1. The document outlines 6 models of educational leadership and management: formal, collegial, political, subjective, ambiguity, and cultural.
2. It also provides definitions for each model, with formal models focusing on hierarchy and accountability, collegial models on consensus decision making, and political models viewing power as emerging through negotiation.
3. Subjective models see organizations as individual interpretations, ambiguity models see unpredictability as dominant, and cultural models see beliefs and values at the core of organizations.
1. The document outlines 6 models of educational leadership and management: formal, collegial, political, subjective, ambiguity, and cultural.
2. It also provides definitions for each model, with formal models focusing on hierarchy and accountability, collegial models on consensus decision making, and political models viewing power as emerging through negotiation.
3. Subjective models see organizations as individual interpretations, ambiguity models see unpredictability as dominant, and cultural models see beliefs and values at the core of organizations.
1. The document outlines 6 models of educational leadership and management: formal, collegial, political, subjective, ambiguity, and cultural.
2. It also provides definitions for each model, with formal models focusing on hierarchy and accountability, collegial models on consensus decision making, and political models viewing power as emerging through negotiation.
3. Subjective models see organizations as individual interpretations, ambiguity models see unpredictability as dominant, and cultural models see beliefs and values at the core of organizations.
Formal models assume that organizations are hierarchical systems in which managers use rational means to pursue agree goals. Heads 1. FORMAL MODELS possess authority legitimized by their formal positions within the organization and are accountable to sponsoring bodies for the activities of their institutions. Collegial models assume that organizations determine policy and make decisions through a process of discussion leading to consensus. Power 2. COLLEGIAL MODELS is shared among some or all members of the organization who are thought to have a shared understanding about the aims of the institution. Political models assume that in organizations policy and decisions emerge through a process of negotiation and bargaining. Interest groups develop and form alliances in pursuit of particular 3. POLITICAL MODELS policy objectives. Conflict is viewed as a natural phenomenon and power accrues to dominant coalitions rather than being the preserve of formal leaders. Subjective models assume that organizations are the creations of the people within them. Participants are thought to interpret situations in different ways and these individual perceptions 4. SUBJECTIVE MODELS are derived from their background and values. Organizations have different meanings for each of their members and exist only in the experience of those members. Ambiguity models assume that turbulence and 5. AMBIGUITY MODELS unpredictability are dominant features of organizations. There is no clarity over the objectives of institutions and their processes are not properly understood. Participation in policy making is fluid as members opt in or out of decision opportunities. Cultural models assume that beliefs, values and ideology are at the heart of organizations. Individuals hold certain ideas and value- preferences which influence how they behave and 6. CULTURAL MODELS how they view the behavior of other members. These norms become shared traditions which are communicated within the group and are reinforced by symbols and ritual.
TYPOLOGY OF MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP MODELS
Management Model Leadership Model Formal Managerial Participative Collegial Transformational Interpersonal Political Transactional Subjective Post-modern Ambiguity Contingency Moral Cultural Instructional Source: adapted from Bush and Glover, 2002