Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Methodology
Fig. 1: Test-bed location (red circle) in residential area of Desa Alam (blue)
with nearby industrial park and construction area (red). Source: GoogleMaps
The test-bed consisted of two identical open-rack mounted
polycrystalline PV panels installed side-by-side and tilted at 15˚ to the ground
facing southwards [12]. The specifications for the PV panels used are listed in
Table 1. Both panels experienced the same instantaneous irradiation levels,
ambient temperatures, humidity and wind incidence. The duration of this
process is more than three months where it starts from the middle of January
2015.
At the same time all other weather parameters were taken such as
daily weather condition, temperature, wind speed, wind direction and relative
humidity. The arrangement for the outdoor dust accumulation on the PV panels
is depicted in Fig. 2.2 as shown above.
Table 1
SLP-005-12 panel specifications.
Dimensions
Module dimensions (mm x mm) 305 x 188
Cell dimensions (mm x mm) 50 x 19
Cells per module (units) 36
Cell area per module (m2) 0.0342
Electrical specifications
Rated power, Pmax (W) 5
Rated voltage, Vmpp (V) 17.5
Rated current, Impp (A) 0.29
Open circuit voltage, Voc (V) 22.0
Short circuit current, Isc (A) 0.32
Green Energy Research Centre (GERC), UiTM Shah Alam has been
selected as location for performance measurement. This is because of the
availability of the solar measurement kit. The measurements have been carried
out for every 25 hours of dust accumulation on PV panels.
The IV characteristics for each of the panels are plotted and logged
using TRI-KA solar module analyzers and the plane-of-array irradiation is
measured using the TRI-SEN irradiation sensor. The module surface
temperatures are measured using TRI-SEN and are recorded.
Next, the equation for the PV panel’s Standard Test Condition (STC)
outputs loss is shown as follows:
𝑂𝑆𝑇𝐶𝑐 − 𝑂𝑆𝑇𝐶𝑑
𝑂𝑆𝑇𝐶 𝐿𝑜𝑠𝑠 = 𝑥 100% (2)
𝑂𝑆𝑇𝐶𝑐
where OSTCc is outputs STC of cleaned panel and OSTCd is outputs STC of
dusty panel. Commented [U10]: Divide your methodology based on your
investigation/objective (if necessary)
2.2 Investigation of water drops effect
The investigation of water droplets effect on PV solar cells’
performance also was conducted at Green Energy Research Centre (GERC) at
similar location with performance measurement for the study on the dust
effect. In this investigation, the quantity of water droplets plays the main role.
At each measurement the water droplets volume will be increased until it
almost fully covered the cells of the tested PV panel. The maximum quantity
was approximately at 25 ml and the increment of water quantity at each
measurement was 5 ml. The cell temperature measured at least 3 different
points before the water was dropped on the panel. This process helps to avoid
a disturbance to the sensor. The cell temperature also measured after the panel
cleaned to ensure no large temperature different between before and after the
test conducted.
Fig. 4: The water dropped on photovoltaic cells. Commented [U11]: Divide your methodology based on your
investigation/objective (if necessary)
10.50%
Cleaned panel
10.00% Dusty panel
9.50%
𝜂
9.00%
8.50%
8.00%
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200
Exposure time (hour)
This pattern shows the effect of accumulated dust on the dusty panel
which results greater fall of efficiency. At 150 hours of exposure time, the
efficiency of dusty panel recorded was 8.42% while cleaned panel achieved
9.32%.
Fig. 6 shows the percentage of efficiency loss at different exposure
time. The graph indicates the increased of efficiency loss as exposure time
increased. At 25 hours of exposure time, the efficiency loss increased
significantly and gradually increased at each 25 hours increment of exposure
time. Based on observation, the quantity of dust that accumulated on the dusty
panel was increasing with respect to longer exposure time. Therefore, longer
exposure time leads to higher concentration of accumulated dust on the panel.
The concentrated dust present as external resistance which obscured solar
irradiance to penetrate in PV cells.
12.00%
10.00%
8.00%
𝜂 Loss
6.00%
4.00%
2.00%
0.00%
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200
Exposure time (hour)
3.50%
3.00%
STC Outputs Loss
2.50%
2.00%
1.50%
1.00% Isc loss
0.50% Voc loss
0.00%
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200
Exposure time (hour)
Fig. 8: The SEM images of the accumulated dust. Commented [U14]: IN RESULTS n DISCUSSION;
First write your results based on WHAT you can see in the graph .
example..minium, maximun, average..incline decline...etc. EVERY
graph MUST have their explaination. YOU can also divide results
3.2 The water droplets effect based on your investigation/objectives
9.61%
9.59%
9.57%
9.55%
9.53%
𝜂
9.51%
9.49%
9.47%
9.45%
0 5 10 15 20 25
Water droplets (ml)
In this study, the effects of dust and water drops on the performance
of PV solar cells were conducted and investigated at Shah Alam residential
area. The outdoor dust had been accumulated on the PV panel, and any Commented [U15]: Write what is Your project
conditions that will eliminate the deposited dust (i.e. rain) were avoided. A
long period exposure of PV panel to real outdoor condition shows that the
efficiency decreases significantly with dust accumulation. Nearly 10 percent
of losses in system efficiency could be experienced if no cleaning is performed
on the panel for 150 hours. The finding shows that the loss in power output due
to dust accumulation on PV panels is largely effect the output current. Unlike
the dust, water droplets result in negligible effect on the efficiency of the PV
panel. Water droplets results show that less than 1 percent of efficiency loss. Commented [U16]: Your significant results and discussion
The results of current investigation are necessary to evaluate the efficiency
drop due to the dust which the economic loss to the users. Therefore, the
implementation of self-cleaning system on PV is a crucial for better
performance. Commented [U17]: Why your results is important? Or your
recommendation to future works
Acknowledgement
The author would like to acknowledge the support of Green Energy Research
Centre (GERC) at Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM), Shah Alam in
conducting this study.
References