Professional Documents
Culture Documents
March 2013
VERSION V1.4 NZ
Cross
Laminated
Timber
Design Guide
Introduction & Contents
This Design Guide provides the key information architects and engineers
need to design buildings using XLam structural cross laminated
timber panels. Figures given in the tables are based on research and
independent tests commissioned by XLam NZ Ltd. They are specific to
New Zealand grown Radiata Pine and Douglas Fir timber and incorporate
values adopted from the New Zealand Building Code.
For detailed information on connections, durability, acoustic and
thermal performance, compliance and building consents, refer to the
XLam website, www.xlam.co.nz
and industrial buildings, including shear walls and floor Efficiency – a ‘just-in-time’ delivery schedule keeps a
clear building site.
diaphragms in multi-storied timber construction.
Speed – a huge reduction in on-site labour and time
XLam NZ Ltd is the first company to manufacture and compared with conventional building systems.
commercialise CLT in Australasia. The XLam factory is Clean – after foundation work, there are no wet trades
located in Nelson, New Zealand, where the immediate required and the loudest on-site noise is the sound of
accessibility of quality timber and manufacturing a screw drill.
resource has established an engineered wood Easy to assemble – panels fit accurately together
industry cluster. using simple connection details.
PERFORMANCE ENVIRONMENTAL
Fire – in fire, a char layer forms to help protect an Green – CLT can actually achieve a carbon neutral
undestroyed timber core which retains its load construction footprint. Each cubic metre of solid
capacity. timber stores approximately 800kg of CO2.
Thermal – the thermal mass of CLT stores heat energy Friendly – the polyurethane bonding adhesive is
and slowly releases it back into the building. Energy formaldehyde free, odourless and inert.
efficiency is enhanced during the use phase of the Recyclable – at the end of the building’s service life,
building life cycle – the time at which the building has CLT panels can be simply lifted off the structure and
greatest global warming impact. used in a new building.
APPEARANCE GRADES
Industrial Grade For general structural use where appearance is not important or alternatively
where visual defects are acceptable as inherent in the character of the
product. Planed surface with occasional skip, wane, resin pockets, voids and
checks. Knots are permitted provided panel strength is not compromised.
Some knots may fall out and some glue squeeze through may be visible.
Architectural Grade For use where panel surfaces will be exposed to view and clear or paint
finished. Planed surface, free of wane and loose knots. Minor blemishes,
voids or checks may be visible. One or both faces may be specified.
Optional add-ons include vee joints and outer boards free of finger joints.
Note that CLT acts as a moisture buffer to even out humidity variations within a building – the product naturally absorbs
and releases moisture with changes in atmospheric conditions. As the wood expands and contracts the gaps between
the boards may open and close, and exposed surfaces (particularly Douglas Fir) may exhibit some checking over time.
This is a natural feature of wood and will not impair the structural integrity or durability of the product. Checking may be
audible as the wood settles during the first seasonal cycle.
l7–
l6–
l5–
l4–
l3–
l2–
l1–
l7–
l6–
l5–
l4–
l3–
l2–
l1–
L≤
duration of load and creep behaviour of CLT when 9.15 ( ρA ) 0.123
designing members.
L = CLT maximum floor span (in meters)
Until further research on New Zealand CLT panels
= Effective apparent stiffness in the span
allows for a less conservative approach, a long
direction for a 1m wide panel (in N-m2)
term creep factor of k2 = 2.0 should be used in the
Serviceability Limit State deflection checks, ρ = Density of CLT (in kg/m3)
in accordance with NZS 3603:1993. A = Cross sectional area of a 1.0m wide CLT
panel (in m2)
The span tables in this design guide have been
designed assuming dry service conditions and a
The FPInnovations method is limited to bare CLT
creep factor of k2=2.0.
floors without a heavy topping, vibrations induced
by normal walking only, and well supported and
DYNAMIC VIBRATION
connected panels.
The low damping ratio and fundamental natural
2. The APA - Engineered Wood Systems method gives
frequency of vibration require particular attention to
the deflection limit for a 1kN point load at the
control in-service vibrations in CLT floors.
centre of the span (Engineered Wood Systems -
• The fundamental natural frequency depends upon APA EWS, 2004) as: 2.55
the specific mass to stiffness ratio of the material, δ≤
L0.63
and is difficult to alter without changing the
material properties – humans are more sensitive to L = CLT maximum floor span (in meters)
low frequency vibrations. = 1 kN static point load mid-span
• Damping is a characteristic that is dependent deflection for an equivalent simply
not only on the material properties, but also the supported 1.0m wide panel
construction details: damping can be improved The APA - Engineered Wood Systems equation
through smart design. accounts for all the stiffness contributions from the
Any measures for increasing the damping two-way action in the floor system and is based on
ratio through CLT product design and CLT the empirical relationship of a single joist mid-span
floor construction will enhance the vibration deflection and the deflection of a diaphragm under
performance of bare CLT floors. point loading.
