
How Liberia’s constitution and all of its symbols and emblems do confirm
this illegitimacy too……………………………………………………………………………13
How Capt. Robert Field Stockton’s criminal acquisition of Cape Mesurado to start
building their “Liberia” even adds insult to injury in this debate…………………………….14
What’s about the question of “Whether the American Colonization Society, that racist
American NGO, that later went bankrupt, can ever be a legitimate authority to grant
any serious people independence, as is still being sorrowfully claimed
by poor, dull, Liberia…………………………………………………………………………..14
What’s about Liberia’s FOOLISH and Criminal founding argument from the ACS:
that Criminal Blacks, when systematically rounded up, and weeded out of the
American society, can be dumped somewhere on the African continent for them to
Christianize and Civilize Africa…….........................................................................................15
How Liberia’s current Agenda for Transformation document confirms its illegitimacy…......15
Check out how TRC too confirmed Liberia’s illegitimacy…………………………………....15
American Political Scientist Robert A. Dahl’s take on Legitimacy …………………………..15
Why is it too dangerous for us to insist on doing things our own, negative, dull, and
foolish way, while we remain so badly behind in life as others massively progress…………16
A word of encouragement for you to please buy into our demand now for some
All-Citizens-Conference rather than Elections, for us to put our house in order now
by the grace of God……………………………………………………………………………17
Closing Notes………………………………………………………………………………….18
 1

First Note: This 18 page narrative, trying to systematically outline some of the countless
justifications of our strong claim of Liberia’s unquestionable illegitimacy is an excerpt of one
of our revolutionary pamphlets, “If This Is The Best Of Americo-Liberian Leaderships, In
Harvard-Trained Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Then What Else Are We, The Natives, Still Waiting
For To Constructively Snatch Our Arm Robbed Country From Out Of The Hands Of
America And Her Americo-Liberians?”, which can be found either https://is.gd/kYZsIT in its
.doc format, or in their Adobe .pdf format at https://is.gd/DyCnOh. This excerpt as such
intends to give you some summarized picture of how dangerous our country’s situation is, for
which total change has now become a MUST by the grace of God. The secret of course, is
that, this much-needed change can, and will NEVER come about from any already existing
source or process, such as political elections, as is being run or administered here by existing
Americo-Liberian structures and institutions.

Revolution, preferably a peaceful revolution, of course, has this God-approved solution

through His grace and guidance. This excerpt is mainly intended to give you a quicker insight
into the much bigger problems at hand, and to drive you into reading our more detailed
pamphlets. These excerpts further come to strengthen our arguments drawn against Liberia
from within other works, based on observations and slightly paraphrased quotations from 3
revered American academicians and professionals including Messrs. Hugh Mason Brown and
Patrick J. O’Rouke and Dr. James Ciment, two of which address Liberia directly, while the
balance one references Liberia indirectly.

The three remarks or paraphrased quotations and observations include: (a) Mr. Hugh Mason
Brown, who studied, observed, and declared that: “a Liberian only sadly memorizes concepts
and theories from other people, and refuses to use or practically apply these concepts and
theories to change his situation and overall life”; (b) Dr. James Ciment, after carefully
studying and observing Liberia for years through research also, finally discovers that Liberia is
unfortunately an illegitimate statehood arrangement whose people have a very twisted
approach to things, and a thwarted modus operandi. Then, (c) Mr. Patrick Jake O’Rouke
declares that, once a people overlook their own History, (by refusing to use it as a guide for
finding solutions to their problems etc., they also will NEVER be able to do well in their
Economics, English, or Math etc.

As usual, some of our presentation styles may seem unconventional, but permissible, as they
are revolutionary, and can’t just be tied to norms. But please read on, and make sense out of
them. Thanks.
 2

Before we start to list and explain in small details each of our key points of argument or
accounts which convincingly render Liberia as an illegitimate statehood arrangement, only
criminally struggling with some limited scope of sovereignty that was granted to it by
America, who too did this with some huge ‘capitalistic, criminal’ motives, let us first list all
the key indicators, or measurement tools, or yardsticks, that modern law and social science use
to qualify a state or nationhood arrangement as legitimate, or valid or legal. Remember that
just as a business entity (whether a proprietorship, a partnership or a corporation) for example,
can be declared illegal either by refusing to register with the government, or, for being
discovered to have registered with the wrong person, or, for having false information in any of
its founding papers, especially its Articles of Incorporation and its By Laws & Constitution
etc., and, such business entity can be closed down or barred from doing business etc. and etc.,
a country too can be brought to book for being illegal or illegitimate for several key reasons, as
you will discover in this short piece of literature, and when such becomes clear of a so-called
nation or country, the only option left is to redo all of that country’s founding theories, along
with all other necessary readjustments. That’s the very undodgeable situation that ‘Liberia’
now finds itself in.
So then here we go with a list of 22 things or indicators derived from both academic sources,
including Law, Political Science, and other Social Sciences, and then from Common Sense,
that can determine whether a country, like for instance, the United States, France, Ivory Coast,
or like ‘Liberia’ is claiming to be, is legitimate:
1. Honesty, Love and Justice MUST characterize all of the motives and intentions leading up
to the setup or establishment of a state
2. The founding arguments of a country must be true, honest, transparent, sustainable, but still
very flexible to change when situations genuinely dictate so, based on changing times
3. The founding arguments of a country must be able to engender and ensure strong social
and psychological cohesion between all members of the society every step of the way.
4. Honesty MUST be demonstrated on the part of the governors towards the governed, and
vice versa. Or, put another way, honesty and sincerity MUST characterize government-to-
citizens relationship. With more emphasis on this point, mutual trust MUST be existing
between the government and its citizens, while generalized trust MUST exist within
society as a whole, among all citizens
5. The state authorities MUST be able to dispense justice and implement laws holistically, or
across the board, and not partially or selectively.
6. The state authorities MUST be able to educate all of their citizens sustainably, since
education opens the door to ALL the other success stories anticipated by the state and its
people. The national authorities must also be able to provide all of its citizens with all the
remaining basic social services and amenities; or, they must demonstrate a strong and
honest will to do so in the short, or even medium to long-term
7. A country MUST be able to generate massive revenues by itself, and for itself
8. The state authorities MUST be able to make decisions independently, outside of any
glaringly impulsive external interference or influence
 3

