Ante Vranković Općinski sud u Sesvetama – Stalna služba u Sv.

Ivanu Zelini
Domjanićeva 15 Posl. Broj: 24 R1-131/14 - Vatrogasna 1
10380 Sveti Ivan Zelina 10380 Sveti Ivan Zelina
Sveti Ivan Zelina, 28. travnja 2015.

2X
Poštovani,
nastavno na Obavijest koju sam Vam poslao 23. siječnja 2015. (dostupno na linku:
https://www.scribd.com/doc/261924978/Dopis-sudu-u-Zelini-Delo%C5%BEacija), obavještavam Vas da sam dana 7.
veljače o. g. slomio nogu na dva mjesta (ovdje Prilog 1). Medicinske pretrage su pokazale da je do loma došlo
uslijed osteoporoze (ovdje, Prilog 2), koja je logično nastupila nakon mojih uzastopnih trogodišnjih potpunih i
„turskih“ (uzimaju se šećer i vitamin B) štrajkova glađu, o kojima svjedoči preko 40 medicinskih nalaza koje sam
objavio na mojoj stranici na Scribdu (link: https://www.scribd.com/ante6vrankovi6_1149).
Zato sam morao prekinuti potpuni štrajk glađu kojeg sam spomenuo u mojoj Obavijesti od 23. siječnja, te sam u
novi potpuni štrajk glađu stupio nakon zarastanja noge, 17. ožujka o. g., o čemu sam izvijestio Hrvatsku odvjetničku komoru
koja i dalje odbija riješiti moje disciplinske prijave protiv ovdje predlagateljice, odvj. Dijane Zoričić, stoga što disciplinskom
tužitelju Predragu Labanu nisam dao za to traženi mito. USKOK, koji nije odbacio moju prijavu, neće još dugo moći
„kolegijalno“ štititi Labana i HOK, jer sam u veljači zatražio da nadzor koji Bruxelles šalje u Hrvatsku, potaknut radikalnom
korupcijom USKOK-a u slučaju Perković, provjeri protuzakonito nepostupanje USKOK-a protiv Labana i onih koji ga štite.
Glavni razlog ovog mog obraćanja je međutim činjenica da je ovaj sud tj. konkretno predmetna sutkinja
Vesna Valentić u mojoj Obavijesti od 23. siječnja o. g. primila dokumentaciju koja dokazuje da je prava svrha
traženja predlagateljice Dijane Zoričić da se razvrgne suvlasništvo nad derutnim montažnim stanom i kućom
naslijeđenim iza pok. roditelja na način davanja istih na dražbu ta da ona, nakon što me (još 2009.) nezakonito
lišila mogućnosti stjecanja sredstava za život (što također dokazuje Potvrda o mom imovnom stanju priložena Obavijesti
kao Dokument 10 iz koje se vidi da sam u zadnje 2 godine uprihodio ukupno 200 kn), čime mi je osporila pravo na život
što je potvrdio i HHO (vidjeti Obavijest, str. 1), sada, kada zna da nemam od čega živjeti jer se ona sama ta to
pobrinula, od ovoga suda traži da se navedeni montažni stan u kojem živim (Obavijest, Dokument 2/II) i nedovršena
kuća prodaju na dražbi, kako bi ona -- koja je mene lišila prihoda a istodobno sama ima izrazito visoke prihode (što
dokazuje činjenica da je samo inventar svojeg stana osiguravala na oko 40.000 eura – Obavijest, Dokument 3) -- isti stan i
kuću mogla sama ili preko druge osobe kupiti za 1 kunu tj. za bagatelu, znajući da ja za njih ne mogu dati ništa,
obzirom da me ona još 2009. lišila sredstava za život, te da će ona tako za 1 kunu ili sličan iznos dobiti obje
nekretnine, a da ću ja završiti na ulici (=deložacija), kako mi se ona prijetila odmah po očevoj smrti 1996. g. da
će učiniti (Obavijest, Dokument 4/b), a što je sada putem ovoga suda odlučila i realizirati.
