Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jessica Tominna
Miles
Pre-Ap English
01 March 2018
Citation:
Dowd, Maureen. “This Snake Can't Shed His Skin.” The New York Times, The New
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/24/opinion/sunday/donald-trump-snake-
dowd.html?rref=collection%2Fcolumn%2Fmaureen-
dowd&action=click&contentCollection=opinion®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version
=latest&contentPlacement=1&pgtype=collection
Maureen Dowd provides an overview of Donald Trump’s actions and the problems that
America faces today with Trump’s actions and how the people aren't doing anything about it.
Her description of Trump in the article is how he relates to a snake because snakes are usually
described as cold, dark, ruthless, emotionless, etc. and his relationship with the National Rifle
Association isn’t getting our issues of mass shootings solved. Dowd claims that as long as Trump
is still around, we most likely aren't going to have our issues with gun control solved.
Tone:
Tominna 2
Dowd uses an informative tone to discuss the topics of gun control and the problems that
America face with issues like Trump's relationship with the NRA.
Context:
with the NRA , however, she could have provided more of a variety of details on a solution to
Appels:
Dowd primarily focuses on connecting towards bringing out emotion to her audience.
She references a variety of examples with past events occurring in America and the outcome of
Organization:
The article follows a chronological order with a few background information before
Diction/Word Choice:
The article is readable and can be understood by people with some sort of little education
and background information on gun control. The vocabulary is simple and uses words such
“collateral damage” and “intolerable” to describe the outcomes of these mass shootings.
Tominna 3
“Dowd’s article is to inform the public on the horrors of gun control. It starts off as her
describing a women taking in Trump being described as a snake and the issues on the NRA is
heading nowhere in America’s eyes. The author's main claim is to inform the audience of the
terrible actions that Trump has done. The thesis in the article is not stated directly until maybe
the end of the article where she becomes bias to the one side on supporting gun control. She
bases most of the text on background story and examples of outcomes of mass shootings. The
columnist states mostly facts and opinions backing it up with information and evidence. Some
information that I’d like to know is if there even is a solution, how would she progress forward
in helping gun control issues? How can America stop these mass shootings from occurring and
how can we be safer from guns? I agree with the authors claims for the reason of most of the
piece being informative with straight up facts and her bias opinion of gun control issues. Before
this article, I felt as if I weren’t educated as much on the subject and how much Trump plays a
role in this deciding factor, but after reading, the passion felt emotional due to the fact that an