9. The rights and interest of all citizens of a legitimate state must be secured and prioritized at
all times
10. The state MUST be able to independently set up, populate, equip, and fund its security
forces – i.e. the army, the police etc. – adequately and sustainably, in line with ALL
contemporary or modern standards
11. National laws, beginning with the constitution, MUST be objective, all-encompassing,
unbiased, and void of intentional flaws and intentional criminal provisions.
12. The interest and identity of every segment of society MUST be reflected in all of the
national symbols and emblems, and every citizen MUST have a common understanding of
these items, in addition to being able to cultivate a clear sense of belongingness to their
country through the simplicity of these national symbols and emblems. This is what we call
shared national identity.
13. State authorities MUST demonstrate consistent moral rightness in all their dealings –
whether with the outside world or with their citizens, but the interest of the citizens MUST
be above all else, and state authorities MUST act in their country’s own best interest
regardless of outside pressure
14. The state MUST demonstrate a consistent capacity to ably detect, fight, and defeat
pervasive, destructive, social ills and crimes
15. A state MUST show honest proof of making steady year-to-year progress in all of its
human development indicators in line with contemporary or modern standards.
16. State authorities MUST be able to derive and design national policies (political, economic,
and otherwise) indigenously
17. The state MUST be able to demonstrate excellence in regularly and seamlessly making
adjustments to its founding civic theories, including its social contract items, such as its
symbols, emblems, awards, constitution etc., and then its systems, infrastructure, and
modus operandi, so ably to match modern and changing times
*Note: the first 17 legitimacy criteria above are more practical in nature, based on common
sense, let’s close on this listing with the below 5 that are more academic and theoretical, as
propounded by modern-day professors and social science theorists or authorities:
18. According to German Professor Fritz Scharpf, basic political legitimacy comes in two
forms: (a) Output Legitimacy – this measures the effectiveness of government’s policy
outcomes on the overall lives of the citizenry, or every citizen, for short. Then (b), Input
Legitimacy – the measure of an authority’s responsiveness to the needs and concerns of its
citizens, which can be expressed in different forms of democratic participation.
19. Vivien Schimidt, Professor of International Relations at the Boston University introduces
what could be referred to as a 3rd basic measure of legitimacy, in addition to Sharpf’s 2
above, that he calls (c) Throughput Legitimacy – the measure of the effectiveness of
governmental processes in effecting both Output and Input Legitimacies.
 4

20. University of Tel-Aviv Assistant Professor of Politics and Senior Research Fellow at
Princeton University, Mr. Uriel Abulof argues political legitimacy from two points: (a)
Negative Political Legitimacy – this is the measurement of the appropriateness or
correctness of each governmental action; and (b) Positive Political Legitimacy – a measure
of how a government takes seriously the importance of having the right and qualified
persons in the right governmental positions. For example, if you are not a proven criminal,
or highly possible criminal etc., can you ever survive to be a president or lawmaker in
Liberia?
21. Democratic Legitimacy depends on the effectiveness of the procedures used or employed
by government institutions and the quality of the decisions that these institutions do make
from time to time
22. Some social scholars do trumpet the concepts of Instrumental Legitimacy and Substantive
Legitimacy. They say: (a) Instrumental Legitimacy gauges legitimacy by how effectively
government delivers social services to all of its citizens; and (b) Substantive Legitimacy
assesses political legitimacy by how much citizens are willing to sacrifice for the common
good of society based upon the trust that they have in their own government and society in
general etc. and etc.
After having laid this premise, let’s now limit our legitimacy debate to the issue of a National
Social contract. Let it be known here that in order for a piece of land and its people, to gain or
reach the status of being called a legitimate country, a legitimate state, a legitimate nation, or
a legitimate nation state – whichever way one prefers to call it, there MUST be some key
agreement called a Social contract that binds these people on the land, to one another, and
to that piece of land itself. This social contract is more theoretical and multidimensional than
some single hard copy, legal document, but it is simply reflected in such things as the
Declaration of Independence, the form of government, the Constitution, the seal, the motto etc.
and other emblems and common public documents. Even societal norms also be regarded as a
function or product of social contract. All this put together, according to the Social Scientists,
form the very foundation of a society. However, the contractual sense of this whole civic and
national concept reflects more within the relationship between the governing authority of a
place and the governed, or those who are being governed, including the ordinary, common
people. In this sense of a governing authority and the governed, a Social Contract is
synonymous with the marital vow between a husband and a wife, in which each party has
some major obligations and responsibilities in line with the vow, and that any substantial proof
of violating such pledge, especially repeatedly and consistently, warrants the cancellation of
this contract through a divorce and stuffs like that. So let’s do a little bit of definitions before
hitting the hammer on the nail’s head with respect to Liberia and her current governing
authority and social contract:
1) Contract – (a) An agreement between two or more competent parties based on mutual
promises to do something, which is both legal and possible; or, to refrain from doing
something, which can normally be illegal. (b) An agreement that the law can force
someone to keep. (c) A writing made to show the terms and conditions of such agreement.
 5

Notes:
 There are 6 elements that must be available or possible to make an agreement a complete
contract, just like a Social Contract, and they include: (1) an offer (2) an acceptance (3) a
mutual consent (4) capacity to live the contract (5) some consideration or sacrifice from
both parties, and (6) Legality/Legitimacy
 Contractual characteristics fall into four main categories, which include: (1) either Valid or
Voidable (2) either Unilateral or Bilateral (3) either Express (ed) or Implied, and (4) either
Informal or Formal
 The following 7 acts or conditions – and actions resembling them, or related to them – can
jeopardize the validity, legitimacy, correctness, or authority of a contract, and each of
them, when proven, is capable, alone and enough, to terminate or cancel a contract,
including a Social Contract. They include: (1) Chicanery (lying/cheating) (2) Fraud (3)
Duress (4) Undue Influence (5) Misinterpretation (6) Mental Infirmity (7) Age Inability
2) Social – (a) Of, or relating to human beings living together in groups or communities (b)
Living or growing together in groups or as a community.
3) Social Contract – (this big agreement could also be referred to as Civic Contract, Political
Contract, Citizenship Contract or National Contract) – According to Wikipedia, Social
Contract is a body of arguments, like we said earlier, such as a constitution, a declaration
of independence etc., claiming that individuals have agreed either in writing or in some
willful cooperation, to surrender some of their freedoms to an authority or a ruler or a
majority, in exchange for the protection of their remaining rights. It is also referred to as
a political contract that defines the origin of a society and validates the legitimacy of a
state over individuals within a specific territorial confines.
Note:
 One other key characteristic of any contract, including a Social Contract is that all parties
to it must stand in probity (truthfulness, righteousness, sincerity, honesty etc.) to each
other with respect to the execution or performance of their duties and responsibilities
under the contract. This requirement makes it incumbent that each party must have a
generally recognized interest in the subject of the contract if they are to be bound to it. Still
in connection to this point, we listed earlier 6 elements that must be present to make a
contract, including a Social Contract, valid or legitimate, but let’s just throw a little light on
only one of them here, which is consideration, an element that lays the foundation for the
duties and responsibilities under a contract, for which probity becomes a serious matter.
Consideration, in the world of contract, and when placed in the very layman sense, is the
sum total of the series of sacrifices needed to be made by one party, on the one hand, in
order to produce a series of benefits to be received by the other party, on the other hand,
and this takes place vice versa, or as a two-way street. Each party is compelled to do some
specific sacrifice for the benefit of the other, and to receive some specific benefit as a result
of the sacrifice made by the other. This is where probity plays a major role to produce
legitimacy. Placing all this into the context of a Social Contract, with the government as a
party (let’s say Party A), and citizens as a party (Party B), for example, or whichever way
we may put it, we say: some of the citizens’ sacrifices that produce benefits to the
 6

