Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Seventy-six aggressive boys were assigned to one of four cells consisting of anger
coping, goal setting, anger coping plus goal setting, and a no treatment cell. The
anger-coping intervention groups were school-based secondary prevention efforts
that utilized social problem-solving and cognitive-behavioral techniques. At the
1 -month follow-up testing, the boys who had been in the anger-coping groups had
reduced their disruptive and aggressive behavior in the classroom, had decreased
their aggression at home, and displayed a nonsignificant tendency for improved
perceptions of self-esteem. Other measures were not significantly affected by the
intervention.
Within a cognitive-behavioral framework, ag- the highest teacher ratings of aggression on the
gression can be conceptualized as a behavioral Missouri Children's Behavior Checklist and were
reaction due in part to distorted and inadequate assigned to the experimental cells on a rotating
cognitive processing of perceived provocations and basis. Teachers were more aware of the specific
frustrations. Because the short-term efficacy of differences between conditions than were parents.
cognitive-behavioral interventions with aggressive The anger-coping groups in the AC and ACGS cells
children has begun to be demonstrated, more met weekly for 12 sessions and focused on increas-
emphasis can focus on generalization issues ad- ing boys' social problem-solving skills, as a sec-
dressing the broadness of the intervention effects, ondary prevention intervention. In the 8-week
and the comparative strength of treatment com- goal-setting treatment, which was a minimal treat-
ponents (Forman, 1980; Hobbs, Moguin, Tyroler, ment intervention, children's weekly goals were
& Lahey, 1980). established in a group, the goals were monitored
The present study used a 2 X 2 factorial design daily by the classroom teacher, and the boys
to compare the separate and combined effects of received contingent reinforcement if appropriate
a cognitive-behavioral condition (Lochman, Nel- goal attainment occurred.
son, & Sims, 1981), and a less intensive goal- Measures were administered prior to the inter-
setting condition. The four experimental cells were vention and were readministered at an average of
anger coping (AC), goal setting (OS), anger coping 4 to 6 weeks following the intervention. The
plus goal setting (ACGS), and an untreated control measures included (a) the Passive Off-Task and
(uc) cell. the combined Disruptive-Aggressive Off-Task Cat-
egories of the Behavior Observation Schedule for
Method Pupils and Teachers (BOSPT; Allen, Chinsky, Lar-
cen, Lochman, & Selinger, 1976), (b) the Aggression
The 76 boys in this study attended eight ele- subscale of the Missouri Children's Behavior
mentary schools and ranged in age from 9 to 12 Checklist (MCBC) completed by parents and teach-
years old. Fifty-three percent of the subjects were ers (Sines, Pauker, Sines, & Owen, 1969), (c) the
black, and the others were white. The subjects had number of alternatives on the Problem Solving
Measures (PSM; Allen et al., 1976), (d) the Coop-
ersmith Self-Esteem Inventory (csi; Allen et al.,
1976), and (e) the boys' social acceptance scores
Acknowledgment is made of the support provided by and peer aggression nominations derived from
the Durham County School System, the Duke University
Medical Center Department of Psychiatry, and the Dur- classmates' sociometric ratings (Allen et al., 1976).
ham Community Guidance Clinic. Interscorer agreement for the BOSPT and the PSM
Requests for reprints should be sent to John E. Loch- was 92% and 83%, respectively. Some of the subjects
man, Box 2906, Duke University Medical Center, Dur- did not have both pretest and follow-up scores for
ham, North Carolina 27710. four of the measures.
915
916 BRIEF REPORTS