Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RULE 15
MOTIONS
What is a motion?
A motion is an application for relief other than by a pleading. (S1 R15) In a motion, you
are asking for another relief other than the main cause of action or the main defense.
1. The motion must be in writing except those made in open court or in the course of a
hearing or trial,
2. It should state the relief sought and the grounds for it and where required by the Rules
or necessary to prove facts alleged therein, shall be accompanied by supporting affidavits
and papers.
Section 2 to Section 6
3. It should be set for hearing unless it is a non litigious motion or an ex parte motion. The
motion should be served in such manner as to ensure receipt by the other party at least
3 days before the hearing. ( 3 day notice requirement ) . The date of hearing must not be
later than 10 days from the date of filing of the motion .
4. It should contain a notice of hearing , which shall be addressed to all parties concerned
and shall specify the time and date of hearing.
The most important requirements are that the motion should be set for hearing and should
contain a notice of hearing. Without these, the motion is but a " mere SCRAP of paper."
To whom should the notice be addressed?
MOTION DAY
Except for motions requiring immediate action, all motions shall be scheduled for hearing
on Friday afternoons, or if Friday is a non-working day, in the afternoon of the next
working day.
1|Page
Omnibus Motion Rule
Sec 8. A motion attacking a pleading, order, judgment, or proceeding shall include all
objections then available, and all objections not so included shall be deemed waived.
Cases
Lack of previous notice of hearing of the motion to dismiss granted by the court, was fully
cured by the aggrieved party‘s motion for reconsideration which was overruled by the
court, ―and the previous objection of lack of notice or opportunity to be heard fully met.
What the law prohibits ―is not the absence of previous notice, but the absolute absence
thereof and lack of opportunity to be heard
Service of a copy of a motion containing the time and place of hearing of that motion is a
mandatory requirement, and failure of the movants to comply with these requirements
renders their motions fatally defective.
However, there are exceptions to this rule where liberal construction has been allowed in
cases:
Tan v, CA, 295 SCRA 755 (1998)
Sec 5 of Rule 15 of the rules of court that the notice shall be directed to the parties
concerned and shall state the time and place for the hearing of motions are
mandatory.Petitioner failed to observe very elementary rules of procedure which is fatal
defect in case at bar.
3. Where the resolution of the motion is addressed solely to the sound and judicious
discretion of the court; and
2|Page
4. Where the injustice to the adverse party is not commensurate to the degree of his
thoughtlessness in not complying with the procedure prescribed.
Kinds of Motions
LITIGIOUS - one which the court may not act upon without prejudicing the rights of the
adverse party.
NON-LITIGIOUS - one which the court may act upon without prejudicing the rights of
the adverse party.
LITIGIOUS MOTION
1. Motion for Reconsideration.
2. Motion to Dismiss.
3. Motion to declare defendant in Default.
4. Motion for Execution.
NON-LITIGIOUS MOTION
1. Motion for extension of time to file answer.
2.Motion for postponement.
3.Motion for extension of time to file record
on appeal.
4. Motion to set case for pre-trial.
3|Page
Rule 16 Motion To Dismiss
SECTION 1. Grounds.—Within the time for but before filing the answer to the complaint
or pleading asserting a claim, a motion to dismiss may be made on any of the following
grounds:
(a) That the court has no jurisdiction over the person of the defending party;
(b) That the court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the claim;
(c) That venue is improperly laid;
(d) That the plaintiff has no legal capacity to sue;
(e) That there is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause;
(f) That the cause of action is barred by a prior judgment or by the statute of limitations;
(g) That the pleading asserting the claim states no cause of action;
(h) That the claim or demand set forth in the plaintiff’s pleading has been paid, waived,
abandoned, or otherwise extinguished;
(i) That the claim on which the action is founded is unenforceable under the provisions
of the statute of frauds; and
(j) That a condition precedent for filing the claim has not been complied with. (1a)
What are the grounds not deemed waived even if not raised in a motion to dismiss or
answer?