The fire span tables in this design guide relate to the support of the adjoining roof structure. The fire span
Blue figures = Long term deflection governs Red figures = Vibration limit governs
XL3/60 2.0kPa 2.15m 2.35m 0.95m
3.0kPa 1.95m 2.35m 0.80m
4.0kPa 1.55m 2.35m 0.65m
5.0kPa 1.45m 2.20m 0.60m
XL3/75 2.0kPa 2.55m 2.80m 1.10m
3.0kPa 2.35m 2.80m 1.00m
4.0kPa 1.90m 2.80m 0.80m
5.0kPa 1.75m 2.70m 0.70m
XL3/90 2.0kPa 3.05m 3.35m 1.35m
3.0kPa 2.90m 3.35m 1.25m
4.0kPa 2.35m 3.35m 1.00m
5.0kPa 2.20m 3.30m 0.90m
XL3/105 2.0kPa 3.45m 3.80m 1.55m
3.0kPa 3.25m 3.80m 1.40m
4.0kPa 2.70m 3.80m 1.10m
5.0kPa 2.50m 3.80m 1.05m
XL5/130 2.0kPa 4.05m 4.45m 1.85m
3.0kPa 3.90m 4.45m 1.70m
4.0kPa 3.25m 4.45m 1.35m
5.0kPa 3.05m 4.45m 1.30m
XL5/145 2.0kPa 4.40m 4.80m 2.00m
3.0kPa 4.25m 4.80m 1.85m
4.0kPa 3.60m 4.80m 1.50m
5.0kPa 3.35m 4.80m 1.40m
XL5/175 2.0kPa 5.00m 5.50m 2.30m
3.0kPa 4.80m 5.50m 2.10m
4.0kPa 4.10m 5.50m 1.75m
5.0kPa 3.85m 5.50m 1.60m
XL7/200 2.0kPa 5.60m 6.15m 2.60m
3.0kPa 5.45m 6.15m 2.40m
4.0kPa 4.65m 6.15m 2.00m
5.0kPa 4.40m 6.15m 1.90m
DISCLAIMER: Nothing contained in this material shall be construed as a warranty or otherwise as to the accuracy of the information provided.
Specific design work shall be carried out by a qualified structural engineer.
Blue figures = Long term deflection governs Red figures = Vibration limit governs
XL3/60 2.0kPa 2.30m 2.55m 1.00m
3.0kPa 2.10m 2.55m 0.90m
4.0kPa 1.70m 2.55m 0.70m
5.0kPa 1.55m 2.40m 0.65m
XL3/75 2.0kPa 2.70m 3.00m 1.20m
3.0kPa 2.50m 3.00m 1.05m
4.0kPa 2.05m 3.00m 0.85m
5.0kPa 1.90m 2.90m 0.75m
XL3/90 2.0kPa 3.25m 3.55m 1.50m
3.0kPa 3.10m 3.55m 1.30m
4.0kPa 2.55m 3.55m 1.05m
5.0kPa 2.35m 3.55m 1.00m
XL3/105 2.0kPa 3.65m 4.00m 1.65m
3.0kPa 3.50m 4.00m 1.50m
4.0kPa 2.85m 4.00m 1.20m
5.0kPa 2.65m 4.00m 1.10m
XL5/130 2.0kPa 4.30m 4.70m 2.00m
3.0kPa 4.20m 4.70m 1.80m
4.0kPa 3.50m 4.70m 1.45m
5.0kPa 3.25m 4.70m 1.35m
XL5/145 2.0kPa 4.65m 5.10m 2.15m
3.0kPa 4.55m 5.10m 2.00m
4.0kPa 3.85m 5.10m 1.65m
5.0kPa 3.60m 5.10m 1.50m
XL5/175 2.0kPa 5.30m 5.80m 2.45m
3.0kPa 5.15m 5.80m 2.25m
4.0kPa 4.35m 5.80m 1.85m
5.0kPa 4.10m 5.80m 1.75m
XL7/200 2.0kPa 5.90m 6.50m 2.75m
3.0kPa 5.80m 6.50m 2.55m
4.0kPa 5.00m 6.50m 2.15m
5.0kPa 4.70m 6.50m 2.00m
DISCLAIMER: Nothing contained in this material shall be construed as a warranty or otherwise as to the accuracy of the information provided.
