WRITES ‘THE INFRASTRUCTURE PEOPLE use fefties (sia FROR aT WEFT) RITES LIMITED (Schedule ‘A’ Enterprise of Govt. of Inia) Urban Transport Division see rere 757 6, Bharat Apartment, 44/1, Fairfield Layout, Race Course Road, Bangalore - 560 00. Phone : 080 - 22355160 Telefax : 080 - 22352165 No: 220724/BLR-MEGA/2015 To, General Manager (Planning & Design) Metro Link Express for Gandhinagar and Ahmedabad (MEGA) Company Ltd ‘Ahmedabad ~ 380015, Gujarat, India, Dear Sir, Sub. Ref Detailed Design Consultancy Services for Elevated Metro-Rail Stations 23.06.2015 Six (6) Numbers including viaduct portion within the station and transition spans on either side of the stations (Vastral Gam, Nirant Cross Road, Vastral, Rabari Colony, Amraiwadi and Apparel Park) on Reach R-1 of East DBR Comments West corridor for Ahmedabad Metro Rail Project 1) email from MEGA on DBR comments dated 4 June 2015 With reference to the above, the DBR is revised as shown under: Registered Offoe : Soope Minar, Laxmi Nagar, Del - 110.092 (NDIA), E- Clause | Page Remarks by DDC 8 Comments i No. No. * Serial numbers given inthe | Serial numbers given in table table are to be checked and checked and corrected. corrected, + The code provides minimum grade + Grade of concrete (M35) taken | of concrete, In the present case is for severe condition but nominal eee ee ewe cone cover given for the same are for based on durability consideration is| moderate condition, Please check it , : shown. Cover shown is foy and provide nominal cover also moderate environmental exposure| sy accordingly 3.2.1.2 10 conditions ¢ Similarly nominal cover ; ede rec lem * For the column and foundation] concourse and foundation are not below concourse level richer Givonin te codes, 0, indly give | coneTee grade with| extra. cove some reference for taking this over reinforcement ig particular value. And grade of recommended, concrete is taken for extreme exposure condition, kindly check | this aan Please rier DBR vieduet document for |» Ineorporated 3.4.4 15 the horizontal road traffic clearance rafts Fiigaeaiaa ea Fa wether, Ral eee a A) etancm al: nfo@ris.com Webetio carci af : “pees sa", 7. 4, Beer 26, gems - 272 ook Corporate Offce : RITES Bhawan’, No.1, Seclo28, Gurgaon, Haryana, Tel: O124 - 2571686 - 68 Fax: 2571850Please refer NBC code for clear height 34.2.2 | 16 | below track girder for passenger’s movement, Tneorporated ‘Application for point 1: The reference for design horizontal seismic 17 | coefficient should be RDSO instead of TS; 1893 (part-1-2002), thus further Bol values should be revised. Revised Value for horizontal design seismic acceleration coefficient has been taken 0.6; please check whether to take 0.6 or 0.06. 18 Revised Maximum compression as per UIC 3.62 | 20 | 774-3R is 92 MPa. Please check the value. Revised Please check DBR via-duct for vertical deflection at mid span of track girder. Tn viaduct DBR vertical deflection value at mid span is not given. 371 | 20 Fience deflection value as per IRS CBC is showa in DBR Live Toad axle configuration is not ‘Changed 381 | 21 | required please refer MEGA SOD for this sar | aa | Plesse consider I code or sation Considered building and IRS code for Viaduct saa) a _ | Piesse consider IS code Tor station Considered building and IRS code for Viaduct Please consider IS code for station Considered 3.16 | 25 _| building and IRS code for Viaduct aa) ay | Revised as per addendum Revised This is for your information. DBR duly incorporating above revisions is enclosed herewith for record, Yours Sincerely, PShameer Bash7>' Ae GM (Civil) & Team Leader CC: GGM (UT) GC, RITES, Gurgaon (for information) Director (SER), MEGA, Gandhinagar (for information)- MAITES A Trusted Partner in Business Across The Globe DESIGN BASIS REPORT FOR STATIONS Contract No: MEGA/DDC/ELEV-STNS/E-W/1/2014 LOA no, MEGA/DDC/ELEV-STNS/E-W/R1/2014-15/LOA/5155 DATED Feb 02, 2015 Detailed Design Consultancy for Elevated Metro Rail Stations — Six Stationson E-W Corridor of Ahmedabad Metro Rail Project Submitted to METRO LINK EXPRESS FOR GANDHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD (MEGA) 803, 8"" Floor, GNFC Info Tower S.G. Highway, Ahmedabad - 380015 INDIA Submitted by RITES LTD Urban Transport (UT) Division Detailed Design Consultants to MEGA Bangalore 560001 Karnataka,INDIA Submitted on Date: 24 Month: UNE Year: 2015 REPORT NO. 220724 / QAP/ R-2AHMEDABAD METRO RAIL PROJECT FOR METRO LINK EXPRESS FOR GANDHINAGAR & AHMEDABAD DESIGN BASIS REPORT - STATION mii ae [Glient/Project owner | (Metro_Link Express for Gandhinagar & Ahmedabad (MEGA) Company Ltd. ] Project [Ahmedabad Metro Rail Project For Metro Link Express For Gandhinagar &| ‘Ahmedabad (Document [Design Basis Report — Station a (Type of document [Report (Date File name IE ‘Framework Reference Confidentiality ‘Language [English ‘Number of pages MEGA a "Feb 2015 fg "Page 2‘Name Designation Signature Date Originator B.Renganayagi Structural 24.06.2015 Engineer ie Reviewer ‘ShameerBasha ‘Team leader 24.06.2015 Issuer / Approver Shameer Basha Team leader y i. annans Issue and Revision Record VERSION DATE DESCRIPTION STATUS Rev.0 | 24.03.2015. Initial Submission or Client/Employer Approval Rev.1 02.05.2015 | First Submission: Incorporating comments by MEGA. Rev.2 24.06.2015 Second submission Tncorporating comments by MEGA ‘This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above- captioned project only It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. We accept no responsibilty for the eonsequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error of omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other patties This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual propery. