INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHERS

SECONDARY LEVEL
(For First Semester)

Name of Employee Name of Rater

Position Position
Review Period Date of Review
Bureau/Center/Service/Division

WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

PERFORMANCE ACTUAL
KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
MFO INDICATORS QUALITY TIMELINESS RESULT RATING SCORE
KRA EFFICIENCY
KRA 1 I. Teaching 35%
Learning
Process 1. Prepared 68 complete set of June - 5% 5 - Prepared 90 5 - SMART, 5 - submitted
Daily Lesson Logs (DLL) October and above 90 & above before the
throughout the first and second complete DLL 4 - lacking 1, 1st period
grading period with at least 3 79-89 of classes
contextualized 3 - lacking 2, 4 - submitted
lessons. 68-78 during the
4 - Prepared 79- 2 - lacking 3, 1st period
89 daily 56-67 of classes
complete DLL 1 - lacking 4, 3 - submitted
with at least 2 55 & below during the
contextualized 2nd period
lessons. of classes
3 - Prepared 68- 2 - submitted
78 complete during the
DLL with at 3rd period
least 1 of classes
contextualized 1 - submitted
lessons. during the
2 - Prepared 56- 4th period
67 complete of classes
DLL or beyond
1 - Prepared 55 within the
and below day
complete DLL
Page 1 of 22
2. Utilized varied learning June - 10% 5 - ICT/ 5 - Utilized 5 or
resources October Multimedia, more
- ICT/Multimedia Audio, Visual appropriate
- Audio & Printed and IMs
- Visual Manipulative 4 - Utilized 4
- Printed instructional appropriate
- Manipulative materials were IMs
utilized 3 - Utilized 3
throughout the appropriate
lessons. IMs
4 - Audio, Visual 2 - Utilized 2
and Printed & appropriate
Manipulative IMs
instructional 1 - Utilized only 1
materials were IM
utilized
throughout the
lessons.
3 - Visual,
Printed and
other
Manipulative
instructional
materials were
utilized
throughout the
lessons.
2 - Printed
materials were
utilized
throughout the
lessons.
1 - Innovative
instructional
materials were
not utilized
throughout the
lessons.

Page 2 of 22
3. a.(For classroom advisers) May – 8% 5 - Met 96-100% 5 - Prepares
Established and maintained October of the items the
a classhome that is on the classhome
conducive for learning Division in May
throughout the semester Standard 4 - Prepares
with at least 75% of the Classhome the
items in the Division evaluation classhome
Standard Classhome checklist in June
Evaluation Checklist is (DSCEC) 3 - Prepares
achieved. (Refer to the 4 - Met 86-95% the
Division Standard of the items classhome
classhome evaluation on the in July
checklist for Elem. and Division 2 - Prepares
Sec.) Standard the
Classhome classhome
evaluation in August
checklist 1 - Prepares
3 - Met 75-85% the
of the items classhome
on the in
Division September
Standard
Classhome
evaluation
checklist
2 - Met 50-74%
of the items
on the
Division
Standard
Classhome
evaluation
checklist
1 - Met only 49%
and below of
the items on
the Division
Standard
Classhome
evaluation
Page 3 of 22
 checklist

3. b. (For non-advisers) Prepared May – 4% 5 - Accomplished 5 - Prepares

an updated office/work October 100% of the the
station structuring and items. office/work
others required of the 4 - Accomplished station in
assignment (EMIS, School 86 - 99% of May
Publication, SSG, DORP, the items. 4 - Prepares
ICT, School Clinic, 3 - Accomplished the
Guidance, NDRRMC, etc.) 75 - 85% of office/work
the items. station in
2 - Accomplished June
50 - 74% of 3 - Prepares
the items. the
1 - Accomplished office/work
only 49% and station in
below. July
2 - Prepares
the
office/work
station in
August
1 - Prepares
the
office/work
only when
there is an
evaluation

