You are on page 1of 7

1468

Journal of Food Protection, Vol. 74, No. 9, 2011, Pages 1468–1474


doi:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-110
Copyright G, International Association for Food Protection

Efficacy of a Novel Sanitizer Composed of Lactic Acid and


Peroxyacetic Acid against Single Strains of Nonpathogenic
Escherichia coli K-12, Listeria innocua, and Lactobacillus
plantarum in Aqueous Solution and on Surfaces of Romaine
Lettuce and Spinach
KAI-LAI GRACE HO,* DIEGO A. LUZURIAGA, KENNETH M. RODDE, SHANNON TANG, AND CUONG PHAN

Research and Development Department, Chiquita Brands International, J. R. Lugg Research Center, 607 Brunken Avenue, Salinas, California 93901, USA

MS 11-110: Received 9 March 2011/Accepted 19 May 2011

ABSTRACT
A novel sanitizer composed of lactic acid and peroxyacetic acid (LA-PAA) was developed as an alternative to chlorinated
water (CW) for fresh produce processing. Single strains of Lactobacillus plantarum, nonpathogenic Escherichia coli K-12, and
Listeria innocua were used to demonstrate the microbial efficacy of LA-PAA. LA-PAA achieved a .7.8-log reduction of L.
innocua and L. plantarum suspended in water at 4uC for 20 s, and LA, PAA, and CW achieved reductions of 0.4, 4.8, and 2.7 log,
respectively. LA-PAA, when compared with LA, PAA, and CW, enhanced the reduction of L. innocua attached to romaine leaves
by .2.2 log, and improved the removal of E. coli attached to spinach leaves by .2.4 log. The exponential improvement in the
microbial efficacy of LA-PAA showed synergism between LA and PAA. LA-PAA microbial efficacy was inversely proportional
to pH value and directly correlated with residence time and concentration. Despite an improvement in microbial reduction
through the addition of surfactant to LA-PAA, the usage of surfactant in washing fresh produce was impeded by excessive
foaming during actual processing. Effects of organic matter on the performance of LA-PAA were minimal. External sensory
evaluations showed that LA-PAA had no negative effects on the quality of lettuce and tender leaves. Temperature-abuse studies
demonstrated that LA-PAA reduced decay by ,50% when compared with CW. Overall, these results support the premise that
LA-PAA has significant potential to be an alternative to CW for fresh produce processing.

Fresh-cut produce is an increasingly popular food organic acids (11, 18, 32), have demonstrated the increase of
category because vegetables and fruits are important the microbial efficacy of such sanitizers to overcome high
components of a healthy diet (27); consumers seek organic loads and low temperatures in fresh-cut produce wash
freshness, nutrition, variety, and convenience. From 1994 water. A novel sanitizer, lactic acid plus peroxyacetic acid
to 2007, U.S. supermarket salad sales increased from $3.3 to (LA-PAA), trademarked as Fresh Rinse, was invented (12) to
$15.5 billion (6). Currently, chlorinated water (CW) is used enhance microbial efficacy for fresh produce processing.
to maintain the microbial quality and safety of wash water The bactericidal property of LA is due to the undisso-
for fresh-cut produce. The microbial efficacy of CW is ciated form of the LA being able to pass through the cell
affected by pH and reduced by soil and organic matters (9, membrane, to dissociate back to its ionic form, and to reduce
13, 16), and this affects its ability to reduce microbial intracellular pH, thereby disrupting the transmembrane proton
contamination during washing of fresh-cut produce. Hence, motive force of the cell (7, 10, 21, 22, 25). In addition, LA
there is a need to develop alternate sanitizers to replace CW permeabilizes the water-soluble porin protein molecules that
in produce wash water systems. are located on the bacterial outer membrane (1). PAA inhibits
Two common types of sanitizers used in the food microorganisms by oxidizing their outer cell membranes (7,
industry include natural organic acids (acetic, citric, lactic, 31). The oxidation-reduction of PAA (1.81 eV), is 15 and
malic, and propionic) and oxidation-reduction potential 33% higher than chlorine dioxide (1.57 eV) and sodium
sanitizers (sodium hypochlorite, chlorine dioxide, hydrogen hypochlorite (1.36 eV), respectively, and 12.5% less than that
peroxide, peroxyacetic acid, and ozone) (3, 18, 21). Studies of ozone (2.07 eV) (19). The antimicrobial activity of PAA is
using more than one sanitizer in sequence from the same therefore greater than chlorine dioxide and sodium hypo-
category (ozone and sodium hypochlorite) (8, 20) or the chlorite but less than that of ozone.
addition of surfactants like sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) to The purpose of this study was to compare the microbial
efficacy of LA-PAA to CW, LA, and PAA, under laboratory
* Author for correspondence. Tel: 831-772-6091; Fax: 831-759-4782;
E-mail: gho@chiquita.com. and pilot plant scale-up conditions. In addition, studies have
J. Food Prot., Vol. 74, No. 9 NOVEL SANITIZER AGAINST NONPATHOGENIC BACTERIA IN SOLUTION AND ON LEAVES 1469