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned iti = [Position Date _] [Signature | (PD Approval (osoesreone) (Production | {_2. al 2 (Cheek [Approval 3 Version 1 [Approval MODIFICATIONS SINCE PREVIOUS VERSIONS MEGA Feb2015TABLE OF CONTENTS { Page S.No. DESCRIPTION ae 1.0 | PROJECT DESCRIPTION 6 2.0 | PURPOSE, 8g 3.0 _ | STRUCTURAL ISSUES 9 3.1__| UNITS 9 32 _ | MATERIAL PARAMETERS 9 3.2.1 [CONCRETE 9 3.2.2 | PRESTRESSING STEEL ul 3.2.3 _| STRUCTURAL STEEL B 32.4_| REINFORCEMENT STEEL(REBARS) 14 33 | TIME-DEPENDENT CHARACTERISTICS OF MATERIALS 15 34 _| CLEARANCES 15 3.4.1_| CLEARANCES FOR ROAD TRAFFIC 15 3.42 | CLEARANCES FOR ROLLING STOCK 15 3.43 | CLEARANCES FOR PASSENGER'S MOVEMENTS ib 3.5 __| SEISMIC DESIGN 15 35.1__| STATION 15 3.6 | RAIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION 18 3.6.1 _| UNIT LOAD CASES - PARAMETERS 18 3.6.2 | STRESS LIMITS 18 37 DEFLECTION 19 3.7.1 | VERTICAL DEFLECTION AT MID-SPAN OF TRACK BEAM 19 3.72 _ | DEFLECTION FOR STATION BUILDING 19 3.8 | LIVE LOADS: TRAIN AND FLOOR LIVE LOAD 20 3.8.1 | VERTICAL TRAIN LIVE LOAD 20 382 | HORIZONTAL TRAIN LIVE LOAD (BRAKING AND TRACTION) 20 3.8.3 | COEFFICIENT OF DYNAMIC AUGMENT (CDA) 20 3.84 _| FLOOR LIVE LOAD 20 39, SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOADS (SIDL) 21 3.9.1_| STATIONS 21 3.9.2_| VIADUCT 21 3.10 | DERAILMENT LOAD (DR) om 311 | OVERALL TEMPERATURE EFFECTS (OT) AND SHRINKAGE 22 EFFECTS. a 3.2 | DIFFERENTIAL TEMPERATURE (DT) | 22 3.13 | WIND LOADS mar [22 MEGA Feb 20153.14 | DIFFERENTIAL SETTLEMENT 2) 3.15 _ | CONSTRUCTION LOADS Ba) 3.16 | COLLISION LOAD (CL) 23 3.17 | NOMENCLATURE FOR ELEMENTARY LOADS CONSIDERED IN 23 DESIGN 3.48 | LOAD COMBINATIONS METHODOLOGY & LOAD COMBINATIONS 24 3.18.1 | REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURE 24 3.18.2 | PRESTRESSED CONCRETE STRUCTURE 25 3.18.3 | LOAD COMBINATION (OTHER THAN TRACK SUPPORTING a5 STRUCTURE) 3.18.4 | LOAD COMBINATION (TRACK SUPPORTING STRUCTURE) 25 4.0 __ | DESIGN BASIS 27 41___| GENERAL 27 42 | METHODOLOGY FOR ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 27 43___| GRADE OF CONCRETE AND NOMINAL COVER Pr 5.0 | FOUNDATION 30 3.1 _ | GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT (GAR) 30 52 | PILE CAPACITY 30 53 __| STRUCTURAL DESIGN 31 54 FOUNDATIONS STIFFNESS 31 5.4.1 | SOIL STATIC STIFFNESS 31 34.2 | SOIL DYNAMIC STIFFNESS — EARTHQUAKE LOADS ONLY 31 543 | ROCK STATIC AND DYNAMIC STIFFNESS 32. 6.0 LIST OF DESIGN CODES AND STANDARDS 33 [ot IRS CODES 3: 6.2 IRC CODES a3) 63 _| ISCODES 33 64 | EURO CODE 35 65 | OTHERS 3 66 | MISCELLANEOUS 35 ‘Annexure 1 Structural System of sections 36 MEGA "Feb 2015 Page 5aS PROJECT DESCRIPTION Metro -Link Express for Gandhinagar and Ahmedabad Company Limited (MEGA), a Special Purpose Vehicle established under the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as “MEGA” or “the Company” or “ the Employer” or “the Client”), invites Tenders under single stage two packet system for Detailed Design Consultancy Services for Elevated Metro-Rail Stations — Six (6) Numbers including viaduct portion within the station and transition spans on either side of the stations (Vastral Gam, Nirant Cross Road, Vastral, Rabri Colony, Amraiwadi, ‘Apparel Park) on East- West Corridor of Ahmedabad Metro Rail Project for Metro-Link Express for Gandhinagar & Ahmedabad (MEGA) Company Ltd. As per terms and conditions contained in Tender No. MEGA/DDC/ELEV-STNS/E-W/1/2014. The mode of traction is Third Rail with 750 volt DC. The track will be Standard Gauge (1435 mm) as decided by competent authority. The Project is proposed to be brought into operational use in various stages. As provided in the DPR and the phase 1 under consideration is scheduled to be commissioned in March -2018 and have two distinct routes on i) East-West Corridor consisting of double track elevated line between Thatle} Gam Station to Ashram Road and then up to start of West Ramp of UG Portion (About 7.9 Km) including portion coming on Sabarmati River ~ bed and then further double track elevated line as between Elevated portion before Apparel Park Station to Vastral Gam (About 6.04 Km) front and in between further Section ~ EW-UG as underground stretch of about 6.57 Km starting from just before Shahpur Station and just ending before Apparel Park Station. S.No Station Name Chainage (m) 1 Vastral Gam 19721.4m 2 Nirant Cross Road 19050.2 m 3 ‘Vastral 18128.7 m (naa Rabri Colony 1661.2 m 5 Amraiwadi 15783.0 m. (6 ‘Apparel Park 14381.0m MEGA Feb 2015 Page 62. PURPOSE “The aim of this report is to present the design basis for the Stations East-West Corridor of Metro rail alignment in the city of Ahmedabad. ‘This design basis note is being submitted highlighting the proposed design methodology fo" the project. All the design works, cost estimates and BOQ calculations shall be performed duly considering this Design Basis Report “The Design Service Life of permanent structures shall be 120 years. The Design Service Life is primarily addressed by the durability of the structure. ‘The factors influencing durability include: the environment; the cover to embedded steel; ‘© the type and quality of constituent materials; «the cement content and water/cement ratio of the concrete; (as shown below) © workmanship, to obtain full compaction and efficient curing; and the shape and size of the member. MEGA Page 855 STRUCTURAL ISSUES 3.1. Units ‘The main units used for design will be: {m ], [mm ], [KN ], [ kN/m? ], [MPa], [°C }, [rad] 3.2. Materials Parameters 3.2.1 Concrete 3.2.1.1 Young’s Modulus a) Instantaneous modulus: Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete, E is taken as per clause 6.2.3.1 of IS 456:2000 E = 5000 sart (fsx) For Instantenuous modulus, E is taken as per clause 5.2.2.1 of IRS-CBC-1997 (with latest amendments) © For f= 60 Mpa E=36000 MPa © For f= 50 Mpa E=34000 MPa © For fy=45 Mpa = 32500 MPa © For f= 40 Mpa E= 31000 MPa For fy=35 Mpa B= 29500 MPa Where fy is the Characteristic Compressive Strength of 150mm Cube at 28 days. Long-time modulus: «Long -time modulus is calculated through time-dependent analysis of structures for the effects of creep, shrinkages. «Inthe absence of detailed study of time-dependent effects, long-term modulus may be assumed equal to 50% of instantaneous modulus. b) Modular Ratio: Modular ratio for all the concrete grade shall be taken as per Cl. 5.2.6 of IRS — CBC — 1997 (upto A & C 13), For tensile reinforcement = 280/ fix For Compression reinforcement = 420/ fox MEGA "Feb 2015 Page 93.2.1.2 Compressive Strength Durability provisions for structures shall be as per “moderate” conditions of environment Keeping the durability and structural requirement, the proposed strength of various elements of structure will be as follows: Minimum grade of concrete should be as per clause no. 5.44 of IRS : CBC ~ 1997 (upto A&C Slip No. 13) ‘The cover should be as per clause 15.9.2 of IRS: CBC - 1997 (upto A & C Slip No.13) for exposure condition defined in Cl. 5.4.1 of IRS: CBC ~ 1997 (upto A & C Slip No. 13). Recommended grade of concrete based on durability consideration are shown; S.No] Structural Components | Grade of | Nominal Cover conerete (mm) (cube) 1 _| Platform ivi. & Concourse M35 25 vl. Slabs 2 | Beam’ M35 35 3__| Columns M35. 50 4 | At Grade road level slabs M35 35 3_| Above road level beams MBS 30 6 | Foundation M35 75 al For above ground structural clements in contact with Nallah water minimum grade of conerete are as follows: S.No | Structural Components | Grade of | Nominal Cover i concrete (mm) (cube) | T | Columns below M40 65 concourse Foundation ‘MAO, 15 3.2.1.3 Density as per Table-1 of IS:875 (latest revision) -25 kNim’ for Reinforced concrete - 24 Nim’ for Plain concrete 3.2.1.4 Poisson’s Ratio Poisson’s ratio for all concrete : 0.153.2.1.5 Thermal Expansion. Coefficient € =1.17x 105 /°C(CL. 2.6.2 of IRS Bridge rule) 3.2.1.6 Fire Resistance Requirements ‘As per National Building Code 3 hours fire r resistance design of structure shall confirm t ating is recommended for assembly buildings. Fire 0 Clause 21, Clause 26.4.3 and Fig.1 of IS 456 : 2000. Nominal Cover to meet Specified Period of Fire Resistance as Per IS 456 ; 2000 — Table 164, Fire Nominal Cover Resistance Beams Slabs Ribs Columns, Simply | Continuous | Simply | Continuous | Simply | Continuous Supported Supported Supported b mm mm mm, mm mm mm mim 0.5, 20 20 20 20 20 20, 40, 1 20 20 20 20 20 20 40 15 20 20 25 20 = 20 40 2 40 30 35, zs 45 35 40 3 60 40, 45 35, 55 45, 40 4 70 50 55. 45 65 55. 40 3.2.2 Prestressing Steel 3.2.2.1 Pre- tensioning strands (C1. 4.6.1(d) IRS CBO) Pre- tensioned strands will be used for precast I girder full spans steel will be conforming to IS: 14268, Class 2 Low Relaxation uncoated str 3.2.2.1.1 Young’s Modulus(as per Cl. 4.6.2.1 IRS CBC) E= 195,000 MPa ( same value for | strand alone or 1 tendon) 3.2.2.1.2 Strand Type Strand will be of 0.6” strands type (Nominal di type (Nominal dia = 12.7 mm, Area=98.7 mm’) relieved strands. 3.2.2.1.3Breaking Strength & 0.2% Proof Strength, Jacking Force MEGA © Breaking strength of strand = 260.7kN © 0.2 % Proof load = 234.6kN + 0.1 % Proof stress (shall be take strength) = 221.6kN Feb 2015 Page 11 at casting yard. Prestressing 15.2 mm, Area= 140 mm?) And 0.5” strands sn as equal to 85% of minimum ultimate tensile«Jacking force in strand is limited to 90% of 0.1% Proof stress = 0. 9 * 0.8: 76.5% ultimate tensile strength, taken ultimately at 75% ultimate strength 195.5KN, Incidentally, as per IRS CBC: 1997 Cl. 16.8.1, the maximum seating force in strand is limited to 75% of the characteristic strength of steel for pre-tensioned tendons. However the jacking force in tendon will be permitted up to 80% of characteristic strength of strand. Following above mentioned approach it is proposed to limit jacking force to 75% of ultimate tensile strength of strand for pre-tensioned steel. 3.2.2.1.4 Volumetric Weight Volumetric Weight = 78.5 kN/m* 2.2.1.5 Other Parameters No anchorage set in and friction losses for Pre-tensioning strands. 3.2.2.2 Post-tensioning tendons Posttensioned strands will be used for precast I girder at casting yard. Prestressing steel will be conforming to IS: 14628, class 2 Low Relaxation uncoated stress relieved strands, 3.2.2.2.1 Young’s Modulus E = 195000 MPa ( same value for | strand alone or 1 tendon) 3.2.2.2.2 Prestressing Units All prestressing steel units willbe of 0.6” strands type (Nominal dia = 15.2mm, Area = 140 mm’) ‘And 0,5” strands type (Nominal dia = 12.7 mm, Area = 98.7 mm’) Prestressing Units: 12T13, 19T13, 12K15, 19K 15, (longitudinal units) 3.2.2.2.3 Breaking Strength & 0.2% Proof Strength, Jacking Foree © Breaking strength of strand = 260.7 KN © 0.2 % Proof load = 234.6 KN © 01 % Proof stress (shall be taken as equal to 85% of minimum ultimate tensile strength) = 221.6 kN - ee ‘Feb 2015«Jacking force in strand is limited to 90% of 0.1% Proof stress = 0.9 * 0.85 = 76.5% ultimate tensile strength, taken ultimately at 75% ultimate strength = 195.5 KN Incidentally, as per IRS CBC: 1997 Cl. 16.8.1, the maximum seating foree in strand is limited to 70% of the characteristic strength of steel for pre-tensioned tendons. However the jacking force in tendon will be permitted up to 80% of characteristic strength of strand. Following above mentioned approach it is proposed to limit jacking foree to 75% of ultimate tensile strength of strand for post-tensioned steel 3.2.2.2.4 Volumetric Weight Volumetric Weight:78.5 KN/m? 3.2.2.1.5 Other Parameters: Sheathing As per the technical specifications Anchorage set-in as per the prestressing system used HDPE ducts (Cl. 7.2.6.4.2.4 of IRS CBC ) shall be used, with Friction (wobble) of 0.002 m'(Cl 16.8.3 IRS CBC) For cables with plan curvature, above value will be enhanced by 10% Friction (curvature) of 0.17 rad"(Cl. 16.8.3 IRS CBC) 3.2.3. Structural Steel 3.2.3.1 Introduction Structural steel will be used for roof portals, steel staircases, foot bridges, purlins and for miscellaneous use such as railing, supporting utilities, coverings etc. 3.2.3.2 General ‘Two types of structural steel are proposed as per the following standards: a) 1S :4923 “Hollow steel sections for structural use with Yst 310” b) IS: 2062 “Steel for General Structural Purposes (Grade B-Designation 410-B)” ©) IS: 1161 — 1998 “Steel tubes for Structural Purposes specification” MEGA ie Feb 2015 Page 13‘the hollow steel sections would be square (SHS) or rectangular (RH). Other traditional rolled sections like plates, angles, channels, joists would also be used where necessary: ‘The base connections and connection with concrete shall be effected by intemally threaded bolt sleeves (hot dipped galvanized @ 300 gmn/sqm) manufactured from 1S: 2062 Grade B mild stee The sleeve shall receive hexagon-head bolt M20 Class 8.8 as per IS: 1364 (Part 1) with galvanized spring washer. ‘At certain locations 8.8 grade bolts will be embedded directly into concrete as applicable. ‘The connections within the steel structure would be effeoted essentially by direct welding of members with / without gusset plates. The minimum thickness of metal for SHS/RHS sections for main chord members as well bracings shall be 4mm as applicable for steel tubes in clause 6.3 of IS:806. Structural steel conforming to Grade FeS40HT as per IS: 8500 will be adopted in case of high strength steel is required. 3.2.3.2.1 Young’s Modulus E= 200,000 MPa (Ch4.5.3 of IRS CBO) 3.2.3.2.2 Tensile Strength / Yield Strength ~ For Hollow steel sections (conforming to IS: 4923) © Tensile strength shall be 450MPa for hollow steel section having Yield strength of 310MPa -or structural Steel (conforming to IS: 2062): © Tensile strength shall be 410MPa «Yield strength shall be 250MPa (for t<20mm), 240MPa (for20mm 3.0 KN/m™ [ 50% 50% Percentage of Train Live Load considered in combination with earthquake In both the seismic conditions (longitudinal as well as transverse), for calculating the stresses due to vertical effect of live load, 50% of the design train live load shall be considered at the time of earthquake. [As per IRS Bridge Rules, correction slip no.22 dated 17/1/1994, in transverse/longitudinal seismic condition, only 50% of gross tractive effort / braking force will be considered ‘The design seismic force resultant at any component shall be computed as follows a) £11 £0.3m+0315 b) £03ntm+03r co) £0.3n+03 mers Where, t= Force resultant due to full design seismic force along X direction = __ Force resultant due to full design seismic force along Y direction ts = Force resultant due to full design seismic force along Z direction 3.6 Rail Structure Interaction 3.6.1 Unit Load cases — Parameters For LWR, the longitudinal force to be calculated as per UIC 774-3R, as per the cl. 5.16 of model DBR ver.2 of RDSO Possibly, Rail-Structure Interaction might be performed for specific cases, Rail-Structure Interactions (RSI) studies analyze the normal stress variation in the long welded rail generated by: © Different expansions between the supporting structure and the rail; © Rotations at deck ends due to deck flexure; © Acceleration / braking horizontal loads: Note that RSI is not a single load case in itself. By the RSI studies, the interaction between rail and deck under acceleration /braking, temperature variation of the deck/rail and end rotation of MEGA Feb 2015 Page 18deck are taken into account. Therefore the effect of RSI is included in LL, LF, OT, and DT load cases. In the RSI studies, the following parameters / loads will be taken into account: © Vertical train load © Braking & acceleration loads © Standard rail type © Ballastless track. Foree/Displacement bi-linear laws will be compatible to that of Fastening system used for the project. Continuous welded rail ‘© Distance between top of rail and soffit of deck at support section © Creep & Shrinkage of concrete not taken into account (i.e. assumed finished at track lyingPhase). ‘+ Thermal effects on rail and deck. For tracks on curvature the radial force due to temperature effect in LWR shall also be considered. 3.6.2. Stress Maximum allowable additional stress in rails (as per UIC 774~ 3R): Maximum compression: 92 MPa Maximum Tension :-92 MPa 3.7 Deflection 3.7.1 Vertical Deflections at Mid-Span of track Girder For members spanning between two supports, the deflection measure immediately after application of the test load for deflections should not be more than L/500 of the effective span. (as per cl.18.2.5.2 to 18.2.5.5 of IRS CBC) 3.7.2. Deflection for station Building Vertical deflection limit will be L/350 (L. 23.2, Cl. 23.2.1 and Annexure C of IS : 45 pan length) or 20 mm whichever is less. (As per Cl. — 2000.3.8 Live Loads: Train and floor live load 3.8.1 Vertical Train live load ‘The Train live load will have the following axle configuration will be as per the approved SOD of MEGA/RDSO Model DBR Ver 2.0 3.8.2. Horizontal Train Live Load (Braking and Traction) ‘* Braking load is taken as 18% of the unfactored vertical loads * Traction load is taken as 20% of the unfactored vertical loads. Since both the tracks are supported by a single girder, hence tractive force of one track and braking force of another track will be taken in the same direction to produce worst condition of loading, As per IRS Bridge Rules, correction slip no.22 dated 17/1/1994, in transverse/longitudinal seismic condition, only 50% of gross tractive effort / braking force will be considered. 