4. Taught all competencies in June – 5% 5 - 95% and 5 - with 90-100% 5 - 95% and 5 - 90-100% in
quarters 1 & 2 in all subject October above of mastery above of line with
areas handled with 75% competencies 4 - with 80-89% the the LCD
mastery were taught mastery competen- 4 - 80-89% in
with at least 3 - with 70-79% cies were line with
75% mastery mastery taught the LCD
4 - 85-94% of the 2 - with 60-69% 4 - 85-94% 3 - 70-79% in
competencies mastery 3 - 75-84% line with
were taught 1 - with 59 and 2 - 65-74% the LCD
with 75% below mastery 1 - 64% and 2 - 60-69% in
mastery level below line with
Page 4 of 22
 3 - 75-84% of the the LCD
competencies 1 - 59 and
were taught below in
with 75% line with
mastery level mastery
2 - 65-74% of the
competencies
were taught
with 75%
mastery level
1 - 64% and
below of the
competencies
were taught
with 75%
mastery level

5. Produced/enhanced/updated 40 June – 5% 5 - 60 or more 5 - has indexed

complete indexed varied October complete IMs/eIMs
IMs/eIM/learning resources per indexed IMs/ daily
assigned/handled subject area eIMs were 4 - has indexed
prepared IMs/eIMs
(Acknowledge the source of 4 - 50-59 every other
the original material) complete day
indexed IMs/ 3 - has indexed
eIMs were IMs/eIMs
prepared weekly
3 - 40-49 2 - has indexed
complete IMs/eIMs
indexed IMs/ monthly
eIMs were 1 - has indexed
prepared IMs/eIMs
2 - 30-39 quarterly
complete
indexed IMs/
eIMs were
prepared
1 - 29 and below
complete
indexed IMs/
Page 5 of 22
 eIMs were
prepared

KRA 2 Students 35%

Outcomes
1. Attained an average MPS of June – 4% 5 - attained 75% 5 - 80 % and
75% in the NAT October MPS and above of
above students
4 - attained 70- attained
74% MPS 75% MPS
3 - attained 50- and above
69% MPS 4 - 70 – 79 %
2 - attained 30- of students
49% MPS attained
1 - attained 1-29% 75% MPS
MPS 3 - 50 – 69%
of students
attained
75% MPS
2 - 30 – 49%
of students
attained
75% MPS
1 - 1 – 29% of
students
attained
75% MPS

2. Attained an average MPS of June – 2% 5 - attained 75% 5 - 80 % and

75% in the Quarterly Test October MPS and above of
(To be implemented in SY above students
2017-2018) 4 - attained 70- attained
74% MPS 75% MPS
3 - attained 50- and above
69% MPS 4 - 70 – 79 %
2 - attained 30- of students
49% MPS attained
1 - attained 1-29% 75% MPS
MPS 3 - 50 – 69%
of students
Page 6 of 22
 attained
75% MPS
2 - 30 – 49%
of students
attained
75% MPS
1 - 1 – 29% of
students
attained
75% MPS

3. Attained 0 dropout rate in all June – 2% 5 - 0 non-reader 5 - 0 dropout

classes handled October 4 - non-reader is 4 - 0.1-1.0%
only 0.1-1.0% dropout rate
of the class 3 - 1.1-2.0%
3 - non-reader is dropout rate
only 1.1-2.0% 2 - 2.1-3.0%
of the class dropout rate
2 - non-reader is 1 - above 3.0%
only 2.1-3.0% dropout rate
of the class
1 - non-reader is
above 3.0% of
the class

4. Zero-out non-readers (for June – 2% 5 - 0 non-

Grades 1-10) October numerates
(use unified tool for PHIL-IRI) 4 - non-numerates
is only 0.1-
1.0% of the
class
3 - non-numerates
is only 1.1-
2.0% of the
class
2 - non-numerates
is only 2.1-
3.0% of the
class
1 - non-numerates
Page 7 of 22
 is above 3.0%
of the class

5. Zero-out non-numerates June – 2% 5 - 0 non- 5 - 0 non-

October numerates numerates
4 - non-numerates 4 - non-
is only 0.1- numerates
1.0% of the is only 0.1-
class 1.0% of the
3 - non-numerates class
is only 1.1- 3 - non-
2.0% of the numerates
class is only 1.1-
2 - non-numerates 2.0% of the
is only 2.1- class
3.0% of the 2 - non-
class numerates
1 - non-numerates is only 2.1-
is above 3.0% 3.0% of the
of the class class
1 - non-
numerates
is above
3.0% of the
class

