AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH IN FACT OF CRIMINAL ACTS BY THE STATE OF GEORGIA

THROUGH FOREIGN CROWN AGENTS AND BAR ATTORNEYS IN A SIMULATED

LEGAL PROCESS EXECUTED UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW CALLED OFFICIAL
CODE OF GEORGIA CASE 2016D-00833-1 OF WHICH THIS LIVING MAN HAS ZERO
LIABILITY OR ASSOCIATION. THESE ARE FRAUDYLENT FALSE CLAIMS
I am Thomas-William: Healan Jr., I am a living, flesh, and blood, soul sentient man with
unalienable rights that existed antecedent to the constitution you were supposed to have an oath
to protect and defend. I am of the opinion there are no constitutionally delegated offices occupied
in GWINNETT COUNTY or the STATE OF GEORGIA, et al. and it don’t matter. It is what it
is. That doesn’t concern me. My family and my losses do. I ACCEPT ALL PUBLIC OFFICIAL
CONNECTED IN ANY MANNER AFFILIOATED WITH THESE CORPORATIONS THAT
CREATED INJURIES IN FACT AND DECLARE MY TRUE RESIDENT AND DOMINION
OF THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN AND REBUT ANY PRESUNPTIONS OF US
CITIZENSHIP AB INITIO AS FRAUD WITHOUT RECOURSE I AM A PEACEFUL
SOJOURNER AND NOT AN ENEMY. THE UNITED STATES AND THE KINGDOM OF
HEAVEN ARE NOT AT WAR I COME IN PEACE WITH DIPLOMATIC STATUS
SEEKING THE PEACEFULL RESOLUTION OF THE RESTITUTION OF TRESPASSES OF
THE STATE. THERE CAN BE NO CONTROVERSY. OR LOSS OF STANDING BY THE
TWEA TITLE 50. THAT IS REBUTTED AS FICTION
I address these questions to all of the respondents and if not rebutted they are affirmed and will
be stare decisis in this matter without recourse. YOUR FAILURE TO REBUT IS YOUR
CONSENT AND AGREEMENT OF FACTS. These points are to the respondents of the claim:
THE STATE OF GEORGIA- TO INCLUDE ALL AGENTS, Senators, Legislature et al
THE COUNTY OF GWINNETT- all municipal bonds securities TO INCLUDE ALL AGENTS
ALL AGENTS OF THE FOREIGN CORPORATIONS in whatever name
THE STATE COURT OF GWINNETT COUNTY –AND ALL AGENTS including all
securities and proceeds from the commercial enterprise
THE GWINNETC COUNTY DETENTION CENTER- AND ALL AGENTS
THE GWINNETT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS- ALL
TRAVELLERS INS. Policy numbers 106447081-106638638-106630986-105531711-
105531716 et al
THE GEINNETT COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE- AND ALL AGENTS
THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA- NATHAN DEAL
THE STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA- CHRIS CARR
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES- JEFF SESSIONS
THE SECRETARY OF THE UNITED NATIONS- António Guterres
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF GWINNETT COUNTY DANNY PORTER
ROSANNA SZABO- Rosanna Szabo – REFUSED TO IDENTIFY
EMILY J BRANTLEY- Emily J Brantley- REFUSED TO IDENTIFY
LEWIS LAWRENCE- Lewis Lawrence BAR# 451060
BUTCH CONWAY – Butch Conway TRAVELERS INS 106634969
SHANE MCKEAN – Shane McKean- REFUSED TO IDENTIFY
RYAN FISHER – Ryan Fisher- REFUSED TO IDENTIFY
CORIZON CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE
ARRESTING BALIFFS - REFUSED TO IDENTIFY
OLDER MALE WHOM APPOINTED ATTORNEY TO DEFENDANT- REFUSED TO
IDENTIFY
GWINNETT JUSTICE AND ADMINISTRATION CENTER- REFUSED TO IDENTIFY
ANYONE PARTICIPATING IN CASE 2016D -00833-1

HONEST SERVICES AND TRUTH ARE REQUIRED BY PUBLIC SERVANTS WHO ARE
PAID FOR THOSE SERVICES AND ARE COMPELLED AS SUCH TO PROVIDE THOSE
SERVICES ARE TO BE IN BREACH OF.

