Professional Documents
Culture Documents
manifests itself in so many ways and one of them is by way of conscripting children into
national army or rebel resistance groups. South Sudan is no stranger to this worst form
of child labour and this is the focus of this essay. It looks at what efforts the South
Sudanese government is putting up in abating the problem of recruiting children into its
national army. With the help of authorities, it will begin by defining who a child soldier is
and delve into the real problem facing the South Sudanese government, thereafter it will
draw a conclusion.
A working definition o who a “child soldier” is, will help ground this discussion. Although
the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child (hereinafter Optional
Protocol) frowns upon the compulsory recruitment of child soldiers, however, it does not
define who a child soldier is.1 Under current international law, a “child” is generally
defined as anyone under the prescribed age of eighteen.2 On the other hand, a term
“child soldier” encompasses more than machine-gun toting boys. Therefore, the concept
“child soldier” has also been used to include “any person under the age of eighteen who
is or has been associated with any kind of regular or irregular armed group, including
those who serve as porters, spies, cooks or messengers, and including girls recruited
for sexual purposes and many others.”3 A child soldier refers to a man below the age of
eighteen years old who has been enrolled by an outfitted group in any way.4
The international law forbids the recruitment of child soldiers. The Additional Protocols
to the 1949 Geneva Conventions prohibited the military recruitment and use of children
1 Article 2.
2 Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 1, 1989.
3 The Cape Town Principles Convention, 1997.
4 Paris Principles on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict 2007.
under the age of 15. Under the 2002 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, it
controlled armed forces or non-state armed groups. The Optional Protocol to the
Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict
(hereinafter OPAC)6 is the world’s first international treaty wholly devoted to ending the
military exploitation of children. This treaty did raise the standard by prohibiting the
The state bears the primary responsibility of providing security to and ensuring the
protection of all children within her jurisdiction. Therefore, the state should take all the
children into armed forces or groups. The state should also facilitate the release of
those children already recruited, provide them with protection and reintegration support.
Such measures include the ratification and implementation of all relevant legal
instruments, ensuring that all relevant international norms are adhered to and reflected
in national law in line with international law, including the OPAC. In this regard, the
South Sudanese government scored in that by 2008 the government did make efforts
towards the goal of ending the recruitment and conscription of child soldiers by enacting
recruitment into armed forces or rebel groups.8 The South Sudanese armed forces and
armed opposition groups continue to recruit child soldiers and force them into the
conflict, despite the numerous commitments to stop. The continued recruitment and use
5 Article 8 2b (xxvi).
6 Article 3.
7 <https://www.child-soldiers.org/international-laws-and-child-rights> accessed: March 6, 2018.
8 Section 25(2)(i) of The Child Act, 2008 of the Laws of Southern Sudan.
1
of children by the military and opposing armed groups point to the utter impunity that
reigns in South Sudan. In August 30, 2010, the Southern Sudanese government
promised that it would demobilise all child soldiers from its ranks by the end of the year.
Pledging to end the recruiting of children into its national army, the Chairperson of the
(SSDDRC), William Deng made the following remarks during the launch of a new child
protection unit:
By the end of 2010 the SPLA (South Sudan People’s Liberation Army) has
committed to have demobilised all children from its ranks, and we give our
full support to establish strong mechanisms for successful reintegration to
civilian life for these children9.
The Chairman further ascertained that the launch was another concrete sign of the
children, the future and hope of the country. Despite enacting laws forbidding the
recruitment of child soldiers and signing various legal instruments, the South Sudanese
government has been hesitant in implementing all these. Human Rights Watch10 found
that commanders from both government forces and rebel groups had been abducting,
detaining and forcing children, some as young as 13, into their ranks since the warring
parties signed the Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan
(ARCSS) in August 2015. The South Sudanese government has continued to disregard
international legal instruments and customary laws that govern the treatment of
2
children11. The United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)12 estimates that 15,000 to
16,000 children may have been used by the armed forces and groups in the conflict.
Under the laws of war, the recruitment or use of children under the age of 15 by parties
to a conflict is a war crime for which commanders can be held criminally responsible 13.
International human rights standards provide that no child under 18 should be recruited
as a soldier. Regardless of the fact that child soldiers have been used for decades in
what is now South Sudan, Human Rights Watch observes that no commander has ever
faced any serious punishment for using child soldiers. UNICEF reports that about
19,000 children have been recruited and associated with armed groups in South Sudan.
The South Sudan government is winking at such atrocities by not having the
commanders who are alleged to have recruited or used child soldiers in both the
government and opposition forces to account for their actions as was done in the case
crimes of enlisting and conscripting children under the age of 15 years and using them
to participate actively in hostilities. This took place even when the African Charter on the
rights and welfare of the Child15 is very categorical regarding child protection with
regards to internal armed conflicts, tension and strife. The government of South Sudan
should therefore rely heavily on the African Charter and the CRC in meting out punitive
11 In particular, Article 77 Protocol I of the Geneva Convention (1977), Article 4.3.c. Protocol II of the
Geneva Convention (1977), Article 38 of the CRC (1989) and Art 2 and 3 of its Protocol on the
Involvement of Children in Armed Conflicts (2000), Article 22.2 of the African Charter on the Rights and
Welfare of the Child (1990), Article 2 of the ILO Convention No. 182 (1999).
12 www.unicef.org/esaro/UNICEF_South Sudan_Report_Childhood_under_Attack_15Dec_FINAL.pdf
3
measure on those violating international laws on the protection against the use of
The problem of recruiting child soldiers in Southern Sudan is far from seceding though.
Reports show that recruitment and use affecting at least 1,022 children is still going on
and all this is attributed to SPLA and other government security forces 16. The South
Sudanese armed forces and armed opposition groups continue to recruit child soldiers
and force them into the conflict, notwithstanding the numerous commitments to stop it.
There are many legal standards in place to protect children from mistreatment yet the
children continue to suffer. Conventions have been enacted and protocols have been
signed and ratified in regard to the protection of children. However, the government of
in recruiting and conscripting children into her army. This crime should carry with it a
16United Nations Secretary-General 2017. “Report of the Secretary-General: Children and armed conflict,
2017”. www.un.org. Retrived March 8, 2018.
4
BIBLIOGRAPHY
International Law
2007.
The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Article 8 2b (xxvi), 2002.
The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Involvement
Protocol II of the Geneva Convention (1977), Article 38 of the CRC (1989) and Art 2 and
3 of its Protocol on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflicts (2000), Article 22.2 of
the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child (1990), Article 2 of the ILO
Regional Law
The African Charter on the rights and welfare of the Child, Article 22 (3).
National Law
The Child Act, 2008 of the Laws of Southern Sudan, section 25(2)(i).
5
Case Law
Web Resources
2018.
06, 2018.
<https://www.hrw.org/news/2015/12/14/south-sudan-terrifying-lives-child-soldiers>