shown that organic acids negatively affect the organoleptic 1% phenolphthalein (Ricca Chemical Co., Arlington, TX).
properties of leafy greens (2, 17, 23, 29); hence, the effects PAA was determined by a colorimetric method that used
of LA-PAA on the organoleptic properties of leafy products N,N-diethyl-p-phenylenediamine sulfate and the DR/820 colorimeter.
was assessed by temperature-abuse storage studies and
Suspended cells challenge study. The suspended cells
sensory evaluations.
challenge study was performed at 4uC. LA, PAA, and LA-PAA
solutions were tested at various concentrations by using MTW and
MATERIALS AND METHODS
CW as controls. One milliliter of the single-strain inoculum was
Bacterial strains. Freeze-dried cultures of streptomycin- added to 9 ml of a treatment solution, vortexed for 20, 30, or 40 s,
resistant Escherichia coli K-12 (ATCC 25253), Listeria innocua and immediately transferred to 9 ml of Butterfield’s phosphate
(ATCC 33090), and Lactobacillus plantarum (ATCC 14917), were buffer containing 10 ml of sodium thiosulfate (Fisher Scientific) to
obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, neutralize the sanitizer. The neutralized samples were serial diluted
VA). E. coli K-12 and L. innocua stock cultures were transferred to and enumerated by spread plating with corresponding growth
10-ml tubes of tryptic soy broth (Difco, BD, Sparks, MD) and medium of each strain at 37uC for 24 h (E. coli K-12 ) or 48 h (L.
incubated at 37uC for 24 h. L. plantarum stock culture was innocua and L. plantarum).
transferred to 10-ml tubes of Lactobacilli de Man Rogosa Sharpe
broth (MRS; Difco, BD) and incubated at 37uC for 48 h. Overnight Suspended cells challenge test scale-up at the pilot plant.
enrichments of E. coli K-12, L. innocua, and L. plantarum were The scale-up study treatments were MTW, CW, and LA-PAA
streaked on streptomycin (100 mg/ml) tryptic soy agar, modified solutions at 4uC. A NonLine double-tank produce wash system
Oxford agar, and MRS agar (Difco, BD) prepoured plates, was filled with 300 gal (1,135 liters) of circulating MTW at 1.7uC.
respectively, to confirm purity. One liter of L. plantarum stock was spiked into the wash system at
nine different locations simultaneously (this was time zero for the
Preparation of inocula for laboratory tests. Overnight test). Four 1-ml spiked water samples were retrieved at different
enrichments of E. coli K-12, L. innocua, and L. plantarum were locations of the wash system after 20 or 30 s and immediately
subcultured with their corresponding growth medium and transferred into 9 ml of Butterfield’s phosphate buffer containing
incubated at 37uC for 24, 36, and 48 h, respectively, to form 10 ml of sodium thiosulfate to neutralize the sanitizer. The
stationary-phase cells. Stationary-phase cultures were cooled (1 h neutralized samples were serial diluted and enumerated by spread
at 4uC), centrifuged (4uC, 10,000 rpm for 15 min; Sorvall Legend plating with MRS agar plates at 37uC for 48 h.
RT, Thermo Electron Corporation, Osterode, Germany), and
resuspended in an equal volume of 0.1% peptone water (Difco, Attached cells challenge study. Fresh romaine lettuce (1.5
BD) and 5% horse serum (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) for by 2.5 in. [3.81 cm by 6.35 cm]) and spinach were provided by
suspended and attached cells challenge tests, respectively (15). The Fresh Express, Inc., (Salinas, CA) and kept at 4uC. Two leaves of
microbial population of the E. coli K-12, L. innocua, and L. the test produce were spot inoculated (one on the upper epidermis