I Thomas-William: Healan Jr, accept for value upon this claim as surety all of the corporations,
and agents and entitles interests, holdings, as well as their spouses holdings or interests in the
official bonding, official oaths, commercial liabilities, commercial holdings, bank accounts,
CRIS, WHFIT, NMWHFIT, CAFR policies, Travellers Insurance as Surety, all BAR Cards, real
estate, policies at Great American Insurance Group, blocked grants, and anything movable or
fixed to provide remedy and immediate restitution for the injuries and losses from the fraud that
was enacted in case 2016d-00833-1 CHARGES AND CLAIM FROM THE STATE OF
GEORGIA , A FICTICIOUS PLAINTIFF THAT HAS NO JURISDICTION OVER A LIVING
MAN. BUT THROUGH CRIMINAL ACTS EXECUTED BY THE STATE OF GEORGIA
AND GWINNETT COUNTY AND THE FOREIGN AGENTS OPERATING MIN A
COMMERCIAL JURISDICTION USING COPYRIGHT PROTECTED CODE THAT
APPLIES TO CORPORATIONS ON A DECEPTIVE CREATED FICTIOUS NAME THAT
THE STATE OF GEORGIA CREATED WITH THE INTENTION TO ENSLAVE ME AND
MY PERSON AND CREATE SECURITIES ALONG WITH OTHER CRIMES.
I TRIED TO DEFEND MYSELF AND THEY ARRESTED ME AND HELD ME 6 MONTHS
FOR A TRAFFIC CITATION UNDER COLOR OF LAW WHILE DENYING MEDICAL
CARE USING THREATS AND INTIMIDATION THROUGH AN ATTORNEY THEY
FORCED UNLAWFULLY UPON ME TO HELP ENSLAVE ME. I MEAN CONSPIRACY
AGAINST RIGHTS IS NOT A START ON THE MASSIVE AMOUNT OF CRIMES THESE
ENTITIES COMMITTED. AMAZING THAT YOU WOULD GO THAT FAR… WOW.

OK IM NOT GOING TO WASTE MY TIME LISTING 4-500 TORTS. NOT YET.

IF THIS IS NOT REBUTTED BY ALL RESPONDENTS UNDER THE PENALTY OF
PERJURY AND WITH UNLIMITED COMMERCIAL LIABILITY YOU AGREE THIS IS
TRUE AND WILL NOT BE BROUGHT TO QUESTION EVER AGAIN. YOU AGREE THE
STATE OF GEORGIA AND GWINNETT COUNTY ALONG WITH ALL OF THE
RESPONDENTS AND THEIR SPOUSES ARE LIABLE AND WILL PAY ME WITHIN 10
DAYS OR THE INTEREST WILL BE 250,000.00 PER DAY ON UNPAID BALANCE.
I DID NOT COME AFTER YOU. YOU HAVE COST ME 3 YEARS AND I LOST
EVERYTHING. YOU CAME AFTER ME AND CAUSED THE DAMAGE. I HAVE
COMMITTED NO CRIME WHATSOEVER. YOU DID INTENTIONALLY.
DISHONOR HAS BEEN WAIVED BY ALL PARTIES THERE IS NO ONE WHO CAN
REBUT THE TRUTH OR YOU WOULD HAVE ALREADY I HAVE SENT 12 AFFIDAVITS
AND YOU REFUSE TO REBUT SO WE KNOW YOU ARE ALL GUILTY.
1- ALL OF YOU ARE GUILTY OF WORKING TOGETHER IN A CRIMINAL
CONSPIRACY AGAINST Thomas-William: Healan Jr. UNDER THE COLOR OF
STATE LAW WHILE COMMITTING ACTS INVOLVING A CRIMINAL
ENTERPRISE THAT CREATES FALSE SECURITIES THROUGH IDENTITY
THEFT THROUGH THE GSA 24, 25, 25A BONDS AND CRIS WHICH ARE
POOLED AND SOLD AND ALL OF YOU GET A PERCENTAGE.
2- I COULD CARE LESS ABOUT THAT.
3-

POWER OF ATTORNEY JUDGE AND RYAN

BONDING INFORMATION

CAUSE OF ACTION

You waive Dishonor, you waive Presentment and you waive Protest. It’s a confessed judgment that’s
why they go to collection.