3.8.3. Coefficient of Dynamic Augment (CDA) CDA for longitudinal and transverse analysis shall be as per latestIRS : Bridge rules ~ 2008 code (upto A&C-42) 3.8.4 Live load on Platform, Concourse level, Staircases and Foot Bridge Live load should be considered as follows. Location Distributed load ‘Concentrated load (KN/m’) I (KN) Public/Staff Room Concourse Floor 50 45 Siairease Area/Foot bridge 5.0 45 Platform 50 45 Oifice Accommodation 30 | 45 ‘Shop 5.0, I 45 Technical Room | [Heavy Equipment* Room 15.0%" 40.0 7] (ASS, UPS, Electrical Switch) | eats | (Other Technical* Room | io | 20.0 * Please be checked for actual load and its location3.9 Superimposed Dead loads (SIDL) 3.9.1 Stations The assumptions of load is based on 1S:875 part 1 For platform slab, the following assumptions will be taken: «Floor finishes is assumed to be a 3.75 KN/m* uniform load. + Suspension load is assumed to be 2.0 KN/m? uniform loads. (Suspension load will be considered as load of false ceiling, plumbing & electrical equipments, Escalator Pits etc. This load is applicable wherever necessary.) «Light partition wall load is assumed to be 1.0 KN/n iniform load For the concourse area, the following assumption will be taken: ‘+ Floor finishes is assumed to be a 3.75 KN/m” uniform load. © Load due to additional fill in the toilets (brick bat): 3.0 KN/m* uniform load «Suspension load is assumed to be 2.0 KN/m? uniform loads. (Suspension load will be considered as load of false ceiling, plumbing & electrical equipments) © Liff and Escalator support shall be designed as per manufacturer's details NOTE: The walls loading will be taken based on actual location shown in architectural drawings, External wall load/glazing load will be taken as per details provided in architectural drawings. It is proposed to take 230mm thick brick wall with 20mm thick plaster on either side. However, same shall not be taken less than 2.4 KN/m’. 3.9.2. Viaduct ‘The following assumption will be taken: SIDLI: 1 Rail + Pads 0.30 tm 2 | Third rail & fixtures 0.20 vm 3. | Hand rail 008m | 4 | Concrete plinths for rails 280m | | Parapet 3.26 Um | “Light weight deck drainage Oo Weare Total : 6.88 tim MEGA Feb 2015 Page 21SIDL2: [1 [Cables nn eEeOOma| 2 | Cable trough cell 074m 3 | Cable trays 001 tm [aT hiscailancous (OCS, Signalling.) —=—=«(=SCAD Tim ere Total : 12 im Note :SIDLI to be considered with the dead load during load combination. 3.10 Derailment Load (DR) Derailment loads shall be considered as per Appendix XXVIII of IRS: Bridge rules with standard gauge in place of Broad gauge. For ULS and Stability check, loading shall be proportioned as pet maximum axle load. In addition, for derailment loads “Sacramento derailment eriteria” is intended to be used. This criterion corresponds to the application of 40% of one coach weight applied horizontally as a 3m Jong uniform impact load on the Box girder top flange. This derailment lond corresponds to an ULS load, For SLS combination (Group V), a 1/1.75 co-efficient shall be applied to the derailment load 3.11 Overall Temperature Effects (OT) and Shrinkage effects ‘A. uniform temperature difference of + 35° Celsius shall be used to calculate axial strain/movements on bearings, expansion joints etc. (The difference between construction temperature & maximum /minimum temperature). Maximum &Minimum Bridge temperature for ‘Ahmedabad is 47.5°C and 0°C respectively Total shrinkage strain of concrete as per cl.6.2.4 of IS 456:2000 and Coefficient of Thermal expansion of concrete is 1.17 E-05 per a 3.12 Differential Temperature (DT) AAs per clause 11.1.1 of IRS CBC, for design of concrete bridges of span 30m and larger; st appropriate temperature gradient shall be considered. In the absence of any data in this regard, depending on the environmental conditions, a linear gradient of temperature of 5°C to 10°C between the top and bottom fibres may be considered for design. 3.13 Wind Loads “The wind loads will be taken as per IS: 875 — 1987 Part 3. Wind loads and Seismic Forces are not considered to act simultaneously. The value of wind load is worked out based upon 1S:875 (Part 3) — 1987 which is as follows: — Feb 2015 Page 22Wind velocity at height =Design Windspeed =V, = Vo Ki.Ko-Ks Where, Velm/s) Regional basic wind speed, taken as 39 m/s for Ahmedabad (IS 875 Part 3-1987, Basic Wind Speed map) ky, z Risk coefficient.(IS 875 Part 3-1987, Table 1 clause 5.3.1) ky Terrain height and structure size factor (IS 875 Part 3-1987, Table 2 clause 5.3.2) kB Topography factor.(IS 875 Part 3-1987, clause 5.3.3.1) And, corresponding wind pressure, P,= 0.6 V,? KN/m? 3.14 Differential Settlement ‘The limit of differential settlement is as follows. As per cl.5.13 of Model DBR ver 2 of RDSO. 12mm - Long Term settlement * 6mm - Short Term settlement 3.15 Construction Loads Detailed verifications of the structure under various construction stages will be carried out as per final construction schemes developed by the contractor. 3.16 Collision Load (CL) [As per cl. 6.1.2 of IS 875(Part-V) ~ 1987, a concentrated load of 630 KN at 1.20m above the road level should be considered in the design 3.17 Nomenclature for Elementary Loads considered in design SL Load Symbol No. 1 |Dead Load (ie. Permanent self weight of DL | structure) | Superimposed Dead Load (i.e. Permanent | SIDL finishing, walls, false ceiling, cable trays. track | | plinth etc.) |3T Live Load (ce. Imposed load on station building & LL | train load including Dynamic Impact & Braking / | Tracking forces | [4 [Live Load on Footpath FPLL MEGA Feb 2015, Page 23,[Seismic or Wind Load, whichever is critical EQWL | {6 | Long Welded Rail Forces LWR 7_| Pre-Stressing Force PR 8 _| Overall Temperature Load oT 9 | Temperature & Shrinkage loads wsH 10 | Differential Settlement DS T1_| Derailment Load DR 12_| Collision Load au 13 _| Differential Temperature DT 14_ | Barth Pressure EP | 15 _| Erection load such as cranes, machines ete ER 3.18 Load Combinations Methodology & Load Combinations Central module of station shall be analysed for load combination as per IS 456 and IRS CBC. All the worst combinations be considered for design. Load combination as per codal provision of IS 456. Load factor of Train live load and track SIDL shall be considered as per IRS CBC code. Load Combination for design of station based on IRS-CBC -Table 12(addendum & corrigendum slip no.13)are presented here in Table 1 3.18.1 Reinforced Concrete Structure ‘As the design criteria for checking permissible stresses for SLS Load Combinations is not covered in IS 456 code, therefore we refer to IRS-CBC-1997, ‘As per IRS-CBC-1997, Table 11, permissible stresses in concrete & reinforcement is as follows'- - Permissible compression in Concrete = 0.5fax = Permissible Tensile stress in reinforcement 0.75f, Crack widths (Cl. 15.9.8.2.1 of IRS CBC, Cl. 10.2.1(a) of IRS CBC based on the exposure condition defined