Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FRED K. BEARD
University of Oklahoma Editor's Note:
fbeard@ou.edu "Speaker's Box" invites academics and practitioners to identify potential areas o f research affecting mar
keting and advertising. Its intention is to bridge the gap betioeen the length of time it takes to produce
rigorous work and the acceleration o f change within practice. With this contribution, Fred Beard takes a
step backfrom an industry that seems to reinvent itself daily with new platforms, new media, and new data
sources. From this distance, he reviews some ideas, practices, and events that contributed to the history c f
advertising and advertising thought before the 19th century. In doing so, he proposes ways that body of
thought might be relevant to present-day practice. He notes, to his dismay, how prevalent and influential
the belief is that nothing remotely resembling "modern" advertising existed before it was "invented" by
the 20th-century American pioneers. Beard argues that, in fact, advertising has a rich, relevant history.
Here, he exposes the bias against historic relevance and suggests some o f its consequences.
Douglas C. West
Professor of Marketing, King's College London
Visiting Fellow of Kellogg College, University of Oxford
Contributing Editor, Journal o f Advertising Research
INTRODUCTION how the past has helped shape the present? Can a
Many historians date the dawn of modern adver deeper understanding of and appreciation for the
tising and branding to the beginning of the 20th ancient history of advertising and branding, the lat
century, and they tend to fixate on the philosophies ter of which advertising historians have claimed as
and practices of the period's American pioneers, part of their subject matter, inform the beliefs and
such as Albert Lasker, Claude Hopkins, George practices of its 21st-century practitioners in any
Rowell, Francis Wayland Ayer, Harley Procter, meaningful, or even interesting, ways?
James L. Kraft, and J. Walter Thompson. Any ear As the authors of a textbook on promotions
lier history, they contend, largely is irrelevant when management observed, "studying a subject with
it comes to gaining a deeper understanding of the out an appreciation of its antecedents is like seeing
institution and business of advertising, as well as a picture in two dimensions—there is no depth.
what its theory and practice can teach about con The study of history gives us this depth as well as
sumption, culture, creativity, economics, and the an understanding of why things are as they are"
media. (Brink and Kelley, 1963, p. 4).
These biases might have produced the combined The early Mesopotamians, Chinese, Greeks, and
view that anything occurring before the late 19th Romans all appreciated the value of a good promo
or early 20th centuries—or the contributions of tion. Witness the following:
anyone other than the founding American adver
tising fathers—is unimportant. Do other biases in • Iron Age Greek potters used trademarks and
advertising's historiography limit the ability to see mottos to differentiate their brands.
quality paper and distributed to customers advertising, in the form of playbills. These negotiated rates, and gave advice on
as a reminder of their shopping experience playbills were so highly valued, upper- advertising problems (Nevett, 1977). Vol-
and to inform them about newly available crust theater patrons sent their servants ney Palmer, by contrast, would not estab
goods. Expensive, visually sophisticated, out to collect them (Stern, 2006). At the lish America's first agency in Philadelphia
and often persuasive in intent, these were beginning of the 19th century in Brit for another 30 years.
used widely and collected in many coun ain, nationally advertised products and
tries for the next 300 years. brands included condiments, patent med Im p lic a tio n s a n d In s ig h ts fo r Today
The first newspapers appeared in the icines, carbonated water, biscuits, shoe In his study of the prophetic but widely
17th century, and many in Europe as well blacking, and a large variety of health and overlooked writings about advertising
as the American colonies primarily existed beauty aids (Corley, 1988). by mid-19th-century German economist
to carry advertising. The "free shopper" A history of advertising in the Roman Karl Knies, historian Ronald Fullerton
was invented in England in 1692 (Russell, Empire, written as a master's thesis by a observed, "Participants in other business-
1910). In another example of an Americani copywriter at DDB/Needham Worldwide oriented disciplines—accounting, econom
zation, Benjamin Franklin was declared the in Detroit, proposed that the first advertis ics, and management, for example—have
first newspaper entrepreneur to recognize ing professionals might have been Roman come to recognize that they have long and
advertising as his most important source of "signatores" or "scriptores" (scribes or rich intellectual heritages, and that the
revenue (Foster, 1967). A more likely can sign painters; Rokicki, 1987). They solic work they produce today does not emerge
didate, however, is John Houghton, the ited and serviced clients, created advertis in isolation but rather develops out of
"father of English advertising" (Sampson, ing, and arranged for its placement. The and contributes to a long stream of work.