Your private

property; be it your home, your car, your body is not required by law to be recorded, (see

U.C.C. 1-203 and 1-201 (25, 26, & 27). They have a good faith obligation to explain

"Full Disclosure"

This is done through fraud, deception and adhesive contracts to confiscate money from

the private citizens under the color of law; Which is not law at all..

(Title 18 United States Code §242 Clearly Provides)

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully
subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the

deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the

Constitution or laws of the United States. . .shall be fined under this title or imprisoned

not more than one year, or both.

(Title 18 United States Code §245 In addition Provides)

Whoever whether or not acting under color of law, intimidates or interferes with any

person from participating in or enjoying any benefit, service, privilege, program, facility,

or activity provided or administered by the United States; [or] applying for or enjoying

employment, or any perquisite thereof, by any agency of the United States; shall be fined

under this title, or imprisoned not more than one year or both.

he term "Averment" comes from the root "aver": to declare or assert; to set out

distinctly and formally; to allege. An averment is a positive declaration or affirmation of

fact, especially and allegation. It is submitted in the form of an affidavit so as to invoke

the superior credibility and power that comes with having unlimited commercial liability.

As an honest, forthright, conscientious, sentient being you have nothing to hide or fear

and so can state your position openly and fully by affidavit. Others with hidden agendas

and skeletons in the closet need to hide behind their corporate mother's skirts of only

limited liability. They are too terrified of being held personally accountable for anything

to step up to the commercial plate and swear out an affidavit stating anything.

(Title 18 United States Code §1983 Also Provides)

Every person who under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of

any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any

citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the
deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws,

shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper

proceeding for redress.

HERE'S SOME CASE LAW

The UCC-1 Financing Statement is the one contract in the world that can NOT be broken.

by properly filing an UCC-1 Financing Statement we can become the holder in due course of the
STRAWMAN This gives us virtual ownership of the government created entity.

As holder in due course you can require the sworn testimony of the presenter of the "claim" (under
penalty of perjury) and request the account be properly adjusted.

a request is made for the bookkeeping records showing where the funds in question were assigned. This
is done by requesting the Fiduciary Tax Estimate and the Fiduciary Tax Return for this claim.

Since the claim has been accepted for value and is prepaid, and our TDA account is exempt from levy,
the request for the Fiduciary Tax Estimate and the Fiduciary Tax Return is valid because the information
is necessary in determining who is delinquent and/or making claims on the account. If there is no record
of the Fiduciary Tax Estimate and the Fiduciary Tax Return, we then request the individual tax estimates
and individual tax returns to determine if there is any delinquency.

The only immunity any agent has is when they are within their jurisdiction, and they have no jurisdiction
over you the real live person.

WELL OFFICER, DO YOU

UNDERSTAND THAT THE TRAFFIC REGULATORY LAWS OF THIS STATE

ARE ADMINISTRATIVE LAWS AND THAT I AM PRESENTLY ENGAGED IN

NO REGULATABLE DRIVING ACTIVITY WHICH CAN POSSIBLY MAKE

ME SUBJECT TO THOSE LAWS?

I did not sign the ticket or contract with the policeman

have damaged Petitioners/Claimants, (names husband and wife), their property and rights to property,
estate, trust, their good name, and their ability to transfer, sale and freely use same, therefore, this has
caused Petitioner/Claimant et.al., to be put into a position of involuntary servitude and peonage against
their will and the laws of the United States of America, the state of Oregon and the Law of Nations by
Respondents/Libelants et.al
parties concerning treaties, compacts, agreements, contracts and the like involving the Respondents-
/Libelant et. Al., as it applies to any alleged claims as against Petitioner’s/Claimant’s property, estate ,
trust and personally, concerning revenue Under the forum United States of America and Law of Nations

Judicial Canon #1 is extremely important. Due diligence and a complete review of the merits of the case
are necessary in the interest of justice. These Pro se litigants are not knowledgeable in the law and rely
upon the discretion of the court to apply justice fairly and evenly pursuant to 28 USC § 471, Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure - Rule 81 and rights and safe guards paid for in the highest premium, the blood
of patriots, for the people of the United States of American and their posterity. Respectfully, _______

I demand the bond in my name be immediately brought forward, so I can see who will
indemnify me if I am damaged.
I withdraw any previous appearances and agreement entered under duress,

SubI do not consent to being surety for this case and these proceedings.

submit a claim against the Attorney for trespass and fraud.

