Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(YOCRIS)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I EVALUATION SCOPE
II TOOLS AND LIMITATIONS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
3.0 PROJECT DESIGN
4.0 ANALYSIS OF PLANNED ACTIVITIES, PLANNED OUTPUTS AND
ACHIEVED OUTPUTS
5.0 ANALYSIS OF IMPACT AT OUT COMES LEVEL
6.0 PROJECT STRATEGIC ACHIEVEMENT
7.0 OVERALL ACHIEVEMENTS OF THE PROJECT
8.0 CHALLENGES
9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
10.0 CONCLUSIONS
I EVALUATION SCOPE
The evaluation was called for specifically to achieve the following objectives:
To assess how the project has performed pragmatically and ascertain whether
there is any impact created.
To review the reporting system, identify gaps and proposed reporting system
in relation child rights issues
Period
The Evaluation schedule lasted for (3) three weeks begging from the day when
the contract was signed (14th December 2007) to the day of submission of final
report.
Mode of working
A working calendar for 15 days was drawn and shared with YOCRIS.
The consultant drew the study tools
A project officer from YOCRIS was attached to work together with the
consultant for the community related work
The following are the tools which were development and used during the
evaluation:
1. Focus Group Discussions (FGD)
The discussions were done with the following groups:
Men
Women
Boys
Girls
4. Seasonal calendar
5. Busometer
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Youth and children rights shield (YOCRIS) has been implementing project that
aimed at protecting child rights through prevention and monitoring of child labour
related issues. The project was implemented in the area of traditional Authority
Kachere in selected four Village development Areas ;
Child Labour is one of the worst forms of Child abuse. According to the
International Labour Organization (ILO), Child labour remains a serious problem
in the world today. Malawi is one of the countries where child labour is being
practiced. Many children are being trafficked or voluntarily leaving the rural
setups migrating to other rural set ups and urban areas where they are engaged
in child labour. Dedza district is one of the districts, which has high numbers of
children being trafficked to districts within Malawi and tobacco estates in
Mozambique and Zambia where they are engaged in child labour as domestic
workers or estate workers. Such children drop out of primary schools willingly or
forced by their parents to go to urban areas and estates where they are
employed to suffice their family income.
According to The Malawi 2002 Child Labour survey, they are 1.4 million child
labourers. 734,845 of the child labourers aged 5-17 and are in agriculture.
288,341 children aged 1-17 are in hazardous labour. 603,780 child laborers are
in community, social and personal services sector. 26.5 % of child labourers
never attended school: while, as 53 % did not complete junior primary school
(ILO, 2002).
Desk review carried out by YOCRIS at Dedza Labour offices in January 2005
indicate that quite a number of children between the ages of 8-17 are going out
of their villages to places where they are engaged in child labour. For instance in
Mcheneka Village alone, 142 children as of February 2005 were engaged in
different forms of child labour in the urban and rural areas. Out of the 142
children, 61 were girls whilst 81 were boys. In Mfutso village within the targeted
area, 107 children by February 2005 had gone to places where they are engaged
in child labour. Out of these children 53 were girls and 54 were boys. Statistics at
Dedza District labour Office indicate that on average most of villages supply
about 70 Children to Child labour. A sample survey in 6 primary schools in the
targeted area shows that there is a considerable drop out of pupils and is linked
to child labour related issues.
Project Goal
To contribute towards reduction of child labour in the area of Traditional Authority
Kachere in Dedza by July 2007
Project purpose
To create a society where communities collaborate in the prevention of child
labour and other child rights violations.
Specific Objectives
Target Groups
a. Children
b. Parents
c. Local Leadership
d. Local Governance Structures
e. Target area
Implementation Strategies
Advocacy
Research
Capacity building
a. Community level
b. Institutional level
Activities
In order to successfully achieve the outlined goal and objectives , the had the
following activities.:
This is one of the strategic objectives the project wanted to achieve. The project
has achieved this strategic objective as follows:
Case studies to show increased knowledge and improved capacity learn from
news cuttings
Girls who were rescued from employment Child prostitution: More information on the news cuttings
YOCRIS - CHILD LABOUR PROJECT END REPORT
At the time of this study (DECEMBER 2007) YOCRIS was in Court with two
people who had also employed girls as child prostitution.
This is another strategic objective the project planned to achieve. In the selected
area where this project was implemented there is improvement in terms of
community participation and coordination in dealing child labour issues. The
graph below demonstrates:
100
90
Level of 80
Participation in 70
% Before
60 Project
50
40 In the course
of the Project
30
20 At the end of
10 the project
0
Kapesi Chikufikani Mnjonja Chimalira
The graph above shows the trend of community participation and coordination in
preventing and monitoring child labour at three levels. The fist level is where it
was measured before the beginning of the project while the middle bar it at the
middle of implementation and the lat bar very tall it is at the end of the project.
