You are on page 1of 2

Group Presentation Rubrics

Criteria Excellent (10) Good (8) Satisfactory (6) Marginal Pass (4) Fail (0)

Research (40%)

Quality (.e.g. use of Information is accurate; Information is mostly Information is acceptably Information is mostly PLAGIARISM or NON
varied sources, resources are legitimate; accurate with only a few accurate; more than one unreliable and/or SUBMISSION
evaluated and validated resources are varied and minor errors’ one resource may be inaccurate; most of the
sources, accurate appropriate resource may be questionable; no resources are not valid
information) questionable; resources variation in resources
good but not varied
enough

Content of
Presentation

Substantive use of Explanations of Explanations are Explanations are Incomplete and/or not PLAGIARISM or NON
information (25%) dimensions are complete complete and helpful but acceptably complete with helpful explanations with SUBMISSION
and helpful and indicate include little or no some interaction of little indication of interact
how the dimensions interaction among dimensions shown; draw naming dimensions;
interact with each other; dimensions or some conclusions and presents others’
draw conclusions, make explanations aren’t quite make some inferences information with little
connections and as complete or helpful but miss obvious ones analysis (e.g. drawing
inferences but there is an indication conclusions, making
of interaction among comparisons,
dimensions; draw some connections and
conclusions and make inferences)
some inferences

Effective slides (e.g. Slides clearly aid the For the most part slides Slides are acceptably Slides mostly interfere PLAGIARISM or NON
coherent, logical speaker in telling a are helpful in telling the helpful in telling the story with the story SUBMISSION
progressions, well coherent story story with minor with a few glaring
organised, include main problems problems
points not details, “tell a
story”) (20%)

Communication
Group Presentation Rubrics

Clarity (e.g. explains Presentation is coherent, Presentation is coherent Presentation is Presentation lacks PLAGIARISM or NON
ideas well, integrates with clear introduction, for the most part, but acceptably coherent, but coherence and is hardly SUBMISSION
with slides, clear transitions, language missing some elements missing a few important polished
introduction and use, and conclusion; elements
conclusion, obvious speaker(s) demonstrates
transitions, doesn’t use intimate knowledge of
jargon, demonstrates the subject
knowledge of key points,
responds well to
questions) (15%)

You might also like