6. Improved reading levels of June – 2% 5 - 5 learners have

learners from non-reader to October improved
frustration level; from current
frustration to reading level
instructional/independent level to the next
in all classes handled higher reading
(Note: Non-advisers will take level
the reading performance of the 4 - 4 learners have
classes handled) improved
current
reading level
to the next
higher reading
level
Page 8 of 22
 3 - 3 learners have
improved
current
reading level
to the next
higher reading
level
2 - 2 learners have
improved
current
reading level
to the next
higher reading
level
1 - 1 learner have
improved
current
reading level
to the next
higher reading
level

7. Zero out failure rate in all June – 4% 5 - 0% failure 5 - on time

classes handled (SHS - by October rate 4 - 1 - 3 days
semester) 4 - failure is late
(Grade 7 -10 at the end of the only 1.0% 3 - 4 - 7 days
quarter) of the class late
3 - failure is 2 - 8-10 days
only 2.0% late
of the class 1 - more than
2 - Failure is 10 days late
only 3.0%
of the class.
1 - failure is
4.0% and
above of the
class

Page 9 of 22
8. a. Updated school records June – 4% 5 - all School School Records 5 - all School 5 - on time
needed in the 1st & 2nd October Records are are: Records are 4 - 1 - 3 days
quarters (SF1, SF2, SF3, updated 5 - accurate, updated late
LIS Portal, Class Records, 4 - lacks 1 school legible, 4 - lacks 1 3 - 4 - 7 days
F138, F137, Grade Sheets, record reliable, valid, school late
F48 for class advisers 3 - lacks 2 school authentic, record 2 - 8-10 days
records organized 3 - lacks 2 late
2 - lacks 3 school 4 - presence of 4 school 1 - more than
records 3 - presence of 3 records 10 days late
1 - lacks 4 or 2 - presence of 2 2 - lacks 3
more school 1 - presence of 1 school
records records
1 - lacks 4 or
more school
records

8. b. Updated school records (for June – 4% 5 - all School School Records 5 - all School 5 - on time
non-advisers) October Records are: Records are 4 - 1 - 3 days
updated 5 - accurate, updated late
and/or legible, 4 - lacks 1 3 - 4 - 7 days
submitted reliable, valid, school late
4 - lacks 1 school authentic, record 2 - 8-10 days
record organized 3 - lacks 2 late
3 - lacks 2 school 4 - presence of 4 school 1 - more than
records 3 - presence of 3 records 10 days late
2 - lacks 3 school 2 - presence of 2 2 - lacks 3
records 1 - presence of 1 school
1 - lacks more records
than 3 school 1 - lacks 4 or
records more school
records
9. Constructed the following June – 2% 5 - complete
assessment tools: Summative October assessment 5 - complete 5 - Prepared
Test with TOS, Item Analysis, tools assessment and
Test Item Bank, MPS Result 4 - lacks 1 tools submitted
assessment 4 - lacks 1 all reports 2
tool assessment days earlier
3 - lacks 2 tool than the
assessment 3 - lacks 2 deadline
tools assessment 4 - Prepared
Page 10 of 22
 2 - lacks 3 tools and
assessment 2 - lacks 3 submitted
tools assessment all reports 1
1 - lacks more tools day before
than 3 1 - lacks more the
assessment than 3 deadline
tools assessment 3 - Prepared
tools and
submitted
all reports
on the
deadline
2 - Prepared
and
submitted
all reports 1
day after
than the
deadline
1 - Prepared
and
submitted
all reports 2
days and
more after
the
deadline.