4|Page
(Motion to Dismiss)
(CAPTION)
MOTION TO DISMISS
DISCUSSION
A cursory reading of the Summons and Return of Service would readily show
that the copies of the Summons dated 08 May 2001 and the Complaint and
its corresponding annexes were allegedly delivered and tendered upon the
Movant _____________ INC. through a certain Maria Clara alleged to be the
authorized personnel of Movant _____________ INC., Bacolod City on 29
August 2001. Copies of the said Summons and Return of Service that form
part of the records on the case are hereto pleaded as integral part of this
Motion;
"Section 11. Service upon domestic private juridical entity.- When the
defendant is a corporation, partnership or association organized under the
laws of the Philippines with a juridical personality, service may be made on
the president, managing partner, general manager, corporate secretary,
treasurer, or in-house counsel" (underscoring ours)
It bears no further emphasis that the service of the summons was done on a
person who is not included in the exclusive enumeration provided for under
the said Section, as service was done only on an alleged authorized personnel
of the Movant Corporation;
5|Page
This new revision of the Rules of Court for the service of summon is a clear
departure from the old rule as stated in Section 13, Rule 14 of the Rules of
Court which provided that:
It must be equally noted that the changes in the new rules are substantial
and not just general semantics as the new rules restricted the service of
summons on persons clearly enumerated therein. In effect, the new provision
makes it more specific and clear such that in the case of the word "manager",
it was made more precise and changed to "general manager", "secretary" to
"corporate secretary", and excluding therefrom agent and director;
PRAYER
(COUNSEL)
(NOTICE OF HEARING)
(EXPLANATION)
COPY FURNISHED:
OPPOSING COUNSEL
6|Page
A Notice of Hearing is a prepared legal document that invokes all parties to hear a motion and
may be emitted by any party. ... One example is a motion to rule a defendant is not responding
to summons (to rule against the defendant automatically). Another example is a defendant's
motion to object to the summons.
NOTICE OF HEARING
Atty. _______________________
Counsel for the _______________
Counsel's Address of Record_____
Greetings: Please take notice that the foregoing Motion for _____________
shall be submitted for the consideration and approval of the Honorable Court
on Friday, __date__, at ________ (a.m./p.m.) or as soon as counsel and
matter may be heard.
COUNSEL
EXPLANATION
COUNSEL
7|Page
MOTION TO AMEND INFORMATION
The rule on amendment of an information is found under Section 14, Rule 110 of the
Rules of Court: A complaint or information may be amended, in form or in substance,
without leave of court, at anytime before the accused enters his plea. After the plea and
during the trial, a formal amendment may only be made with leave of court and when it can be
done without causing prejudice to the rights of the accused. However, any amendment before plea,
which downgrades the nature of the offense charged in or excludes any accused from the
complaint or information, can be made only upon motion by the prosecutor, with notice
to the offended party and with leave of court. The court shall state its reasons in resolving
the motion and copies of its order shall be furnished all parties, especially the offended
party. If it appears at any time before judgment that a mistake has been made in charging
the proper offense, the court shall dismiss the original complaint or information upon the
filing of a new one charging the proper offense in accordance with section 11, Rule 119,provided the
accused would not be placed in double jeopardy. The court may require the witnesses to give bail
for their appearance at the trial. In fine, before the accused enters a plea, a formal or
substantial amendment of the complaint or information may be made without leave of
court. After the entry of a plea, only a formal amendment maybe made but with leave of
court and only if it does not prejudice the rights of the accused.