„Ako su bogatun i siromah braća, onda je bogatome ime Kain“ (Oscar Wilde: „Misli“, str. 123)
Taj zahtjev je tim perfidniji, što je predlagateljica svoj dio u tom stanu i kući po Zakonu o naslijeđivanju
čl. 125 i 126 uopće nije trebala naslijediti, obzirom da ostaviteljima nije pružila nužnu pomoć: pokojne majke po
kojoj je naslijedila dio u kući čak se javno odrekla izravno time uzrokujući njezino samoubojstvo (Dokument 6),
iz kojeg samoubojstva je odmah izvukla veliku materijalnu dobit prisvojivši CJELOKUPNE majčine mirovine
(Dokument 7 – na odrescima je navedeno samo njezino ime) koje je koristila na kupovanje bundi (Dokument 8) i t. sl., te sad na
opisani način nastoji doći do CJELOKUPNE imovine, a mene izbaciti na cestu, kako se zarekla 1996. g.
Ovaj je sud iz zaprimljene dokumentacije (Obavijest, Dokumenti 1-10) sve te činjenice znao, te me
stoga iznenadilo da je --- unatoč tome da je sud bio svjestan da se radi o pokušaju instrumentalizacije ovog suda putem
kojeg me predlagateljica dražbe nastoji, kako je rekla: uništiti (učiniti beskućnikom, a sebi za 1 kn pribaviti dvije nekretnine
što mi se zarekla 1996., a o čemu sam pisao u Zelinskom glasniku još 2002. g. (Dokument 4/b, vidjeti i Dokument 5) --- u za
naše prilike rekordno brzim sazivanjem ročišta za 14. svibnja - Prilog 3 (isto sazivanje je u ovom običnom izvanparničnom
postupku najmanje hitnosti za nevjerojatnih 150% brže, nego što je to npr. bilo u postupku najveće hitnosti („Nasilje u obitelji“) Pp I-J
odlučio pogodovati takvom perfidnom,
34/2013 u kojem je prvo ročište sazvano 10 mjeseci nakon primitka tužbe (Dokument 9))
nemoralnom i krajnje zlonamjernom postupanju predlagateljice, koja uopće ne dolazi ne ročišta, nego na njih
šalje svoje pijune, kako bi oni i sud za nju odredili prljav posao, te me zapravo oni uništili za njezinu korist.
Obzirom na iznimnu ozbiljnost cjelokupne situacije, odlučio sam ovaj podnesak napisati dvojezično,
kako bi u slučaju moje smrti u štrajku glađu nadležni u Bruxellesu koji su upoznati sa slučajem, znali poduzeti
odgovarajuće mjere koje im stoje na raspolaganju. Predlagateljici pak ističem da će moj život biti ugrožen u
lipnju, te da će je HOK vjerojatno tada kontaktirati na kućnoj adresi, glede dostave rješenja mojih prijava.
Dear Sirs,
following the Notification that I sent you on January 23, 2015 (available at the following link:
https://www.scribd.com/doc/261924978/Dopis-sudu-u-Zelini-Delo%C5%BEacija), I decided to inform you that on February
7, this year I broke my leg in two places (here Prilog 1). Medical tests have shown that the fracture occurred due
to osteoporosis (here, Prilog 2), which is logical consequence of my three-year consecutive complete and
"Turkish" (taking of sugar and vitamin B) hunger strikes, proven by over 40 medical reports that I have
published on my page on Scribd (link: https://www.scribd.com/ante6vrankovi6_1149)
So I had to stop a full hunger strike which I mentioned in my Notification of January 23, and I have started a new
hunger strike after healing of my leg, on March 17, which I reported the Croatian Bar Association, which continues to refuse
to solve my disciplinary reports against here proposing lawyer Dijana Zoričić, because the disciplinary prosecutor Predrag
Laban have not received bribes that he requested from me. USKOK, who has not rejected my criminal report, will not be able
to "collegialy" protect Laban and HOK for much longer, becouse in February I requested supervision coming from Brussels
to Croatia, due to the radical corruption of USKOK in the Perković case, to check illegal non-conduct of USKOK against
Laban and those who protect him.