Specific design work shall be carried out by a qualified structural engineer.
Blue figures = Snow load Governs Red figures = Live load governs
XL3/60 0.4kPa 4.05m 5.80m 1.85m
0.9kPa 3.80m 5.50m 1.65m
1.5kPa 3.40m 4.90m 1.45m
3.0kPa 2.80m 4.10m 1.20m
XL3/75 0.4kPa 4.55m 6.60m 2.10m
0.9kPa 4.50m 6.50m 1.95m
1.5kPa 4.05m 5.85m 1.75m
3.0kPa 3.40m 4.95m 1.45m
XL3/90 0.4kPa 5.35m 7.65m 2.45m
0.9kPa 5.35m 7.65m 2.40m
1.5kPa 4.90m 7.10m 2.15m
3.0kPa 4.15m 6.05m 1.80m
XL3/105 0.4kPa 5.85m 8.40m 2.70m
0.9kPa 5.85m 8.40m 2.70m
1.5kPa 5.55m 8.05m 2.45m
3.0kPa 4.75m 6.90m 2.05m
XL5/130 0.4kPa 6.60m 9.50m 3.05m
0.9kPa 6.60m 9.50m 3.05m
1.5kPa 6.55m 9.45m 2.90m
3.0kPa 5.65m 8.20m 2.45m
XL5/145 0.4kPa 7.05m 10.10m 3.25m
0.9kPa 7.05m 10.10m 3.25m
1.5kPa 7.05m 10.10m 3.15m
3.0kPa 6.20m 8.95m 2.70m
XL5/175 0.4kPa 7.70m 11.10m 3.55m
0.9kPa 7.70m 11.10m 3.55m
1.5kPa 7.70m 11.10m 3.55m
3.0kPa 7.05m 10.20m 3.05m
XL7/200 0.4kPa 8.40m 12.10m 3.90m
0.9kPa 8.40m 12.10m 3.90m
1.5kPa 8.40m 12.10m 3.90m
3.0kPa 7.90m 11.45m 3.45m
DISCLAIMER: Nothing contained in this material shall be construed as a warranty or otherwise as to the accuracy of the information provided.
Specific design work shall be carried out by a qualified structural engineer.
1. Load combinations given for roof spans do not 14. Specified characteristic strengths:
consider wind loading which requires specific a) Radiata Pine
design by a registered structural engineer. • Bending - fb,0 = 14MPa
• Shear - fv,0 = 3.8MPa
2. For the Ultimate Limit State strength, the total
b) Douglas Fir
factored load is the critical load combination from:
• Bending - fb,0 = 20MPa
1.35G; 1.2G+1.5ΨlQ; 1.2G+Su+ΨcQ
• Shear - fv,0 = 3.0MPa
3. For the Serviceability Limit State deflection, the
15. Factors used:
total factored load is the critical load combination
• Load duration factor for strength k1 = 0.8
from: G+ΨsQ; G+ΨlQ; G+Ss
• Load duration factor for deflection k2 = 2.0
4. The span tables have been designed for a • Multiple element factor k4 = 1.28
structure with an importance level of 2 and a • Stability Factor k8 = 1.0
design working life of 50 years. • For floors: when Q≤3.0kPa, Ψs = 0.7 and when
5. All loads are assumed to be uniformly distributed Q>3.0kPa, Ψs = 1.0
over the panels apart from the cantilever spans • For roofs: Ψs = 0.7
where the backspan is assumed to be unloaded. • For floors: when Q≤3.0kPa, Ψl = 0.4 and when
Q>3.0kPa, Ψl = 0.6
6. End spans of continuous beams and double spans
• For roofs: Ψl = 0.0
can be conservatively designed using the single
• Strength reduction factor ф = 0.8
span design table.
• Density = 540kg/m3
7. The SLS deflection limit used for the floor panel
16. Snow Loads are based on NZS 1170.3 with the
design = span/400.
following factors:
8. The SLS deflection limit used for the roof panel • s = sgCeµi
design = span/300. • Ce = 1.0
• µi = 0.7 (A minimum roof pitch of 3 degrees
9. Multi-spans are assumed to be equal for all spans.
has been assumed).
