Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
8.3 – 8.4 Good. Expected level. Quite Challenging: Difficult match with some
8.2 Satisfactory with small areas for improvement. difficult decisions for the officials
8.0 – 8.1 Satisfactory with important areas for improvement. Very Challenging: Very difficult match with
7.9 One clear and important mistake, otherwise 8.3 or above. many difficult situations for the officials
REFEREE
1 Application and interpretation of the Laws of the Game / match control, tactical approach and management of the
game with the special situation(s) of the minute(s):
Comments:
The match had a very intensive beginning with several fouls whistled in the first minutes. Here Atkinson was able to notice
that it was a crucial moment of the game. A remarkable situation happened in the fourth minute, when there were
complaints by Zenit for a possible DOGSO situation: the referee showed alertness, with a correct evaluation. Then in
second half there were two penalty appeals by Paços. Even though the second one appeared very difficult to evaluate, the
feeling is that Atkinson took a correct decision. Not enough for a penalty. Apart from that, the match was always under
control in both halves. There weren’t riot or tense moments. Overall, a satisfying performance under this point of view.
2 Disciplinary control, management of players and team officials (bench) with the special situation(s) of the
minute(s):
Comments:
The referee followed a clear line in his disciplinary control of the match. Two cards were given for blatant and reckless
tackles, then in the 74’ minute for a clear infringement of the rules, when Anyukov (Zenit) threw the ball away to waste
time. The card given to Ricardo (Paços) at 84’ was correct, too. So, a very good knowledge of the LotG. There weren’t
other situations in which a mandatory card was missed. Card management was consistent.
7’ Filipe Anunciação (Paços) is booked for a very reckless tackle. Correct decision.
74’ Anyukov (Zenit) is cautioned for having thrown the ball away to delay the restart of the play.
Ricardo (Paços) is booked for having stopped a potentially dangerous action. The situation was borderline to
84’ DOGSO but the YC is correct because there is another defender ready to take part in the action and the player
was not clearly going towards the goal.
90’+3 Hubočan (Zenit) is booked for a late tackle
© The Third Team –footballrefereeing.blogspot.com
3 Physical Condition:
Good
+ Expected -
--- X --- Always close to the play, follows play at all times, and does not interfere with play
--- X --- Flexible diagonal system
--- X --- Able to anticipate the action
--- X --- Enters the penalty area when necessary
--- X --- Efficient positioning at set pieces / dead ball (e.g. corner-kick, free-kick, goal-kick)
Please describe any special situation(s) with indication of the minute(s) – mandatory if you tick “-“ (negative point) in one of
the above boxes:
Minute Description of the situation
The referee had a good physical condition. There weren’t situations in which an advantage might have been
Full time possible. His positioning and running were always at expected level. When he had to evaluate the second
penalty situation he was not that close and this is probably a small area for improvement.
4 Co-operation with assistant referees, additional assistant referees (where applicable) and fourth official:
We can’t know whether Atkinson was helped by AAR1 in second half, when he had to evaluate two possible penalties.
Anyway, the cooperation with assistant referees was good: they reported several situations to the referee, and they helped
him in taking important decisions, as happened for the (correctly) disallowed goal.
5 Personality:
The referee showed to be firm and sure in his decisions, and he often explained by words and gestures the reasons of his
whistles to players. He never appeared unsure. So, very good under this point of view. The players respected him and
there were never problems.
The performance was overall good. We can say something about the penalty appeals in second half, in order to justify the
mark we have given to the referee. The first situation (68’) is clear, no foul. The second situation (81’) is a bit more
difficult. The feeling is that Atkinson wasn’t able to notice the whole scene, he anyway decided to let the game flow, not
detecting a blatant foul. A decision that we can accept, but at the same time, he can improve trying to be more attentive.
Positive points: 1) Control of the game by showing authority and firmness in his decisions.
2) Knowledge of the LOTG, mandatory YC correctly given when required.
3) Cooperation with assistant referees.