in Cl. 5.4.1 of IRS: CBC) <0.2mm — _ For track supporting structure, as per IRS Table 10 (Column, Beam and slab under the track) <0.2mm — __ Forother components of station building as per IS 456, C1 35.3.2 <0.2mm -— For Piles &Pilecap MEGA Feb 2015 Page 243.18.2 Prestressed Concrete Structure Precast Pre-tensioned/Post-tensioned I girder simple spans (SLS Check) No Load ‘Allowable “Reference | Allowable | Reference Combination Compressive Tensile | Stress Stress ‘At transfer and/or Construction Stage iy DL + ODS AppPR +] 0.5 fy but <0.4 fx | 1997 1.16.4.2.2(0) of IRS CBC 1997 INimm | CL16.4.2.4(0) of IRS CBC During Service of, 1997 IRS CBC | anywhere 2 |SLSGI Oa C11642.2(@) [No tension - of IRS CBC | anywhere 1997 3 |SLSGI 04 fe CL1642.2(@) [No tension - of IRS CBC | anywhere 1997 4 |SisGil 04 fx CL1642.2(2) | No tension 2 3.18.3 Load combination for other than track supporting structure Design criteria for ULS checking is as per IS 456 : 2000, Section 5 and IS 1893 part | 3.18.4 Load Combination for track supporting structure (Based on IRS — CBC -Table -12(addendum & corrigendum slip no. 13) and RDSO guidelines) Limit Loads ‘Symbol GI GHEQ GII(WIND) [Gill | GV State Cracking | Gila ] Gib] Gile | Gila [Gib | Stress | Stres Stress | Stress_| Stress | Stress | Stress | Stress s 2 Dead Loads | DL 1.00 1.00 [1.00 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 $ Shrinkage & | SC 1.00 1.00 [ 1.00 1.00 | 1.00 [ 1.00 | 1.00 & Creep Z Prestressing | PR 1.00 1.00_[ 1.00 700 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 a Super SIDL1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 = Imposed 18 | Loads | sioe2| _1.20 120 | 120 | 120 | 1.20 | 1.20 12 Earth quake | EQ 1.00 | 1.00 a ) | [OveranT™ | OT a (ears 1.00 Differential | DT i Slats‘Temperature Differential | DS 1.00 | Settlement LiveLoad | LL 1.10 1 1.00 | 1.007 Derailment | DR | TD] Loads ‘Wind Loads 1,00_[_1.00 Limit Loads | Symbol GT GHEQ GIIWIND) | Gil | GV State Gila [Gib] Gile | Gila |Gilb Dead Loads | DL 1.25 12s_[ 125 | 09 | 125 | 125 | qj [1.25 Prestressing PR 1.15/0.87(*) 14 14 14 1150, | 1.15%. | = TIS! sn) | 87) | | 0.87 eee) - Super | SIDLT{ 125 as | 12s | 09 | 125] 125 |m {125 Zz Imposed i) S Loads | SIDL2|__2.00 15 | 15 | 08 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 4 | 2.00 a Earth quake | EQ 15 ieee a Zi eS a e Overall T oT s 6 Differential | DT 5 Go ‘Temperature =z a Differential DS 0.0 Bi e Settlement 2 Live Load ae L75 1 1.407] 3 Derailment DR 3 1.75 Loads 1 | Wind Loads 1.60_| 1.25(*) 1.15/0.87 : ACCORDING TO IRS CBC ART. 11.33. WHEN THE PRESTRESSING PR INCREASES THE SECTION CAPACITY Vs. SHEAR THEN PR IS MULTIPLIED BY 0.87. WHEN THE PRESTRESSING PR DECREASES THE SECTION CAPACITY Vs, SHEAR THEN PR IS MULTIPLIED BY 1.15. (It should be noted that temperature load case is never combined with seismic loading. Notes : Super imposed Load :SIDL | Fixed SIDL. SIDL 2: Variable SIDL. (1) Long Welded Rail loads are naturally included in OT load case. (2) 50% of LL and LEP will be used in Group IIb combinations. (3) The Structure has also to be checked for the following construction stage combinations: 1, 0DL+1.2SIDL+0.8EQ+1.0ER+1.3EP+ 1.0PS; as per RDSO guidelines i.e. at construction and at Structure has to be checked with appropriate Prestressing value, “infinity” stage (ie. Year 120).4.0 DESIGN BASIS 4.1 General ‘The conerete structures of the project are proposed to be designed in accordance with the Indian Code IS: 456-2000 which is considered mandatory for concrete structures in the country. However, for some technical issues which are not adequately covered in IS codes, reference will be made to IRS code or other internationally accepted code of practice as mentioned in the list below Section 7, Detailed methodology of analysis and design shall be submitted for approval to MEGA. 4.2 Methodology for analysis and design The design consultant should model the station using reputed software of usual practice and this software shall be termed as main software, The main software should be used to present the result of analysis and design in a calculation note. In addition to above, the consultant should verify the results obtained from main software, using different reputed software. This different software for the vetting of analysis shall be termed as verification software. However, the critical designs (as asked for) shall be supported by manual checks. Dynamic analysis shall be performed to obtain the design seismic force by response spectrum method as per IS: 1893 (Part-1) — 2000. Analysis of framed structure shall be carried out considering fixed support at top of pile cap. Soil structure interaction shall be carried out for design of pile foundation only. Structural design of central module of station shall confirm to codal provision of IS 456, IS 4326 and IS 13920. Structural design of end module of structure shall confirm to codal provision of (Foundation, Substructure and track beam as per IRS — CBC, (i) ii) Platform beam as per IS 456, IS 4326 and IS 13920. Design of water retaining structure shall confirm to codal provision of IS 3370. Curtailment of reinforcement is not allowed in the column. Dynamic analysis shall be carried out for all structure. 4.3. Grade of Concrete and nominal cover ‘The appropriate grade of concrete and nominal cover to reinforcement is governed by the following main considerations: i) Durability of Concrete ii) Fire Resistance Corrosion Protection to the Reinforcement iii) Bar Size (Minimum diameter shall not be less than 10 mm) iv) Nominal maximum aggregate size MEGA Feb 2015 Page 28Minimum Cementitious Material Content in kgim3 PCC [Rec PSC ‘Moderate 240 [300 400 Severe 250 350 4 Extreme 300 400 440Bs SA FOUNDATION Geotech: ‘al Assessment Report (GAR) Geotechnical assessment report based on detailed Geotechnical investigation describing the test conducted and parameters recommended for design shall be submitted to MEGA for comments / approval prior to start of foundation design. 