A substantial amendment consists of the recital of facts constituting the offense charged
and determinative of the jurisdiction of the court. All other matters are merely of form.The
following have been held to be mere formal amendments: (1) new allegations which relate
only to the range of the penalty that the court might impose in the event of conviction; (2)
an amendment which does not charge another offense different or distinct from that
charged in the original one; (3) additional allegations which do not alter the prosecution's
theory of the case so as to cause surprise to the accused and affect the form of defense
he has or will assume; (4) an amendment which does not adversely affect any substantial
right of the accused; and (5) an amendment that merely adds specifications to eliminate
vagueness in the information and not to introduce new and material facts, and merely
states with additional precision something which is already contained in the original information and
which adds nothing essential for conviction for the crime charged. The test as to whether
a defendant is prejudiced by the amendment is whether a defense under the information
as it originally stood would be available after the amendment is made, and whether any evidence
defendant might have would be equally applicable to the information in the one form as in
8|Page
the other. An amendment to an information which does not change the nature of the
crime alleged therein does not affect the essence of the offense or cause surprise or deprive
the accused of an opportunity to meet the new averment had each been held to be one of form and not
of substance. [Ricarze v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 160451, February 9, 2007,515 SCRA 302] More
importantly, reinvestigation is required in cases involving a substantial amendment of the
information. Due process of law demands that no substantial amendment of
an information may be admitted without conducting another or a new preliminary
investigation. In Matalam v. The 2nd Division of the Sandiganbayan, [G.R. No. 165751,
April 12, 2005] the Court ruled that a substantial amendment in an information entitles an
accused to another preliminary investigation, unless the amended information contains a
charge related to or is included in the original Information
9|Page
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
NATIONAL CAPITAL JUDICIAL REGION
Branch 43, Manila
ABCDE BANK,
Plaintiff,
PIOLO PASCUA,
Defendant,
X
-------------------------------X
PLAINTIFF, through the undersigned counsel, before this Honorable Court respectfully
moves that the case be set for status conference preferably November 29, 2016 at 8:30 A.M. to
determine the status of its Motion for Execution.
PRAYER
10 | P a g e
Counsel for the Plaintiff
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
NATIONAL CAPITAL JUDICIAL REGION
Branch 43, Manila
AKU SADO,
Accused,
X------------------------X
Accused, AKU SADO, through the undersigned counsel, respectfully states that:
1. The Honorable Court issued a Bench Warrant of Arrest dated June 22, 2016 directing
the apprehension of accused for failure to appear during the Pre-Trial on June 17, 2016.
2. The records of the case would show that accused was not personally informed of the
supposed pre-trial setting on the said date, resulting in his absence.
3. The Notice of Pre-Trial was sent through registered mail to the address of the accused
but per Registry Return Receipt, a certain Pedro Juan, a "security guard", received the same on
June 2, 2016.
3. The said Notice of Pre-Trial was never turned over by the said Pedro Juan to accused.
4. Accused sincerely apologizes to this Honorable Court and the other party for whatever
inconveniences his actions may have caused.
11 | P a g e
5. Accused most respectfully begs this Honorable Court to immediately lift the bench
warrant in the interest of substantial justice.
6. Accused shall endeavor to attend all succeeding hearings in the above-captioned case.
If accused anticipates that he may not be able to appear for just and valid reasons, he shall
immediately inform this Honorable Court.
7. This motion is not intended to delay the proceedings of this case but solely for the
reasons stated above.
(place) , (date) .
NOTICE OF HEARING
ATTY. AB CD
Private Prosecutor
2233 Zamora Street, Pasay City
12 | P a g e
Please be notified that the undersigned will submit the foregoing motion for the consideration
and approval of the Court on _________________ at ______________.
(place) , (date) .
ATTY. AB CD
Private Prosecutor
2233 Zamora Street, Pasay City
13 | P a g e
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
NATIONAL CAPITAL JUDICIAL REGION
Branch 43, Manila
- versus -
Dingding Dantes,
Accused.
x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
ACCUSED, through counsel, respectfully moves for the lifting of the Order for
issuance of warrant for his arrest issued on June 24, 2014 (copy of which is hereto
attached as Annex "A") on the following grounds:
1. Accused was never served a copy of the complaint filed against him. The records will
show that he did not receive it nor was it received by a duly authorized rep. A copy
of the sheriff's return is hereto attached as Annex "B";
2. The records will show that the accused was never served any copy of a subpoena or
notice of hearing at any stage of the proceedings. All notices appear to have been
delivered in a business establishment used to be rented by the accused in the past
which had already been closed and unoccupied long before the process was served;
14 | P a g e
4. Accused was therefore, not given an opportunity to be heard and effectively deprived
of hisconstitutional right to due process.
PRAYER
Respectfully submitted.
ATTY. VX YZ
NOTICE OF HEARING
PROSECUTOR MARIENROVERA
Office of the City Prosecutor, Manila
ATTY. AB CD
Private Prosecutor
2233 Zamora Street, Pasay City
Greetings!
15 | P a g e
Please take notice that the undersigned counsel will submit the foregoing
Motion to the Honorable Court on July 5, 2014 at 8:30 in the morning for its favorable
consideration and approval.