I demand the bond in my name be immediately brought forward, so I can see who will indemnify me if I
am damaged.

Report post

Posted October 18, 2011 (edited)

The constitution was declared void some time ago. It has been hijacked and we are to believe we are
still living under its blessings. Every time a President uses Executive Order it is actually a declaration that
HE is acting outside the reach of the Constitution. Or, that the Constitution is suspened. Happens all the
time. The Constitution is now meaningless, sorry to say. And we allowed it!
The united states “...is a corporation, a legal fiction that existed well before the Revolutionary War.”

Republica v. Sween, 1 Dallas 43.

United States Code Title 28, Part VI, Chapter 176, Subchapter A, § 3002;

(15) “United States” means, (A) a Federal corporation

1933 March 9, a bank emergency [bankruptcy] was declared by President Roosevelt because of the
insolvency of the United States. Executive Order 6073, 6102, 6111, 6260; Senate Report 93-549, pgs.
187 & 594, 1973.

1933 March 9,“The new money (paper promissory notes) is issued to the banks in return for
Government obligations, bills of exchange, drafts, notes, trade acceptances, and banker’s acceptances.
The new money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar, because it is backed by the credit of the nation. It
will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other

property of all the people in the Nation.” Senate Document No. 43, 73rd Congressional Record, 1st
Session.

1933 May 1, gold was transferred from U. S. Citizens to the United States by Executive Order 6102.

1933 May 23, Congressman, Louis T. McFadden brought formal charges (Congressional Record May 23,
1933 page 4055-4058) against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, The
Comptroller of the Currency and the Secretary of United States Treasury for numerous criminal acts,
including but not limited to, conspiracy, fraud, unlawful conversion and treason. The petition for Articles
of Impeachment was thereafter referred to the Judiciary Committee and has yet to be acted on.

1933 June 5, to mitigate McFadden's charges (and prevent being hung for treason), Congress passed
House Joint Resolution 192 to provide U. S. Citizens the right to set off all debt obligations as the
consideration (something bargained for i.e., an exchange) for the transfer (theft) of all the gold and
property.
1950 Congress declared "bankruptcy and reorganization". Secretary of Treasury appointed receiver in
the bankruptcy. Reorganization Plan, No. 26, 5 U.S.C.A. 903; Public Law 94-564; Legislative History, Pg.
5967.

1973 "Since March 9th, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency
(bankruptcy)..." Senate Resolution 9, 93d. Congress, 1st. Session, Foreward.

1977 Oct. 28th, the United States as a "Corporator" and "State" declared insolvency. State banks and
most other banks were put under control of the "Governor" (Secretary of the U. S. Treasury) of the
"Fund" (I.M.F.). 26 IRC 165 (g)(1); U.C.C. 1-201(23), C.R.S. 39-22-103.5, Westfall vs. Braley, 10 Ohio 188,
75 Am. Dec. 509, Adams vs. Richardson, 337 S.W. 2d. 911; Ward vs. Smith, 7 Wall 447.

1993 March 17th, United States Congressional Record, Vol. 33, page H-1303. Speaker-Rep. James
Traficant, Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House: "Mr. Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11.. Members of
Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any Bankrupt entity in world
history, the U. S. Government. It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has
been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by
President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress m session June 5, 1933 –
Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign
Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices,
Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists
today in name only.”

The SUBSTANCE of the American citizenry, their real property, wealth, assets and productivity that
belongs to them, was pledged by the government and placed at risk as the collateral for US debt, credit,
and currency for commerce to function.

Under the 14th amendment and numerous Supreme Court precedents, as well as in equity, private
property cannot be taken or pledged for public use without just compensation or due process of law.
The United States cannot pledge or risk the property and wealth of its PRIVATE CITIZENS for any
government purpose without legally providing them remedy to recover what is due them on their risk.
Courts have long ruled that to have one’s property legally held as collateral or surety for a debt, even
when one still owns it and still has it, is to DEPRIVE him of it since it is at risk and could be lost for the
debt at any time.