government include: (1) Remaining, or keeping informed – of relatively all of the key
issues of society; (2) Working to improve the community; (3) Respecting constituted
authority; (4) Respecting public property; (5) Ensuring that government performs all of its
duties well; (6) Voting; (7) Serving in government etc.
On the other hand, some of the government/governing authority’s binding sacrifices that
produce benefits to the citizens – which in turn comes back logically and practically to
producing benefits for the government itself too – include: (1) Providing quality education to
ALL – as a beginning point for everything else to work well; (2) Ensuring that sound, and all-
encompassing laws are in place to govern all of society’s affairs; (3) Ensuring that justice is
accorded to all, equally and equitably, under the rule of law; (4) Putting up maximum security
for ALL, alike, including proven criminals; (5) According freedom to, and protecting freedom
for ALL; (6) Providing a range of other basic social services that facilitate healthy, long, and
productive life for ALL, including health services, food, transportation, electricity, water
supply etc., employing different legal or legitimate mechanisms that will ensure that ALL
these basic services are supplied to EVERYBODY in a substantial way etc. and etc.
But a striking point of interest here is that because government is a small unit of people
selected or taken from among the citizens to work on behalf of the citizens, and is given all of
the required resources and authority to do such work adequately on behalf of the rest of the
citizens, and to keep society growing and progressing success after success, it is government
who is ultimately responsible to ensure, one legitimate way or the other, that each of the two
parties to the Social Contract – i.e. government itself and the citizenry – is adequately
empowered to responsibly live its side of the bargain in the contract; again, with probity to the
other.
After all these theoretical narratives that give us a full idea of what truly constitutes
legitimacy, let’s now provide some historical and empirical proofs of Liberia’s lack of
legitimacy, so as to sharpen our resolve to now fight for true legitimacy for our country by the
grace of our Almighty God. Here we go.
But first off, it’s important to let you know that 4 great LIES were used as pillars at the 4
cornerstones putting up Liberia’s foundation, and these great LIES continue to reign supreme
today in different respects. The four, which come from credible sources including: Wikipedia,
Joseph Saye Guannu’s Liberian History Up To 1847; Catherine Reef’s “This is our Dark
Country: The American Settlers of Liberia; Hezekiah Niles’ Weekly Register etc. are as
follows:
A. LIE #1: Criminal, threatening, and rampaging Black freed slaves, when systematically
weeded out of the American Society, and dumped forcibly – if that’s what it takes – on
some spot on the African continent, can form a state by themselves, and then begin to
‘Christianize’ and ‘Civilize’ the whole continent of Africa from this spot
B. LIE #2: American Colonization Society (ACS) Agent Eli Ayres and US Naval Lieutenant
Robert Field Stockton had lied to our tribal forefathers that they were settling their
hardcore criminal Black slaves, the occupants of their Elizabeth the Mayflower, the
Nautilus etc. on our Cape Mesurado for a while, to trace their rightful locations on the
African continent before taking them to their final destinations, since it will be so absurd
and stupid enough to rationalize that all those troublesome Black slaves systematically
 7

rounded up from America did come from this particular Western spot on the African
continent, which is this Grain Coast.
C. LIE #3: Again, ACS Agent, Surgeon Dr. Eli Ayres and US Naval Lieutenant Robert Field
Stockton of New Jersey, after pointing pistol at our tribal forefather’s head to surrender our
land, Cape Mesurado, went further, as part of some professedly formal deal for this land,
drawn out of coercion, to promise our people some unspecified sum of money, to be
brought later for this land, after insultingly giving our people some smoke fish, salt, old
shoes etc. from their ships, as so-called part payment for this land. The promised cash
payment, to be brought later to our ALWAYS badly cheated, defenseless, and choiceless
tribal forefathers, became a great LIE in the end
D. LIE #4: The criminal Black Americans had claimed to the whole world, and a claim that
they and their master, the US Government, still fiercely defend in many respects to this
date, as demonstrated in the name, symbols, emblems, and holidays of this place, that,
when they arrived here on January 7, 1822, they NEVER met any human beings, but
rather, all that they met was a vast wilderness, inhabited to some extent by wild beasts or
savages, that they began to transform bit by bit into human beings etc.
Since LIE is the greatest destroyer, and is among the very few sins and iniquities that God
hates the most, according to the Bible (Proverbs 6:16-19 for instance), let’s take a little more
time off to throw light on some of these fundamental and sustained LIES of Liberia, as listed
above, in the immediate section below:
1. From what we now know, Liberia’s Social Contract was designed formally between June
25 and July 25, 1847, according to sources such as the “Liberian History Up To 1847” by
Dr. Joseph S. Guannue, when 12 persons, representing only one, and the most questionable
one for that matter (i.e. the Americo-Liberians), of ‘Liberia’s somewhat formally known 17
social or ethnic groups, converged at a so-called Constitutional Convention in Monrovia.
This 1-month ‘National Convention’ produced a set of Social Contract elements, including
the Declaration of Independence, the First Constitution of the Republic of Liberia, a
national motto, a seal, a flag etc. with key supporting general arguments like the ones
below, among others, again, ALL OF WHICH ARE GREAT LIES, one way or the other,
as they are being sustained to date:
(a) According to the Declaration of Independence and the First Constitution, all the citizens of
this country (‘Liberia’) are originally from the United States of North America.
(b) The motto, which is also part of the seal, says that it is the love of liberty that brought
everybody here, originally from North America; and in fact, this is the reason for which
this place is called Liberia.
(c) When the Black Americans came here, they never met any human beings on ground, but
instead, they met a complete wilderness, with only wild animals – savages and beasts, not
human beings. In logical terms, our tribal forefathers, in the Bassas, Deis, and Golas for
example, from whom these Black American miscreants took Cape Mesurado to begin
building their failed, barren, and criminal Liberia, were wild animals and beasts, not human
beings.
Small Proof of our claim
 8

