1.

The chart compares the percentages of total money allocation in terms offor different public
sectors in UAE in the year 2000.
The pie chart compares the ten public sectors of UAE in terms of the money allocation in the
year 2000.
It is clear that the money spent on social security and health service was by far the highest and
other public sectors’ expenditures were mostly equal.
It is clear that the amounts of money allocated to social security and heath service sectors
comprised/made up the majority of the total money spent by the UAE’s government in 2000.
The shares for other fields mentioned in the pie chart were mostly equal.
There was a slight difference between the shares for other fields mentioned in the pie chart.

The UAE government spent around 603 percent of budget on three areas namely social security;,
health and personal social services and Education. While health and personal social services cost
53 billion, the social security’s money allocation was doubled it, at 100 billion.
The total spending for social security AED was highest, at 100 billion, followed by that of health
and personal social services AED, which was around one half that figure, at 53 billion.

Educational money feeThe figure for education sector came at the third place, at 38 billion.

Transport, Industry, Agriculture and job employment sectors were received allocated/received
the least money from the UAE’s government, with 9 billion, and 13 billion respectively. Other
expenditure sector, defense, debit debt interest were tied at a same level of money paid by the
government, at around 23 billion. Meanwhile, 17 billion of money was allocated to law and
olrder area in comparison with 15 billion to housing, heritage and environment.
154 words

2.

The map describes how the village of Ryemouth has changed from 1995 to nowsince 1995.
Over the period shown, the town has become more urbanized with far more places for living,
shopping, and entertainment and shopping. However, itthe town now had has less natural beauty
at the present. Thatthan it used to be in 1995.
By now, In the Eastern of the village, thea farm land and a forest park in the northeastern corner
of the town have totally disappeared and they werebeen replaced by a brand new golf course and
two tennis stadiumscourts. There were mMore houses along the center main road crossing the
town from the northwest to the southeast which was widen to the Western side of the town:have
been constructed. The main road has also been extended to the west to accommodate more
houses that have just been built. 12 houses in 1995 compared to 16 ones at the moment.
To In the Ssouthern part of the layout, thea fishing port has been destroyed, and so a new
apartments were have been built in on the site where athe fish market used to be. At the opposite
side of the main road crossing from the west to the east of the town, athe shops that which
belonged to the yearexisted in 1995 was have been transformed into anew restaurants. There was
has been no change in the positions of both hotel and café/The hotel and café have remained over
the same period shown, but a new car park was has been established erected right next to the
hotel.
181 words
3.

- 1985: Canada: highest: 18 tones; EC: 17; Autraslia: 15

In 1985, Canada exported the greatest amount of wheat among the three areas shown, at around
18 million tons, followed by EC and Australia, at approximately 17 million tones and 15 million
tons respectively.
- By 1986: Autralia: increase by 2 tons: WHILE Canada and EC decreased by 3 tons.
By 1986, the figure for Australia had increased by about 2 tons, WHILE those of Canada and EC
had decreased/dropped by nearly 3 tons.
- Between 1986 and 1988: Canada: significant rise; rose significantly; reaching a peak of
25 tons; WHEREAS Australia: saw a steady decline. EC remained relatively stable.
Between 1986 and 1988, Canada’s total amount of wheat export rose significantly, reaching a
peak of about 25 tons, whereas the figure for Australia saw a steady decline to around 12 tons.
EC’s figure remained relatively stable over the same period.

The line graph compares the amounts òof wheat which was exported in three areas namely
Australia, Canada and European Community over a period of 5 years.
The line graph compares three different areas in terms of the amounts of wheat exported over a
period of 5 years.

It is clear that there was a downward trend of in the amount of wheat exported byexporting
wheat in Australia, while EC saw and an upward trend in its wheat exportation.in EC. But in
Canada,’s wheat exporting output fluctuated with a high fluencyfrequency.
Over the first 34 years of the period shown, Canada remained the top of exporting wheatwheat
exporter among the three countries listed, with a dramatically increase from nearly 19 billion of
tones in 1985 to 25 billion tons in 1988. Over the same period, Australian production the figure
for Australia dropped from the second place in 1985 to the last in 1988 at 15 billion. EC kept its
production relatively stable at around 15 billion of tones over the same period shown.
The rest of the period saw a significasignificantnt drop in Canada’s figure to under 15 billion of
tones in 1985, an increase of roughly 11 billion of tones decline followed by a dramatic increase
of European Community to take the lead from Canada. In 1990, there was over 21 billion tones
oftons of wheat exportation in Europe compared to Canada with nearly 19 billion. Australian
output gradually decreased then reached the bottom at approximately 11 billion of tones.
197 words (Bài này dài quá e viết quá 220 chữ phải xóa bớt ý đi)
Over the rest of the period shown, the figure for Canada decreased dramatically to the lowest
point of fewer than 15 tons of wheat, followed by a significant rise in the final year to the same
level as that of the year 1985. While EC’s wheat exportation output increased steadily to well
above 20 tons, that of Australia experienced a gradual fall to just above 10 tons.