10. Prepared & submitted the June – 2% 5 - Prepared 5 - Conducted

following reports as required: October complete counselling
1st and 2nd Quarter Periodic reports sessions/ho
Exam Results (MPS), Oral 4 - Lacks 1 me
Reading Pre-Test Result, report visitation 5
Proposed Action Plan, 3 - Lacks 2 times per
Monthly Accomplishment reports quarter
Report, SBM Reports, M & 2 - Lacks 3 4 - Conducted
E Reports reports counselling
1 - Lacks 4 or sessions/ho
more me
reports visitation 4
Page 11 of 22
 times per
quarter
3 - Conducted
counselling
sessions/ho
me
visitation 3
times per
quarter
2 - Conducted
counselling
sessions/ho
me
visitation 2
times per
quarter
1 - Conducted
counselling
session
once per
month

11. Conducted counseling/home June- 5% 5 - conducted 3 5 - complete

visitation with supporting October PTA meetings 4 - lacks 1
evidences: with complete MOV
- Letter Request MOVs 3 - lacks 2
- Travel Order 4 - conducted 3 MOVs
- Certificate of PTA meetings 2 - lacks 3
Appearance/Affirmation with MOVs
- Agreement Form incomplete 1 - lacks 1
- Pictures MOVs MOV
3 - conducted 2
PTA meetings
with complete
MOVs
2 - conducted 2
PTA meetings
within
complete
MOVs
Page 12 of 22
 1 - conducted 1
PTA meeting

12. Compiled complete and June - 3% 5 - presence of

properly labelled students’ October all MOVs
portfolio with written and 4 - presence of
product/performance-based 4 MOVs
output with the presence of 3 - presence of
the following MOVs: 3 MOVs
- portfolio 2 - presence of
- student's profile 2 MOVs
- outputs 1 - presence of
- filled up/rated rubric 1 MOV
- journal

KRA 3 III. School and 10%

Community
Involvement
1. Conducted at least 2 PTA June – 2%
(Homeroom/General) Oct
meetings with the following
MOVs: agenda, attendance
sheet, minutes of the meeting,
pictorials

2. Attended school meetings June – 3% 5 - 95-100%

October attendance
in school
meetings
4 - 85-94%
attendance
in school
meetings
3 - 75-84%
attendance
in school
meetings
2 - 55-74%
attendance
in school
Page 13 of 22
 meetings
1 - 1-54%
attendance
in school
meetings

3. Initiated the conduct of at least June – 2% 5 - conducted

2 Brigada Eskwela activities: October three (3)
letter of invitation, Brigada
accomplishment reposrt with Eskwela
attendance and pictorials activities
MOVs: with
- Letter of Invitation complete
- Attendance Sheet documentati
- Narrative Accomplishment on
Report 4 - conducted
- Pictorials three (3)
Brigada
Eskwela
activities
without
complete
documentati
on
3 - conducted
two (2)
Brigada
Eskwela
activities
with
complete
documentati
on
2 - conducted
two (2)
Brigada
Eskwela
activity
without
complete
Page 14 of 22
 documentati
on
1 - conducted
Brigada
Eskwela
activity

4. Participated in at least three May- 3% 5 - International 5 - participated

civic-oriented activities within October /National in 5 or more
the 1st and 2nd quarters Level civic-
4 - Regional oriented
Level activities
3 - Division Level with MOVs
2 - District Level (pictures,
1 - School Level certificate)
4 - participated
in 4 civic-
oriented
activities
with MOVs
(pictures,
certificate)
3 - participated
in 3 civic-
oriented
activities
with MOVs
(pictures,
certificate)
2 - participated
in 2 civic-
oriented
activity
with MOVs
(pictures,
certificate)
1 - participated
in only 1
civic-
oriented
Page 15 of 22
 activity
with MOVs
(pictures,
certificate)

KRA 4 IV. Professional 15%

Growth &
Development
1. Attended In-service trainings 5% 5 - Doctoral
of at least 3 days conducted by Degree Holder
DepEd 4 - Earned units in
MOVs: Doctoral
-Memorandum Degree
-Certificate of Participation 3 - Masteral
and Appearance Degree
-Travel Order 2 - CAR in
-Pictorial report Masteral
Degree
1 - units in
Masteral
Degree

2. Earned units or Degree in post 5% 5 - International

graduate studies Level
4 - National Level
3 - Regional
Level
2 - Division Level
1 - School/District
Level

