Professional Documents
Culture Documents
0 and sevense
uy 20°(G)aW "Ll O) auch that for lel cy
ee
As wil be seen nthe pro tues to cove Rauch that 16/2 Dh
<¢y(0} foro) =m, where 24(0) denotes th Osis eats, Consaguetly,
‘when we Wy), 1 can be taken ssbitrary eal si we Tove
from Theorom 1 ho real of (4] mentioned above,
"he apace Wy} wil bs, — ‘seated with a subepce otthe produ J] (0) = []Zy. Dencting by ST the 2-untion eon
toto I, we eraider the wen topologies of] Dx [T Ba 20d ([T Le
II in). Density eet nvaring he lee BAY a mportant sol th
‘xsttuee theory for eronelynoniesr Doondary value problems ( (82
{stp Comparing the nodair convergence with o{f] Za, [] Za) (Lanna 6
bow, we obtain te ‘allowing
onariawy 2. C°(Q}AWLy (A) se off] Las I] Em) deme in
Werytah
i now tum to the approximation by funetone whlch are ant
vp to the boundary, assuming stne negulasity on. Row thot 12 ie
Tid to have the spmen! propry If tharo exist an open covering {U)}
(FD and corresponding vectors {y, 8°) such thst, for #8 Ur, nd
Octet, eyed; @ bas tho cone propery if thre exes w finite
fom @ rach that each 2 i tho verter of 8 cone (<0 congrawat
400, St mas prov in [3] that 2 has tho sogent property, then 312)
18 e(f] Zar IT Ep) dente Sa Wy), here 3D) donoes the vsti
‘ons to of the fosetins in.) This is improved in oar next rst
‘under the somuaption that 2 alo as tho cone property.
‘Tuxoun 9. Seppane that cate Bh the segment andthe one
propery. at © WL) Then tee eet > Vand vopunce vy © 210)
ch that for elm
JMU —Drayajs0 ae bees
‘The proot wil show that i ution to chose Z such that 18(47+2)2
Dru ed yl) Sor [oem Moreover, the cone property Se only uHel %
fqursste thet an someat ee W'Ey(d} with compect sapport in D
{is tn (2) (the imbodalng shone of [4] sples# © O()AL"(0} ot
te Dy) with Mon Rluaclion wh, By Lamm 44 of (8), eros
‘seen more aspldiy then 20, aud a6, aby cit ve Zt} his
fer probebly holds under » yenker sammpéon on. Anysy, aking
‘gain aritrary anal, se rooover tom ‘Theoren 8 the emis a (6)
‘at I 2 has the pment propery, then 9) i borm dense in WE (2
Finally we comer the aasiogso of the We" econ, WPLy(2i
1s died ue the olf] Li [] Bn) loro of 92) in Wy (2) a0
WEEy(O) ae the norm slow wf G(2) WL y(O} (or equally
i WP (2). When 02 is aficently regu, ose ean dine the tee
0 £0 of Du for we Wy) ad lel m1 and prove thatthe fone.
tions tn WP vy() es. W3 (0) are prea howe WZ)
(aesp, Wey (al) whoee tee atid neal Gervais upto order 2
20 ani (19D.
Some epprocinaton pope in Orn ht spans = 8
usomat 4. Suppose at O safer the segment property. Lat
We'll Gy Thon there eet 1> 0 and a uguene oy ©8(0) suck Dat
for lel,
JMor Teo a Kew.
‘The some estinata om 398 in Theoren 8 holds here. Thre in
roves our rst of (8) tnt if 2 bas the eogment propery, then (2)
4s olf] Tac I] x) se in W3 Ey),
"The ‘prov of the, Wed (Gy seals of (4) reered to shove a8 well
‘8 Bose ofthe off] Ly, [] x) verso of Thearena $ and & ven in [8]
‘te ratner sapla wodlflentons ofthe ewndand prot, No get Cala
2or Mhuorems 1,2 and 4 requis more ‘avaived callin, although
‘the construction ofthe approsimants asta the ase. An inegaalsy
‘whieh willbe tied repeataly
a(Sr)er* ating
‘hate 2% sna + i the maximum aunber of nosaeo 7s, Whan to
‘in orginte from 9 pariti af unity, « catrel on r am be obtained,
‘ons single topological considerations (Lemna 7 below)
‘rool, Given function wa), wo danots Dy uy is ranslate (0)
omy), by sits regularization 4 — weg, wher ee”) 3)
0 for i>, 40 und [-q—1y and byw, the fnaton w;-— 9
wher pa) = go) with p= 9), 0 pe, ) — fr Joh <1 and
tla) 0 for (si >2, The faliowing ierine wil be Desde.
amc 6. If we L(Y) with Mu 2B, them f M(4y—w) 0
4 00 and £69 —¥)-0 oF B00 wey fe, (24-8)
root. Wo consider mj the cae of my is treated sinariy and that
of ois tmmedits, Since yo in F004, one has, fora subsequence,
yoru ne, and wo M(aj—u->0 a. Moreover,
Ae oa) AMEE) + HD) < HaHCOW +E)
‘whore we have ved Jensen's integral inequality. Sino (4(2e-02 (24)
SUR") we conlade by Will's hearer that (ay) +01),
‘ins we ese that for any we Zyy(R™) oye with reapect co the
rodalarconvegence Le. ther xsts 0h that oy—W) i}.
‘i general, 4, does not converge to w in the mean a. the above with
21) and @ foion In noms Te 6 By), then 2u/he-2g RY) taeaU 250 sud by tsking 2 abltary emall, wo eventually dvive trom
Lemon tnt ooverge to innova,» elt oily given in (2),
Sinar remark apaly (Dy
Proof of Theorem 1, Lat we W'y(2) and choote > 0 each
‘iat Iara e Ly (0) for alm. Let > 0, 2 We ll prow
that there ele ¢0"(2}a0MZy(2) seh Oak
o fMere—areya) ce
fo cm Dain fF 622,
2m le0 wit aad di 20) > 20,
tod any fe core, = By = y= Lt (pg f=, 2-3)
SOO pall et tly oh a a sappy 8 Nl
TE Or ah ete eg
® seein,
® Winton Drae You might also like