52 a) 8) hy i) d y Pile Capacity Minimum 1.0 m diameter bored cast-in-situ vertical piles in soil/rock have been contemplated for the foundation of piers /columns in the main station building. Open foundation have been contemplated primarily for the Access / Entry structure in firm soil / rocky strata at shallow depth. For pile carrying capacity, the SLS check only will be considered. The lateral load capacity of pile shall be evaluated either by using empirical formulae given in IS: 2911 (Part-l/section — 2) or by soil structure interaction analysis using Winkler’s spring model. ‘The capacity of piles in rock shall be taken as per IRC:78-2000 ‘The caleulation should be carried out for rock socketing as per latest IRC:78 (including all amendments). The latest amendment specifically covers the details on socketted piles in rock. Initial load tests (not on working pile) shall be conducted first for determination of safe vertical and lateral loads. The safe load shall be taken as least of (a) load arrived at from the initial load test and (b) the calculated safe load based on static formula. Initial test shall be conducted for a load of 2.5 times the safe vertical load based on static formula. The working load on pile for vertical and horizontal loads shall be checked by conducting routine tests during construction. In case of multiple pile system , spacing between the piles shall not be less than 3 times the diameter of pile in soil and 2.5 times the diameter when founded on rock. The top of pile cap shall be kept about min 500mm (approx. as per site condition ) below the existing ground level and weight of the earth cover will be applied on top of pile cap when unfavourable. The earth cover on pile cap for any favourable effect (Stability, soil horizontal capacity) will be neglected. For the calculation of pile capacity, value of bearing capacity factor Nq should be carried out as per latest IS:2911 (Part 1/ Sec 1) ~ 2010 (including all amendments) and the value of bearing capacity factor Ny (for General Shear Failure) should be taken directly from Table — 1 18 6403 : 1981. The following limiting values shall not be exceeded for computation of safe load: © Result of sub-structure investigation will be used for adopting the value of angle of intemal friction & and cohesion of soil c. ‘© Angle of wall friction 6 shall be taken as equal to deg as 1.0 to 1.5 © Coefficient of Earth pressure *K” shall be taker MEGA Feb 2015 Page 30© Maximum overburden pressure at bottom of pile for calculation of shaft resistance and bearing resistance shall be limited to 15 to 20 times the diameter of the pile. The ‘maximum depth shall be considered from existing ground level The entire overburden shall be assumed fully submerged (wherever appl the purpose of calculation of safe load, «Factor safety to arrive at working load = 2.5. © Bulk density corresponding to 100% saturation (wherever applicable) shall be calculated and used for working out submerged density of soil 1m) Permissible increase in allowable bearing pressure or resistance of soils should be as per IS 1893 (Part — 1) ~ 2002. 53 Structural Design (a) Pile cap shall be designed based on truss analogy and bending theory. However, the reinforcement in pile cap shall be provided based on higher value as assessed from both the theories, viz. truss analogy and bending theory. Detailing of reinforcement shall be done according to the method which gives higher reinforcement. For other pile groups, bending theory shall be employed for pile design. No support from soil below pile cap shall be considered, The minimum % of reinforcement in either direction shall not be less than 0.12% of cross sectional area for high strength deformed bars as per IS 456and IRS CBC. b) Computation of bending moments along the pile length due to forces applied at the pile cap level shall be based on a space frame mode! with actual stifliness of piles restrained by springs simulating the soil stiffness. In case upper strata of soil will have liquefaction potential, soil springs shall be ignored in the idealization. ©) The structural design of the pile and pile cap shall be checked in SLS and ULS conditions. d) Ductile detailing for central module of pile shall confirm to codal provision of IRC: 112- 2011. ©) Vertical reinforcement of pile shall be curtailed only after lowest point of contraflexure providing development length below the point of fixity (Ae. point of maximum moment below point of contraflexure). 5.4 Foundation Stiffness 5.4.1 Soil Static Stiffness Soil static mechanical characteristics and stiffiress for lateral loads shall be taken from IS:2911 (Part-I /Seetion 2 Appendix C) 5.4.2. Soil Dynamic Stiffness — Earthquake loads only The lateral stiffness’ of soil under very dynamic loads such as earthquake loads are generally higher than static values used for all other static loads. MEGA Feb 2015Dynamic stiffiness’s are calculated using particular geotechnical tests in order to evaluate shear and compression velocity, G values, and other parameters of the soil. ‘These parameters are not provided in available geotechnical reports. However, correlations can be made between dynamic stiffness and SPT values, Same linear variation of stiffness value according to depth will be considered for dynamic stifliness, ‘These dynamic values will be used both for : = Calculating vibration period of foundation for determination of seismic forces. = Structural verification of pile foundations under seismic loads. 