a) Jo M. Sullivan of the Cambridge Public Schools in Massachusetts, the USA, expressed his
frustration once at the sad characterizations of the indigenous people of this country by the
so-called Black American ‘pioneers’, as presented in a 2002 book written by Catherine
Reef entitled, “This is our Dark Country: The American Settlers of Liberia”. Mr. Sullivan
criticizes for example, the Americo-Liberians’ use of such phrases as: “building a nation in
the wilderness”, “surviving in the wilderness” etc. He said, in Reef’s description of the
region [as very lately as 2002 in her book], she still gave preference to animals before
making some little mention of a local people.
b) In the book, “Liberia, the West African Republic”, Richard and Doris Henries narrate that
upon the arrival of the Black Americans from bondage, they met on the Grain Coast, only
savages, whom they (the ‘Congo People’) began to transform into human beings.
c) In Liberia’s official Civics textbook, as late as the Tubman’s Era, “Civics for Liberian
Schools, 1966”, A. Doris Banks Henries, the author of this book, with full approval of the
Government of Liberia, referred to us, the indigenous people, the Nagbes, the Boakais, the
Samukais, the Weahs, the original Sirleafs and so on, as savages. Note that, no popular and
well-premised official policy has EVER changed these characterizations and descriptions
of us, the aboriginals, and original owners of this land yet.
Conclusion
While we know that there exists no bilateral, express/expressed, valid, and formal Social
Contract underlying this entire Liberian society, even if someone, especially the Congo
people who established their Liberia along with their American masters, will insist that
there exists something, then we will agree with them for argument sake, but will still prove
strongly that what they are referring to therefore, is instead an implied, informal, unilateral,
and unconscionable June-July 1847 Social Contract, that is one-sided and very oppressive,
giving unfair advantage to the Americo-Liberians over the Aboriginal people of our
country. This situation or reality, we assert, has now become very, very untenable and
UNACCEPTABLE. It has thus become perfectly justifiable for us to resist such informal
Social Contract at all costs now, as we have begun, by the grace of God, in order to change
these things around.
2. Every story, every narration, and so forth, surrounding Liberia’s establishment, onward
existence and movement is so queer, negatively strange, and criminal, most often like a
fable (or a story of animals), and not like a narration about human beings. Note that this is
without prejudice to our good, suffering, and innocent people. We believe that activities
characterizing the founding or establishment of a sound and legitimate country should be
both inspirational and virtue-packed so that these beautiful realities can flourish throughout
the existence of such a country. But what we know about this Liberia is quite the opposite,
with narrations about the founding and onward survival of this Black American Criminal
outpost called country, up to this point, just so uninteresting, heart-sickening and terrible,
as they are almost all characterized by very queer human behavior toward fellow human
beings, and numerous ghastly tales of criminalities, corruption, dishonesty, poverty,
brutality and the likes, all the way, from the very beginning of this Liberia in 1822 to this
date in 2017. This NASTY profile of a whole group of God’s children MUST change now
by His grace, and it will NEVER change if we keep obeying the current criminal status
 9

quo. It’s time for virtuous men and women to rise up to the arduous and dangerous
challenge of laying a new civic and social foundation that will first fear God, and then
respect all men, by according all men what they truly deserve out of life.
3. Every knowledgeable and well-meaning person in this country knows perfectly well by
now that Liberia started everything the wrong way, and it continues to conduct itself the
completely wrong way in almost every aspect of positive life, including how we even eat
and how we worship our Creator, not to mention the great mess that we keep making out of
the noble calling and responsibilities of governance and leadership. Now, when reasonable
people establish that a system has got everything wrong, and they keep obeying that
system, then they are saying that they are very proud of that wrong system, and that they
want to keep growing and strengthening it to become more and more dangerous and
deadlier. That way, we all become badly guilty of nurturing the problem, rather than
becoming part of the solution. Here is just a little sample of big opinion leaders of today
who completely agree with our Plain Truth Revolution that this particular social order in
our country (the Grain Coast, cheatingly called Liberia), that was initiated here by the
Americo-Liberians in 1822, is very miserable, and must be completely torn down now, and
redesigned:
(a) Mr. John S. Morlu, former Auditor General of Liberia – Mr. Morlu once said, in Liberia,
we have a kleptocracy (or one would say, a ‘rogue-cracy’ or ‘criminocracy’),
masquerading as a democracy. He then called on the Press Union of Liberia to help break
this rogue structure called Liberian democracy down, and not to help it grow to born more
babies of poverty, uncontrollable foreign exchange rates, astronomical prices of
goods/services, and sky-rocketing rate of unemployment (www.frontpageafricaonline.com,
November 28, 2015)
(b) Mr. Keith Morris, Journalist in Local Print Media – according to Journalist Morris, there
is no coordination in the administrative structure of the country….He says, there’s a very
serious climate of deceit in the thing called government in this place, so much so that
politicians or government officials come to the public and talk different things, but behind
the scenes, they mean quite different things (Farbric FM New Dawn, August 26, 2015)
(c) Mr. Nathaniel Barnes, Politician and former Liberian Ambassador to the United
Nations – Mr. Barnes argues that we “dangerously don’t have any institutions in this place,
but instead, we just have personalities.” He says we are terribly not even a reconciled
people, and that we don’t have any common purpose, and any common goal as a people.
He continues that there’s an incredible lack of trust by Liberians in their leaders and
government generally, and that this lack of citizens’ trust is JUSTIFIED!!!!!!!!(Farbric FM
New Dawn, December 2, 2015)
(d) Senator Henry Yallah, Bong Country – according to Senator Yallah, in Liberia, and in the
Senate in which he serves, when the President for example nominates a person this
evening, before day breaks the next morning, that nominee has already been confirmed. He
then goes on to say, “We [make a] lot of mistakes in this place, and this place needs to be
redeemed….” (Sky FM News, October 31, 2014)
 10