The main reason for this letter is, however, the fact that this court ie. judge Vesna Valentić, in my Notification of
January 23 received documents proving that the real purpose of the request of Diana Zoričić to dissolve our co-ownership of
an disrepaired montage apartment and unfinished house of our parents in a way of giving them on the auction is that, after
she had (in 2009) unlawfully deprived me of the opportunity of earning for my living (which also proves Confirmation of my
financial status attached to Notification as Document 10, which shows that I have earned in last 2 years total of 200 kn/=30
euros/), and by doing so she denied my right to life, as it was confirmed by the Croatian Helsinki Committee (see
Notification, p. 1), now, when she knows that I have no money because of her described illegal acts, she demands that this
court sels at the auction the disrepaired montage apartment where I live (Notification, see the photo at Document 2/II) and
unfinished house of our parents. Since she has a very high incomes (as evidenced from the fact that she insured only
inventory of her apartment on the amount of 40.000 euros - Notification, Document 3) – she is going to buy the same
apartment and house for one kuna (directly or via another person), ie. at a bargain price, knowing that for them I can not give
anything, because back in 2009 she deprived me of possibility for earning money, so for one kuna (or euro) or a similar
amount, she is going to buy both estates, and I will end up on the street (= eviction), as she threatened me immediately after
our father's death in 1996. that she will do (Notification, Document 4/b), and what now through this court she has decided to
implement.
"If a rich man and a poor man are brothers, then the rich man`s name is Cain" (Oscar Wilde: "Thoughts", p. 123)

This requirement is even more perfidious, as according to the Law on inheritance art. 125 and 126 should not have
inherit her part neither int he unfinished house, nor in disrepaired montage apartment, since she did not provided the
necessary assistance to the parents: our mother from which she inherited part of the house commited suicide after Diana
Zoričić has publicly renounced her (Document 6). immediately after that, Dijana Zoričić pulled out a large financial gain
from mother`s death that she caused appropriating ENTIRE mother's pension (Document 7 – mother`s pension documents
are mentioning only her name as a user) that she used to purchase a fur coat (Document 8) and etc., and now in the described
manner is trying to reach the ENTIRE parent`s property, and to throw me out on the road, as she thretened me in 1996.
This court received documents proving all this (Notification, Documents 1-10) and knew all this facts, and
therefore I am surprised that --- despite the fact that the court was aware that this is an attempt of obvious instrumentalization
of the court by which the proponent of the auction tryes, as she said: to destroy me (make me homeless, and to buy for 1 kuna
to two real estates, as she thretened in 1996, and about what I wrote in Zelinski glasnik in 2002 (Document 4/b, see also
Document 5) --- in all that circumstances this court decided that the next court hearing will be already on May 14 - (here
Prilog 3) (this conduct of this court in regular judicial process is 150% faster than for example it was conduct oft he court in Hvar in the
process of the utmost urgency ("domestic violence") PP IJ 34/2013 in which the first hearing took place 10 months after receiving the
prosecution (Document 9)) which early date is in favor of a perfidious, immoral and utterly malicious conduct of proponent,
which do not come to court hearings, but sends there her pawns so that they, and the court do her dirty work, and in fact they
destroy me for her benefit.
Given the extreme seriousness of the overall situation, I decided to write this brief bilingualy, so that in case of my
death in a hunger strike competent persons in Brussels who are familiar with the case, could take appropriate measures that
are available to them. To the proposers I can say that my life would be threatened in June, and that is probably that Croatian
Bar Association will then contact her at her home address, for the delivery of the verdict of my criminal report.

Ante Vranković
vlastoručni potpis – handwriten signature
Prilog 1
Prilog 2
Prilog 3
Povratnica koja dokazuje primitak u sudu u Sv. Ivanu Zelini
Avis de réception which is proving the reception at the court in Sv. Ivan Zelina