By laws:
1. Any vehicle that comes in T/A Kachere to collect labourers should come
through the District labour office where they should be given letter of
authority to take labourers to where every they want to go with them.
2. Having collected the letter from the district labour officer they should go
through the T/A’s office where they should be given letter of authority from
the T/A to go to the villages to collect people.
3. Having arrived in the villages before start taking people they should first
report to Village head and show the village head the letter of authorization
they got from the T//A .
4. Upon leaving they should bid bye to the village head who together with the
Child protection committee inspect the vehicle to check if there are no
children aboard.
5. Any child should be told to disembark from the car if found.
6. Any family who has children in their company should also be told to
disembark from the car.
7. On the way back from the village the vehicle should pass through the T/A
who should also verify that in the car there are no children whether on
their own or in the company of their parents. Any one who also at T/As
office is believed to be a child is forced to disembark from the car. Then
the T/A gives the owner of the car a letter that he has to take with him to
labour office indicating that very thing is okay.
8. Any car that come to the T/A or Villages without authorization letter is sent
back to the district labour office.
The project has achieved tremendously its intended goal in relation to reduction of child labour overall it has reduced child
labour in the selected four Village development Committees with average over of 81%.
Table 3: Matrix showing the number of children who re engaged in child labour at the beginning of the project, mid way
implementation and at the end of the project. The totals give an overall decrease of 81% of children engaged in child
labour
Before The Project After 7 Months After 14 months
Kapesi Village Development Committee 86 42 24
Chikufikani Village Development Committee 187 78 32
Mnjonja Village Development Committee 273 157 49
Chimalira Village Development Committee 264 111 42
Table 4: Linier graph showing impact performance of the project emerging from Table 3.
YOCRIS - CHILD LABOUR PROJECT END REPORT
200
150
100
50
0
Before The Project After 7 Months After 14 months
Project Span
Table 5: Bar chart showing numbers of children withdrawn from various forms of child labour and others that have gone
back to school as a result of the project.
Children30
Withdrawn20
10
0
Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Table 6: Matrix showing numbers of children withdrawn from various forms of child labour and others that have gone back
to school as a result of the project.
Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total
Cattle herding 0 0 6 10 15 21 18 3 0 14 0 0 17 104
Household chores 0 0 23 12 32 11 17 10 13 4 34 9 0 165
Farming 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 23 11 31 0 78
withdrawn out side Dedza 0 0 2 7 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 28
Child Prostitution 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 3 0 4 0 2 13 29
Children Back to school 0 19 0 19 0 34 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 81
Improved condition of services 4 3 12 2 11 17 43 17 18 23 16 12 0 178
5. Enhanced capacity for the community structures (village development committees, (child
protection committees an to deal with child labour issues capacity increased knowledge and
skills.
6. Increase knowledge and awareness on what continues child labour among the members of
the community in the targeted 4 VDCs (Chimalira, Chikufikani, Kapesi and Mnjonja)
YOCRIS - CHILD LABOUR PROJECT END REPORT
8.0 CHALLENGES
The following are major challenges the project faced
8.1 Monitoring
a. Inadequate Monitoring visits.
The project proposed to have approximately 400 visits is its entire project period. However
there are about 56 visits made to monitor project progress.
YOCRIS management retaliated that inadequate monitoring visits were as a result of little
amount of fuel allocated to monitoring as compared to the distance covered during
monitoring because the project was being implemented in an area that was about 70
Kilometers from Dedza Boma. However because of the good monitoring tools the
organization has been able to capture a lot of data.
9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
The following are major challenges the project faced
9.1 Monitoring
Issues of T-shirts in a number of projects always become a hot issue as every one would
want to get a T-shirt. With limited funding produce T-Shirts must be prudently distributed. In
future projects, T-shirts must be first distributed to key structures such as community
structures that are directly linked to the project and others later.
The committees indicate that there is need to have replicated in other VDCs . However the
following has to be taken into consideration if plans are underway to replicate the project in
other areas.
1. The VDCs where this project was being implemented should not be abandoned.
2. There is need to come up with follow up projects that would sustain children withdrawn
from the labour to as to ensure that children withdrawn do not go back to child labour.
3. Future projects of child labour should propose to include initiatives that will provide
alternatives to child labour for the families that are prone to have their children engaged
in child labour.
The community structures must be linked which school management committees and
Primary Education Advisors for proper guidance on issues of re admission.
10.0 CONCLUSIONS