(e) Mr. Jonathan Paye – Lay-Leh – BBC Correspondent/Liberia – Mr. Paye Layleh says that
the behavior of Liberian leaders in dealing with the country’s resources, especially its
natural resources (iron ore, gold, diamond, oil etc.) makes him to wonder whether leaders
here have something at the back of their minds telling them that the country is now coming
to an end (Farbric FM New Dawn, October 20, 2015)
(f) Ms/Mrs. Makita Redd/Wreh, Commerce Inspector, Ministry of Commerce & Industry,
Liberia – at one time, Madam Redd/Wreh publicly expressed fears for her son Justin’s life
in the hands of the country’s national police, saying that her son’s safety was not
guaranteed in the hands of the police once the President, Madam Sirleaf, was out of the
country at the time. (Local Radio News, December 13, 2013)
(g) Mr. Isaac Redd, Director of Press & Public Affairs, House of Representatives, Liberia –
fed up with the status quo, Mr. Redd complains, with utmost disgust, that in Liberia, the
construction or rehabilitation of little stretches of substandard one-lane roads is only
determined by where the president goes. In his direct words, “Our country just can’t go this
way…we need to jumpstart everything all over again….and we need real patriotic people
to do this…..” (Farbric FM New Dawn, November 12, 2015)
(h) Mr. Koffi Woods, former Public Works Minister, Liberia – He says, Liberia’s very
chronic problems can be attributed to the tragic return of the so-called freed slaves from
America – development which he said eventually gave birth to all of the deadly vices that
now overwhelm our society, including ethnic marginalization and the very unspeakable
abuse of power and authority, but not because of any April 14 or April 12, 1980 incidents,
as others may always want to claim (Sky FM News, April 28, 2014)
(i) Dean Johnson, African Methodist Episcopal University, Monrovia – this honorable Dean
says, Liberia’s declaration of independence was imprudently thought out, and was
untimely…He continues, “we need a complete renaissance… we need a complete
rebirth…(Farbric FM New Dawn, March 16, 2015)
(j) Mr. Wilfred Bangourah, Senate Protemp’s Office, Liberia – According to Mr.
Bangourah, Liberia was founded on a false premise. He says, “We should now check our
founding papers and make some more adjustments…” He further states, “We now need to
reclaim and repossess our country…” (Farbric FM New Dawn, March 16, 2015)
(k) Dr. Amos C. Sawyer, head, Liberia’s Good Governance Commission – here is how Dr.
Sawyer summarizes the whole dangerously funny and sad Liberian story: According to
him, “The idea of Liberia is flawed in conception, design, and implementation” (as
quoted by Mr. Jo Sullivan of the Cambridge Public Schools in Massachusetts, the USA)
4. Liberia completely lacks the ability to EVER dispense equitable and fair justice to all of
the people of this land. In fact, it will be a complete mockery out of ourselves, to ever feel
in this life, that an Americo-Liberian designed arrangement, including its GOL, will EVER
mean well for the Natives, the 16 African tribal population of this country – let alone will it
dispense fair justice in this place, when the harsh fact remains that criminals can NEVER
dispense justice or fight crime. As a result of this painful and damaging reality, just as
President Obama once said that in some countries, there are separate sets of laws for
different groups of people, Liberia has 3 sets of laws – one set for the Americo-Liberians in
 11

general, one set for the so-called well-connected in the Americo-Liberian society, and the
last and most ruthless set, for the huge mass of ordinary ‘Yarkpawolos.’ It may interest you
to discover that even if a Williams, a Bryant, or a McClain were seen broad day rampaging
and killing a swarm of indigenous people’s kids and babies in cold blood in this country, or
stealing millions of dollars of the country’s wealth in broad day light, the Liberian so-
called legal system will do all it can to acquit that Williams, Bryant, or McClain
permanently, if, out of some external pressure the Black American element ever appears in
their courts, in the first place.
Even the very government and court authorities here, one day after another, do validate in
different forms and actions that, criminally rooted Government of Liberia from 1822, has
got no capacity to EVER dispense fair and reasonable justice to the good people of this
country. Here are just few proofs of how the Government of Liberia and its judicial
officials do agree with us that nothing good is happening here in terms of sound justice for
God’s children, and that there’s NO sign that it will EVER improve:
a. Judge/Justice Francis S. Korkpor, Sr., Chief Justice, Liberia – the two crippling human
rights abuses of: (a) indiscriminately, unprofessionally, and many times, just maliciously
throwing people behind bars on the one hand, and then on the other hand, (b) keeping
people illegally for long time under pretrial detention had gotten to the Chief Justice’s
nerves, as some of the deadliest problems of the Americo-Liberian Justice System, so
much so that he had to blow alarm about them in October 2015. He emphasized to the
public that prolonged detention of an accused person before trying them – which is terribly
plaguing his own justice system – amounted to travesty of justice, or making mockery out
of justice. He then warned his judges and magistrates to take full advantage of provisions
under the law for options or courses other than incarcerating accused people while also
warning them to speedily and promptly attend to court cases instead of what is currently
happening. Note: The sad news is that all of the Chief Justice’s warnings and
admonishments here, deriving from his frustrations about the broad day travesty of justice
in this Black American country will all fall on barren ground and hard rock because this
Liberia was NEVER designed to seek any form of excellence and fair dealings with human
beings, PERIOD!!! (http://www.hotpepperliberia.com; Detained Alleged Criminals Have
Rights, October 13, 2015)
b. Associate Justice Kabineh J’aneh, Supreme Court of Liberia – After Liberia has been
around for the past 194 years now dispensing justice to its citizens, here are just 3 of the
many fundamental and very damaging deficiencies still plaguing her justice system,
according to Cllr. J’aneh, an authority himself: (1) persistent over-crowdedness of court
dockets; (2) very huge numbers of pretrial detentions; and (3) insufficient laws on the
books to adequately handle ongoing concerns and challenges. (ELBC, November 23, 2015).
Judge Korboi Nuta of Criminal Court ‘A’ had also earlier expressed similar grave
concerns about the Liberian Judicial System, adding that it lacks, as yet, any coherent and
uniform approach to handling the country’s huge justice problems and needs. He said this
was a very serious impediment in dispensing justice in the country. (ELBC, November
2013)
 12