Trying to be more attentive, in the meaning of being close to play when particular
Points for improvement: 1)
or difficult situations happen in penalty area.
© The Third Team –footballrefereeing.blogspot.com
ASSISTANT REFEREE 1
8 Assistant referee’s performance (please mention some important decisions with reference to the minute):
+ Expected -
--- X --- Correct offside decisions and good application of the “wait and see” technique
--- X --- Good positioning and movement
--- X --- Adequate alertness and good co-operation with the referee
X --- --- Reaction to incidents within his vicinity
--- X --- Efficient control at set pieces / dead ball (e.g. corner-kick, free-kick, goal-kick)
Comments:
The first assistant was quite challenged in this match. He had to evaluate several important offside situations, in first half.
He took almost always the correct decision. Then, in second half a crucial NO FLAG whe Paços scored. Well detected
ONSIDE. For the rest, he showed alertness in his area of vicinity but nothing really relevant happened under this aspect.
Very good performance.
Please describe any special situation(s) with indication of the minute(s) – mandatory if you tick “-“ (negative point) in one of
the above boxes:
Minute Description of the situation
2’ Bystrov (Zenit) is flagged offside. Correct decision.
21’ Kerzhakov (Zenit) is flagged offside. Borderline decision, the player seems still onside.
58’ André Leão (Paços) is correctly evaluated onside prior to score the 1-1. Excellent and very difficult NO FLAG.
© The Third Team –footballrefereeing.blogspot.com
ASSISTANT REFEREE 2
9 Assistant referee’s performance (please mention some important decisions with reference to the minute):
+ Expected -
--- X --- Correct offside decisions and good application of the “wait and see” technique
--- X --- Good positioning and movement
X --- --- Adequate alertness and good co-operation with the referee
X --- --- Reaction to incidents within his vicinity
--- X --- Efficient control at set pieces / dead ball (e.g. corner-kick, free-kick, goal-kick)
Comments:
The second assistant was less challenged than his colleague but he had more difficult decisions to take. The first situation
was a very good and crucial decision, a goal disallowed for offside when Paços scored at 36’. Then, a borderline situation
in 57’: acceptable flag. The last one was a mistake, which denied a obvious goal scoring opportunity to Zenit, but as said,
extremely difficult to detect. Arshavin was onside. In addition to that, he also helped the referee reporting several fouls.
Basically, good performance with small areas for improvement.
Please describe any special situation(s) with indication of the minute(s) – mandatory if you tick “-“ (negative point) in one of
the above boxes:
Minute Description of the situation
36’ Hurtado (Paços) is flagged offside and a goal scored by home team is annulled. Correct and crucial decision.
57’ Bystrov (Zenit) is fagged offside. Borderline and difficult decision, probably very tight offside. Acceptable call.
63’ Arshavin (Zenit) is flagged offside. Mistake. It was an important chance to score.
© The Third Team –footballrefereeing.blogspot.com
10 Additional Assistant referee’s performance (please mention some important decisions with reference to the
minute):
+ Expected -
Comments:
The AAR1 might have been involved in the penalty situations, in second half. Nothing relevant was detectedin both cases
so we can evaluate his performance as expected level, sharing the decisions of Atkinson.
Please describe any special situation(s) with indication of the minute(s) – mandatory if you tick “-“ (negative point) in one of
the above boxes:
Minute Description of the situation
68’ and Potentially involved in both penalty situations, probably he followed Atkinson. No reasons to act in a different
81’ way, so expected level.
11 Additional Assistant referee’s performance (please mention some important decisions with reference to the
minute):
+ Expected -
Comments:
Nothing relevant happened in his penalty area. He was probably involved in a goal kick decision in first half. For the rest,
expected level.
Please describe any special situation(s) with indication of the minute(s) – mandatory if you tick “-“ (negative point) in one of
the above boxes:
Minute Description of the situation
© The Third Team –footballrefereeing.blogspot.com
FOURTH OFFICIAL