Professional Documents
Culture Documents
New York, NY, June 08, 2018 --(PR.com)-- After the New York Court of Appeals answered two burning
questions, a federal appeals court reinstated Jimmy Nolan's Law. The move opens up the possibility for
an entire group of 9/11 injury victims to obtain relief in court.
“We worked hard to get Jimmy Nolan's law passed. So, it hurt when the court struck it down,” Paul J.
Napoli recalled. “But the Second Circuit got it right, so we are back on track. Now, we can fight for the
compensation and justice that second-wave 9/11 victims need and deserve.”
Jimmy sought compensation from the Battery Park City Authority. But under the law, victims only have
90 days to file a claim with a state agency. That includes an Authority. By the time Jimmy's respiratory
symptoms appeared, that claim deadline had long passed.
So, Paul J. Napoli and others lobbied the State Legislature to pass S.B. 3325-B/A.B. 7122-C. This
measure extended the deadline to one year. "Despite the reasonableness of this request, the BPCA
immediately challenged Jimmy Nolan's Law as unconstitutional," Napoli said.
The problem was, according to Paul J. Napoli, that state agencies can only challenge a law's
constitutionality under very, very narrow circumstances. “It's like that old saying goes: Everyone wants to
go to the party but no one wants to stay and help clean up,” he explained. “In my opinion, the BPCA
desired all the legal protections that come with being an Authority but did not want any of the
responsibilities. That's not the way things work,” he added.
Both the answers came back in favor of 9/11 victims. First, according to the Court of Appeals, “a public
benefit corporation is treated like any other state entity and is subject to the general rule that state entities
lack capacity to challenge the constitutionality of a state statute, with only a few narrow exceptions.”
Second, “a claim-revival statute will satisfy the Due Process Clause of the State Constitution if it was
enacted as a reasonable response in order to remedy an injustice.”
"Translation: The BPCA had no basis for its suit, and even if it had a basis, its claims had no merits.
Page 1/3
PR.com Press Release Distribution Terms of Use
While the law did only benefit a certain class of New Yorkers, the change was necessary to correct an
injustice in the law. Victims should never be shut out of court on a technicality,” Paul J. Napoli said.
These victims may now have their claims decided on the merits as opposed to the days on a calendar. “A
day in court is all we ever wanted,” Paul J. Napoli concluded. “Once our story is known, we're confident
that fair compensation will follow.”
Page 2/3
PR.com Press Release Distribution Terms of Use
Contact Information:
Napoli Shkolnik PLLC
Paul J. Napoli
(844) 230-7676
Contact via Email
https://www.napolilaw.com
News Image:
Page 3/3
PR.com Press Release Distribution Terms of Use