Professional Documents
Culture Documents
David Garvin is noteworthy for analyzing the range of quality definitions, classifying them into five
groups.
1. The Transcendent approach
2. The Product-based approach
3. The User-based approach
4. The Manufacturing-based approach
5. The Value-based approach
Service quality can be defined as “the collective effect of service performances which determine the
degree of satisfaction of a user of the service” (ITU E.800). In other words, quality is the customer’s
perception of a delivered service. By service-quality management, we refer to the monitoring and
maintenance of end-to-end services for specific customers or classes of customers.
1
The GAP model
The Gaps Model is a useful framework for understanding the impact of the organization on
quality. A technique for determining what to measure, and how, has been developed for
service quality. It is called SERVQUAL.
Quality of service has been studied in the area of business management for years because the market is
more competitive and marketing management has transferred its focus from internal performance such
as production to external interests such as satisfaction and customers' perception of service quality.
Based on this traditional definition of service quality, Parasuraman, Zeithaml, and Berry (1985)
developed the "Gap Model" of perceived service quality. This model has five gaps:
Gap 1: Consumer expectation - Management perception gap
Gap 2: Management perception - Service quality specification gap
Gap 3: Service quality specifications - Service delivery gap
Gap 4: Service delivery - External communication gap
Gap 5: Expected service - Experienced service Gap.
The figure below shows the "GAP" model of service quality from Parasuraman et al. (Zeithaml &
Bitner 1996). This model offers an integrated view of the consumer-company relationship. It is
based on substantial research amongst a number of service providers. In common with the
Grönroos model it shows the perception gap (Gap 5) and outlines contributory factors. In this
case expected service is a function of word of mouth communication, personal need and past
experience, and perceived service is a product of service delivery and external communications
to consumers.
However the GAP model goes further in its analysis of these key contributory factors. It not only
provides a more rigorous description of the contributory Gaps, it lists key drivers for each gap and
generic breakdown of each of these drivers. These are illustrated below in summary form below.
Gap 1
Inadequate market research orientation
Lack of upward communication
Insufficient relationship focus
Gap 2
Absence of customer driven standards
Inadequate service leadership
Poor service design
Gap 3
Deficiencies of human resource policies
Failure to match supply and demand
Customers not fulfilling roles
2
Gap 4
Ineffective management of customer expectations
Overpromising
Inadequate horizontal communications
This level of detail allows powerful analysis of the contributory factors to a perception gap at a practical
level. The model shows the importance of marketing, business leadership quality and HR systems in the
management of the expectation gap.
3
A Small Walk-through on Service Quality Audit:
Service delivery system should conform to customer expectations.
Customer impression of service influenced by use of all senses.
Service managers lose sensitivity due to familiarity.
Need detailed service audit from a customer’s perspective.
4
Service Excellence
“Excellence is an art won by training and habituation. We are what we repeatedly do
- Aristotle
Service Excellence means exceeding customers’ expectations and paying attention to detail.” -
Disney Institute
“Customers don’t expect you to be perfect. They do expect you to fix things when they go
wrong.” - Donald Porter
“People don’t want to communicate with an organization or a computer. They want to talk to a
real, live, responsive, responsible person who will listen and help them get satisfaction.” - Theo
Michelson
5
Enhancing Capacity Means…
• Innovation
• Flexibility
• Training
• Recognition
• Consulting with stakeholders
• Developing service partnerships
You will also want to look at the market itself to determine what the market will bear and what effect
your geographic location has on your pricing strategy. A manicurist in New York City, for example, could
probably charge more than a manicurist in Idaho simply because people in metropolitan areas are more
willing and able — because of the relative higher costs of all products and services in those areas — to
pay a higher price than folks living in rural areas.
Similarly, the principle of supply and demand applies to service companies. If there are several other
businesses in your area performing the same or a similar service, the demand will probably be less
because the supply is greater. Hence, you may have to charge less. On the other hand, if you own a dry-
cleaning service, and you are the only dry cleaner in town, you can charge higher prices than you could if
there were several dry cleaners located very close to you.
A final thing to consider in pricing a service is reputation. If you have a stellar reputation, people will
most likely be willing to pay more for your service since their perception will be that they are getting
more. If you own a printing service, and you have a reputation as someone who can take on big jobs at
the last minute, perform high quality work, and deliver on schedule, you will be able to charge premium
6
prices. If you are a consultant, you must consider all of the above and add into the mix your credentials.
For example, if you are a financial advisor, what is your degree? Do you have an M.B.A. from Harvard?
The higher your credentials, the more you will be able to charge. Remember, when consulting, a good
part of what people are buying is your experience.
Demand Considerations
7
Price Sensitivity Factors
Perceived Substitute Effect
Few search attributes
Providers often lack resources and marketing expertise
Limited product mix
8
Switching Costs
Higher levels of perceived risk
Uncertainty involved in changing providers
Consequences associated with a bad outcome
Price-Quality Effect
Expenditure Effect
End-benefit Effect
The more price sensitive consumers are to the cost of the end-benefit, the more
sensitive they will be to purchases that contribute to the end-benefit.
Price bundling adds value to the consumer’s end-benefit
Shared-cost Effect
Consumer price sensitivity decreases as the shared-costs with third parties increase
Fairness Effect
Fairness is typically assessed by comparing the price to:
Previous prices paid for similar services
Prices paid for similar services under similar circumstances
The benefit gained
Assessing “service” fairness is difficult
9
Inventory Effect
Cost Considerations
Price is sometimes not know until after the service has been produced
Cost-oriented pricing is more difficult
Activity-based costing breaks down the organization into a set of activities, and
activities into tasks, which convert materials, labor, and technology into outputs.
High fixed cost to variable cost ratio
Economies of scale tend to be limited
Customer Considerations
Price tends to be one of the few search clues available
More likely to use price as a quality cue
Consumers are less certain about reservation prices
Competitive Considerations
Comparing prices is more difficult
Self-service is a viable alternative
Profit Considerations
Price bundling makes the determination of individual prices in the bundle of services more
complicated
Price bundling is more effective in a service context
10
Product Considerations
Many different names for price
Consumers are less able to stockpile by taking advantage of discount prices
Product-line pricing is more difficult
Home sellers have three levels of service (6, 7, or 8%)
Legal Considerations
Opportunity for illegal pricing practices to go undetected is greater for services than
goods.
To consumers, the issue is one of fairness and dual entitlement
Relationship Pricing
Primary objective is to enhance the firm’s relationship with its targeted consumers.
Long-term contracts: offers price and non-price incentives for dealing with the same
provider over a number of years
Pricing bundling: marketing two or more services as a single package for a single price
Efficiency Pricing
Primary objective is to appeal to economically-minded consumers by delivering the best
and most cost-effective service for the price.
Example: Southwest Airlines
11
12