c. Cllr. Benedict Sannoh, Justice Minister, Liberia – in an ELBC January 2, 2015 news cast,
Cllr. Sannoh was heard publicly announcing that in Liberia, certain people are allowed to
go with impunity when they do wrong – just for the sake of peace and reconciliation, and
that such persons were now taking advantage of this situation. He is quoted verbatim, while
serving as Acting Justice Minister at the time, as saying, “…Government has been letting
certain things go unpunished for the sake of peace and reconciliation, and people are taking
advantage of this, and thinking that they are above the law, but 2015 will be a different
year…” During another time, Cllr. Sannoh, while now serving as Justice Minister proper,
claimed that his own justice system comprises imperial magistrates [or by extension court
officials] who make themselves so powerful [criminally], and do such unwholesome things
as imposing excessive bail bonds on accused citizens….(Local Daily, Winston W. Parley,
October 14, 2015)
d. Judge Blamo Dickson/Dixon, Judge, Temple of Justice, Monrovia – at the opening
ceremonies of the November 2015 term of court, at Criminal Courts A, B, C, and D at the
Temple of Justice, Judge Dickson/Dixon disclosed that some magistrates were in the bad
business of [maliciously] denying citizens their due rights to obtaining bonds under the
law. Note: If Judge Dickson/Dixon could observe and alarm at this kind of painfully
unwholesome human rights abuse from his court chambers at Capitol Hill in Monrovia,
then one has the right to worry about what’s happening in the remote towns and villages
across this country, beginning with the interior part of the very Montserrado County that
hosts the so-called capital city.
e. In August 2015, a senior court official in Grand Cape Mount County was heard bitterly
complaining about how court authorities in the county [which is symptomatic of the entire
country] imprudently, unprofessionally and maliciously incarcerate too many persons
beyond the capacity of detention facilities. He said they were doing this by just
mischievously and intentionally issuing out writs of arrest in very simple cases that only
required writs of summon (ELBC, August 2014) etc. and etc.
Note: Meanwhile, the very credible US State Department is on record for consistently
indicating that the Liberian Judiciary or legal system does not, as yet, know the very basics
of the law, and that there is a no justice as yet in the country since 1822 etc. and etc.
Here is a caveat from Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. pertaining to such a dangerous and nasty
situation like that of Liberia, which can now be proven beyond all doubts: According to Dr.
King, “.... Law and order exist for the purpose of establishing justice, but when they fail in
this purpose, they become the dangerous structured dams that block the flow of all social
progress.” To keep obeying such a system is just a painful act of ignoring our consciences
while insulting ourselves and prolonging our own agony, including the pain and anguish of
our huge suffering majority in this country. For God will hold us responsible for being
equally guilty of all these big crimes, including the broad day white-collar terrorism and
genocide associated with this very nasty Liberian tale of burning our consciences with hot
iron for the sake of food and money.
5. Last, but not the least, apart from the numerous proofs of Liberia’s illegitimacy that we
have expounded above, Liberia is just a downright illegitimate state arrangement from
countless other respects, again, a few of which are as follows:
 13

a. The revered Greek Philosopher, Aristotle once said, “At his best, man is the noblest of all
animals, [but] separated from the law and justice, man becomes the worst of all animals.”
This is Americo-Liberia’s sad fate – with all due respect to all of our good and innocent
citizens. From the perspective of running a country and a government, using the skill of
politics and its most powerful tool called Civics, only one instrument or document can
generally handle the issue of law and justice, and this book, this instrument, this document,
is called the Constitution. This is also called the Organic Law, or the Supreme Law of a
country. Liberia’s part of Supreme and ‘sacred’ law, its Constitution, is so messy, dirty,
unfair and bloody; and as such, does not need to be obeyed any longer until we redo it.
Here are some of our justifying arguments against this strong claim: This book, written
mainly by self-interest seeking, criminal politicians, and written under very unfavorable
conditions and atmosphere when blood was being wasted in every corner, and secret
beheadings taking place all across the country in the early 1980s, is full of lies and all sorts
of criminal dualities. Few of its lies and criminal provisions can be found in such passages
as Articles 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 20, most of 21, 26, 27(b), 97, and many more. In fact, this
constitution does not respect our people; it is a recipe for chaos, as alluded even by the
United Nations; it promotes impunity; it promotes perversion of the law; it promotes
selfishness; it was used to kill and ‘rekill’ almost 1 million of our poor citizens through
some senseless war, and through the ever-corrupt Supreme Court of Liberia; it was used as
a tool to send more than 1 million of our citizens into exile, making them suffer and face
humiliating conditions and harsh fate including disgraceful deaths without befitting burials
outside of their home; it is being used to shield productive President Tolbert and his
officials’ killers forever; it was used to deny our people reparations after criminals took
advantage of its loopholes to set our people’s lives far back for scores and decades; it has
been used to perpetuate the sufferings of our people by maintaining and sustaining a
criminal gang in place called government, and to keep bringing criminals to power to
inflict more harm on our good people forever etc. In addition to these very damaging and
dangerous characteristics, the Liberian constitution carries in it a lot of provisions which
the authorities themselves know that they are unable and unprepared to implement, but
keep them on the books for formality. This too is very dangerous, as by this, the
constitution regards certain articles as more important than others, while other articles are
mere suggestions that can be trampled upon anyhow. We just can’t keep obeying such a
dangerous joke called constitution. The consequences can very deadly and far-reaching in
the end, both in this life, and before our Creator.
b. As we mentioned somewhere in this text, our Social Contract can best be reflected also in
our national symbols and emblems, thus giving legitimacy to our civic arrangement or state
arrangement. And let’s not forget what we said earlier that the legal and moral legitimacy
of a state sit right within its underlying Social Contract, according to the Civic and Social
architects and experts. A national symbol represents an idea or a reality that means so
much to a group of people. In a state, the flag, the seal, the motto, the national anthem, the
national holidays, the folk heroes and heroines etc. constitute the national symbols. These
symbols inspire citizens to be more patriotic. They represent the hopes and aspirations of
all citizens. National emblems and symbols steer every citizen in the same direction in
fulfilment of common national objectives. Symbols and emblems serve to hold the mirror
to the value of the country. They help to instill confidence in, and also to gain the
 14