plantarum resuspended inocula was enumerated with streptomycin and the other on the lower epidermis) with 50 ml of ,109 CFU/ml
(100 mg/ml) tryptic soy agar, modified Oxford agar, and MRS agar E. coli K-12 or L. innocua (10 to 15 droplets) and air dried in a
(Difco, BD) prepoured plates, respectively. class II, type A2 biological safety cabinet (NuAire, Plymouth, MN)
for 45 to 60 min at 20 to 25uC and 35 to 40% relative humidity.
Preparation of inocula for pilot plant scale-up test. The spot-inoculation method was used, as it imitates contamination
Overnight enrichment of L. plantarum at ,108 CFU/ml was on produce from a point source (4, 5).
spread plated onto the surface of 600 MRS prepoured agar plates at Study treatments included MTW, CW, LA, PAA, and LA-
1 ml per plate. The inoculated MRS agar plates were incubated at PAA solutions. To simulate commercial conditions, organic matter
37uC for 48 h and then wetted with 2 ml of sterile MRS broth. The in the form of chopped romaine lettuce was added to the treatment
L. plantarum colonies were harvested to form 1 liter of inoculum wash solutions at 1:6.5 by weight. The two spiked leaves were
stock, ,109 to 1010 CFU/ml. The microbial population of the submerged into 3 liters of 4uC test solution, with continuous
inoculum was enumerated at the beginning and end of the test by stirring for 20 or 30 s, macerated by mallet hammer, and then
using MRS prepoured agar plates. immediately stomached by a 400 circulator stomacher (Seward,
Ltd., London, UK) at 260 rpm. The samples were enumerated by
Preparation and measurement of sanitizers. Four saniti- spread plating at 37uC for 24 h (E. coli K-12 ) or 48 h (L. innocua
zers (CW, LA, PAA, and LA-PAA solution) were prepared in and L. plantarum) (28).
triplicate with 4uC municipal tap water (MTW). CW was prepared
by mixing cooled MTW with 15% (wt/wt) sodium hypochlorite Evaluation of factors affecting microbial efficacy. Effects
solution and 50% (wt/wt) citric acid solution (both solutions from of pH were determined by a challenge test of E. coli K-12
Basic Chemical Solutions, Redwood City, CA) for pH adjustment suspended cells at pH 3.0, 3.3, 3.6, and 3.9. Solutions were
to 7.0 ¡ 0.2 (a common practice in the industry to maintain free adjusted to their corresponding pH by 0.1 N sodium hydroxide
chlorine in its bactericidal form, hypochlorous acid, for effective solution. Effect of residence time was evaluated by exposing L.
microbial reduction without liberation of chlorine gas (26)). Food- innocua to tested solution at 20, 25, 30, and 35 s of residence time,
grade 88% LA (Purac Biochem, Gorinchem, The Netherlands) and following procedures laid out by Ho (12). Influence of surfactants
35% PAA (Pfaltz and Bauer, Inc., Waterbury CT) were used to on the microbial efficacy of LA-PAA was assessed by L. innocua
prepare LA, PAA, and LA-PAA solutions. Solutions were kept and E. coli K-12 attached cells challenge tests with spinach and
refrigerated until testing. romaine leaves, using SLS at 220 to 250 ppm. Effects of organic
Free chlorine was measured by a DR/820 colorimeter (Hach, matter were determined by washing chopped romaine leaves that
Loveland, CO). LA was determined by titration with a TITRONIC were continuously fed into a fixed volume (,1,200 gal [,4,500
basic titrator (Schott Instruments, Mainz, Germany), with sodium liters]) of sanitizer (CW and LA-PAA solution) that was circulating
hydroxide solution (0.05 N; Fisher Scientific, Fairlawn, NJ) and in a NonLine wash system at 3uC. No additional sanitizer was
1470 HO ET AL. J. Food Prot., Vol. 74, No. 9