1874). He was the first to conduct a system "album," a flat, whitewashed space on a We in advertising also have a rich herit
atic campaign to promote advertising in a wall, was their primary medium. Adver age, and exploring it can enrich our self
newspaper, beginning in 1692 (Hotchkiss, tising contractors might have controlled understanding" (Fullerton, 1988, p. 64).
1938), although advertisements for his own some of these Pompeiian albums, given The contention, however, persists that
businesses and products soon displaced that they included a variety of announce early nonperiodical media and mes
those of his clients (Walker, 1973). Frank ments (theatrical performances, baths, sages were not really "advertising" and
lin did not launch his Pennsylvania Gazette gladiatorial contests, and circuses), and that any pre-20th-century advertising did
until 1729. locations apparently were chosen for their not contribute much to current practice
Houghton's encouragement of adver high volume of traffic (Presbrey, 1929). (Norris, 1980). These claims appear to be
tising for foods, clothing, luxury items, Both newspapers and advertising agen directly attributable to the modernization
and store goods in general earned him cies can trace their origins to the European and Americanization biases. It is true that
advertising-historian Frank Presbrey's public registries. Inspired by French essay early 20th-century advertising agents and
(1929) nom ination in The History and ist Michel de Montaigne, buyers and sell newspaper publishers struggled to con
Development of Advertising as "the out ers registered their offers and requests, vince businessmen that advertising was
standing advertising figure of the 17th and copies were then distributed to branch both valuable and reputable. A newspaper
Century" (p. 59). offices. Parisian Theophraste Renaudot advertisement for advertising agent R. H.
Toward the end of the Elizabethan (publisher of France's first newspaper, La Fitch, for example, includes a variation of
era (1558 to 1601), English booksellers Gazette) and Englishmen Henry Walker and NW Ayer & Son's widely repeated and fre
unleashed a "flood of advertisements" Marchmont Nedham all established such quently plagiarized slogan "Keeping Ever
(Voss, 1998, p. 737) and further devel "offices of entry" between 1630 and 1657 lastingly at It Brings Success" (See Figure 3).
oped the "advertising arts" by employing (Presbrey, 1929). Ancient branding and advertising, how
sophisticated consumer-focused strategies The first advertising agent likely was ever, often were consistent with modern
and tactics, such as an emphasis on the England's William Tayler, in 1786 (Nevett, strategies and tactics in form, technique,
"new," ornamental type, headlines, wood- 1977). Although most agents at the time and intent. Both clearly were important
cut illustrations, rhyming copy, and market just sold space in one or more newspapers, to many types of manufacturers and mer
segmentation. at least one, Charles Barker, was function chants, and they consistently came into use
The theaters of London during the ing as a true advertising agent as early as with increases in competition. Once the
same period also relied on extensive 1812. He booked insertions in newspapers, earliest production of commodities and
Source: The Norwalk Hour, 1910, March 26, p. 5. Retrieved from https://news.googIe. hardly has been uniform around the world
com/newspapers?nid=KKiikWAUrRgC&dat=19100326&printsec=frontpage&hl=en. or across the centuries. By avoiding the
Americanization and modernization biases,
advertising and branding historians might
Figure 3 Advertisement for Advertising Agent R. H. Fitch, 1910 discover other instances in which early
advertisers were able to engage with and
other goods surpassed local consumption of the earliest advertised products to those empower consumers, as previous research
and export to distant markets became via of today also suggests that advertising long ers advocated (Acar and Puntoni, 2016).