The United States Supreme Court said that, the Constitution provides that “private property shall not be
taken for public use without just compensation.” United States v. Russell, 13 Wall, 623, 627.
“Sureties compelled to pay debts for their Principal have been deemed entitled to reimbursement, even
without a contractual promise… And probably there are few doctrines better established…” Pearlman v.
Reliance Ins. Co., 371 U.S. 132, 1962

United States Code Title 31 section 3123 states that the US Government has an obligation to pay 'dollar
for dollar' principal and interest in legal tender ALL debts accrued by the American people.

Are you aware of the 8 essential items of contract? Yes or no Are you aware of the clause, open
disclosure? Yes or no Are you aware of the clause, certainty of terms? Yes or no Do you understand the
word treason? Yes or no

Would I have to enter a plea if there was no cause of action presented? Yes or no.

Would I have to enter a plea if there was no crime presented? Yes or no.

Would I have to enter a plea if the alleged plaintiff lacks standing to complain against me? Yes or no.

Would I have to enter a plea if there is no jurisdiction over me? Yes or no.

Would there be a crime if there was no jurisdiction? Yes or no.

Is jurisdiction an element of this alleged crime? Yes or no.

[Presumed innocent question will contradict his answer here if y

If no:So the one bringing the complaint is not required to prove jurisdiction? Yes or no.

[If the judge enters a plea of not guilty, usually accusing me of refusing to plea]

Sir, on whose behalf did you enter that plea?

Do you represent me? Yes or no.

How can you enter a plea on my behalf and not be representing me?

Then on whose behalf was the plea entered?

[I may ask here]

Sir, who do you represent here?

[There are questions like this further down]

Does this ticket\charge present every element of a cause of action? Yes or no.

How many elements does a cause of action consist of? (Two, I don’t tell them though)
What are the two elements of a cause of action? (breach of duty [legal right] and damage)

The supreme court has held these are the two elements: injury alleged must be, for example, "distinct
and

palpable,'and not “abstract” or “conjectural” or “hypothetical,”;The injury must be “fairly” traceable to

the

challenged action, and relief from the injury must be “likely” to follow from a favorable decision.; Allen
v.

Wright, 468 U.S. 737 (1984) (citations omitted) (emphasis added).

Where on this charge\ ticket is a distinct and palpable; injury presented?

What are the essential elements to a justiciable case or controversy? (breach of duty and damage)

s there a victim? Yes or no.

Have I been accused of violating someone’s rights? Yes or no.

If yes, can you identify the right I allegedly violated?

[To clarify, was it some one’s right to life, liberty or property?]

There will also be an inconsistency with the ticket where no victim is noted.

This civil action does not involve the alleged violation of a legal right? Yes or no.

How does someone acquire standing in a civil case?

Do you know and understand what jurisdiction is factually? Yes or no.

Is jurisdiction control over me? Yes or no.

Do you exercise control over me? Yes or no.

Factually, how was your jurisdiction, or control over me, acquired?[I

Does your control over me depend on my freely given consent? Yes or no

If I don’t consent to your control over my life and property you’ll back off and leave me alone? Yes or no

My consent to your control over my life is not required? Yes or

Would it be accurate to state you acquired your control over my life violently? Yes or no. [This has to
conflict

with the previous question]

So your control over me is based on your coercion

Doesn’t control imply ownership? Yes or no

Didn’t you state I had basic human rights? Yes or no

Can you please explain to me how I have basic human rights that you respect while you take control
over my

life and property without my consent?

15572934.doc g

Except for physical violence, where, when, why and how was your alleged jurisdiction; over me
acquired?;

I entitled to a fair hearing? Yes or no. [proves RELEVANCE of following questions]

Am I entitled to a meaningful hearing? Yes or no.

What are the consequences, if any, if you don’t give me a fair and meaningful hearing?

Am I entitled to be informed of the nature and cause of the charges and proceedings against me? Yes or
no.

Would your orders and judgments be valid if I don’t get a fair hearing? Yes or no.

Would you seek to enforce your orders and judgments if I don’t get a fair hearing? Yes or no.

Would you seek to enforce your orders if there was no evidence of jurisdiction over me? Yes or no.

What rules, if any, govern the proceedings here?

Do you have to comply with all the rules? Yes or no.

Are there rules you can ignore? Yes or no.

If yes: Which ones, why?

Do the constitutions, Australia, nsw, govern these proceedings? Yes or no.

Do you serve the people of Australia?..yes or no

Do you have to comply with the constitution