VX YZ
PROSECUTOR MARIENROVERA
Office of the City Prosecutor, Manila
ATTY. AB CD
Private Prosecutor
2233 Zamora Street, Pasay City
16 | P a g e
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT
NATIONAL CAPITAL JUDICIAL REGION
Branch 61, Makati
ABCD BANK,
- versus -
ELIZA SOBERANO,
Defendant.
x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
1. Defendant was declared to be in default on April 11, 2014 when she failed to file her
answer within the reglementary period. Herein attached as Annex "1" is the said
Order.
2. Defendant begs for a reconsideration of the said Order for the reason that she did not
receive a copy of the complaint nor any summons from this Honorable Court
regarding the above cited case. She only received on April 23, 2014 a copy of the
Order dated April 11, 2014, already declaring her in default. She immediately sought
assistance from the Public Attorney's Office to avail of any remedies.
3. In the interest of substantial justice and for the reason earlier stated, defendant begs
thecompassion of this Honorable Court to admit her attached Answer. Delay in the
proceedings of this case was never intended.
17 | P a g e
PRAYER
Respectfully submitted.
By:
NOTICE OF HEARING
Clerk of Court
METC Branch 61, Makati City
Greetings:
18 | P a g e
Please submit the foregoing for the consideration and approval of this Honorable
Court at the soonest possible time or on May 17, 2015 at 8:30 in the morning.
19 | P a g e
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT
NATIONAL CAPITAL JUDICIAL REGION
Branch 61, Makati
ABCD BANK,
- versus -
ELIZA SOBERANO,
Defendant.
x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
(place) , (date) .
_______________
Plaintiff/Defendant
NOTICE OF HEARING
20 | P a g e
NAME OF DEFENDANT (If filed by the Plaintiff)
Please be notified that the undersigned will submit the foregoing motion for the
consideration and approval of the Court on _________________ at ______________.
(place) , (date) .
_______________
Plaintiff/Defendant
21 | P a g e
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT
NATIONAL CAPITAL JUDICIAL REGION
Branch 61, Makati
ABCD BANK,
- versus -
ELIZA SOBERANO,
Defendant.
x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
The parties agree that the approval of this agreement by the Court shall put an end
to this litigation, except for purposes of execution in case of default.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the parties respectfully pray that the court
approve this agreement and render judgment on the basis thereof.
SO ORDERED.
(place) , (date) .
22 | P a g e
_________ __________
Plaintiff Defendant
ABC CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
- versus
- Civil Case No. 111222
2. However, due to volume and pressure of work, coupled with other equally
important and urgent professional commitments, the
undersigned counsel cannot complete the said Comment to the Offer of
Evidence within the period required and will need an additional ten (10) days
from August 8, 2013 or until August 18, 2013 within which to do so;
3. This motion is being filed due to the reason above-stated and not for the
purpose of delaying the instant case.
23 | P a g e
Quezon City, Philippines. August 30, 2013.
ATTY. VX YZ
Counsel for Defendant
NOTICE OF HEARING
Greetings!
Kindly submit the foregoing motion for consideration and approval of this
Honorable Court immediately upon receipt hereof.
VX YZ
ATTY. AB CD
Counsel for the Defendant
2233 Zamora Street, Pasay City
Please take notice that counsel has requested for the approval of
this motion immediately upon receipt.
VX YZ
24 | P a g e
Republic of the Philippines
National Capital Judicial Region
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT
Branch LXII (62)
Makati City
AMER KADO,
Plaintiff,
- versus
- Civil Case No. 111222
KARLA BAN,
Defendant.
x-------------------------------------------x
MOTION TO INHIBIT
2. That it appears that there is danger of partiality, bias and prejudice in favor
of the plaintiffs for the reason that Honorable Judge Maka Tarungan is related
to the plaintiff within the 4th civil degree of consanguinity;
3. That defendant will be prejudiced if the Honorable Judge continues to hear the
above-entitled case;
25 | P a g e
NOTICE OF HEARING
Greetings!
Please take notice that the undersigned counsel will submit the foregoing
Motion to the HonorableCourt on August 27, 2013 at 8:30 in the morning for
its favorable consideration and approval.