ble, it also became necessary to seal, mark, has served a fundamental need for informa Finally, it is important to recognize that
and brand the goods. By 1750, advertising tion, especially about newly available goods "ad bashing" long has been a popular
had become essential to the marketing of that appeal to changing tastes, fashions, and sport. A 16th-century critic of playbills
many British goods and services, with up consumer choices. complained that "by sticking of their bils
to 75 percent of the space in some new spa In addition to the limitations of Ameri in London, [the posters] defile the streetes
pers devoted to it (Walker, 1973). canization and m odernization, another w ith their infectious filthiness" (Stern,
The full pre-20th-century history of im portant bias in advertising's historiog 2006, p. 74). hi 1759, British essayist Samuel
branding and advertising also challenges raphy exists: Much historical work has Johnson wrote, "Advertisements are now
the contention that such tools of brand rec approached the history of advertising and so numerous that they are very negligently
ognition were unim portant to consumers. branding as forms of m anipulation (Berg perused, and it is, therefore, become nec
Historians have confirmed that assurances and Clifford, 2007; Church, 1999). Consum essary to gain attention by magnificence
of purity, quality, authenticity, and brand ers were assumed to be passive recipients of promises, and by eloquence sometimes
consumption as a symbol of status have of a "fictional" world of advertising, where sublim e and som etim es pathetick" (as
been important to commodity consumers "h id d en p ersu ad ers" (Packard, 1957) cited in Rivers, 1929, p. 58). Some 300 years
for thousands of years. Indeed, "the long or "captains of consciousness" (Ewen, later, marketing historian Richard Pollay
history of consumer culture and branding in 1976) were capable of exploiting them. (1977) highlighted the seriousness of the
China demonstrates that the marketplace is Brands also have been viewed as weapons potential consequences for today's adver
not just now becoming a consumer society "wielded by capitalists to extract rents out tisers with the following warning: "Unless
driven by symbolic brand consumption, as of consumers" (Eckhardt and Bengtsson, the history of advertising is exhaustively
is so often argued in both the popular press 2010, p. 218) and have been targeted by researched and accurately docum ented,
and in the academic literature" (Eckhardt contem porary critics such as Kalle Lasn, the industry and those within it stand too
and Bengtsson, 2010, p. 217). The similarity cofounder of Adbusters. great a chance of being demeaned" (p. 3).
C hurch, R. "Advertising Consumer Goods in Po lla y , R. "The Importance, and the Problems,
In The Story of Advertising, magazine
Nineteenth-Century Britain: Reinterpretations." of Writing the History of Advertising." journal of
editor, author, and advertising historian
Economic History Review 53,4 (1999): 621-645. Advertising History 1,1 (1977): 1-5.
James Playsted Wood (1958) offered an
elegant rationale in favor of understanding C o r le y , T. A. B. "Competition and the Growth of P resbrey , F. The History and Development of
and appreciating the connections between Advertising in the U.S. and Britain, 1800-1914."
Advertising. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1929.
ancient advertising and its practice today: Business and Economic History 17 (1988): 155-167.
"Over the centuries, advertising has expe
R ivers , H. W. Ancient Advertising and Publicity.
rienced changes in the proportioning of its E c k h a r d t , G. M., and A. B eng tsso n . "A Brief His
Chicago: Krochs, 1929.
ingredients, in direction, in application, tory of Branding in China." journal of Macromar
but something of the first advertisement keting 30,3(2010): 210-221.
R o k ic k i , ]. "Advertising in the Roman Empire."
survives in the latest, and there will be
Whole Earth Review Spring (1987): 84-87.
Ew en, S. Captains of Consciousness. New York:
traces of it in the last" (p. 502). CID
McGraw-Hill, 1976.
R ussell , T. H. Advertising Methods and Mediums.
of Historical Research in Marketing, Journalism and St e r n , T. '"On Each Wall and Comer Post': Play
H o t c h k is s , G. B. Milestones of Marketing. New
Communication Monographs. Journalism. History, and bills, Title-Pages, and Advertising in Early Mod
York: MacMillan, 1938.
the Journal of Marketing Communications, among other ern London." English Literary Renaissance 36, 1
publications. M cD o no ug h, J., and K. Eg o ff. The Advertising (2006): 57-89.
Age Encyclopedia of Advertising. Chicago: Fitzroy
Dearborn, 2000. Voss, P. J. "Books for Sale: A dvertising and
B r in k , E., and W. K e lle y . The Management of Pro Packard, V. The Hidden Persuaders. New York: W ood, J. P. The Story of Advertising. New York:
motion. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hail, 1963. David McKay, 1957. Ronald Press, 1958.