Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2
Problem Statement
• Solids Build Up in Produced Water Pipeline
• Solids and Emulsion Build Up in Oil Water
Separators, Storage Tanks, and Other
Production Equipment at SWD Battery
• Increase SWD LOE, Reduced Pipeline
Capacity, Potential to Curtail Production
3
Typical Response
• Scaling Problem?
o Add more scale inhibitors
o Switch scale inhibitors
• Biomass Problem?
o Inject biocides
o Switch biocides
• Iron Problem?
o Inject iron control reagent
o Include iron treatment process
4
Our Approach
• Analyze the Solid / Scale
o Obtain samples from representative locations
o Find out what are the major components
• Analyze the Water
o Track the source of the solid / scale
o Track the change of water quality throughout the system
• Bench Scale Test & Field Trial
o Bench scale treatability test to determine treatment
methods
o Field trial to confirm the treatment methods
5
Case Study – System Overview
Barstow Water Gathering System
• 6 permitted SWDs (4 active)
• 30 miles of gathering pipe
• 45 delivery points across multiple
productive intervals
• First flow in 3Q 2015
• 100% operational in 1Q 2016
• 35,000 - 40,000 BWPD gross system
throughput
6
Case Study – Impacts to Operations
• Decreased hydraulic performance due
to scale accumulation
– Mechanical or chemical remediation
7
Case Study – Solid / Scale Analysis
8
Tank Sludge / Solid Composition Analysis - XRD
Oil, 46.9%
NaCl, 3.5%
Pyrite,
Other, 5.7%
Moisture, 47.4% 0.4%
CaCO3,
0.6%
Magnetite, 0.6%
CaMg(CO3)2, 0.6%
9
Tank Sludge / Solid Composition Analysis - XRF
Element %
Cl 20.3
Fe 14.0
S 10.5 XRF Results confirm the
Ca 4.8 finding through XRD
Si 0.4
Fe, S, Ca, Na and Cl should
P 0.3
Sr 0.2 be the major elements
Al 0.2
K 0.2
Ba 0.1
Ti 0.1
Zn 0.1
V 0.0
Cr 0.0
Au 0.0
Rb 0.0
Bi 0.0
Pd 0.0
Se 0.0
As 0.0
Mo 0.0
Bal 48.7
10
Elemental Analysis of Scale Sample - 2
Others, 1.25%
Solids, 2.30%
Oil, 55.10%
S, 0.01%
Cr, 0.01%
Water, 42.60%
Ti, 0.02% Fe, 0.35%
Ca, 0.03%
Al, 0.16% Si, 0.20% Cl, 0.27%
55.1% of the scale sample was oil (organic matter). Could be paraffin, asphaltenes
or broken gels?
The majority of the solid was iron, silica and salt
11
Elemental Analysis of Scale Sample 3
Al, 2.76%
Si, 6.35% Ca, 2.50% Cl, 1.56%
Mg, 1.36%
S, 0.98%
Oil, 41.20%
Solid, 49.10%
Fe, Solids,
18.13% 15.45%
Water, 9.70%
12
Case Study – Solid / Scale Analysis
13
Water Quality Analysis
• Samples were taken at 45 tank batteries and 3
SWDs
• Produced Water Qualities at Tank Batteries and
SWDs
Basic Water Quality
Cations / Anions
Scaling Species
Bacteria
• Water Qualities at Different Locations of the
SWDs
14
Basic Water Qualities at Tank Batteries and SWDs
Delaware
Parameter Unit Deeper Targets SWDs
Mountain Group
Temperature °C 37.3 35.5 34.1
Dissolved oxygen mg/L 1.4 2.3 1.5
pH s.u. 7.2 6.2 6.6
Sulfide mg/L 39.6 0 11
Conductivity mS/m 7842 36052 21364
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 51388 292048 158767
16
Cations Level for the Water at Tank Batteries and SWDs -2
17
Anions Level for the Water at Tank Batteries and SWDs -1
18
Anions Level for the Water at Tank Batteries and SWDs -2
Boron presents in the water samples, mostly under 50 mg/L. Higher level at Delaware
Mountain Group.
The levels of nitrate, Fluoride and Phosphate are low and negligible.