TABLE 1. Log reduction of Listeria innocua (ATCC 33090) and Lactobacillus plantarum (ATCC 14917) in suspension treated with LA-
PAA, LA, PAA, and CW a
Peroxyacetic acid (ppm):

Lactic acid (ppm) 0 63.0 67.5 72.0

L. innocua
0 NAb 1.70 ¡ 0.13 B
c
2.27 ¡ 0.12 B 3.02 ¡ 0.31 B
1,800 0.08 ¡ 0.05 A 4.19 ¡ 0.32 C 5.68 ¡ 0.11 D .7.80 F
2,250 0.19 ¡ 0.08 A 4.61 ¡ 0.74 C 6.00 ¡ 0.05 D .7.80 F
2,700 0.05 ¡ 0.03 A 5.19 ¡ 0.06 CD 6.76 ¡ 0.25 E .7.80 F
CW (15.4 ppm, pH 7.0) 0.09 ¡ 0.05 A

L. plantarum
0 NA 3.93 ¡ 0.06 C 4.25 ¡ 0.15 C 4.79 ¡ 0.87 C
1,800 0.13 ¡ 0.11 A 5.21 ¡ 0.08 D 5.13 ¡ 0.10 D 5.24 ¡ 0.26 D
2,250 0.19 ¡ 0.02 A 5.11 ¡ 0.48 D 5.51 ¡ 0.50 DE 5.86 ¡ 0.10 DE
2,700 0.40 ¡ 0.17 A 5.09 ¡ 0.27 D 6.46 ¡ 0.04 E .7.79 F
CW (15.4 ppm, pH 7.0) 2.68 ¡ 0.20 B

a
Test performed at 4uC and 20 s of residence time.
b
NA, not applicable.
c
Log reduction values with different letters indicate statistical significance at P , 0.05.