BEN TONG
EXPLANATION
BEN TONG
26 | P a g e
STERLING BANK OF ASIA,
Plaintiff,
- versus
- Civil Case No. 111222
1. On May 5, 2013, plaintiff sued defendant for a sum of money in the amount of
Two Hundred Thousand Pesos (P200,000.00);
2. In his Answer, defendant admitted the obligation and merely stated that he
was asking to be given an extension of time to pay his obligation but that
plaintiff instead filed the Complaint;
3. Said Answer has not tendered any issue and in fact it can be read therefrom
that defendant admitted the obligation; consequently, a judgment on the
pleadings may be rendered.
ATTY. VX YZ
Counsel for Plaintiff
NOTICE OF HEARING
ATTY. AB CD
27 | P a g e
Counsel for the Defendant
1234 Zamora Street, Pasay City
Greetings!
Please take notice that the undersigned counsel will submit the foregoing
Motion to the Honorable Court on August 27, 2013 at 8:30 in the morning for
its favorable consideration and approval.
VX YZ
ATTY. AB CD
Counsel for the Defendant
2233 Zamora Street, Pasay City
EXPLANATION
VX YZ
28 | P a g e
Republic of the Philippines
National Capital Judicial Region
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Branch 1, Manila
____________________,
Plaintiff,
-versus- Civil
Case No.
For ______________
______________________,
Defendant.
x------------------x
GROUNDS
ARGUMENTS
Atty. Y
Counsel for Defendant
29 | P a g e
(With Notice of Hearing, Proof of Service and Explanation)
- versus
- Crim. Case Nos. 555555
3. A year had already lapsed, and the prosecution has not instituted any action to
revive the case; hence, accused respectfully moves that the case be
permanently dismissed.
Other reliefs just and equitable in the premises are likewise sought.
30 | P a g e
Makati City, Philippines. September 2, 2013.
ATTY. VX YZ
Counsel for the Accused
NOTICE OF HEARING
Greetings!
PROSECUTOR WX
ATTY. AB CD
Private Prosecutor
2233 Zamora Street, Pasay City
Plaintiff,
versus - for
Frustrated Murder
31 | P a g e
AKU SADO,
Accused.
x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
1. That the instant case was file by virtue of an Inquest Proceedings conducted
by Inquest Prosecutor Jeri Koh on February 20, 2014;
2. That the herein accused failed to submit any counter affidavit or any
controverting evidence in his behalf;
3. That the accused believes that if he will be given an opportunity to answer the
charges against him, the resolution could have been different;
4. That the accused most respectfully prays that a preliminary investigation for
the instant cases be conducted before the Office of the Provincial Prosecutor;
5. That this motion is not intended for delay but solely for the above-mentioned
grounds.
Respectfully submitted.
26 February 2014
City of Makati.
32 | P a g e
ATTY. VX YZ
Counsel for the Accused
NOTICE OF HEARING
Greetings!
Please submit the foregoing motion for the kind consideration and
approval of the Honorable Court upon receipt hereof.
VX YZ
PROSECUTOR WXYZ
Office of the City Prosecutor, Makati City
ATTY. AB CD
Private Prosecutor
2233 Zamora Street, Pasay City
33 | P a g e
Republic of the Philippines
National Capital Judicial Region
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT
Branch 67
Makati City
ABC CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
- versus
- Civil Case No. 111222
34 | P a g e
ATTY. VX YZ
Counsel for Plaintiff
NOTICE OF HEARING
Greetings!
Please submit the foregoing Motion to the Court for its consideration and
approval immediately upon receipt hereof and kindly include the same in the
court’s calendar for hearing on Friday, 27 September 2013 at 8:30 in the
morning
VX YZ
Copy furnished:
ATTY. AB CD
Counsel for the Defendant
2233 Zamora Street, Pasay City
VX YZ
35 | P a g e
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
NATIONAL CAPITAL JUDICIAL REGION
Branch 43, Manila
- versus -
x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
1. The child hereby respectfully applies for release on recognizance pursuant to the Rule
on Juveniles in Conflict with the Law [Administrative Memorandum No. 02-1-18-SC],
issued by the Honorable Supreme Court, providing for the following, thus, to wit:
"Section 16. - When Bail A Matter of Right. - xxx However, where the juvenile
does not pose a threat to public safety, the Family Court may, motu proprio or upon
motion and recommendation of the DSWD, release the juvenile on recognizance to
the custody of his parents or other responsible person."
