ene
SPECIAL REPORT
Horizontal Shellside
Thermosiphon
Reboilers
Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers are much more
effective at low temperature differences than kettle and
vertical thermosiphon units.
Salim B. Yilmaz, Heat Transfer Research, Inc.
orizontal shellside thermosiphon reboilers are
shell-and-tube heat exchangers that are positioned
horizontally and boil the process fluid on the out-
side of the tubes (shell side). They are used commonly in
petroleum and chemical processing plants to vaporize pro-
cess fluids and generate steam.
‘The horizontal thermosiphon reboiler installation, Figure
1, has two types of feed systems: recirculating and once-
through. Both feed systems can be used for distillation col-
tumns, but only the recirculating type is used with fire-tube
waste heat boilers that have a steam drum in place of the
distillation column. The process liquid feed flows through a
downcomer (inlet piping), and the two-phase mixture from
the reboiler returns to the distillation column or the steam
drum through a riser (exit piping). The density difference
between the liquid in the column and the two-phase mix-
ture in the heat exchanger and the riser causes the ther-
mosiphon circulation through the reboiler.
‘The heating medium (hot fluid) flows inside the tubes in
single or multiple tube pass arrangements. The hot fluid
could be steam, hot oil, process fluid (gas or liquid), or
S.B. Yilmaz, a research engineer at Heat Transfer Research, Inc.
specializing in boiling heat transfer and two-phase flow research,
correlations, and model development, has authored a number of pa-
pers on boiling, enhanced surfaces, and the design of reboilers and
‘heat exchangers. A lecturer in chemical engineering at the Unie. of
Southern California, he earned his B.S.Ch.E. degree from Bospho-
vous Unie. and his MS. and Ph.D. degrees in chemical engineering
from the Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Alhambra, CA 91802
Figure 1. Horizontal thermosiphon reboiler: a. recirculating feed
system; b. once-through feed system.
waste heat gas streams. Boiling on the shell side is attrac
tive in a design when the heating medium is fouling or cor-
rosive. Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers compared to ket-
tle reboilers are less likely to be fouled by the process fluid
because of their good circulation and lower percent vapori-
zation. Vertical tubeside thermosiphon reboilers are less at-
tractive than horizontal reboilers when the heat transfer
area requirements are large due to mechanical considera-
tions (eg., distillation column height). Fluids with moderate
viscosity boil better in horizontal thermosiphon reboilers
than in vertical units. It is also possible to use low-finned
and enhanced boiling tubes on the shell side of horizontal
thermosiphon reboilers.
‘The vertical height of the riser between the horizontal
heat exchanger and the column discharge nozzle allows a
Chemical Engineering Progress.i
Figure 2. Shell types selected for horizontal thermosiphon reboilers
very flexible hydraulic design. The static head require-
ments are lower for horizontal thermosiphon reboilers than
vertical ones. Because of their high circulation rates, the
temperature rise for the boiling fluid across horizontal
thermosiphon reboilers is lower than that for kettle reboil-
ers, especially for wide boiling range mixtures. This leads to
higher local boiling temperature differences for the hori-
zontal thermosiphon and, therefore, higher heat transfer
rates,
There are certain disadvantages associated with horizon-
tal thermosiphon reboilers. Fluids with fouling tendencies
should not be boiled on the shell side which is hard to
clean, Horizontal heat exchangers require large plot areas
and more expensive foundations and structures. If a re-
hoiler system is not designed for good flow distribution, in-
adequate circulation on the shell side usually results in con-
centration of the heavier components in wide boiling range
mixtures, with a resulting rise in bubble point temperatur
A pinch can occur between the hot and cold fluid temper
ture profiles, reducing heat transfer rates.
Phe thermal design methods for horizontal thermosiphon
reboilers discussed by Kern (1) and Collins (2) are based on
rules of thumb and are very conservative. Those proposed
by Palen (3), and Fair and Klip (4) for shellside flow boiling
may be acceptable in principle. However, the validity of heat
transfer and pressure drop calculations and the proposed
correlations depend on how accurately they predict the per-
formance of industrial-size units. Unfortunately, these
models usually need to he adjusted for the effects of several
parameters, Since there are no published data on thermal
and hydraulic performance for shellside flow boiling, this is