added to the wash water in order to measure the loss in active plantarum at 4uC were similar (0.1 to 0.4 log). The
ingredients caused by organic matter. Collected wash water reductions by 63.0, 67.5, and 72.0 ppm of PAA on L.
samples were analyzed for the active ingredients concentrations innocua were 1.70, 2.27, and 3.02 log, respectively, while
and total aerobic plate counts, while the romaine leaves samples those on L. plantarum were 3.93, 4.25, and 4.79 log,
were enumerated for total aerobic plate counts only.
respectively (Table 1).
Sanitizer affect on product quality. Temperature-abuse The log reductions on L. innocua and L. plantarum by
storage studies at 7uC on spinach and tender leaves mix bagged LA-PAA (1,800 ppm of LA and 63.0 ppm of PAA) were
under commercial conditions at a pilot plant were used to 4.19 and 5.21 log, respectively. A reduction of .7.80 log
determine the effects of CW and LA-PAA on product quality. (,1 CFU/ml) resulted when the LA-PAA level was
Six bags of each treatment were selected randomly from boxes increased to 2,700 ppm of LA and 72 ppm of PAA. The
situated at different locations of a pallet. Percent decay (wt/wt) of reduction of L. innocua was enhanced from 4.19 to .7.80
each bag sample was determined by randomly retrieving 80 g log as the PAA in the LA-PAA solution was increased from
(,50% of the bag sample weight) of leaves from the bag. The 63.0 to 72.0 ppm, with LA constant at 1,800 ppm. At
retrieved leaves were individually inspected for signs of decay, and
72 ppm of PAA, the reduction of L. plantarum improved
the weight of the decay leaves was weighed and recorded. The
percent decay (wt/wt) of each bag sample was calculated by
from 5.24 to .7.79 log, as the LA was elevated to 1,800
dividing the weight (in grams) of the decay leaves with the total and 2,700 ppm, respectively (Table 1).
weight (in grams) of the sample. The average of six bag samples Under all replications, the log reduction of CW with
provided the average percent decay (wt/wt) of each treatment on a free chlorine of 15.4 ppm and at pH 7.0 was 0.09 and 2.68
certain sampling day for a particular test. log on L. innocua and L. plantarum, respectively. The
External sensory evaluations employing a nine-point hedonic reductions were equal to or better than the tested LA levels,
scale on appearance, color, aroma, taste, texture, and overall liking but significantly less than that of PAA alone and LA-PAA
were used to assess the organoleptic properties of CW- and LA- solution.
PAA–washed leafy green products including chopped iceberg,
chopped romaine, and tender leaves mix with spinach. Each Suspended cells challenge test scale-up at the pilot
replication of the sensory evaluation test was conducted by 100 plant. Minimal decrease in L. plantarum (0.02 to 0.06 log)
panelists. Evaluated products were produced at a commercial
population at the beginning of test showed that homoge-
facility.
neous mixing was achieved in the 300-gal (1,136-liter) wash
Statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was carried out with solution. CW with free chlorine of 9.9 and 16.5 ppm at 20 s
analysis of variance (ANOVA). The least significant difference test delivered 1.6- and 2.3-log reductions, respectively (Fig. 1)
was used to determine significant differences (P , 0.05) among and the reduction increased by 0.85 and 0.25 log,
mean values. Microbial data were log transformed before respectively, at 30 s.
performing ANOVA. Each study was repeated three separate Treatment of L. plantarum by LA-PAA at 20 and 30 s
times independently. resulted in 5.1- and .7.2-log reductions, respectively. The
increase in exposure time improved significantly the log
RESULTS
reduction of L. plantarum by .2.4 log (Fig. 1). The
Suspended cells challenge study. The log reductions microbial efficacy of LA-PAA at 20 and 30 s was ,3.0 and
by LA (1,800 to 2,700 ppm) on L. innocua and L. .4.7 log better than CW, respectively. The suspended cells
J. Food Prot., Vol. 74, No. 9 NOVEL SANITIZER AGAINST NONPATHOGENIC BACTERIA IN SOLUTION AND ON LEAVES 1471