36 | P a g e
2. This motion is also in line with Article 191 of Presidential Decree 603, otherwise known
as the Child and Youth Welfare Code, as amended, and Section 8 of the Rules and
Regulations on the Apprehension, Investigation, Prosecution and Rehabilitation of
Youth Offenders, mandating law enforcers to divert and turn over children at the
point of arrest to the custody of social workers and/or responsible members of the
community, and Section 8 of Republic Act 8369 or the Family Courts Act of 1997,
providing children with alternatives to imprisonment such as community continuum,
counseling, conflict resolution seminars, essay writing, apology, community service,
etc.;
4. MRS. Name of Mother and/or other proposed custodian, mother of the said child,
residing at ____________________________________, Manila, is willing to take
the said child into her own custody pending the trial of this case;
5. The said parent hereby undertakes to guarantee the child’s appearance whenever so
required before this Honorable Court, pursuant to the herewith attached Affidavit of
Undertaking executed by her and marked as Annex A;
6. The pertinent provisions of the Family Courts Act of 1997 (Republic Act 8369),
together with its progenitor, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and other
international instruments, accord special protection to children accused of violating
the law;
7. The United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice
(BeijingRules), specifically Article 13.1 thereof, provides:
13.1. Detention pending trial shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the
shortest possible period."
37 | P a g e
8. By virtue of the Beijing Rules and in the advent of the Family Courts Act of 1997,
detention should be undertaken by the state only as a measure of last resort and
only for the shortest possible period;
9. Both international human rights law and Philippine laws mandate the state to observe
the best interest of the child principle (UN Convention on the Rights of the Child) as
well as the principle of diversion enshrined under Section 8 of the Family Courts Act
of 1997 (RA 8369) and under Sections 4 (f-g) and Sections 20-24 of the Rule on
Juveniles in Conflict with the Law as well as Article 11, Section 11.1 to 11.4 of the
United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice
(Beijing Rules) in order to avoid the contact of children and youth with the criminal
justice system which criminological findings show merely traumatize, criminalize,
and alienate them from society.
PRAYER
Respectfully submitted.
38 | P a g e
NOTICE OF HEARING
Greetings:
Please take notice that the undersigned shall submit the foregoing for the
consideration and approval of the Honorable Court immediately on
________________, 2006, at 8:30 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the Honorable City
Prosecutor may properly be heard thereon.
39 | P a g e
Republic of the Philippines
National Capital Judicial Region
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT
Branch 67
Makati City
______________________,
Plaintiff,
- versus
- Civil Case No. ______
______________________,
Defendant.
x-------------------------------------------x
MOTION TO INTERVENE
ATTY. VXYZ
Counsel for Plaintiff
40 | P a g e
Republic of the Philippines
National Capital Judicial Region
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT
Branch LXIII (63)
Makati City
XYZ CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
RODA M. PEREZ,
Defendant.
x----------------------------------------x
NOTICE OF HEARING
Greetings!
41 | P a g e
Kindly set and submit the foregoing Motion for the consideration and
approval of this Honorable Court immediately upon receipt hereof.
VX YZ
XYZ CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
RODA M. PEREZ,
Defendant.
x----------------------------------------x
MOTION TO PLEAD AS INDIGENT
1. I am a resident of ___________________; .
3. I do not own real property with an assessed value of more than (amount as provided in
the Revised Rules of Court, as amended) as shown by the attached Certification issued by the
Office of the City/Municipal Assessor and the City/Municipal Treasurer’s Office;
4. Due to financial constraint, I cannot afford to pay for the expenses of a court litigation as
I do not have enough funds for food, shelter and other basic necessities;
5. Should the court render judgment in my favor, the amount of the docket and other legal
fees which I was exempted from paying shall be a lien on the judgment, unless the court orders
otherwise.
42 | P a g e
WHEREFORE, premises considered, it is respectfully prayed that I be exempted from the
payment of docket and other legal fees as indigent pursuant to Section 21, Rule 3, in relation to
Section 18, Rule 141 of the Revised Rules of Court.
Other reliefs just and equitable under the premises are likewise prayed for.