commitment of all citizens to work for the common good of the country. They help place
focus on the core values of society, and they are an embodiment of the principles and ideas
of society, while motivating all citizens to perform well etc.
But sadly, Liberia’s part of National symbols and emblems first off, kill and insult all of the
indigenous people of this country, which constitute 99% of the population. These symbols
consider our people as mere dogs and other wild or domesticated animals who deserve
nothing good out of life; and as we fully elaborated upon from the beginning of this text,
they were designed to validate and defend the 4 BIG LIES that laid Liberia’s foundation
pillars, and the subsequent bloody LIES that continue to sustain Americo-Liberia.
c. Claims of the illegitimacy of Liberia are not coming from us, the Plain Truth Revolution
alone. Official proofs are being provided and corroborated, first by history explicitly, then
by prominent institutions and opinion leaders, before finally, by the very officials of
government through their own pronouncements and actions on a very regular basis. Here
we go with a small sample:
1. The piece of land, Cape Mesurado, on which the building and nurturing of the state
called Liberia began, was sadly arm robbed by US Naval Captain Robert Field
Stockton of the USS Alligator Battleship in late December 1821, according to very
credible American sources. Note: If the American Colonization Society and the United
States Government will disprove this claim, then we will demand them, that is, the
United States Government, to produce Cape Mesurado’s land deal so that we all find
out how much they paid for our land in 1821 from our dear forefathers, and through
what means. It should not be difficult to produce this land deal because Wikipedia tells
us that all of ACS’s documents were turned over to the Library of Congress in
Washington DC at the bankruptcy of this NGO, just lately in 1964.
2. Liberia is an illegitimate statehood arrangement because history narrates that the club or
NGO that established the country in 1822, and professedly granted it independence in
1847, called the American Colonization Society was a racist ‘business’ NGO that could
not even sustain itself, let alone sustain the so-called colony that it established. And so
after they completed their very deadly business mission of ridding the United States of
mischievous Black American criminals and dumping them on our productive soil in
about 20 years, ACS ultimately went bankrupt, and existed only on paper for a couple
of years, until it was officially pronounced closed down in 1964. Such an entity can
NEVER be a legitimate grantor of independence status to any proud and God-fearing
people on the face of this Planet, and even no serious, productive, and proud people will
ever allow such funny story to characterize their foundation.
3. As we clarified at the beginning of this work, the National Convention of June to July
1847 that professedly formalized Liberia’s sovereignty and independence was
unrepresentative, unfair, and criminal, thus making its offshoot, Republic of Liberia,
illegitimate. This National Convention was attended only by the Johnsons, Grippons,
McClains, and Tubmans, who represent 1 ethnic group, the 17th questionable one for
that matter, to the bloody exclusion of the Samukais, Zeagans, Kromahs, Weahs, and
Cherrues, who represent the 16 original African ethnic groups, and the recognized
owners of the land. By the way, it takes no rocket science to declare with the greatest of
 15

emphasis and precision that NOTHING designed by America and her Americo-
Liberians will EVER mean well for the 16 tribal African groups of this country, let
alone a Social Contract designed by them – not because America is bad, but because
this relationship we have with them, rooted in December 1816 is just demned well
NASTY and CURSED.
d. Although part of the first 4 LIES that laid Liberia’s treacherous foundation, it’s better to
lay more emphasis here on Lie #1, since it is the main theory upon which Liberia was built.
In the world of business, this statement qualifies as the Vision Statement or the Unique
Selling Proposition of the entity, Liberia. Thus we say here, Liberia is an illegitimate civic
arrangement because it was constructed on a completely false argument or premise.
According to several historical accounts, including the ones we provided earlier, the main
argument propounded by the American Colonization Society, as approved by the United
States Government, was that “Black American criminals should be shipped, or should be
brought here to ‘Christianize’ and ‘Civilize’ Africa after settling somewhere on this
Western Coast of Africa, which happened to be this place, our precious home, the Grain
Coast. This is a demned Lie, and God’s children don’t subscribe to such a lie from the
Devil’s belly, that’s why we MUST begin now to disobey Liberia in order to change this
funny story in our lives by the grace of God.
e. Liberia is an illegitimate civic arrangement because as old as 194 years of age, it has
proven completely unable to cater for the welfare and wellbeing of all of its citizens in a
structured and systematic manner. Apart from its gross failure to dispense justice, as we
mentioned earlier, this Black American country is terribly unable to provide any other
basic social services such as health, electricity, transportation, water, and so forth. The
current government attests to this painful claim in its present Agenda for Transformation
(AfT) document when it shamefully asserts that by 2030 it will then be able to provide
adequate social services to all of its citizens, and thus be able to attain its legitimacy.
f. The Truth & Reconciliation Commission’s July 2009 report categorically asserts that
Liberia faces a big LEGITIMACY CRISIS!!!!! etc. and etc. Let’s pause here for now.
In the end, American Political Scientist Robert A. Dahl posits Legitimacy as a reservoir,
assuming that, so long that that water is at a given level, stability is maintained within the
society, but if that water falls below its required level, social and political stabilities are
threatened, or stability will absolutely never be achieved.
Now, ladies and gentlemen, fellow citizens, these criteria or list of requirements for legitimacy
are like the list of individual subjects or courses that we do in school, any school for that
matter. At the end of the school year or semester, to determine whether you performed well or
passed to the next class, these individual subject’s grades are tallied and an average is derived.
So, while you may not pass in all the courses, or score high marks in all, you MUST be able to
obtain a passing average in order to survive. In the case of a country, as we are discussing
Liberia now for example, you must be able to get a passing average in the combined scores of
these individual indicators before ever considering yourself a legitimate country or legitimate
government. Any country falling short of these basic requirements is completely illegitimate,
like dull Americo-Liberia, and MUST go back on the drawing board to readjust its overall
design.
 16

Fellow friends, from all of our 4 years of both theoretical and practical research work on this
criminal, funny civic theory called Liberia; it has since 1822, miserably failed in all these
beautiful criteria, and thus, can NEVER even claim sovereignty or independence, let alone
LEGITIMCY in the first place.
As such, no God-fearing child or well-meaning citizen should ever continue to obey this kind
of false civic theory and its authority any longer, although with objectivity, tolerance, and
respect, so as to maintain relative peace, understanding and stability in the process, since this
kind of strange, harsh, but lifesaving move is actually intended for everyone’s good in the end
by God’s grace. Instead, let everyone of us now get on fire to see to it that all of Liberia’s
original designs from 1822 (meaning its key reason for being established; its Declaration of
Independence; its seal; its motto; its flag; its holidays; its constitution; its name etc.) be
completely redesigned if we ever want peace and prosperity to take firm root once and for all
in our society by God’s unmatched power. Anything short of this hard action means that we
will remain collectively doomed, just as we have evidently been, since 1822.
And someone may say yes, we are completely doomed in the eyes of the Plain Truth
Revolution, but at least, some less than 1% of our population (mainly the Americo-Liberian
group, and a few of their Native collaborators in the thing called Government here) are
enjoying the spoils, traveling to America back and forth, and eating the best of food etc., while
such things as ambitions and desires for the balance 99+% suffering masses to ever live their
potentials are almost non-existent, and majority of this huge group are strangely enjoying the
little crumbs being dropped down by this cruel and criminal less than 1% etc.; and so, we are
satisfied with the status quo, and will move on with our lives without any action that will make
us threaten our current comfort zone. Thus, the Plain Truth Revolution should go to hell with
their forceful demand for unconditional social change.
To anyone with this notion, here is a hint for you. Here is the danger attached to your notion:
The world is a single entity, with some common quality standards and growth requirements
that every group of human beings calling themselves a country, a state, a nation or a territory,
MUST keep making honest efforts to meet. A decision by any group of people to ignore these
basic, but strong obligations to quality and standards, and to live just anyhow, caring less
about the standards of the world, but, out of fear and laziness, wanting to do things their own,
traditional and negative ways, refusing to catch pace, in terms of positive growth, with their
peers on this planet, they pose serious threat to their own existence, and to the peace of our
world. This serious threat emanating from laziness and fear to take strong, sweeping actions at
change and development, could blow up into everyone’s face from different angles, including
Spiritual, Security, and Dependency etc. points of view.
For example, (a), which is the Spiritual Angle, God has said that, it is He, who provided for
the set up of every country, and that He wants every country or group of people to know Him
and worship Him directly, while thinking and acting for themselves independently, based on
their faith in Him (God), but not to live, or at least always live, at the beck and call of another
man. He went on to say that if a country refuses to uphold this obligation, He will keep them
in a vicious cycle of War, Earthquake, Disease (Epidemic), and Hunger (Famine), to the point
that all their peers and friends will look down upon them. (b) When you don’t move honestly
and swiftly with your development, and in meeting up with the quality standards and
 17