FIGURE 1. Pilot plant scale-up results for log reduction of FIGURE 2. Effects of pH on the microbial efficacy of LA-PAA on
Lactobacillus plantarum (ATCC 14917) suspended in 300 gal suspended cells of Escherichia coli K-12 (ATCC 25253). LA-PAA
(1,136 liters) of MTW, CW, and LA-PAA solution for 20 and 30 s. concentration: 1,555 ppm of LA and 55 ppm of PAA.
Log reductions values with different letters indicate statistical
significance at P , 0.05. E. coli K-12 were only 0.87 and 1.36 log, respectively
(Table 2).
challenge test at the pilot plant with L. plantarum confirmed
the results obtained from the bench top (laboratory scale) Factors affecting microbial efficacy of LA-PAA. The
test. log reduction of LA-PAA on E. coli K-12 decreased from
4.07 to 2.83 log as the pH of the solution increased from
Attached cells challenge study. At 4,500 and pH 3.0 to 3.9 (Fig. 2). LA-PAA microbial efficacy on L.
6,000 ppm, LA decreased L. innocua attached to chopped innocua at 20-, 25-, 30-, and 35-s residence times was 4.7,
romaine leaves by 0.69 and 1.32 log, respectively, and E. 5.4, 6.2, and 7.3 log, respectively, better than CW (Fig. 3).
coli K-12 attached to spinach leaves by 0.43 log and 0.83 The addition of SLS at 250 ppm to the PAA alone, LA
log, respectively. LA-PAA (4,500 to 6,000 ppm LA and alone, and LA-PAA solution enhanced the reduction on
80 ppm PAA) achieved .3.58 log on L. innocua attached to suspended L. innocua by 2, 3, and 1 log, respectively
romaine leaves. The inactivation achieved by the LA and (Fig. 4A). There were no significant differences between
PAA solutions alone, however, were both only 1.3 log log reductions of L. innocua and E. coli K-12 attached to
CFU/ml. Reductions .4.88 log on E. coli K-12 attached to romaine and spinach leaves by LA-PAA, with or without
spinach leaves were delivered by LA-PAA (6,000 ppm of SLS (Fig. 4B).
LA and 80 ppm of PAA), whereas reductions of only 0.83 Residual free chlorine dropped sharply to 10% after one
and 2.47 log were obtained from the LA and PAA solutions, bin (,600 lb [272.3 kg]) of chopped romaine leaves was
respectively. The log reductions by CW (55 ppm of free washed under the enclosed wash system, with no replen-
chlorine at pH 6.8) on the attached cells of L. innocua and ishment of sodium hypochlorite (Fig. 5). The percentage of

TABLE 2. Log reduction of Listeria innocua (ATCC 33090) attached to chopped romaine leaves and Escherichia coli K-12 (ATCC
25253) attached to spinach leaves treated with LA-PAA, LA, PAA, CW, and MTW a
Peroxyacetic acid (ppm):

Lactic acid (ppm) 0 70.0 80.0

L. innocua
0 NAb 1.10 ¡ 0.04 C
c
1.38 ¡ 0.01 D
4,500 0.69 ¡ 0.16 B 1.75 ¡ 0.16 E .3.58 F
6,000 1.32 ¡ 0.07 CD 2.00 ¡ 0.05 E .3.58 F
CW (55 ppm, pH 6.8) 0.87 ¡ 0.00 B
MTW 0.14 ¡ 0.03 A

E. coli K-12
0 NA 1.34 ¡ 0.01 D 2.47 ¡ 0.01 F
4,500 0.43 ¡ 0.07 B 1.94 ¡ 0.13 E 3.72 ¡ 0.11 G
6,000 0.83 ¡ 0.13 C 2.40 ¡ 0.17 F .4.88 H
CW (55 ppm, pH 6.8) 1.36 ¡ 0.09 D
MTW 0.01 ¡ 0.03 A

a
Tests performed at 4.4 to 7.2uC and 30 s of exposure time.
b
NA, not applicable.
c
Log reduction values with different letters indicate statistical significance at P , 0.05.
1472 HO ET AL. J. Food Prot., Vol. 74, No. 9

FIGURE 3. Effects of residence time (20, 25, 30, and 35 s) on the


log reduction of Listeria innocua (ATCC 33090) suspended in FIGURE 5. Percentage of active ingredients left in CW and LA-
MTW, CW, and LA-PAA. Log reduction values with different PAA during washing of chopped romaine lettuce in a 1,200-gal
letters indicate statistical significance at P , 0.05. CW con- (4,500-liter) NonLine wash system with no sanitizer replenishment.
centration: 10 ¡ 2 ppm of free chlorine at pH 7.0 ¡ 0.2. LA-PAA
concentration: 2,000 ppm of LA and 70 ppm of PAA.