19
Ions Balance of the Samples
TDS All Ions
600000
500000
400000
mg/L
300000
200000
100000
0
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49
TDS readings are generally higher than the sum of all the ions.
Need to pay attention to the testing methods for the TDS testing.
20
Charge Balance of the Samples
Cations Anions
6000
5000
4000
mmol/L
3000
2000
1000
0
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49
21
Scaling Species for the Water at Tank Batteries and
SWDs
22
Scaling Index for the CaSO4 and BaSO4 for the Water at
Tank Batteries and SWDs (25ͦC)
23
ATP (Bacteria) Level for the Water at Tank Batteries and
SWDs
Delaware Mountain Group Deeper Targets SWDs
25
20
# of Wells
15
10
0
<500 500-1000 1000-5000 >5000
24
Bacteria Growth at the SWDs
1000000
100000
10000
CFU/ml
1000
100
10
1
Ballpark 20D SWD Barstow 26-20D SWD Arco State 33-28 SWD
SRB 1200 0 0
IRB 500 0 0
APB 150 800000 0
Bacteria is detected at Ballpark 20D and Barstow 26-20D, while it is not detected for the
sample from Arco State.
At Ballpark 20D, most of the bacteria is SRB
At Barstow 26-20D, only APB is detected, but the level is high
25
Water Qualities at Different Locations of the SWDs
Iron Sulfide
3.5
14.0
3.0
12.0
2.5
10.0
2.0
mg/L
8.0
mg/L
1.5
6.0
1.0
4.0
0.5
2.0
0.0
0.0
Inlet After ClO2 After OWS Before wellhead
Inlet After ClO2 After OWS Before
wellhead Arco State 33-28 SWD Ballpark 20D SWD Barstow 26-20D SWD
Arco State 33-28 SWD Ballpark 20D SWD Barstow 26-20D SWD
ATP Samples were taken at the Inlet, right after the ClO 2
5000 injection, after the Oil/Water Separators and right before
4500
4000 the well heads
3500
3000 Iron level fluctuates as the water flows through the
pg/ml
2500
2000 facility. The level at Barstow is higher than at Arco Sate
1500
1000 and Ballpark
500
0 Sulfide level is low at all three SWDs, while it fluctuates
After After Before
Inlet
ClO2 OWS wellhead
throughout the facility
Arco State 33-28 SWD 105 58 212 963 The ATP level at Arco State and Barstow is relatively low,
Ballpark 20D SWD 4521 2307 1719 2403 while it is high throughout the whole facility of Ballpark.
Barstow 26-20D SWD 106 433 8
Arco State 33-28 SWD Ballpark 20D SWD Barstow 26-20D SWD
26
Case Study – Bench Scale Analysis
27
Tank Sludge / Solid Break Test – Acetone Dissolution
28
Tank Sludge / Solid Break Test – Hexane Dissolution
29
Tank Sludge / Solid Break Test– Diesel Dissolution
30
Tank Sludge / Solid Break Test – H2SO4 Digestion
Sludge Sample in H2SO4 Solution Sludge Sample after H2SO4 Digestion Solution
31
Tank Sludge / Solid Sample Dissolution Test
Two tank sludge/ solid samples were collected, one from Barstow 26-20D, the other one
from Ballpark 20D
With the suspicion that most of the sludge is paraffin, tests were conducted by dissolving
the sludge with paraffin solvent at room temperature to check the solid/ water / paraffin
separation.
32
Dissolution of Tank Sludge / Solid Sample from Barstow
26-20D
33
Dissolution of Tank Sludge / Solid Sample from Ballpark
20D
34
Summary
• Start the approach from Solid / Scale
analysis
• Paraffin is the major issue other than
inorganic scales in this case
• Water qualities need to be investigated with
a holistic program
• Testing methods need to be verified.
• Bench scale test treatability test can be an
important step in the approach.
35
Contact Information
• Brad Whitnell
– Midstream Manager, Jetta Operating Company, Inc.
– bwhitnell@JettaOperating.com
• Jinxuan Hu
– Engineering Manager, Hydrozonix, LLC
– jhu@hydrozonix.com
36
Thank You
37