3. Contributed in the 5 - perfect 5 - Chairman

development and attendance in any
implementation of the school 4 - 1 to 2 absences aspect of
banner project 3 - 3 to 5 absences developing
2 - 6 to 8 absences and
1 - 9 or more implementi
absences ng the
school
banner
Page 16 of 22
 projects/pr
ograms
4 - Co-
chairman
in any
aspect in
developing
and
implementi
ng the
school
banner
projects/pr
ograms
3 - Member in
any aspect
in
developing
and
implementi
ng the
school
banner
projects/pr
ograms
2 - with
Special
Participati
on in the
developme
nt of the
school
banner
projects/pr
ograms
1 - Contributed
in the
implement
ation of
School
Page 17 of 22
 banner
project

V. Plus Factor 5%

A. Winning A. The teacher will gain

Coach/ maximum points of 5 if he/she
awardee achieved/served/reached/mani
- Resource fested the following:
Speaker/
Trainer
- Facilitator
- Curriculum
writer

B. 100% Daily B. Incurred 100% attendance and

Attendance punctuality in school
excluding approved leave of
absence

C. Chair- C. Chair/Coordinator in various 5 - 3 or more

manship / school PAPS,program and chairman-
Coordinator- project ship school
ship level
School-based 4 - 2 chairman-
INSET, ship school
SLAC, PAPs, level
Gulayan. 3 - 1 chairman-
DRR, Eco ship or 4 or
Friendly, more
SBM, GAD, membership
Adopt A school level
School, 2 - active
Brigada member in
Eskwela, 3 or more
School comm.
Publication, School level
School 1 - active
Banner member in
Project, 1-2 comm.
Page 18 of 22
School School
Feeding level
Program,
Child
Friendly
School, SSG
with MOVs

D. Come up with Action 5 - Accom-

Research plished the
Action
Research
with MOVs
4 - Implemen-
ted the
Action
Research
with MOVs
3 - Approved
Action
Research by
the
SDS/ASDS
2 - Submitted
Action
Research
Proposal to
the
SDS/ASDS
1 - Proposed
Action
Research to
the
Immediate
Supervisor

E. Acted as Critique Teacher (for 5 - as critique

Student Teachers) teacher to 2
students
teachers
Page 19 of 22
 with
comlete
MOVs
4 - as critique
teacher to 2
student
teachers
with
incomplete
MOVs
3- as critique
teacher to 1
student
teacher with
complete
MOVs
2 - as critique
tecaher to 1
student
teacher with
incomplete
MOVs
1 - No direct
Student
Teacher but
is asked to
give
technical
assistance
Overall Rating for Accomplishments

Rater Ratee Approving Authority

Page 20 of 22
 PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS DISCUSSIONS

Final Performance Results

Rating Adjectival Rating
Accomplishment of KRAs and Objectives

Rater- Ratee Agreement

The signatures belowconfirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed on content of this appraisal form and the performance rating.

Name of Employee Name of Superior

Signature Signature

Date Date

Page 21 of 22
 PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs (Recommended Developmental Timeline Resources Needed
Intervention)

INSTRUCTIONS:
1. For teachers who have served at least a year of service in DepEd, they must fill-out the two (2) sets of IPCRF (1st Semester and 2nd Semester). To
come-up with the Overall Rating for SY 2017-2018, they must add-up the initial rating for the two (2) rating periods and divide it by 2, for
example: 4.3 (initial rating for the 1st Sem.); 4.6 (initial rating for the 2nd Sem.):
4.3 + 4.5 = 8.8
8.8/2 = 4.4
4.4 = Final IPCRF rating for SY 2017-2018

2. For newly hired teachers, they have to fill-in the semesters applicable to their ACTUAL date of service. For example:
a. Teacher A, hired August 6, 2017, IPCRF to be filled-in should be both 1st Semester and 2nd Semester;
b. Teacher B, hired November 8, 2017, IPCRF to be filled-in should be for the 2nd Semester only, therefore, the initial rating for
the 2nd Semester shall become the FINAL rating.

3. This IPCRF ready-to-print and is consisting of 20 pages. YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO MAKE ANY CORRECTIONS/ALTERATIONS/ADDITIONS to the
template. Any comments/suggestions will be treated separately.

4. This form is also to be used by the Senior High School Teachers.

Page 22 of 22