No residual cells (,1 CFU/ml) were enumerated from all


the collected LA-PAA solution samples throughout the
residual LA-PAA ingredients remained at 100% after entire test, whereas the total aerobic plate counts in the CW
washing three bins (,1,800 lb [818.2 kg]) and ,75% after samples were between 4.5 and .6.0 log CFU/ml.
six bins (,3,600 lb [1,632.4 kg]) of chopped romaine
leaves. The log reductions by LA-PAA on the indigenous Sanitizer effect on product quality. The log reduc-
total aerobic plate counts attached to the romaine leaves tions on the indigenous total aerobic plate counts on spinach
were 1.7 to 2.5 log, while that of CW was ,0.4 log (Fig. 6). and tender leaves mix by CW and LA-PAA were 0.55 log,
and 1.5 to 1.7 log, respectively (Fig. 7). After 15 days of
storage under temperature-abuse conditions (7uC), the
percent decay (wt/wt) of LA-PAA–washed spinach was
54% less than that of CW (Fig. 8). The percent decay
(wt/wt) of LA-PAA–washed tender leaves mix after 14 days
of temperature-abuse storage at (7uC) was 54% less than
that of CW (Fig. 8).
The leafy green products external sensory evaluations
results showed that for all three replicates, there were no
significant differences between the LA-PAA and CW
average sensory scores on appearance, color, aroma, taste,
texture, and overall liking for chopped iceberg, chopped
romaine, and tender leaves mix with spinach.

FIGURE 4. Effects of surfactant on log reduction of (A) Listeria


innocua (ATCC 33090) in suspension by PAA, LA, and LA-PAA,
and (B) Listeria innocua (ATCC 33090) and Escherichia coli K-12
(ATCC 25353) attached to romaine and spinach leaves by LA- FIGURE 6. Log reduction of indigenous total aerobic plate
PAA. Log reduction values with different letters indicate statistical counts attached to chopped romaine leaves by washing with CW
significance at P , 0.05. LA-PAA concentration: 4,500 ppm of LA and LA-PAA with a NonLine 1,200-gal (4,500-liter) wash system
and 70 ppm of PAA. with no sanitizer replenishment.
J. Food Prot., Vol. 74, No. 9 NOVEL SANITIZER AGAINST NONPATHOGENIC BACTERIA IN SOLUTION AND ON LEAVES 1473

FIGURE 8. Percentage of decay (wt/wt) of CW- and LA-PAA–


FIGURE 7. Initial log reduction of indigenous total aerobic plate washed spinach and tender leaves mix after storage at 7.2uC for 15
counts on spinach and tender leaves mix by washing with CW and and 14 days, respectively. Log reduction values with different
LA-PAA with a 1,200-gal (4,500-liter) NonLine wash system. Log letters indicate statistical significance at P , 0.05. CW con-
reduction values with different letters indicate statistical signifi- centration: 10 ¡ 2 ppm of free chlorine at pH 7.0 ¡ 0.2. LA-PAA
cance at P , 0.05. CW concentration: 10 ¡ 2 ppm of free chlorine concentration: 2,000 ppm of LA and 70 ppm of PAA.
at pH 7.0 ¡ 0.2. LA-PAA concentration: 2,000 ppm of LA and
70 ppm of PAA. However, there was no statistically significant difference (P
, 0.05) between the microbial efficacy of LA-PAA with or
DISCUSSION without SLS on attached cells. In addition, excessive
In this study, all trials (laboratory, pilot plant, and foaming was observed during scale-up studies because of
commercial facilities) were conducted at 4uC with 20 to 30 s the properties of the wash system. These are reasons why
of residence time, using organic matter containing water. we do not recommend the addition of surfactant in the LA-
These testing parameters are normal commercial processing PAA formulation for fresh produce processing.
conditions for leafy greens; thus, the results are valid and Unlike other studies that showed sogginess of leaves
applicable for commercial scale-up. Previous works on other resulting from PAA washed produce (2, 17, 23, 29), sensory
sanitizers were performed at higher temperatures (20 to 25uC) evaluations from three studies with 100 panelists each,
and longer dwell times (1 to 10 min) (11, 17, 20, 24, 30, 32), showed that LA-PAA presented no negative effects on the
which did not simulate commercial processing conditions. organoleptic properties of chopped iceberg, chopped
LA-PAA demonstrated significant enhancement in romaine, and tender leaves mix with spinach. In addition,
reducing microorganisms that were suspended in wash temperature-abuse storage studies demonstrated that LA-
water and attached to surfaces of the leaves, when compared PAA reduced spinach and tender leaves mix decay
with CW, LA, and PAA. The surprising advancement in percentage (wt/wt) by ,50%. This reduction in decay was
antimicrobial activity of LA-PAA demonstrated the pres- attributed in part to the higher reduction in indigenous
ence of synergistic effects between the antimicrobial microorganisms attached to the leaves surfaces by LA-PAA.
properties of LA and PAA. All pilot plant microbial tests Our validation of LA-PAA as an effective new sanitizer
were performed with commercial-scale systems, and the was comprehensive, as recommended by others for
results mirrored that obtained from bench-top, indicating development of such novel technologies (14). It involved
that LA-PAA is scalable for commercial applications. studies conducted at bench-top, pilot plant, and commercial
The chopped-romaine pilot plant study demonstrated facilities, with sensory evaluation performed on treated
both the resilience of LA-PAA to organic matter in the wash produce after temperature-abuse storage. LA-PAA is
water (a serious problem for maintaining the free chlorine scalable from bench-top to commercial scale, and it
concentration in CW) and the capability of LA-PAA in possesses no negative influence on produce quality.
keeping fresh produce wash water microbial population low In this study, L. innocua and E. coli K-12 were used to
(,1 CFU/ml in wash water enumeration), even in the demonstrate the microbial efficacy of LA-PAA, as these two
presence of high organic load. This indirectly supports the strains have served commonly as the nonpathogenic
premise that LA-PAA is highly probable in preventing surrogates in produce cases that involved L. monocytogenes
cross-contamination in wash water, a study that will be and E. coli O157:H7, respectively (5). Results of studies
reported in our sequel article. using pathogens cocktails will be published subsequently to
Similar to other studies that showed significant substantiate the inactivation of LA-PAA on produce-
improvements in microbial efficacy with surfactants (11, pertinent pathogens, as many pathogens are known to be
18, 32), the inactivation of L. innocua suspended in solution significantly more resistant to inactivation intervention
by LA, PAA, and LA-PAA was increased by 3.0, 1.8, and treatments than other nonpathogenic variants within the
1.4 log, respectively. In the case of L. innocua and E. coli same species or genera. Nonetheless, the overall results
K-12 that were attached to romaine and spinach leaves, the reported in this article indicate that LA-PAA has great
average improvement in the antimicrobial activities of LA- potential to be an excellent alternative for CW in fresh
PAA with the addition of SLS was from 0.26 to 0.90 log. produce processing.
1474 HO ET AL. J. Food Prot., Vol. 74, No. 9

