A NOVEL ADAPTIVE FUSION SCHEME FOR COOPERATIVE SPECTRUM

SENSING
We will use the same scheme in the reference paper and compare different
adaptive filter such as NLMS, LMS RLS, KRLS, Kalman Filter, EKF Filter. Result evaluation
based,

 Mean of the confidence level vector versus time (K = 3):

1. NLMS algorithm
2. KLMS algorithm
3. LMS algorithm
4. RLS algorithm
5. KRLS Algorithm
6. Kalman Filter
7. EKF Algorithm

 MSD versus. for

1. NLMS algorithm
2. KLMS
3. LMS
4. RLS
5. KRLS
6. Kalman Filter
7. EKF

 Performance of the proposed approach:

1. Qd and versus time (K = 10) for (NLMS, LMS, KLMS, RLS, KRLS, Kalman, EKF,
OR Rule)
2. Qf versus time (K = 10). for (NLMS, LMS, KLMS, RLS, KRLS, Kalman, EKF,
OR Rule
3. Qd versus time (K = 10). for (NLMS, LMS, KLMS, RLS, KRLS, Kalman, EKF,
AND Rule.
4. Qf versus time (K = 10). for (NLMS, LMS, KLMS, RLS, KRLS, Kalman, EKF,
AND Rule.
5. Qd and versus time (K = 10) for (NLMS, RLS, LMS, KRLS, Kalman, EKF,
Majority Rule)
6. Qf versus time (K = 10). For (NLMS, KLMS, LMS, RLS, KRLS, Kalman, EKF,
Majority Rule)

 ROC curves (K = 10 and Pf = 0.1). For all adaptive proposed schemes.

 Received SNR at the 1st SU changes (K = 3 and Pf = 0.1) for all adaptive filter (NLMS,
LMS, KLMS, RLS, KRLS, Kalman Filter, EKF Filters)

VERILOG COURSE TEAM, CHENNAI-INDIA. www.verilogcourseteam.com

 PU status changes (K = 10 and Pf = 0.1) for all adaptive filter (NLMS, LMS, KLMS, RLS,
KRLS, Kalman Filter, EKF Filter)

VERILOG COURSE TEAM, CHENNAI-INDIA. www.verilogcourseteam.com