sophistications of our one world, you expose your country and people to different kinds of
vulnerabilities, including criminal maneuvers and manipulations from both within and outside;
your country remains easily penetrable, and your people remain badly exposed to all sorts of
shocks etc. Note that criminals can be economic, military or belligerent, religious, moral, or
the likes, all of which, based upon the serious loopholes found within your ways of doing
things, will flock in by the day. This constitutes the security threats we mentioned earlier.
Then (c) Acute Dependency on your part can also be a huge security risk or threat posed by
you to others, as you badly depend on other people’s part of universally scarce resources to
make every move in your country, including hosting your own elections to select leaders.
When you do this, the people you depend on usually request and sometimes demand you to do
all sorts shameful, or even evil things – even to your own people – just to satisfy their selfish
interests – whether these interests are criminal or not etc. and etc.
Ladies and gentlemen, from our years of researching this Americo-Liberia, these are sadly the
kinds of conditions that this funny Black American Colony has decided to cruelly subject itself
for the rest of its existence on this planet, all because this NASTY collective fate hugely
benefits the triplet of: Wall Street business interests, Americo-Liberians’ always devilish
greed, and the selfish taste of an always few, who find themselves in the higher echelons of the
white-colar terrorist organization here called Government of Liberia.
But our Plain Truth Revolution says God forbid! All this must radically change right now
through the grace and power of our God Almighty. That’s why instead of encouraging you to
go stand on line on October 10, 2017 or November 7, 2017, or any date for that matter, to tell
the world that we are satisfied with all that’s going on here, and that we want it continue – God
forbid – our Revolution says, let Ellen and her people remain there yet, and before UNMIL
goes finally in March 2018, let us plan and conduct the same kind of National Convention
(from June to July 1847) that gave Liberia its Mickey Mouse independence, but this time
around, rather than having only the Tubmans, Johnsons, Bernards, and McClains in
attendance, let this one bring on board all the best brains from each of our ethnic groups
(tribes), our political parties community, our civil society community, our religious groupings,
our Diaspora community etc. for us to boldly and thoroughly debate and lay down new rules
for society together through God’s guidance. Thanks.
After reading this article, or any of the other articles and pamphlets, please share your thoughts
with us at plaintruthrevolution@gmail.com, plaintruthrevolution@yahoo.co.uk, or
plaintruthrevolution@hotmail.com. We are also entertaining any historical documentaries or
any other worthwhile articles intended to further encourage us, or strengthen our case for this
revolution, and any other concerns, using the address above. We moreover have other social
media sites. Our Facebook page is https://web.facebook.com/plaintruth2013. We also have
three discussion groups: a Facebook Group and a Google+ Community, both under the name
Grain Coast (Liberia) Independence Movement (GIM), at https://is.gd/cO3rbV and
https://is.gd/cyZm54 respectively, plus a Google+ Page named plaintruthliberia, which is at
https://is.gd/SnsihD. We additionally have a Twitter and a YouTube presence, with our
Twitter handle being @plaintruthrev, and on YouTube, we are at
http://youtu.be/cTCeDYD8gw. You are encouraged to Google out any of our key documents
or pamphlets by titles as a last option.
 18

Thanks again for your unflinching support to our quest to build a new, better nation, by first,
your willingness to begin constructively disobeying Liberia to make this change possible by
the grace of God. As we are repeating in every work we do, the beginning point is to now
demand a grand National Citizens Convention this 2017, rather than some election that will
take us nowhere. Don’t worry, the Plain Truth Revolution will lead this dialogue process, and
not government by the grace of God.
Note finally that these great revolutionary summaries are 7 in number; and one you are just
concluding, again, is entitled, “Why do we say that Liberia is an illegitimate statehood
arrangement that must be legitimized now, before we take any more steps forward as a
people, again by God’s grace”; and the balance 6 include: (1) Why do we say that another
danger is already at our door steps, unless we do something radically different together now,
to avoid this by God’s grace; (2) Liberia”, A Black American Theory Of Massive Human
Suppression And Oppression – Reasons For Which It Will Remain A Failure Forever -
Unless We Change Everything About It Now – From Name, To Flag, To All Its Theories
(3)More convincing reasons why we say Revolution is the only way out for us now, God
willing, rather than elections and reforms;(4) The overriding reasons for which people are
elected in Liberia; How Liberia understands the science and art of setting up and nurturing
an economy – all being reasons for this dull Black American Colony’s untold poverty”; (5)
The United States and Liberia – two geopolitical entities with very similar founding history,
but one (the US) is an excellent example worth emulating, while the other (Liberia), is a
very horrible example that deserves serious avoidance immediate demolition before it fatally
explodes and harms the world and (6) The Plain Truth Revolution, Its Roadmap, Plus
Governance Plan, For The New Country, And The New Democracy That We Now Demand
To Replace Evil, Failed Liberia, and they all can be found at https://is.gd/yOqxwE.

For our 5 key revolutionary flyers preaching against the continuous holding of fake elections
in ‘Liberia’ like the current or ongoing one, please visit https://is.gd/P38O2J, and some
powerful Anti-Elections 2017 25-page pamphlet that we have also developed, please visit
https://is.gd/yOqxwE.
Thanks once more.