5.4.3 Rock Static and dynamic Stiffness For most of cases (open foundation, long piles, and multiple piles) it will be assumed that foundations are fixed to rock and there is no flexibility of rock. For particular cases (for instances short piles socketed in rock), stiffness of rock may be assumed and calculated on case — by-case basis according to actual characteristics of rock encountered ‘This will be detailed in specific calculation notes for foundations as required. MEGA Feb 20156.0 LIST OF DESIGN CODES AND STANDARDS The following codes including all the correction slips will be used in various stages of works (non-exhaustive list}: 6.1 IRS Codes IRS Substructure& Foundation Code 2004 (Including all correction slip). IRS Bridge Rules — 2004 (Including all correction slip). IRS Concrete Bridge Code ~ 1997 (Including all correction slips) 6.2 IRC Codes IRC:5-1998 Standard Specification & Code of Practice for Road Bridges ~ General Features of Designs (Sixth Revision). IRC:6-2010 Standard Specification & Code of Practice for Road Bridges — Loads and Stresses (Third Revision). IRC:78-2000 Standard Specifications & Code of Practice for Road Bridges ~ Section Foundations & Sub-Structure (Ist Revision). IRC:83-1999 Standard Specifications & Code of Practice for Road Bridges, Part-I Metallic Bearings. IRC:83-2002 Standard Specifications & Code of Practice for Road Bridges ~ Part-II Elastomeric Bearings. IRC:112-2002Code of Practice for Concrete Road Bridges. IRC: SP-33-1989 Guidelines on Supplemental Measures for Design, Detailing & Durability Of Important Bridge Structures (Only Clause-1,2,3.1,4.3.7,4.3.8 & 4.3.9 are Applicable) 6.3 1S Codes 18:269-1976 Specs for Ordinary and Low Heat Portland cement. 18:383-1970 Specs for Course and fine aggregate from natural sources for concrete. 18:432-1982 Specs for Mild Steel & medium tensile steel bars (Part 1) Specifications for Portland Slag Cement. Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete — based essentially on CP- E Feb 2015 Page 33,IS: 800 — 2007 Code of Practice for General Construction in Steel IS: 875 ~ 1987Code of Practice for Design Loads Parts 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 (other than Earthquake) for Building and Structures. 18: 1080-1985 Design and Construction of Shallow foundations in soils (Other than Raft, Ring & Shell). IS: 1343-1980 Code of Practice for Prestressed Concrete — based essentially on CP-110. IS: 1364-1992 Hexagon Head Bolts, Screws & nuts of product grades A &B Part 1 (Part 1) Hexagon Head Bolts (Size range M1.6 to M64). IS: 1489(Part 1) Specifications for Portland Pozzolana Cement (Fly ash based). IS: 1786-1985 Specs. for High Strength Deformed steel bars and wires for concrete Reinforcement, IS: 1893-2000 Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures. IS: 1904-1986 Design and Construction of Foundation in soils : General Requirements. TS: 1905-1987 Code of Practice for Structural Use of Un-reinforced Masonry. IS: 2062-2006 Specifications for Weld able structural steel. IS: 2502-1963 Code of Practice for Bending and Fixing of Bars for Concrete Reinforcements. IS: 2911 Code of Practice for Design & Construction of Pile Foundations Part 1 (Part 1/Sec2) Concrete Piles Section 2. Bored Cast-in-situ Piles. Is: 2911 Code of Practice for Design & Construction of Pile Foundations Part 4 Load test on Piles. IS: 2950-1981 Design and Construction of Raft Foundations. IS; 4326-1993 Code of Practice for Earthquake Resistant Design and Construction of Buildings. IS: 4923-1997 _ Hollow steel sections for structural use-specifications. IS: 2062-1999 Steel for General Structural Purposes specifications. IS: 8009-1976 Calculation of Settlement of Shallow foundations. IS: 8112-1989Specification for 43 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement. IS: 8500-1991 Structural steel - Micro alloyed (Medium and high strength qualities). IS: 9103-1999 Specifications for Admixtures for Conerete, IS: 12070-1987 Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Shallow Foundations on Rocks. IS: 12269-1987 Specification for 53 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement. IS: 13920-1993 Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures subjected to Seismic Forces, MEGA Feb 2015 Page 34IS: 14268-1995 Uncoated Stress Relieved Low relaxation Seven-ply Strands for Prestressed Concrete, Situ Piles founded on Rocks IS: 14593-1998 Design and Construction of Bored Cast-i Guidelines. ‘SP-06-2005 National Building. 6.4 Euro Code Eurocode 0) Basis of Structural Design. Eurocode 1 Action on Structures. Eurocode 2 Design of Concrete Structures. Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures. Eurocoded Design of Composite Steel and Conerete Structures. Eurocode7 Geotechnical Design. Eurocode8 Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. 65 Others FIP Recommendations for the Acceptance of Post ~ Tensioning Systems. MOST Specifications for Road and Bridge Works — 1994 6.6 Miscellaneous Any other codes & special publications as required and as mentioned in this report. MEGA Feb 2015 Page 35Annexure I Structural system of sections S.No Des Main station structure ~ 3 legged portal with twin columns at Expansion joint (P3, PS & P7) Pile Foundation (M35/M20) Pile cap (M35/M40) Colunin ( GL to PL) (MSO) Concourse level Portal beam (M45/M50) (transverse) Portal ledge (Ma5/MSO) End longitudinal Beam (Connecting all portal frame) ‘No of Pre tensioned | girders (M50) No of strands ‘ASS / TSS room slab (M35/M40) Slab (other area) (M35/M40) | No of staircases (C to P) No of Escalator (C to ) No of lft (Cto P) 1 Track level No of Post tensioned | girder (MSO) No of cables (w35/Mao) Platform level Portal beam (Ma5/MSO) Portal ledge (M45/MS0) End longitudinal Beam (Connecting all portals) No of Pre tensioned | girders (M50) ‘No of strands Slab (M35/M40) Roof Roof at platform level 4 legged portal in transverse direction with galvalume sheet Steel roof in staircase, Escalator & connecting bridge Off road Entry structures Pile Foundation (M35/M20) Pile cap (M35/M40) No of Staircases(G to C) 2 No of Escalator(6 to C) No of Lift (6 to C) MEGA Feb 2015 Page 36Ancillary buildings / Misc Structures Emergency Staircase (Stee! — 80kg /m2) 3 UG tank DG room | Crash Barrier (M35) Road formation for widening. Granular Sub Base (Barricading width x 3) 4 Wet Mix Macadam (Barricading width x 3) Dense Bituminous Macadam (3 m strip x 4 nos) Bituminous Conerete(3 m strip x4 nos) Prime Coat (3 m strip x 4 nos) MEGA Feb 2015 Page 37