REFERENCES 17. Martinez-Sanchez, A., A. Allende, R. N. Bennett, F. Ferreres, and M.


I. Gil. 2006. Microbial, nutritional and sensory quality of rocket
1. Alakomi, H.-L., E. Skytta, M. Saarela, T. Mattila-Sandholm, K. leaves as affected by different sanitizers. Postharvest Biol. Technol.
Latva-Kala, and I. M. Helander. 2000. Lactic acid permeabilizes 42:86–97.
gram-negative bacteria by disrupting the outer membrane. Appl. 18. Olmez, H., and U. Kretzschmar. 2009. Potential alternative
Environ. Microbiol. 66:2001–2005. disinfection methods for organic fresh-cut industry for minimizing
2. Allende, A., M. V. Selma, F. Lopez-Galvez, R. Villaescusa, and M. I. water consumption and environmental impact. Food Sci. Technol. 42:
Gil. 2008. Role of commercial sanitizers and washing systems on 686–693.
epiphytic microorganisms and sensory quality of fresh-cut escarole
19. Organic Materials Institute. 2000. Peracetic acid. Available at: http://
and lettuce. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 49:155–163.
www.electropure-inc.com/docs/peracetic-acid.pdf. Accessed 7 Feb-
3. Beuchat, L. R. 2000. Use of sanitizers in raw fruit and vegetable
ruary 2011.
processing, p. 63–78. In S. M. Alzamora, M. S. Tapia, and A., Lopez-
20. Rahman, S. M. E., T. Ding, and D. H. Oh. 2010. Inactivation effect of
Malo (ed.), Minimally processed fruit and vegetables. Fundamental
newly developed low concentration electrolyzed water and other
aspects and applications. Aspen Publishers, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD.
sanitizers against microorganisms on spinach. Food Control 21:
4. Burnett, A. B., M. H. Iturriaga, E. F. Escartin, C. A. Oettugrew, and
1383–1387.
L. R. Beuchat. 2004. Influence of variations in methodology on
21. Raybaudi-Massilia, R. M., J. Mosqueda-Melgar, R. Soliva-Fortuny,
populations of Listeria monocytogenes recovered from lettuce treated
and O. Martin-Belloso. 2009. Control of pathogenic and spoilage
with sanitizers. J. Food Prot. 67:742–750.
microorganisms in fresh-cut fruits and fruit juices by traditional and
5. Busta, F. F., J. N. Farber, E. H. Garrett, L. J. Harris, M. E. Parish, and
alternative natural antimicrobials. Comp. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 8:
T. V. Suslow, 1998. Guide to minimize microbial food safety hazards
157–180.
for fresh fruits and vegetables. U.S. Department of Health and Human
22. Ricke, S. C. 2003. Perspectives on the use of organic acids and short
Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and
chain fatty acids as antimicrobials. Poult. Sci. 82:632–639.
Applied Nutrition, Washington, DC.
23. Rodgers, S. L., J. N. Cash, M. Siddiq, and E. T. Ryser. 2004. A
6. Cook, R. June 2009. Trends in the marketing of fresh produce and
comparison of different chemical sanitizers for inactivating Esche-
fresh-cut products. Available at: http://agecon.ucdavis.edu/people/
richia coli O157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes in solution and on
faculty/roberta-cook/docs/links/ShtCse09CookConsumer091106.pdf.
apples, lettuce, strawberries, and cantaloupe. J. Food Prot. 67:721–
Accessed 7 February 2011.
7. Davidson, P. M. 2001. Chemical preservatives and natural antimi- 731.
crobial compounds, p. 593–627. In M. P. Doyle, L. R. Beuchat, and 24. Samara, A., and K. P. Koutsoumanis. 2009. Effects of treating lettuce
T. J. Montville (ed.), Food microbiology: fundamentals and frontiers, surfaces with acidulants on the behaviour of Listeria monocytogenes
2nd ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC. during storage at 5 and 20uC and subsequent exposure to simulated
8. Garcia, A., J. R. Mount, and P. M. Davidson. 2003. Ozone and gastric fluid. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 129:1–7.
chlorine treatment of minimally processed lettuce. J. Food Sci. 68: 25. Stratford, M., and T. Eklund. 2003. Organic acids and esters, p. 48–
2747–2751. 84. In N. J. Russell and G. W. Gould (ed.), Food preservatives, 2nd
9. Gil, M. I., M. V. Selma, F. Lopez-Galvez, and A. Allende. 2009. ed. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, London.
Fresh-cut product sanitation and wash water disinfection: problems 26. Suslow, T. 1997. Publication 8003: Postharvest chlorination, basic
and solutions. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 134:37–45. properties and key points for effective disinfection. Regents of the
10. Gottschalk, G. 1985. Bacterial metabolism, 2nd ed. Springer, New University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural
York. Resources, Oakland.
11. Guan, W., L. Huang, and X. Fan. 2010. Acids in combination with 27. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and
sodium dodecyl sulfate caused quality deterioration of fresh-cut Human Services. 2010. Dietary guidelines for Americans, 2010, 7th
iceberg lettuce during storage in modified atmosphere package. J. ed. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Food Sci. 75:S435–S440. 28. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 1998. Bacteriological analytical
12. Ho, K.-L. G. December 2009. US patent application 20090324789. manual, 8th ed. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Washington,
13. Keskinen, L. A., A. Burke, and B. A. Annous. 2009. Efficacy of DC.
chlorine, acidic electrolyzed water and aqueous chlorine dioxide 29. Velazquez, L. D. C., N. B. Barbini, M. E. Escudero, C. L. Estrada,
solutions to decontaminate Escherichia coli O157:H7 from lettuce. and A. M. S. Guzman. 2009. Evaluation of chlorine, benzalkonium
Int. J. Food Microbiol. 132:132–140. chloride and lactic acid as sanitizers for reducing Escherichia coli
14. Koutchma, T., K.-L. G. Ho, and P. J. Slade. 2005. Roadmap to validation O157:H7 and Yersinia enterocolitica on fresh vegetables. Food
of processing technologies for juice. Food Prot. Trends 25:114–119. Control 20:262–268.
15. Lang, M. M., L. J. Harris, and L. R. Beuchat. 2004. Survival and 30. Virto, R., D. Sanz, I. Alvarez, and C. J. Raso. 2005. Inactivation
recovery of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and Listeria kinetics of Yersinia enterocolitica by citric and lactic acid at different
monocytogenes on lettuce and parsley as affected by method of temperatures. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 103:251–257.
inoculation, time between inoculation and analysis, and treatment 31. Xu, L. 1999. Use of ozone to improve the safety of fresh fruits and
with chlorinated water. J. Food Prot. 67:1092–1103. vegetables. Food Technol. 53:58–63.
16. Li, Y., R. E. Brackett, J. Chen, and L. R. Beuchat. 2001. Survival and 32. Zhao, T., P. Zhao, and M. P. Doyle. 2009. Inactivation of Salmonella
growth of Escherichia coli O157:H7 inoculated onto cut lettuce and Escherichia coli O157:H7 on lettuce and poultry skin by
before or after heating in chlorinated water, followed by storage at 5 combinations of levulinic acid and sodium dodecyl sulfate. J. Food
or 15uC. J. Food Prot. 64:305–309. Prot. 72:928–936.

You might also like