10. The back-span for cantilevers is assumed to be • Ψc = 0.0 for roofs
1.25 x cantilever span. This is as per NZS3604, • Sg,SLS = 0.7Sg,ULS
section 7.1.5.3. (k(p,SLS)/k(p ,ULS) = (0.85)/(1.25)=0.70).
11. Dead load accounted for on the floor is the self- • The roof loading is designed for live loads
weight of the panel. using Q = 0.25kPa.
2. The flexural capacity of the panels have been 9. Multi-spans are assumed to be equal for all spans.
calculated from the critical of:
10. The back-span for cantilevers is assumed to be
i The bending strength of the reduced,
1.25 x cantilever span. This is as per NZS3604,
unaffected cross section,
section 7.1.5.3.
ii The tension capacity of the outside CLT layer.
11. Dead load accounted for on the floor is the
These fire span tables follow the suggested design
self-weight of the panel.
approach in the FPInnovations CLT handbook,
Chapter 8 (FPInnovations, 2012) and additionally 12. The spans indicated are the spans from the
the outside layer is checked for tensile capacity. centre-to-centre of supporting elements.
3. It has been assumed that the char rate for the first 13. Specified characteristic strengths:
layer of CLT is 0.65mm/min, but for all subsequent a. Radiata Pine
layers, the char rate doubles to 1.3mm/min (as • Bending - fb,0 = 14MPa
suggested by Frangi, Fontana, Hugi, & Jobstl, 2009). • Tension - ft,0 = 8.8MPa
4. A heated zone adjacent to the char of 10mm is b. Douglas Fir
assumed to have no strength or stiffness. • Bending - fb,0 = 20MPa
5. When calculating the moment resistance of • Tension - ft,0 = 8.8MPa
the floor panels, only the plies running in the 16. Factors used:
longitudinal direction of the applied stress are • Load duration factor for strength k1 = 1.0
considered. • Multiple element factor k4 = 1.28
6. The following fire load combination was used: • Stability factor k8 = 1.0
G + ΨlQ • For floors: when Q≤3.0kPa, Ψl = 0.4 and when
Q>3.0kPa, Ψl = 0.6
7. All loads are assumed to be uniformly distributed
• For roofs: Ψl = 0.0
over the panels apart from the cantilever spans
• Strength reduction factor, ф = 1.0
where the backspan is assumed to be unloaded.
• Density = 540kg/m3
1. It has been assumed that the char rate for the first 6. Factors used:
layer of CLT is 0.65mm/min, but for all subsequent
• Load duration factor for strength k1 = 1.0
layers, the char rate doubles to 1.3mm/min (as
suggested by Frangi, Fontana, Hugi, & Jobstl, 2009). • The slenderness ratio was calculated using:
S=0.213h√(A/I) and the stability factor k8 was
2. A heated zone adjacent to the char of 10mm is
interpolated from Table H1 of NZS3603:1993.
assumed to have no strength or stiffness.
Note that results have only been shown for
3. Post fire, walls are required to withstand a face stability factors up to 50.
loading of 0.5kPa without the support of the
• Moisture content factor K14 = 1.0
adjoining roof structure. The wall fire capacity
tables do not account for this. The wall fire capacity • Face grain orientation factor K15 = 1.0
tables are most usefully applied to multi-storied • Strength reduction factor, ф = 1.0
buildings where the fire rated floors at each level
7. Specified characteristic strengths:
provide lateral out-of-plane support to the wall.
a. Radiata Pine
4. It has been assumed that the fire is burning from
one side of the wall. • Compression - fc,0, parallel = 20.9MPa
References
Engineered Wood Systems - APA EWS. (2004). Minimising Floor Vibration By Design and
Retrofit. In E. W. -A. EWS. Washington.
FPInnovations. (2012). CLT Handbook: DOL and creep - Duration of load and creep factors for
cross-laminated timber panels. Canada: FPInnovations.
Frangi, A., Fontana, M., Hugi, E., & Jobstl, R. (2009). Experimental analysis of cross-laminated
timber panels in fire. Fire Saftey Journal, 44.
Standards New Zealand. (2001). New Zealand standard timber-framed buildings. NZS 3604;
2011. Wellington, New Zealand
Acknowledgements
Span Tables published by XLam NZ Ltd are based on modelling by Gavin Robertson CPEng,
MIPENZ, peer reviewed by Shane Haydon CPEng, MIPENZ, of Aurecon Engineering.
XLam NZ Ltd thanks Professor Andy Buchanan of Canterbury University for reviewing
the content and format of the structural engineering information in our Design Guide,
especially concerning design for lateral loading.