Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: Laura Simon & Kristian Daneback (2013) Adolescents’ Use of the Internet for Sex Education:
A Thematic and Critical Review of the Literature, International Journal of Sexual Health, 25:4, 305-319, DOI:
10.1080/19317611.2013.823899
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained
in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no
representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the
Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and
are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon
and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable
for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities
whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of
the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic
reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any
form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://
www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
International Journal of Sexual Health, 25:305–319, 2013
Copyright §C Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ABSTRACT. A thematic and critical literature review was conducted to determine what is known
about adolescents’ experiences with online sex education. Four major themes could be dis-
cerned from the literature, revealing that: (a) adolescents report engaging with sex information
online; (b) adolescents are interested in a number of topics, including sexually transmitted
Downloaded by [University of Gothenburg] at 11:14 30 October 2013
infections and pregnancy; (c) the quality of adolescent-targeted sex information online can be
lacking, but adolescents can evaluate these sources; and (d) Internet-based interventions can
increase adolescents’ sexual health knowledge. Inconsistencies in the literature are discussed
and suggestions are made for future research.
305
306 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SEXUAL HEALTH
fore be based on more than just the quality of teenagers, high school, Internet, media, online,
an adolescent’s available offline sex education; and digital. More than 500 articles were re-
the Internet’s ease of use, its availability to in- trieved and read to determine their relevance
creasingly large numbers of adolescents, and its based on the inclusion criteria. We also used
perceived anonymity regarding sensitive topics Internet searches, engaged in discussions with
are unique in the delivery of sexual information colleagues, and evaluated references to gain a
in the digital age. comprehensive understanding of knowledge in
Indeed, this use of the Internet was pre- the field.
dicted by researchers more than 10 years Inclusion criteria for review were: (a) a
ago (Barak & Fisher, 2001; Cooper, 1998; primary or substantial focus on adolescents,
Goldman & Bradley, 2001). However, to (b) a primary or substantial focus on sex ed-
date, this field of study is under-researched ucation, not just general health education, (c)
compared with other online sexual activities a primary or substantial focus on the Internet
(Döring, 2009). What then is known about ado- or media associated with the Internet (such as
lescents’ potential use of the Internet for educa- mobile phones), and (d) text written in English.
tion in sexual matters? The aim of this literature To assess the literature for the first criterion, we
review is to provide insight into the prevalence defined adolescents as teenagers (aged 13 to
and viability of the Internet as a source of in- 19 years old). We followed Caldwell, Caldwell,
formation about sexuality for adolescents. To Caldwell, and Pieris’s (1998) definition of ado-
comment on this topic with breadth and depth, lescence as being a “postpubertal popula-
we have developed the following objectives: (a) tion younger than 20 years of age” (p. 137).
to discover the major and emerging themes of This age range also aligns with the markers of
research in the field, (b) to summarize the major adolescence according to Gagnon and Simon
findings and their significance, (c) to critically (2005): the beginning of puberty and the ending
analyze the current state of the literature for of childhood/beginning of adulthood. To deter-
gaps in knowledge and methodology, and lastly mine if recalled studies fit this age range, we
(d) to provide suggestions for future research. focused on the abstract and Methods section
To the best of our knowledge, this is the to ascertain the participants’ ages; if a study
first literature review to focus on adolescents’ included a wider range of age than was appro-
use of the Internet for sex education. Our find- priate for this review but provided data on just
ings are useful to the research community, to adolescents, we used this information to fit the
practitioners looking to modernize their sex ed- criterion. Similarly, to determine whether the
ucation programs and lesson plans, and to par- literature fit the second and third criteria, we fo-
ents wishing to broaden their understanding of cused on the abstract, Methods section, and Re-
their adolescents’ sex information seeking. sults section of each study to determine whether