Plaintiff
43 | P a g e
Republic of the Philippines
National Capital Judicial Region
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Branch 1, Manila
-versus-
Crim Case No. _____
For ___________________
______________________,
Accused.
x------------------x
MOTION TO QUASH
(state one or more grounds provided for in Rule 117, Rules of Court)
ARGUMENTS
Atty. Y
Counsel for Accused
44 | P a g e
Republic of the Philippines
National Capital Judicial Region
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT
Branch LXIII (63)
Makati City
1. The accused has been charged with Malicious Mischief and Attempted Homicide;
2. Consequently, warrants of arrest were issued against accused and the bail for
his provisionalliberty has been set at P12,000.00 for Malicious Mischief and
P15,000.00 for Attempted Homicide with a total of P27,000.00 for the two
cases;
3. Accused desires to post the required bail but due to financial constraints
considering that he is jobless and is only depending upon his family, he can
only raise the amount of P12,000.00 for the two cases.
Other reliefs just and equitable in the premises are likewise sought.
45 | P a g e
ATTY. VX YZ
Counsel for the Accused
NOTICE OF HEARING
Greetings!
VX YZ
PROSECUTOR WXYZ
Office of the City Prosecutor, Makati City
ATTY. AB CD
Private Prosecutor
2233 Zamora Street, Pasay City
46 | P a g e
Republic of the Philippines
National Capital Judicial Region
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT
Branch 67
Makati City
Plaintiff,
versus for
Frustrated Homicide
AKU SADO,
Accused.
x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
1. That accused posted bail for his provisional liberty in the above-entitled
case as evidenced by Official Receipt No. 222224, dated March 4, 2011, a
copy of which is hereto attached as Annex “A” and made an integral part
hereof;
2. That in the Judgment of the Honorable Court promulgated on July 24, 2013,
the accused was acquitted of all charges and liabilities;
3. However, the said Judgment failed to provide for the release of the bail bond
posted by the accused.
47 | P a g e
Respectfully submitted.
15 August 2013
City of Makati.
NOTICE OF HEARING
Greetings!
BEN TONG
48 | P a g e
Republic of the Philippines
National Capital Judicial Region
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT
Branch 67
Makati City
Plaintiff,
versus -
for:
THEFT
AKU SADO,
Accused.
x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
06 January 2014
City of Makati
Makati City
By: Atty. Public Attorney
49 | P a g e
Copy furnished by personal service:
50 | P a g e
National Capital Judicial Region
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT
Branch 67
Makati City
ABC CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
- versus
- Civil Case No. 111222
ATTY. VX YZ
Counsel for Plaintiff
NOTICE OF HEARING
Greetings!
51 | P a g e
Being a non-litigated motion, please submit the foregoing motion for
consideration and approval of this Honorable Court immediately upon receipt
hereof.
VX YZ
Copy furnished:
ATTY. AB CD
Counsel for the Defendant
2233 Zamora Street, Pasay City
Please take notice that counsel has requested for the approval of
this motion immediately upon receipt.
VX YZ
52 | P a g e
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
NATIONAL CAPITAL JUDICIAL REGION
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES
CEBU CITY
BRANCH 61
AKU SADO,
Accused,
X--------------
----------X
1. Private complainant was informed that this case will no longer be heard by Hon. Presiding
Judge Mario De Pedro but by the Hon. Pairing Judge Ana Dela Cruz of Branch 63.
2. However, this case was originally raffled to Branch 63 presided by Hon. Dela Cruz and
was re-raffled to this branch after the Judicial Dispute Resolution failed.
3. Considering that Hon. Dela Cruz had previously heard private complainant's side during
the JDR, the Consolidatedand Revised Guideline on JDR disqualifies her from further trying this
case.
53 | P a g e
4. Consequently, private complainant respectfully submits that this case ought to be
immediately referred to the Office of the Clerk of Court for re-raffling to another branch of this
court.
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that this case immediately be referred to the Office
of the Clerk of Court for re-raffling.
(place) , (date) .
With my conformity:
NOTICE OF HEARING
54 | P a g e
Please be notified that the undersigned will submit the foregoing motion for the consideration
and approval of the Court on _________________ at ______________.
55 | P a g e